The following is by Moira Malley, who attended the 2015 Church Ministers Conference on September 19 in San Diego.
The 2015 Church Ministers Conference, entitled “Called to Be Disciples of Christ,” was held on September 19 at Mater Dei Catholic High School in Chula Vista, California. In addition to a keynote address by Robert McElroy, Bishop of the Diocese of San Diego, the conference featured a total of 96 workshops, some in English and others in Spanish. I was privileged to hear presentations by all of the speakers in the last few years, and greatly benefited from their insights. This time, however, I ventured into less familiar territory, and chose to attend a workshop entitled “Evangelization and Catechesis in a Bilingual and Multicultural Context: Challenges and Opportunities” by Father Jon Pedigo. Although I was interested in hearing new ideas for evangelization and catechesis, I soon discovered that his version of Catholicism was heavily influenced by secular progressivism.
Born and raised in San Francisco, Father Pedigo is currently the pastor of Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, located in a heavily Hispanic area in east San José, where, according to him, the average income is between $15,000 and $20,000 a year, and where undocumented immigrants abound. He was formerly the pastor of Saint Julie Billiart, a more affluent parish, also in San José, where most parishioners were white and also homeowners.
Father Pedigo began his talk by emphasizing his Jesuit background and the inspiration he has drawn from Pope Francis’ encyclicals: Evangelii Gaudium and Laudato Si. His main focus was on meeting the challenges of culture clashes in our parishes, caused by prejudice as well as differences traditions, language abilities, and choice of music. He then requested that we turn to the person next to us to discuss ways we have overcome cultural differences in our parishes. When he asked us to share our findings with the group, I raised my hand and said that in my parish, which is located in an area of San Diego that is multicultural, but primarily Hispanic, we now have the Legion of Mary, where people of different ethnic groups, be they Hispanic, Caucasian, or Black, team up to visit people in the neighborhood to either introduce them to or reacquaint them with the Catholic Faith. I was about to provide more details as to how this breaks down cultural barriers, but he quickly moved on, probably because the Legion of Mary: 1) smacks of traditionalism, and 2) does not involve political activism.
According to Father Pedigo, Pope Francis is shifting the focus of the papacy, challenging us to have a true “encounter”—encuentro in Spanish with the poor. The location is now the parish, not the chancery or the Vatican. To illustrate this point, he provided the following quotations from paragraph 28 of Evangelii Gaudium:
“The parish is not an outdated institution; precisely because it possesses great flexibility, it can assume quite different contours depending on the openness and missionary creativity of the pastor and the community. While certainly not the only institution which evangelizes, if the parish proves capable of self-renewal and constant adaptivity, it continues to be ‘the Church living in the midst of the homes of her sons and daughters.’ This presumes that it really is in contact with the homes and the lives of its people, and does not become a useless structure out of touch with people or a self-absorbed group made up of a chosen few.”
In his slide presentation, Father Pedigo turned his attention to the word “Rule,” i.e., the rules of our Faith, saying “we’ve got that down.” Given that so many Catholics today are poorly catechized, this statement was indeed stunning, but when I voiced my objection, he merely said, “We respectfully disagree.” He went on to say that we have tradition, but the people we encounter have a journey. Therefore, instead of saying that we have the truth, Father Pedigo said that we are to “walk with them to discover that truth.” Instead of saying, “We have the answers,” we are to focus on the encounter by listening, sharing, empathizing, showing compassion, and welcoming.”
In Father Pedigo’s estimation, therefore, truth should be replaced with relativism. He then stated that “we have the sacraments,” but instead of referring to them as outward signs instituted by Christ to give grace, he ignores their spiritual significance and places the emphasis on the individual, saying: “We celebrate your life with the sacraments.”
From his presentation, it was clear that instead of providing instruction in the faith, Father Pedigo’s priority was to “go deeper into the neighborhood” and “teach people how to organize.” The questions he asked us were: “Are we thinking beyond the parish?”, “Can we as an institution serve the common good of the neighborhood?”, and “How do you lift up the poor and excluded in your neighborhood?”
Convinced that people from affluent neighborhoods are incapable of understanding the realities of the poor, he mentioned a prominent Republican politician by name and said that this person would soil himself when he heard Pope Francis address both houses of Congress. (The actual expression he used was unprintable.)
At the end of the talk, I asked Father Pedigo what all of this had to do with the salvation of souls. His response was that Evangelii Gaudium and Laudato Si covered that subject extensively. In Evangelii Gaudium, Pope Francis rightly condemns our modern “throw-away culture,” the idolatry of money, and the exclusion of the poor. However, in paragraph 182, he states that “It is no longer possible to claim that religion should be restricted to the private sphere and that it exists only to prepare souls for heaven.” In Laudato Si there is no mention of the salvation of souls.
