The following comes from a May 16 story by Brandon McGinley on TheFederalist.com.
“It was like some horrible crime committed in a dungeon, all unseen and unheeded, buried out of sight and of memory.”
This is how Upton Sinclair summed up the process by which hogs were transmogrified into meat in the turn-of-century Chicago meatpacking industry. It occurred in plain sight—he describes the horror on the faces of visitors to the plant—but Americans were broadly unaware of how their meat came to be. It took his novel The Jungle to douse the industry with public attention, resulting in reforms that still have force today.
I couldn’t help but think of the celebrated muckraker Sinclair as Philip Bump’s attempt to discuss when life begins on the Washington Post’s “The Fix” blog ricocheted around the Internet yesterday. It wasn’t just the content of Bump’s effort at explanatory journalism—the obedient acceptance of a pro-abortion organization’s spin, the ignorance of embryonic science—that was so galling. More than that, it was the posture of incuriosity toward his topic that showed just how poorly today’s media compares with the courageous figures of years past.
Bump writes with the insouciant incuriosity that defines media coverage of abortion in America: “‘Life’ is something of a philosophical question…” It never seems to have crossed his mind that whether the United States has permitted the genocide of 50 million human beings rests on the answer to this question. Bump and his media compatriots are content to leave this essential question sitting in shadow, even while shedding light is their job.
In the same way, the media continues to permit the practice of abortion in America to go on without scrutiny. Let us be clear: This is not a political complaint, but a journalistic scandal. The great conceits of journalism—speaking truth to power, confronting the public with uncomfortable realities, giving a voice to the voiceless—are all abandoned when it comes to abortion.
What if we had a latter-day Upton Sinclair willing to expose our abortion regime, rather than the incurious mandarins who pathetically claim his mantle? What would he find when he opens the door to the dungeon?
He would find systematic slaughter, but of children rather than hogs. In Delaware, Planned Parenthood nurses reported “meat market-style assembly line abortions.” The conveyor of pregnant women moved so quickly that bloody discharge remained on the exam table. We know about this only because courageous nurses came forward; one can only imagine how many other abortion facilities still operate in such putrid conditions.
He would find callous disregard for human dignity, as children are treated in life and death more like livestock than persons. Former Planned Parenthood director Abby Johnson (again, a whistleblower rather than a journalist) reports that the organization had abortion quotas it expected its centers to fulfill, because abortion is the most lucrative part of the Planned Parenthood business model. And only a few weeks ago we learned from The B.C. Catholic newspaper of the Archdiocese of Vancouver that children aborted in British Columbia were being incinerated as fuel in Oregon.
And he would find that the squeals of hogs have a human analogue, as well:
[Sherry West] hated working in the room where Gosnell performed abortions—never more than the night a staffer asked for help with a problem at Gosnell’s Women’s Medical Society clinic in West Philadelphia.
“There was this clear glass pan, and I saw it, and I thought, ‘What do you expect me to do?’” West testified Monday at Gosnell’s murder trial.
“It wasn’t fully developed,” West told the Common Pleas Court jury, referring to the 18- to 24-inch-long newborn in the pan. It didn’t have eyes or a mouth but it was like screeching, making this noise. It was weird. It sounded like a little alien.”
Questioned by Assistant District Attorney Joanne Pescatore, West, 53, said she did not know what happened to the “specimen”—the term she said she used because “it was easier to deal with mentally.”
“It really freaked me out, and I said call Dr. Gosnell, and I went back out front,” West added.
And when Dr. Gosnell arrived, we can safely assume, with a snip the screeching fell silent.
And the silence persists. The voiceless remain so, except for that terrible shriek of primordial fear. They have no champion to make them heard….
To read the entire story, click here.
Sorry to diminish Upton Sinclair in this context, but this Pulitzer Prize winner was a progressive who ran for office for the Democratic and Socialist parties and mercifully failed.
Why do men procreate if they are unable to follow with their unborn children?
Or a man think that just by placing his “seeds of life” into a uterus, he, the man has finished his job?
Isn’t the father responsible for providing food/ medical care ? Or the father may be willing to eat only half, and give the other half to his unborn child ( of course, through the umbilical cord of the mother, ha,ha,ha…).
So what’s your point, Jenny. If the man is unwilling or unable to do his duty (and with your rambling it’s hard to tell what you’re getting at here), then it’s OK to kill the innocent bystander (the unborn baby)?
If they write about abortion they condemn themselves, the media. They would also be condemning the medical profession, the educators and politicians. Exposing the horrors of abortion performed on the most vulnerable of us is not as important as protecting the power and money of others. Why did the press section at the Gosnell trial remain empty month after month of testimony? Why is the killing of unborn babies the lynchpin of progressive secular society? Why do so many Christians fall prey to the lies?
abortion is murder and it is evil. God have mercy on us all. God help us end this madness.
“California Legislature Approves Gender-based Abortions! (AFF)
Last week, the California Assembly Health Committee chose to reject a proposed bill that would have prohibited abortion based on a baby’s gender.
This should have been a no-brainer….of course we should not allow abortions based on gender selection. However, California has failed to support that logic, and the Assembly voted right down party lines, 6-13 against the bill.
Assemblywoman Shannon Grove, who brought the bill to the legislature, said, “I know that the political stance is normally pro-choice and under a woman’s right to choose but someplace there has to be a line where it’s not okay. And I submit to you today that it is not okay to have an abortion just because it is a little girl…”
We are saddened by this decision, and we ask for your prayers for the unborn who cannot speak up for themselves.