The following comes from an April 10 Daily Trojan article by Danny Helms:
The USC Pharmacy will now have the option to offer birth control following the implementation of the new California Birth Control Law, which went into effect Friday.
The law allows pharmacists to offer birth control products, such as pills, shots, skin patches and vaginal rings, to women without a prescription from a doctor. While the law does not allow pharmacists to supply these products over the counter, women can obtain them after completing a screening questionnaire on their medical history and consulting with a pharmacist.
The statute does not mandate pharmacies to provide birth control prescriptions. A similar law that was passed in Oregon took effect in January, but their law restricts use by women under age 18, whereas the California law extends to women of all ages. Similarly, there is not an age requirement when requesting birth control from a doctor.
Many states have sought increased birth control access, based on the consistently high rates of unintended pregnancy. Patrick Whelan, faculty at Keck School of Medicine, responded to a recent study at the Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine indicating effective contraception reduces unplanned pregnancies and abortions.
“Roughly 50 percent of pregnancies in the United States are unintended, thus occurring in women who are not using contraception or are irregularly using contraception,” Whelan said in an email to the Daily Trojan.
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists not only oppose the law, but also seek to create a model explicitly derailing the new law. They have questioned the effectiveness of these laws in California and Oregon, arguing the laws merely replace the barrier of visiting the doctor with another.
“It’s a little paternalistic to hold their birth control hostage,” said Kathleen Besinque, USC’s clinical pharmacy professor, to the Los Angeles Times.
In conjunction with the opposition it has undergone from medical associations, religion has surfaced in the discussion of birth control policy. A recent Supreme Court case addressed religious objections to the Affordable Care Act requirement that employers ensure coverage for contraception to all their female workers.
“Religious leaders will increasingly have to answer the question of how they can be opposed to birth control use when it directly leads to fewer abortions,” said Whelan, who is also a board member for the Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies at USC.
Planned Parenthood’s flagship Los Angeles location is right across the street from USC. They can anticipate even more business from Lady Trojans as their campus dispensed birth control fails and they end up pregnant.
Clearly Patrick Whelan, “board member for the Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies at USC” refuses to see the proven link between increased contraceptipn and abortion. He should resign for the sake of his soul.
Why in the world is Patrick Whelan a board member of the Institute of Advanced Catholic Studies, at USC?? Young people all need to be taught, once again, that sex is sacred, and belongs only in marriage! They need to be taught that attending a university is serious, and that they must concentrate on their studies, and try to make a good future. Good schools, from kindergarten through university, once again must also teach and form their students in GOOD CHARACTER! We will have a much better Nation, and a much better world, as a result, with better marriages and better parenting, too!
Doctors of many years ago, used to have a formation in GOOD CHARACTER, when the Nation was more religious, and about 90% of the population attended the church/synagogue of their choice, weekly. Premarital sex was considered by all as a terrible sin! A doctor would always counsel a girl NOT to get into risky, immoral situations, and had a professional responsibility to see to her highest welfare. These birth control laws should be struck down! They are immoral— and highly risky, medically, for women! Also, birth control pills are abortifacients! The immoral, immature, subversive hippie-liberals of the 1960’s promoted LIES of so-called “free love” — NOTHING in this world, is “FREE!!”
The Contraceptive Choice Project is the study that Whelan refers to above. Ob-Gyn and Catholic Dr. Michael Dixon of St Anthony Med Ctr St Louis delineates the problems with the study–its methods and conclusions. He says among other things that “75 % of the participants chose LARCs” (which include IUDs). These have the ability to cause EARLY abortion. Dr Dixon: “One cannot justify a policy of reducing abortions by a mechanism that simply causes earlier abortions.” He notes:”no detailed analysis within the study on sexually transmitted infections, which the contraception methods used do not protect against. A 2010 survey by the Centers for Disease Control noted that St. Louis has one of the highest STI rates in the country.”
(cont from above):
Critique of the Contraceptive Choices Project by Dr. Dixon:
https://stlouisreview.com/article/2012-10-18/catholic-doctors
–Below sources that Disprove Whelan’s claim [artificial] “birth control lead(s) to fewer abortions”:
1) Fact Sheet:Greater Access To Contraception Does Not Reduce Abortions
https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/contraception/fact-sheets/greater-access-to-contraception-does-not-reduce-abortions.cfm
2)Contraception And Abortion: The Underlying Link by Rev Walter J. Schu
https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/contraception/articles-and-publications/contraception-and-abortion-the-underlying-link.cfm
The mindset at ease with OTC contraception and abortion paid for by someone else– is the same mindset that is comfortable with every kind of sexual immorality. This new CA law has no regard for women nor for the doctors who care for them.
I am fortunate that I am a pharmacist at a federal medical facility and that this law does not apply to us. As a practicing Catholic, I would never prescribe birth control pills or devices. What would happen to a retail pharmacist at CVS, Walgreen’s or Rite Aid if they objected?