In his talk, Father Pedigo clearly expressed his distaste for ”separate but equal” CCD courses in English and Spanish, because in his estimation, they create an “us vs. them” situation. Yet his plan to “listen, share, empathize, and show compassion” does not seem to provide for catechesis for both groups, nor does he address the language barrier. In my own experience at multicultural parishes, the unifying force is our Catholic faith.
The story that Father Pedigo did not want to hear goes as follows: A few years ago, the Legion of Mary visited a woman in the neighborhood who no longer went to church because she had lost a child and could not understand how God could have permitted such a tragedy. Coincidentally, two of the Legion of Mary visitors had each lost a child, so they were able to empathize with her, comfort her, and pray with her, and eventually succeed in evangelizing her without compromising the truth.
Instead of resorting to relativism, secular humanism, and community organizing to solve human problems, let us make use of the resources that already exist in the Catholic Church.
NATIONAL CATHOLIC REPORTER 9/22 – Two days after appearing at a women’s ordination conference in Philadelphia, Precious Blood Fr. Jack McClure said today he has been told he can no longer celebrate Mass at Most Holy Redeemer parish in San Francisco where he has been pastor and parochial vicar for the past 15 months.
According to McClure, he was informed by Precious Blood Father and Most Holy Redeemer pastor Matthew Link that the secretary for San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone said McClure can no longer celebrate Mass at the beyond the end of this month.
McClure said his last Mass will be Sunday, Sept. 27.
“I feel bad about this. I feel bad for the parish. I feel bad about this silencing,” said McClure. “But I want to make it…
It’s about time that we get rid of the HERETICS.
CCC: ” 1577 Only a baptized man (vir) validly receives sacred ordination.” The Lord Jesus chose men (viri) to form the college of the twelve apostles, and the apostles did the same when they chose collaborators to succeed them in their ministry. ……… The Church recognizes herself to be bound by this choice made by the Lord himself. For this reason the ordination of women is not possible.”
Both the Bible and the “Catechism of the Catholic Church, second edition” are available in many languages – and certainly English and Spanish.
https://store.usccb.org/span-catechism-of-the-catholic-church-p/5-828.htm
and https://store.usccb.org/catechism-of-the-catholic-church-p/5-110.htm
Bad teachers are going to destroy the Faith of the Immigrants, like they are destroying the Faith of Americans.
” My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge;
because you have rejected knowledge,
I reject you from being a priest to me.
And since you have forgotten the law of your God,
I also will forget your children.” – Hosea 4:6
Pedigo is a bad ‘cafeteria’ Catholic priest.
QUOTE: “ These, then, are the four elements which comprise the storehouse of memory which the Church hands down: the profession of faith, the celebration of the sacraments, the path of the ten commandments, and prayer. The Church’s catechesis has traditionally been structured around these four elements; this includes the CATECHISM of the CATHOLIC CHURCH, which is a fundamental aid for that unitary act with which the Church communicates the entire content of her faith: “all that she herself is, and all that she believes”. “ – Pope Francis (Encyclical Letter LUMEN FIDEI, 2013)
“….. let us ask ourselves if we have actually taken a few steps to get to know Christ and the truths of faith more, by reading and meditating on the Scriptures, studying the Catechism, steadily approaching the Sacraments.” – Pope Francis , May 15, 2013.
For more quotes about the CCC from our Popes John Paul II, Benedict XVI,
and Francis on the internet go to:
“What Catholics REALLY Believe SOURCE”
https://whatcatholicsreallybelieve.com/
The Pope is not an expert in Economics, Politics, or Science.
His personal opinions are merely his personal opinions.
He should not mix his personal opinions with the Doctrine of the Faith – because that causes confusion with the un-catechized.
Rather – than resorting to relativism, secular humanism, and community organizing to solve human problems, let us make use of the resources that already exist in the Catholic Church.
” True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within. Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties….” – Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals.
This book was dedicated to: “Lucifer – the very first radical”.
Has anyone heard Pope Francis speak about the EVILS of Communism, and/or evils of Socialism ?
Or the evils of Liberation Theology – which advocates taking the property of one person and giving to others ?
These of course violate Doctrine : CCC # 1885, and 2411.
Has the Pope said anything about the evils of Communism,
or the evils of Socialism ?
Which violate CCC # 1885 & # 2411.
Has the Pope said anything about the evils of Liberation Theology which includes taking the goods of one person and giving them to others in violation
of Thou shall not steal, and Thou shall not covet thy neighbors goods ?
Is John Pedigo a product of bad formation in a Seminary, or just a bad “cafeteria” priest ?
Father Alinsky, S.J.
