The following comes from an August 2 posting by John Allen in the National Catholic Reporter.
In most respects, Alitalia flight 4001 from Rio de Janeiro to Rome on Sunday night was nothing to write home about. The seats in economy class were fairly uncomfortable, and the food was merely adequate. The main course was a lukewarm square of lasagna roughly the size of a Ritz cracker.
I’ll say this for it, however: The in-flight entertainment was spectacular.
As is by now well-known, we were treated to a pope standing in the press compartment for an hour and 20 minutes, taking questions on every topic under the sun with no filters and no limits, speaking without notes and delivering straight answers. Among other things, one had to be awed by the energy of the 76-year-old pontiff, who had just finished a grueling seven-day trip to Brazil yet seemed capable of going on almost indefinitely.
As I said Monday on CNN with Michael Holmes, when you cover the Vatican, you sometimes sit around late at night dreaming of moments like this, but you never really think you’ll live to see them happen.
While the headline was the pope’s comments on gays — “Who am I to judge?” — it was a sprawling conversation, with the full transcript extending to almost 10,000 words. It’s dangerous with such a wide range of topics to try to reduce the pope’s message to a single word, but in this case, I believe it can be done without leaving anything essential out of view.
The one-word interpretive key to Francis’ news conference and arguably to his entire papacy to date: “mercy.”
As I’ve written before, each recent pope has had a catchphrase that represents his core emphasis. For John Paul II, it was “Be not afraid!”, a call to revive the church’s missionary swagger after a period of introspection and self-doubt. For Benedict, it was “reason and faith,” the argument that religion shorn of self-critical reflection becomes extremism while human reason without the orientation of ultimate truths becomes skepticism and nihilism.
For Francis, his signature idea is mercy. Over and over again, he emphasizes God’s endless capacity to forgive, insisting what the world needs to hear from the church above all today is a message of compassion….
Francis’ emphasis on mercy is nearly ubiquitous. In a recent essay for the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera, Enzo Bianchi, founder of the celebrated ecumenical monastery of Bose, offered a statistical analysis of the words used most frequently by Francis since his election. He found that the single most commonly used term was “joy,” more than a hundred times, followed closely by “mercy,” which the pope has used almost a hundred times.
This conviction that we are living in a kairos of mercy makes sense of everything else the pope said on the plane and, for that matter, most of what he’s said and done since his election in March.
It explains his unwillingness to pass judgment on gays, and it also explains his refusal to be drawn into a political diatribe when a Brazilian journalist asked him about recent laws in the country liberalizing abortion and permitting same-sex marriage. Asked why he didn’t address those issues during his trip, the pope said, “It wasn’t necessary to speak of them, but of the positive things that get young people going. Anyway, young people know perfectly well what the position of the church is.”
Pressed for his personal conviction, Francis didn’t duck: “That of the church. … I’m a son of the church.”
There you have it in a nutshell. Francis is no doctrinal radical, and there will likely be no substantive upheaval of the church’s positions on issues of gender and sex or anything else. On the one specific question Francis fielded along these lines, women’s ordination, he reaffirmed “that door is closed.”
The revolution under Francis is not one of content, but of tone. He believes it’s time for the church to lift up its merciful face to the world, in part because of its own self-inflicted wounds and in part because of the harsh and unforgiving temper of the times. This is a pope who will look for every chance to express compassion, steering clear of finger-wagging unless it’s absolutely necessary.
His focus on mercy also helps explain why the sacrament of confession is so important to him, why he made a point of hearing confessions before Mass during his first visit to a Roman parish May 31, something John Paul II and Benedict didn’t do. As I wrote July 26, it’s quite possible that when he went to Rio de Janeiro’s Boa Vista Park to hear five confessions that morning, in his own mind, it was the most important thing he did all week….
To read the original story, click here.
One Hundred words in 48 seconds, sustained for 80 minutes equals 10,000 words: This according to John Allen is what the Pope and journalists generated on the plane. 125 words per minute … two and one twelfth words per second: Well, this is more believable than William Shatner in that incredible classic Twilight Zone episode where they haul him off the plane in a staight jacket.
One of John Allen’s most brilliant messages to the world, over his entire career, is making note of the shear volume of words used on that plane trip. The rest of Allen’s note is almost as brilliant, which is that the Pope channels God through the NC Reporter.
Why does this site (Cal Catholic Daily) keep quoting and therefore advertising the heretical and schismatic – “National Catholic REPORTER” ?
Who is making these decisions ?
Andy,
Very good question, let us see if anyone answers it!
Whenever I read Allen’s name or National (Anti) Catholic Reporter, I reach for a barf bag!
