The following comes from a Sept. 4 posting by Mallory Millett on Truth in Revolt.
“When women go wrong men go right after them.”
– Mae West
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” Winston Churchill wrote this over a century ago.
During my junior year in high school, the nuns asked about our plans for after we graduated. When I said I was going to attend State University, I noticed their disappointment. I asked my favorite nun, “Why?” She answered, “That means you’ll leave four years later a communist and an atheist!”
What a giggle we girls had over that. “How ridiculously unsophisticated these nuns are,” we thought. Then I went to the university and four years later walked out a communist and an atheist, just as my sister Katie had six years before me.
Sometime later, I was a young divorcee with a small child. At the urging of my sister, I relocated to NYC after spending years married to an American executive stationed in Southeast Asia. The marriage over, I was making a new life for my daughter and me. Katie said, “Come to New York. We’re making revolution! Some of us are starting the National Organization of Women and you can be part of it.”
I hadn’t seen her for years. Although she had tormented me when we were youngsters, those memories were faint after my Asian traumas and the break-up of my marriage. I foolishly mistook her for sanctuary in a storm. With so much time and distance between us, I had forgotten her emotional instability.
And so began my period as an unwitting witness to history. I stayed with Kate and her lovable Japanese husband, Fumio, in a dilapidated loft on The Bowery as she finished her first book, a PhD thesis for Columbia University, “Sexual Politics.”
It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was “to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’”: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.
It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish.
To me, this sounded silly. I was enduring culture shock after having been cut-off from my homeland, living in Third-World countries for years with not one trip back to the United States. I was one of those people who, upon returning to American soil, fell out of the plane blubbering with ecstasy at being home in the USA. I knelt on the ground covering it with kisses. I had learned just exactly how delicious was the land of my birth and didn’t care what anyone thought because they just hadn’t seen what I had or been where I had been. I had seen factory workers and sex-slaves chained to walls.
How could they know? Asia is beyond our ken and, as they say, utterly inscrutable, and a kind of hell I never intended to revisit. I lived there, not junketed, not visited like sweet little tourists — I’d conducted households and tried to raise a child. I had outgrown the communism of my university days and was clumsily groping my way back to God.
How could twelve American women who were the most respectable types imaginable — clean and privileged graduates of esteemed institutions: Columbia, Radcliffe, Smith, Wellesley, Vassar; the uncle of one was Secretary of War under Franklin Roosevelt — plot such a thing? Most had advanced degrees and appeared cogent, bright, reasonable and good. How did these people rationally believe they could succeed with such vicious grandiosity? And why?
….I’ve known women who fell for this creed in their youth who now, in their fifties and sixties, cry themselves to sleep decades of countless nights grieving for the children they’ll never have and the ones they coldly murdered because they were protecting the empty loveless futures they now live with no way of going back. “Where are my children? Where are my grandchildren?” they cry to me.
“Your sister’s books destroyed my sister’s life!” I’ve heard numerous times. “She was happily married with four kids and after she read those books, walked out on a bewildered man and didn’t look back.” The man fell into despairing rack and ruin. The children were stunted, set off their tracks, deeply harmed; the family profoundly dislocated and there was “no putting Humpty-Dumpty together again.”
Throughout the same time these women were “invading” our institutions, the character of the American woman transformed drastically from models portrayed for us by Rosalind Russell, Bette Davis, Deborah Kerr, Eve Arden, Donna Reed, Barbara Stanwyck, Claudette Colbert, Irene Dunn, Greer Garson. These were outstanding women needing no empowerment lessons and whose own personalities, as well as the characters they interpreted, were strong, resilient and clearly carved. Their voices were so different you could pick them out by that alone. We all knew Rita Hayworth’s voice. We all knew Katherine Hepburn’s voice….
To read the entire posting, click here.
The nun predicted that if the young women attended a state university, after four years, they would come out as communists and atheists. From what I’ve read, that happens nowadays when one attends some (certainly not all) Catholic universities, and one might also become a homosexual. One may as well attend a state university and pay less tuition.
CCD, thank you for posting this article. One of the “institutions”, not explicitly mentioned in this article, which was “invaded” by this communist theology was many of our Catholic convents. Their dying parallels the dying of the family. So sad.
CCC: ” 2411 Contracts are subject to commutative justice which regulates exchanges between persons and between institutions in accordance with a strict respect for their rights.
Commutative justice obliges strictly;
it requires safeguarding property rights, paying debts, and fulfilling obligations freely contracted.
Without commutative justice, no other form of justice is possible.
One distinguishes commutative justice from legal justice which concerns what the citizen owes in fairness to the community,
and from distributive justice which regulates what the community owes its citizens in proportion to their contributions and needs.
CCC: ” 1885 The principle of subsidiarity is opposed to all forms of collectivism.
It sets limits for state intervention.
It aims at harmonizing the relationships between individuals and societies. It tends toward the establishment of true international order.
SUBSIDIARITY – CCC: ” 1883 Socialization also presents dangers.
Excessive intervention by the state can threaten personal freedom and initiative.
The teaching of the Church has elaborated the principle of subsidiarity, according to which “a community of a higher order should not interfere in the internal life of a community of a lower order, depriving the latter of its functions, but rather should support it in case of need and help to co- ordinate its activity with the activities of the rest of society, always with a view to the common good.”
SUBSIDIARITY – also see CCC # 1894, 2209.
Marxist Saul Alinsky wrote “RULES for RADICALS” which was studied by Obama and H. Clinton.
It was dedicated to Lucifer, and requires the manipulation of the people to seize power – the creation of conflict between black and white, employers and employees, rich and poor, etc.
True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within.
The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties….
