The following comes from a January 1 Breitbart article by Judith Gelernter Reisman and Mary E. McAlister:
CNN’s The Hunting Ground has won critical acclaim from filmmakers, winning the Stanley Kramer award from the Producers Guild of America while garnering criticism from Ivy League elites who worry that their reputations are being sullied by the depiction of a “rape culture” on their campuses (Harvard Crimson). That, in turn, has prompted a response from students in the form of a discrimination complaint under the Federal anti-discrimination law known as Title IX.
The attention that The Hunting Ground has attracted raises the question, “has it always been so on college campuses?” Even radical sexologists such as Professor Ira Reiss have to admit that it has not. Reiss reports that unmarried WWII 18-22 year-old Army lads were largely “still virgins.” Even Hugh Hefner was a college virgin at age 22. Dutch “sexperts” Drs. Kronhausens’ 1960 survey revealed, “The average modern college man is apt to say that he considers intercourse “too precious” to have with anyone except the girl he expects to marry and may actually abstain from all intercourse for that reason.” (p. 219). However, by the 1970s youth were generally sexually radicalized–once normalized, most thought unwed sex was “natural.”
How did this transformation occur? A brief chronology shows the historical context:
1950: “Age Disparity (Relations Involving One Adult) …. [P]ersons under the age of 7 are legally regarded as not responsible….but many are by endowment and training fully capable of….responsibility for sexual behavior.”
Manfried Guttmacher, Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry (GAP).
1953: “The cultural tendency to overprotect women and children [is] often…more detrimental to the…victim than the offense itself….Kinsey’s findings…permeate all present thinking on this subject.” The Illinois Commission on Sex Offenders
1955: “Despite the indication that 12 is…the onset of puberty….it is known that significant numbers of girls enter the period of sexual awakening as early as the tenth year.” Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry; the ALI, Model Penal Code
1983: “[T]he older term “rape” was fraught with negative emotion and [is] unrealistic for this era. . . . [T]he female is [not] … harmed in some unique way by untoward sexual behavior.” C. Nemeth, How New Jersey Prosecutors View the New Sexual Offense Statutes; N.J. Law Journal.
A 2014 op-ed by Yale Professor Jed Rubenfeld, drew heated objections from Yale Law Students. He reminds our largely historically ignorant populace of the fallout following the nostalgic 1969 “Woodstock” “sexual revolution”:
It’s part of the revolution in sexual attitudes and college sex codes that has taken place over the last 50 years. Not long ago, nonmarital sex on college campuses was flatly suppressed. Sex could be punished with suspension or expulsion….Rape was a matter for the police, not the university. Beginning in the late 1960s however, sex on campus increasingly came to be permitted….The problem then became how to define consent.
So almost three generations ago, youth were lied to (read Dr. Reisman’s books for details) and persuaded that the WWII generation were closet sexual adventurers. This belief in their parental hypocrisy (see, The Graduate, 1967) helped youth reject the American legacy of sex restrictions in exchange for “sex drugs ‘n rock-n-roll.” Since then, each subsequent generation has been increasingly sexually permissive.
Meanwhile, back at Harvard, nineteen Law Professors posted an irate protest of CNN’s portrayal of the sexualized campuses as a “rape culture.” Their most illustrious professorial signatory is Professor Laurence Tribe, an admitted plagiarizer, who taught American Legal History to Obama and two Supreme Court Justices. Tribe apparently is inexcusably ignorant of, or deliberately hiding, the worst child sex crimes and frauds in American Legal History—of pedophile Professor Alfred Kinsey of Indiana University, the “father of the sexual revolution.” American past and present sexual law was revolutionized based upon experiments on up to 2,035 children raped and tortured for alleged “orgasms” published in Kinsey’s Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) Kinsey, a sadistic obsessive masturbating pedophile and pornography addict was the scientific authority for these disastrous changes. His Tables 30-34 record the worst, unprosecuted, infant and child sexual experimentation ever conducted in American Legal History, (Reisman, 2013)
By 1952 Herbert Wechsler’s Harvard Law Review article relied on Kinsey’s sex tome to justify liberalizing all sex laws. By 1955 Wechsler, chief author of the first-ever American Law Institute Model Penal Code (MPC), reported that sex protections for females were onerous for men. The new, innovative MPC argued that reduction of sex crime required more sexual freedom, lighter penalties, parole, and tax paid therapy for all sex criminals. Under Wechsler the neoteric MPC proposed age ten for consent as her “seductive” conduct might push men to rape. Kinsey claimed of 4,441 female interviewees none was really injured by a sexual assault, hence the Kinsey-MPC plan was to eliminate “unrealistic” rape and statutory rape laws. No rape harm, no need for rape laws!