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher
Mercy implies sin that must be repented. We cannot ask for the mercy of God and refuse to submit to the justice of God. Mercy is no license to break the laws of God, but rather an offer of forgiveness for admitting to having broken them. Let us take care not to reject it by arrogantly thinking we can change God’s Laws by “growing” or “progressing”, as do Allen’s bosses on the “Fishwrap”.
Wow! There isn’t any element of the Good News (the primary proclamation of both Jesus Christ and His Church) that some one on the Cal.Cath. pages won’t make all about sin. Just as there is more than one note on the piano, there is more to our faith than rubbing everyone’s noses in their sinfulness. Sheesh.
It’s wonderful when you can be joyful in the Lord whatever the circumstance, Weary, and in our own daily living, I’m sure most of us here try to be salt and light to our families and friends. My understanding has always been that this website is about sharing our deepest concerns with fellow Catholics and develop ways to defend our faith as well as learn from one another. If you want good news, go into the world and share it. And share it here, as well. But frankly, your gloomy post didn’t brighten anyone’s day either, friend. Maybe you should look in the mirror? That’s why this website isn’t called Happy Clappy Catholic.com…this place is definitely a reality check , not happy days. I can only speak from my own perspective, however. I wish we had a site like this for each state so we could address the specific problems taking place in our own neck of the woods, however.
Wearwolf, glad to hear that there is no sin in your life or those around you. Write it up and sell it on Ebay.
Be weary of those transparent “sheeshers.” who suddenly appear out of nowhere bearing false gifts of sheeshing Tom Byrne’s excellent and very wise and truthful post. “Sheesh” was a favorite word of the “happy clappy” anything goes pappy poster named Max. Like minded “sheeshers” of the same feather often flock and *anonymously* “sheesh” together.
Well, there was a max, a MAX and a Mackz. I think you mean max who was very humorous but who got on your bad side. He was not gay or a gay lobbyist.
Tom:
“Mercy is no license to break the laws of God, but rather an offer of forgiveness for admitting to having broken them. ” The parables of the Good Shepherd, the Lost Coin and the Prodigal Son tell a different story: God’s mercy not “an offer of forgiveness for” anything and there is never a divine quid pro quo. Rather, God’s mercy and forgiveness are unbounded and ever available. If we respond with love, we won’t break God’s laws.
Francis and others:
I don’t presume to write a complete theology of mercy in less than 250 words. If we lived in the 1600s, in terror of the awesome and distant god of Calvin and Jansen, we’d need to emphasize one thing. We live in a soft, morally slushy age where too many of our fellow Catholics hear “mercy” and think “indulgence, my sins don’t count”. We need to address the misconceptions of our own age. The New Testament is 10-12 hours steady reading. It can’t be summed up in any one word!
Mercy is an attribute of God. You are thinking of the mortal sin of presumption.
I remember reading the New Testament in several translations 20 times through over several months … without glossing. This kind of puts it into memory and then year after year little mini-studies help illuminate the message and the event given us by the Merciful One.
And conversely, Francis, which is why the sodomites who incessantly whine that they are the loving people are full of deceit.
Not at all Tom. Mercy is refraining from just punishment in circumstances when following the “letter of the law” will not benefit anyone.
Mercy does not presuppose repentance on the part of the sinner. You offer mercy, perhaps, with the HOPE of inspiring repentance by a sinner—but it is foolish to count on it.
Jonj: The offer of mercy is always there – who would deny it – but the Prodigal Son didn’t benefit from mercy until he repented and returned. The Father waited for him, remember: he didn’t drag him back! God will neither drag us into Heaven or shove us into Hell. We must cooperate with His mercy, if it’s to do us good. Repentance is part of that cooperation.
You’re changing the parameters Tom. You’ve added the condition for “mercy” to do any “good” you must have repentance.
Of course, you’re thinking of God’s mercy toward man. I must confess I’m thinking more of a human being offering mercy to another.
When a human being offers mercy to another, you CANNOT know if the other will repent and change their ways. All you can do is HOPE. Now, the virtue from this act is unaffected by the results. If the person does not reform and still persists in the same actions, your act of mercy is still a moral good.
Let us suppose you come upon a man in the desert dying of thirst. You recognize that he’s a sodomite because you saw him (by accident) engage in a group gang bang with other men only two weeks before. Before offering him water from your canteen you ask him, “If I give you water, will you give up your Sodomy?”
What if he refuses? Will you still let him die of thirst in the desert before your eyes? Recall, of course, that strictly following Leviticus suggests that not only could you withhold water, justice would say that you are obligated to pick up a rock and bash in his skull.
Never heard of the hound of heaven?
Well said, Tom!!!