Allie, thank you for posting this. When I talk to those who voted for and still support Obama and mention his ties to Saul Alinsky, I haven’t found even one who has the slightest clue of who he was.
Destruction of the FAMILY – is well on its way – fatherless families, fornication, adultery, pornography, and redefining marriage for the approval of homosexual activity.
CCC:” 2207 The family is the original cell of social life.
It is the natural society in which husband and wife are called to give themselves in love and in the gift of life.
Authority, stability, and a life of relationships within the family constitute the foundations for freedom, security, and fraternity within society.
The family is the community in which, from childhood, one can learn moral values, begin to honor God, and make good use of freedom. Family life is an initiation into life in society. “
This MISANDRY (Hatred of Men & Boys, Masculinity & Normal Heterosexuality) Is The Tenure Track in the pathetic farce of Academentia – where only the most vile of the Twysted Systers get to wallow at the front of the Tax Trough.
At UC-BS (university of ca in goleta, santa barbara county) it is Party Line that: “Gang Rape represents Normal Male Sexuality, the Abuse of Womyn for Fun” – and anyone who dares to disagree (say by writing a letter to the editor of the paper) is targeted for retaliation (even in the community at large) by the Campus Thought Police (real ones, with badges & guns) IN SECRET.
Been There & Done That – having been found guilty in Star Chamber proceedings of “Writing Letters to the Editor expressing Negative Views about Current Womyn’s Issues.”
Oh – and “Asking Loaded Questions” at public seminars on Gender on and off campus (usually related to campus promotion of MISANDRY)- which is also Verbotten!
The Armpit of Academia
Men told not to rain on parade Unity key to Dyke March / 50,000 expected at S.F. Dyke March 50,000 expected — men not advised.
Women rule the world, if only for a little while – SFGate
For a few hours Saturday night, Vicki Noblegot a fleeting glimpse of a world Devoid of Men — and she came away excited and deeply moved.
“This is what the world would look like if women ruled the world, which we intend to do,”
This was such a good article! I especially took to heart her warning to mothers about their sons as I feel one of the most damaged people in the wake of radical femin-naziism are men and boys. Test scores have dramatically decreased in boys, fewer boys are going to college, more boys spend hours and hours a day playing video games than they devote to any other activity and worst of all is the diminishment of men in societal and religious roles. Made to look like wimps and buffoons in tv and movies, undermined by women at work, and myriad other ways (I won’t even touch women in the Church) real men are an endangered species.
Frankly, I think more real women need to start speaking out and start telling these spoiled, indulged brats that they are total crackpots! We get mad at moderate muslims for not speaking out against the barbaric ISIS and other murderers, but how often do we hear women speak out against these anti-family women by name, like this well-spoken woman did. She’s very fortunate to have Fr Rutler as a friend too. He’s got to be one of the greatest men of our time.
Dana, I agree with you. This article is comprehensive. Nothing was left out. Years ago I realized that manhood was in trouble.
Me too, Tracy! It was no accident that my son is an adventurous, strong male with confidence in his role as a man. I never made derogatory jokes about men and supported his dad in discipline (though so many times I was biting my tongue) and encouraged him in his male activities, like little league, etc. I had a male cousin who tried raising his daughter not to do any housework and to avoid female activities so she wasn’t just a housewife (no dolls, play dish sets, etc)…needless to say, you know how that turned out, right? Despite a really off the charts IQ, she’s a domestic goddess with three strong sons, loves being a wife and mother and is a strong Christian (her dad was an atheist) He didn’t know I would let her be a girly girl when he dropped her off at my house for a visit. heh Anyway, lets hope this article becomes a book, as it really was well done!
LEST WE FORGET
FDNY 9/11 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWoKAdVHLYY
Way 2 Go Mates… Reductio Ad Absurdum – all the way to the Championship Game.
Perhaps most interesting about the scam is the Outrage, mostly by those paid well to be Professionally Outraged at such things – over their failure to take seriously the ‘vows’ that get the free tickets (kind of like tax benefits to ‘partners’) as part of the deal…
– Which outrage is only matched by the whole Homosex Hissy Fit over the notion that Two Men would use ‘their’ laws to ‘marry’ – and yet have absolutely no interest in engaging in homo-anal coprophile Behaviors with each other; both being attracted to Women -only.
Such Mockery Makes a Mockery of the Whole Mockery – and is thus Against Gaystapo Thought Police Rules! Hence – Verbotten.
The punishment remains to be seen, but know that it will be swift and severe – as all the ‘intolerant’ must be shown the consequences of resistance, which is futile.
Mates’ marriage horrifies gay rights groups
Chesterton once observed that an ‘Atheist’ is someone who believes absolutely every thing came from absolutely nothing’.
Were this person an ‘Agnostic’ (one who simply and honestly admits they don’t know or believe enough to say either way) it would be different than someone who asserts what they absolutely cannot prove, the Complete and Total Absence of God – as the only ‘truth’.
Likewise – the Nihilism inherent in Atheism, and failure to allow for Judgment of their Own behaviors while here on earth – to be conducted at a later date by a ‘higher power’ – essentially means they consider themselves to be their one and only ‘god’ (small ‘g’) – and thus answerable to no moral code other than which suits them at the moment. These tend to be the types who believe (without personal experience) that suicide leads to Nothingness – and nothing else, ever.
The only real question is which is more reliable – a Jihadi sworn to take as many as possible with him / her as an article of ‘faith’, or an Atheist in charge who doesn’t really care about where anybody is headed – because he thinks everyone is going nowhere anyway.
Air Force can’t use oath to disqualify atheist sergeant
– See more at: https://onenewsnow.com/perspectives/miscellaneous/2014/09/12/air-force-cant-use-oath-to-disqualify-atheist-sergeant?