Fr. Pedigo has a long history of speaking and acting in ways that are contrary to Church teaching. Here are a few links from CalCatholic’s own archives that bear this out:
https://calcatholic.web711.discountasp.net/news/newsArticle.aspx?id=75317df2-b8c9-43b6-9883-0c942c9f3d35
https://calcatholic.web711.discountasp.net/news/newsArticle.aspx?id=842337b1-3adf-439b-a845-dac666c82ec1
https://calcatholic.web711.discountasp.net/news/newsArticle.aspx?id=a7e71dde-70cd-4a43-ba09-c4ed84b7ac90
Thank you, Wm. Hamilton for the informative links.
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH – Second Edition
# 675 Before Christ’s second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the “mystery of iniquity” in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. The supreme religious deception is that of the Antichrist, a pseudo-messianism by which man glorifies himself in place of God and of his Messiah come in the flesh.
“For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect.” Matthew 24:24 Douay-Rheims
Well, William, you certainly did your homework!
You get an A – and a nice gold star.
I speak English as my native tongue and imperfect Spanish, learned as an adult. I helped teach a class in which each sentence was repeated in the other language. Over the course of several months, in addition to basic catechism, many of the speakers of only one language learned quite a bit of the language they did not yet know. We discovered that our shared Catholicism can be a wonderful bridge to embracing our shared humanity. This approach takes just a bit longer than one-language classes and confers countless benefits to all.
At many parishes, we seem to have two or even three separate churches on the same grounds. Unification of these functionally separate churches should be a goal if we are to serve our communities to the…
It’s a great story maryanne, thanks for sharing it. And I agree with you that it is a shame that language too often separates various elements of our parishes. Good point.
What Moira Malley, the author of this story describes, is what is called the “Delphi Method” (sometimes called “Delphi Process”) .
Delphi (much like the ambiguous sibyl) is a system where a question is posed to a larger group, which is then broken down into smaller groups to discuss the issue. A record-keeper is supposed to report the findings to the moderator (in this case Mr. (er, sorry), Fr. Pedigo. You will be told that “all the responses will be carefully considered in the final report.”
What actually happens is that the pre-planned outcomes of the moderator are pronounced as the ultimate findings of the meeting (Does this sound like the Synod?). Delphi is an old trick of community-organizers to dupe people…
Delphi actually originated in the post-ware 1940’s for a different purpose: but it was taken over by political operatives (sometimes we call them community-organizers) in the 1960’s and 1970’s to dupe people into submission, by making them think they are in the minority, but “that they were listened to”. Horse puppies.
In this example, Moira Malley had a perfectly excellent idea, but this process is not to develop and engage new ideas, but to carry out the pre-determined judgment of the “leader(s)”. It is an appallingly deceptive and dishonest system, and points to the dishonesty of the leadership utilizing it. By the way, the Jesuit Province in the West excelled in Delphi starting in the 1970’s, so that is where Pedigo…
So, what do you do when you are “Delphi’ed” at a parish meeting. Observe. Listen. Record. Try to find people of like-mind to yours in the small groups, and (if possible) exchange contact information with them. Reverse Delphi, by doing so, and you use their own meeting to undo the deception.
However, trying to confront people openly in a big shout-down at a Delphi event, is futile: I’ve seen others try it, and they only end up looking like “the crazy” (rather like the man a few weeks ago who spoke up at the Diocese of Orange meeting, and then stormed out). Unfortunately, most people are the milque-toasts in the middle who don’t want confrontation and want to maintain the status-quo, even if it means death.
Here is more on the Delphi Method, and other ideas on how to disrupt it:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2737378/posts
I don’t subscribe to the idea of actively disrupting a Delphi Method meeting: the orchestrators will just wise up and be prepared for next time.
The Jesuit universities and colleges have long been known to “love” Delphi: everyone breaks into small groups, discusses the supposed “Great Question” posed to them; they then record their findings on butcher paper, and the moderator then announces them to the Group Session: And all their ideas are actually discarded (they will be told “all your ideas will be incorporated in the final report”) [they are not, and we are fools to think so]. The final outcome is just what “Fr.” Privett (former president at USF) or now the current puppet, Paul Fitzgerald, always had pre-determined would be the plan.
You are being played.
Interesting. Many of the formal priest gatherings I have attended use the technique you just mentioned. And, as you mention, it always seemed that the end was pre-determined.
Interesting. I believe the Holy Father has spoken quite clearly and directly about evil, the Devil and the evil of GOSSIP!
To begin with– we need a very solid Church, of integrity, like we used to have, with the Traditional Latin Mass, and solid, truly Catholic schools, and well-trained, truly Catholic clergy! And also, good human relations, with Christian love, as Christ taught!. No progressive “cafeteria Catholic,” secularized “gimmicks!” When we go to the Church, it is to learn Christ’s teachings, not the secular world. Anyone can be taught how to be a good, practicing Catholic! To practice Christian virtue, requires maturity. Liberal progressives want something cheap and easy and babyish, so they don’t have to do the real spiritual work, correctly! I will continue…
I will continue, with my above post. The true Catholic Church, places the focus correctly on Christ, and practicing His teachings. The true Church has her own religious culture, with priests and nuns in charge, not the laity! That is what we need, not secular “junk!” When young, I knew of many international religious orders of priests and nuns, with many of them, at times, knowing little English. Their ways of life were set, with the Latin language, and Catholic religious culture. The Catholic Church was always the same, no matter where you went, in the world! It brought us all together, on our knees– as it should!