Who installed John Allen as the definitive expert in all things Vaticano?
The Vatican?
Those who keep repeating John Allen’s work, (and those who keep giving him interviews).
The ban against the “NC REPORTER” has been renewed by their Diocese Bishop in 2013. (The ban was originally placed in the mid 60s by their Diocese Bishop at that time.)
In the Gospels, Our Lord tells the sinners, YOUR SINS ARE FORGIVEN, GO AND SIN NO MORE! In other words, there is mercy, but there is also the command NOT to sin anymore. With God’s grace this is possible, but man on his own, cannot do this. That is why Christ founded the Catholic Church where so many spiritual helps are available to sinners, so they can convert from their evil ways, and follow the virtuous path which leads to Heaven. It is much like what traditional Catholicism has always preached: mercy is shown towards us up until we die. As soon as death occurs, justice takes over. While we must love the sinner and hate the sin, we must always pray for conversion, and hope we will not die in mortal sin. The Hail Mary’s final plea, PRAY FOR US SINNERS, NOW AND AT THE HOUR OF OUR DEATH, shows that God’s mercy is infinite, but also that He is a just judge.
They will not listen to you; even though God himself has put you here to tell them.
Oh, the Shock when they die!
Pope Francis is a straight shooter, to borrow a phrase from Tejanos, and I like that. He has changed nothing so far in his pontificate as he is preaching out of the Catechism; and, yet the traddies are in a uproar over that Guido liturgy, and progressives are disappointed over the rights and rolls of genitalia. His emphasis is on Christ’s mercy for the sinner, and that’s a good thing for bringing in converts and reverts.
*roles
Traddies? Southside Loc0, if you prefer to go to a Mass put together by a Mason and some Protestant ministers, that’s your choice. Please don’t insult the Mass that served the Church well for hundreds of years.
John Feeney,
THOUSANDS OF YEARS!
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher
1962 – 1570 = 392.
how profound…francis can subtract… can i get your autograph?
haha. Sure you can Clovis…he can write too…sort of.
You’re so right, Kenneth…you’re marching to eternal time.
It will take time to unravel the thinking of our new pope. I find him not nearly as simplistic as John Allen seems to imply. We may yet be surprised and perhaps disappointed by this Argentine pontiff. When pressed by Brazilian journalists on abortion and same-sex marriage, his answer was very succinct:
“It wasn’t necessary to speak of them, but of the positive things that get young people going. Anyway, young people know perfectly well what the position of the church is.” I hope that after all the mixed messages since the second council and the obvious dichotomy within the church, young people do indeed know what the position of the church is. I am not as confident as Pope Francis that they actually do.
I don’t see the problem of the Church partying out while the babies are being aborted, and the genders being distorted. Didn’t Jesus come to put smiles on our faces and push the Calvinist doctrine of fatalism that man cannot change, but is as he is?
Many of the declarations of our Pope Francis are difficult for me to understand. Like war on Pelagianism or confirming Gay Msgr. Battista Ricca at the Vatican bank.
We need to understand that Pope Francis was not declaring that to be gay is o.k. The conversation dealt with same-sex orientation and a priest’s decision and commitment to being chaste and who is Pope Francis to judge that priest’s intentions in terms of his sincerity. God gives us the grace to repent. True repentance means orientating ones life to the good; to what God wants. The sinner repents and God gives us His mercy instead of our just punishment. God continually calls to us. His mercy is always there but there must be a response from us. We cannot say God gives us His mercy but then go on living sinful lives.
Remember too, that the proscription on SSA candidates being refused the priesthood only came in 2005.
Consequently, there are consecrated priests who have SSA. Should they all be booted out even though they were ordained before this instruction from the Vatican? Are we going to insist that even is an ordained priest who never used deceit in order to win ordination is incapable of providing good service if he accepts God and faithfully obeys his vows (including celibacy)?
This, I believe, is the crux of Francis’ comments.
Hog dumplings, Mary M: your blog would not only emasculate a pope but dehumanize the laity. Why don’t you sodomites simply turn from your sin. You cannot conquer God, but only dig your Hell Pit deeper, by destroying your own souls and wreeking damage on faithful souls, not to mention countering ever effort of God to repair creation.
Maybe God has told the popes to ease up on their vine pruning being as the end of time is near. Maybe God has orchestrated the recent popes to draw His line in the sand, and now we’re simply awaiting the outcome. After all, at some point evangelism stops and dust is shaken off the shoes and left to settle.
The good news never ends, so neither does the evangelism.
According to the person who keeps advertising the “Reporter” on this site – – –
“The one word to describe Pope Francis’ papacy” is “REPORTER”, or “ALLEN”.