With this “cultural” pedagogy promoted by our prestigious legal lights and backed by Kinseyan “sex science” our legacy would inevitably be a “rape culture”—rape on college campuses, middle schools, libraries, bedrooms, barrooms, church pews, court rooms, etc. Be careful what you ask for. After the MPC advised a lowered age of consent (to allow “peer” sex), as Reisman documents, America’s legislatures and courts loosened state laws that had favored women (harsh laws against rape, adultery, child sex abuse, incest) and eased criminal penalties for sex offenders in more than two-thirds of U.S. states.
Judith Gelernter Reisman, PhD Research Professor, Director Liberty Child Protection Center, Liberty University School of Law
Mary E. McAlister, Esq.
Senior Litigation Counsel, Liberty Counsel
Besides giving us the rape culture, the sexual revolution also gave us open pornography, abortion, birth control, child abuse, and sodomy. These vices were around before the revolution, but they were brought out of the sewer and became more widespread. Our Lady of Fatima warned us to always be pure as sins against purity greatly offend Our Lord.
The Official Published Teaching of the University of California states that: ” Gang Rape – Represents Normal Male Sexuality, the Abuse of Womyn for Fun.”
At UC-BS (in Goleta) the Student Newspaper publishes ‘editorials’ with pictures of caucasian males with a pig growing out his forehead, and the Caption:
I am a Lying Sexist, Cut Open My Head, Drag out the Pig, and Butcher It.”
Anyone who dares to object to such rank Misandry (Hatred of Men & Boys, Masculinity & Normal Heterosexuality) is Targeted by the Campus Gaystapo Thought Police (real ones with guns & badges) – who are empowered to Secretly Retaliate against members of the public who dare to criticize the noble goals of the Twysted Sisterhood that pretty much runs…
The entire sick, immoral hippie youth culture, of “free” sex, drugs, and filthy rock “music,” as well as so-called “rebellion” of the 1960’s, is too defended, by very ignorant people, who eagerly swallow whatever is given to them, in the media! This is SHOCKING!! Who really likes all of this EVIL?? And the filthy modern movies, and degraded dress and speech– who truly LIKES all of this garbage?? Why do so many ignorant people ACCEPT this??
I will say one more thing. Why do people so willingly accept “Freud the Fraud,” and the scientifically-shaky, laughable, so-called “soft” sciences, of psychology, and psychiatry?? With so many immoral, liberal, “idiot” QUACKS practicing their “garbage,” legally, pretending to “cure” sick people?? The premise of the filthy, deviant mind of anti-social, atheist Freud (who raped and bullied his half-sister into an incestuous affair)— is that life, and psychology, is based on the sex instinct, beginning with babyhood! WHY ACCEPT THIS??
I was completely shocked, by the 1960’s movie, “The Graduate!” I saw it as a piece of garbage, anti-society propaganda, aimed at the destruction of our society, and of the young. Dustin Hoffman’s character was DESPICABLE!! Want that low-class filth, to date and marry? Want that low-class hippie filth, as the new standard for American male citizens?? Call it for what it is– a misguided, vengeful, liberal, anti-society propaganda film, aimed at DESTROYING AMERICAN CULTURE, AND AMERICA’S CHURCHES, TOO!!
America’s colleges and universities all desperately need to get rid of fraudulent, immoral, highly destructive, pseudo-intellectual academic leaders, who promote “free” sex and immorality, using filthy, fraudulent, highly immoral pseudo-“scientific” books written by Freud, Kinsey, Masters and Johnson, and many others! Our Nation and its academic institutions, all need to be placed back upon our original Judeo-Christian foundations– with the demand that all obey and uphold Judeo-Christian morality! We need serious, true scholars in our universities– and no more immoral, fraudulent “studies” and “experiments,” in human sexuality!