I think the author has misinterpreted what the Father was discussing and maybe just wasn’t ready for it. She did talk about evanglizing but not really addressing cultural differences within Catholic communities.
So the lady goes back to Church. Now what?
The goal is not just to get people to go to Church but to get them to live authentic discipleship. Your job is not done just because someone goes back to Mass and Confession. Your job is not done if they say no to going back to Mass, either.
I am so tired of all the secular gimmicks, such as the endless pseudo-intellectual “psycho-babble,” babyish group-psychology “games” for adults, and political manipulations, etc.– that are so often used, in the modern Church, as well as in secular society! Ridiculous! We need good Catholic teaching in the Church, and solid practice of the Faith– and good “horse sense,” with mature people, in secular, daily life! Mature people practicing their Faith, can always warmly welcome newcomers of any kind, in a parish church, and under the leadership of good priests, they can make a truly good parish, using simple, common sense! We are all Americans, and Catholics!
In the era of my parents, and grandparents, they were all eager to come to America, give up some of their past ethnic languages, customs, and cultural identities– and be a part of the great American “melting pot!!” When asked where you were from, most would reply, “I am so PROUD TO BE AN ANERICAN!!” Also, to work very hard, to learn good English, and pass the Citizenship Exam— oh, it MEANT SO MUCH TO THEM!! Next– to get good jobs, work your way up, and proudly provide for your growing family; to educate them well, and contribute a lot, eventually, to your community– WHAT GREAT JOY!!! DREAM COME TRUE, IN AMERICA, LAND OF THEIR DREAMS!!
Ah yes, the great Italian Catholic parishes of North Beach got to be that way because they stopped speaking Italian and stopped eating pasta. Right. I forgot about the day they all vowed to stop speaking Italian or living in neighborhoods like North Beach, or eating their native foods. RIght. When was that day, exactly?
Anonymous– The whole point, is to enthusiastically embrace our new Nation, be proud of it, and learn her language and culture! Appreciate all the good that America can give, especially to people who might be starving and poor, with NO OPPORTUNITY– in the “old country!” Yes, everyone loves to be bi-cultural, and carry on their original languages, cultures, and foods– at home! But the only way we can all make a truly good country– is to give up some of our past histories, for the grand “melting pot,” of this great land! WE ARE ALL NOW PROUD AMERICANS, ALL TOGETHER!!
I will say one more thing, to Anonymous. In a Catholic parish or school situation– I think it is best, for the priests or nuns to be in charge, and to teach and lead everyone, in our Faith. They do not need any gimmicks. All they need, is the Church, and Christ’s mission, as the main focus! There may be many people there, of all ages and ethnicities, yet as I said before– we are all Americans, as well as Catholics! We should all be together, in CHRIST, worshipping God, as Catholics! 1960’s secular social activist “baloney” is useless, and DELIBERATELY DIVISIVE!!
What ethnicity are you, if you don’t mind my asking?
Anonymous– When Americans worry about “ethnicity,” they can lose the whole point, that we are all-together, one group of very special citizens– we are all PROUD TO CALL OURSELVES, “AMERICANS!!” Not Italians, Filipinos, Mexicans, French, English, Germans, Spanish, Chinese, Japanese, Indians, South Africans, etc. Even though some of us are different races, we should stop thinking that way! It is too DIVISIVE!!
Anonymous— It is possible to receive a very excellent education, in a foreign nation, by a fine religious order of the Church– and then, what are you going to do, after that?? STARVE?? NO!! HOW ABOUT GOING TO AMERICA?? Well, look at our Holy Father, Pope Francis. His family emigrated from Italy, to Argentina. They probably were bi-cultural, in their own family home. Yet, they also EMBRACED BEING ARGENTINE, AND PROUDLY CALLED THEMSELVES, “ARGENTINE,” NOT “ITALIAN,” OR “ITALIAN-ARGENTINE!!” The Pope is even HOMESICK, for Argentina, although he lives in Italy!
My mother’s parents made her and her siblings answer them in English instead of their native Swedish. Why? “You’re Americans now. You speak English!”
It was a different time, Linda Maria. A time of gratitude and common sense. An understanding that moving to a new world, a new country was to embrace one’s adopted mother with love, not disdain or reserve or anything else. Yes, the Swedish roots remained, absolutely. But moving to America meant truly moving, not creating a new Sundsvall!