The original ban from 1968 that is still in effect – https://greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=00Cofv
” NOW, AS a last resort, I am forced as bishop to issue a condemnation of the National Catholic Reporter for its disregard and denial of the most sacred values of our Catholic faith. ‘…….”
“IN AS MUCH as the National Catholic Reporter does not reflect the teaching of the Church, but on the contrary, has openly and deliberately opposed this teaching. I ask the editors in all honesty to drop the term “Catholic” from their masthead. By retaining it they deceive their Catholic readers and do a great disservice to ecumenism by being responsible for the false irenicism of watering down Catholic teachings……..”- Bishop Helmsing
The 2013 statement from their current Bishop – https://catholickey.org/2013/01/25/the-bishops-role-in-fostering-the-mission-of-the-catholic-media/
” Bishop Charles Helmsing in October of 1968 issued a condemnation of the National Catholic Reporter and asked the publishers to remove the name “Catholic” from their title – to no avail. From my perspective, NCR’s positions against authentic Church teaching and leadership have not changed trajectory in the intervening decades. ” Bishop Finn (This article references several Canon Laws that the “NC REPORTER” is currently in violation of.)
Bishop Finn’s statement was a response to NCR’s calling on him to resign after he was convicted in criminal court of aiding and protecting priests who sexually abused children.
Did they request the same of Weakland ???
Weakland wasn’t convicted in court of a crime, Finn was. NCR carried quite a few stories and pointed opinions about Cdl. Mahoney and his coddling of pedophiles.
Some more differences: Weakland was bishop in Milwaukee, not Kansas City (NCR’s diocese). Weakland did retire, but it was because of his age. According to his Wikipedia page, he retired before the hush money payments to his boyfriend and his local pedophile scandal became public.
Francis this is false. It was an accusation/statement made by the NC Reporter which was totally UNRELATED to the NCR’s own heresy and schismatic editorials.
David:
If you check facts, you’ll see that it is true.
The history was that shortly after its founding in the 1968, Bishop Helmsing asked NCR to stop calling itself Catholic, but they refused. They continued publishing and had cordial relationships with Bishop Sullivan and Bishop Boland. With Bishop Finn, not so much.
According to an AP story this March: “A Kansas City-based newspaper known for unflinching coverage of the Catholic church scandal was rebuked by the area bishop after calling for his ouster.”
Tit for tat.
Thanks for the clarification Andy. Bishop FInn is a good man and faithful bishop! Only the liberal lost believe the lies spread about him by the mean-stream press. God bless you!
Please check out some of these resources on the true story of Bishop Finn and woe to those liars and slanderers who spread false and prejudiced information because their hearts are full of deceit.
https://www.justiceforbishopfinn.com/
Please check Wikipedia pages (and the external links to diverse news media) for NCR and Bishop Weakland before you trust an advocacy page to give you the straight story.
Dana:
How did he get convicted in court if he did nothing wrong?
Too bad the one word to describe this or any papacy is not “Jesus”. Why do people substitute all sorts of lesser things?
Bingo. It has been before our eyes for a week or more now, and who am I to be the first one in the world to get it? “Who am I to judge?” The Pope is asking us whom he should judge. Like duh, world and especially media … why did you spin it the controversial way instead of what he obviously means??? Pope Francis is asking us to point out, ie discern, whom he should judge. He is opening his ears but the media is jumping on the smear spin so quick that nobody got it. Pope wants to hear from us whom to judge, so start pointing out these errant souls and gay problem makers.
Even if you analyze the English grammar and come up with “Who” instead of “whom”, nevertheless his question remains in need of the object of judgment. Those readers who have no grammar insight, just don’t worry about it, and do what the media tells you.
Skai:
“…his question remains in need of the object of judgment…” I would have thought you, with you amazing insights might volunteer to be that object.
Thanks Andy for the links regarding the continued ban of the “National Catholic REPORTER”.
1968 – https://greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=00Cofv
and
2013 – https://catholickey.org/2013/01/25/the-bishops-role-in-fostering-the-mission-of-the-catholic-media/
I hope everyone will read them, and no longer read, do anything to support, or advertise the ‘Reporter’.
I was one of many who encouraged the current Bishop to make a statement about the heretical and schismatic ‘N C Reporter’. It is deceitful and fraudulent and frequently violates teachings of the Church while pretending to be ‘Catholic’.
” It is deceitful and fraudulent and frequently violates teachings of the Church while pretending to be ‘Catholic’.” Apparently none of that prevented Archbishop Chaput from granting John Allen an interview which NCR published
https://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/right-wing-generally-not-happy-francis-chaput-says
No connection, Francis; Jesus constantly has allowed interviews.