President Joe Biden’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) nominee, Tracy Stone-Manning, is an ecoterrorist who demanded Americans undergo population control in the name of environmental stewardship.
According to the Daily Caller Thursday, Stone-Manning featured a shirtless American baby in an ad for her graduate thesis declaring the child an “environmental hazard.”
“Can you spot the environmental hazard in this photo?” the ad’s headline asked. “That’s right, it’s the cute baby. Americans believe that overpopulation is only a problem somewhere else in the world. But it’s a problem here too.”
Stone-Manning’s ad continues, urging Americans adopt a Chinese-style limited child policy.
“The earth is only so big, and we can tap into it only so often. In America, we tap in often and hard,” Stone-Manning wrote. “When we overpopulate, the earth notices it more. Stop at two. It could be the best thing you do for the planet….”
“The point is a simple one,” Stone-Manning explained in her thesis. “Harshly, the ads say that the earth can’t afford Americans. More softly, they ask people to think about how their family planning choices affect the planet….”
Stone-Manning’s nomination had already been under fire from Republicans for her links to episodes of ecoterrorism in Idaho.
In 1993, Biden’s nominee accepted legal immunity in exchange for testimony that she aided in a 1989 tree-spiking incident, wherein left-wing environmental terrorists jam metal spikes into trees which turn into projectiles when processed for logging….
Circumstances of the investigation into the Idaho tree-spiking case show Stone-Manning had been a primary subject which contradicts her testimony to Senate lawmakers that she had never been the target of a federal investigation. Stone-Manning had even complained to the local press several decades ago about being investigated….
Despite her links to ecoterrorism, the Biden White House pursuing a radical environmental agenda has continued to stand by its pick to manage the nation’s public lands.
“Tracy Stone-Manning is a dedicated public servant who has years of experience and a proven track record of finding solutions and common ground when it comes to our public lands and waters,” the administration said in a statement earlier this week. “She is exceptionally qualified to be the next Director of the Bureau of Land Management….”
The above comes from a June 25 story in The Federalist.
You fake Catholic democrats who voted for Biden, this is what you also voted for, don’t say you are shocked.
God allowed it to happen so in some way it accords with his will.
God does not will evil. God is not a sinner.
Anonymous, don’t be deceived. God allows all evils– starting in the Garden of Eden Our task as earthly pilgrims, is a mighty one– to resist sin, fight evil, and seek the holy Kingdom of God. Better say your prayers each day, don your suit of armor, and grab your sword– together with St. Michael the Archangel–and go fight the Devil– with God at your side.
Bishop McElroy must adore her.
Isn’t she just lovely, Your Excellency? <3
I don’t think he swings that way.
Has no business being considered for a Senate confirmation. Legal immunity from prosecution doesn’t mean that our elected representatives can’t take prior admitted criminal acts into account when someone is being vetted for a responsible position. Senators of both parties, do your job.
Being nominated for a Black Lives Matter position isn’t that important.
In this case “BLM” is “Bureau of Land Management”. I was confused at first too.
Quite right. BLM manages federal lands in most western states, including a huge part of Nevada (what isn’t operated by military or DOE). Like National Forest lands, most BLM land is open to dispersed or “dry” camping, out in the open or at abandoned mine sites. Expect that to change – too much freedom involved for the taste of Biden’s band. An admitted eco-terrorist in charge of a large chunk of Nevada and other states? Bad idea.
Her graduate thesis? 1992 was almost 30 years ago. This digging up old stuff on people and trying to embarrass them on the Internet is not an OK behavior.
SHe hasn’t changed
I do not care what someone else did thirty years ago, unless they murdered someone, but I do care what they are dong now. People can change and become better and wiser, repent and make restitution the best they can, or become worse than they were thirty years ago. That makes all the difference in the world. Now I am going to do my day’s work and stay out of this.
“This digging up old stuff on people and trying to embarrass them on the Internet is not an OK behavior.” Unless of course its done against someone anonymous does not like, but liberals they must be protected at all costs.
No. I don’t “like” this nominee but something she wrote 30 years ago in college should not be a headline on the Internet.
Wrong – she wrote it and has not repudiated it, therefore she must own it.
Every day a new revelation how Democrats align themselves with and support evil.
I would expect nothing less from a creature this hideous
What a psycho! She should be removed from any office and declared a danger to human beings. Put her in a place where she cannot harm herself or others.
ALL population controllers and eco-freaks are effectively
saying the exact same thing. This gal’s just more open about it.
I cannot believe that this is the *BEST* candidate for the position and that she is “exceptionally qualified.” Putting spikes into trees so that the spikes can turn into projectiles should disqualify Tracy Stone-Manning for PUBLIC office. She did not care about the fact that these spikes could have hurt other people. This was cruel and reckless endangerment aimed at injuring other human beings.
This is the most horrific, monstruous, unsuitable candidate for anything at all! A sickening, Satanic, “hippie psycho!”
Don’t mean to totally condemn this lady, in my post of
June 30th at 8:59pm. But I strongly believe that the REAL “environmental hazards” are the violent liberal leftist activists, rioting and destroying our cities, and our Nation — and Planned Parenthood, destroying our children! How about a campaign for Chastity and good morals? Babies are not conceived by those who are chaste! Most important for the environment– is Respect for Life– especially– the life of the child in their mother’s womb!
sorry, didn’t quite get the name