There was a time – it encompassed most of the 1980s – that Catholic publishers weren’t very interested in what the largely unknown Father Joseph Ratzinger of Germany had to say about Christian morality, the mystery of the heart of Christ, the role of religion in post-Marxist Europe or, for that matter, any other topic.
U.S. Jesuit Father Joseph Fessio was an exception. The California priest had already become convinced of the highly academic German priest’s ability to synthesize Christian truth and complex theological issues and express them succinctly, as well as in a way that encouraged deep reflection and meditation.
By intention and providential design, Ignatius Press, established by Father Fessio in 1978, became the sole English-language publisher of the pre-papal books and the biography of the man who was elected Pope Benedict XVI in 2005.
“We knew we wanted to publish translations of fine European theologians like Ratzinger, Henri de Lubac, Hans Urs von Balthasar and others,” Father Fessio told Catholic News Service before the retired pope’s death Dec. 31. “It was kind of a golden age of Catholic theology, in the mid-20th century. But their works were rarely translated into English. That was our mission.”
Pope Benedict’s body of writings will be his legacy, said Father Fessio. Ignatius Press pledges to keep his core writings in print.
“He will be not only a saint but a doctor of the church someday,” Father Fessio predicted.
Father Fessio gained a deep-seated admiration of Father Ratzinger in the early 1970s, while pursuing a doctorate in theology at the University of Regensburg, in what was then West Germany. His thesis, “The Ecclesiology of Hans Urs von Balthasar,” was directed by Father Ratzinger, his professor and mentor.
During that process, he gleaned an appreciation of his mentor’s great intelligence.
“We had these seminars with theological and doctoral students– maybe seven or eight of us — and he’d be directing the seminar. They’d last about two hours, and he’d make sure everyone had his chance to speak. He would ask people what they thought about this or that, and at the end, he would sum up the whole seminar in just a few very long, German sentences. He had a tremendous power of synthesis. He listened so well. He grasped things immediately, and he organized them very organically,” said Father Fessio.
The Jesuit said that later, when then-Cardinal Ratzinger oversaw the writing of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, he saw the same qualities.
“He had the tremendous ability to understand what others were saying and writing,” Father Fessio added. “He could be critical, but he was fair, and then he would present what he thought was a more accurate view of things….”
Full story at Detroit Catholic.
Ratzinger in an appalling display of cowardice threw us all to the wolves, but he “will be a saint”. My God, what nonsense.
check out the book of Job. from the outside, his friends all knew he had sinned.they didn’t know the inside story to make their harsh judgments. Don”t pummel Job
JD, there is n interesting parallel one could draw between you and Pope Benedict, and Dante Aligheri (born 1265) and Pope St. Celestine V, whom Dante consigned to hell’s ante-chamber. Although Dante did not mention Celestine V by name, he did not hesitate to mention Boniface VIII several times by name and placed him into hell for simony; but the acts of Boniface were very detrimental to Dante, to the city of Florence, and to the city of Palestrina, which he demolished, with the killing of a total of 6,000 citizens. The placing of St Celestine in hell was owing to the fact that Boniface VIII was the successor to Celestine V. It was for his cowardice, as Dante saw it, that he put pope St. Celestine into hell.
JD-Don’t forget God is the one in charge ,not any #of human leaders.We will always be disappointed by human weakness.
This was a good article with much to discuss but I guess people were tired of the subject.
The mid-80s being the golden age of theology is interesting because it was also the tarnished age of theology in my opinion.
But maybe the theology he is talking about was the clarification and response to some of the ooky stuff.
Just like the wacky Scripture scholarship was followed by Scott Hahn.