The second story I’d like to begin with is geared toward Beatles fans, of which I am one. Paul McCartney turned 80 years old June 18. He recently published a two-volume work entitled: The Lyrics: 1956-Present, by Penguin Books. In it, he tells the background and the inspiration for 154 of his songs.
I recently listened to a podcast interview between the publisher and Paul McCartney. When Paul was asked about the major influences on his lyrics, he pointed to his education. He attended the Liverpool Institute for Boys, a 7-12 public school in Liverpool. He related the books he read in school, works like the epic poems of Homer and Virgil, which he read in the early grades. He mentioned authors such as Shakespeare and Milton, and particularly “The Miller’s Tale“ from the Canterbury Tales by Chaucer. He said he laughed all the way through the tale for its outrageous humor. In the upper grades he read Dickens, Dylan Thomas, and Lewis Carroll, whose description of the Walrus was the inspiration for the song, “I am the Walrus“ on the White Album. Providentially, Paul met John Lennon at a church festival when he was 15 and, I guess the rest is history.
Whether you are a Beatles fan or not, the lyrics, words and melodies of those songs, absolutely captured the imagination of a whole generation. They spoke to millions around the world, people of all languages. Paul McCartney also studied Latin, German and Spanish at the Liverpool Institute for Boys. The Beatles made their debut on the world stage in Hamburg, Germany, where they sang many of their songs in German! The point is, “words matter.” The nature and power of language can never be underestimated.
These two stories illustrate that whether you are a university professor or a rock and roll star, a good grasp of language and familiarity with great literature can take you a long way.
We all know the nursery rhyme: “Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall/ Humpty Dumpty had a great fall/ all the king’s horses and all the king’s men/ couldn’t put Humpty together again.” It’s a kindergarten classic.
Humpty began his career 300 years ago as the name on a cannon in the English Civil War. His work as a talking egg in the fairytale industry came much later. His importance for us in this session is his co-starring role, with Alice, in Lewis Carroll’s strange children’s story, “Through the Looking Glass,“ published in 1871.
In that book, Humpty says, in a rather nasty tone, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” Put simply: Humpty, and Humpty alone, decides whatever his words mean. It’s the kind of self-assertion that marks Humpty Dumpty as one of the most prophetic political and educational theorists of the modern era. Here’s why.
Words are the basis of thought, belief, and action. A rich vocabulary expands our subtlety and precision not just in our verbal expression, but also in our thought. Thus – when properly used – language builds up the dignity of our species.
To the degree that a word accurately reflects reality – words like unborn child, man and woman, male and female – it tells the truth. And as Jesus himself once said, “the truth will make you free.” Not always comfortable, or happy. But truly liberated, and always free….
The ferocity of verbal abuse, physical violence, and irrational hatred unleashed by otherwise “progressive” people with the downfall of Roe is instructive. Roe v Wade was a badly reasoned decision that invented a “right” to abortion, unrelated to the Constitution or democratic process. But we now live in an environment where emotion substitutes for logic; where people have lost the skills of careful reasoning and cultural memory; where there’s your truth, and Ann’s truth, and Bill’s truth, and my truth. Which really means that there’s no truth at all; just the naked will to power….
The above comes from a talk given by Bishop James Conley of Nebraska to the Institute for Catholic Liberal Education and printed in the July 22 Southern Nebraska Register.
And so our beloved cultural elites, beholden to Humpty Dumpty, cannot decide on what a woman is.
What is a man?
Is this Humpty Dumpty asking?
A man is an adult male human being.
Sorry I stumped you.
The Beatles were a pop group with little musical talent– and little intellectual ability or schooling. They were just very average kids, fooling around, with a band to perform in some crummy bar or something,
on weekends. Their group was managed and marketed– as any pop group or product, as the latest fad for impressionable kids to spend their money on. Girls were paid to scream and fall at their feet, so they could hope to gain attention and popularity, and sell records. They couldn’t sing nor play instruments worth beans. A few of their songs were cute, marketable– but way too mediocre. They got into dope and a sinful lifestyle, which was a terrible influence on impressionable kids. By contrast– there are a great many kids out there, with beautiful, well-trained voices, and many talented kids in outstanding vocal/choral groups– as well as extremely talented kids who have mastered their musical instruments. Let’s hear these kids, instead– performing all sorts of musical styles, beautifully! A true artist does not need cheap marketing “tricks” to sell a mediocre product or fad. The beauty of their true talent is a gift of God, and a joy to all!
I grew up with the Beatles, being born in 1950. I remember the first time I heard I Want to Hold Your Hand and She Loves You. This music was exciting to me, an average teenager, and I do not apologize for that. The youthful exuberance of the early Beatles was a factor in screaming girls, not a paycheck to perform on the spot as you suggest. I was too busy enjoying the early Beatles to worry about how much talent they had, or whether their songs were mediocre. Later, when their music descended into themes of drugs and sex (compare I Want to Hold Your Hand with the later Why Don’t We Do It in the Road) I lost all interest in the group, and thankfully they broke up. Incidentally, I wrote a Responsorial Psalm using the chording of I’m Happy Just to Dance with You (sung by George Harrison in A Hard Day’s Night). So at least in one case I have found their music adaptable to sacred use.
After WWII, the economy boomed. Teen rock music got marketed to kids, like Coca-Cola– a catchy, popular fad. Serious types of music, performed by truly talented artists, is never a cheap fad. Like Coke– these fads are not really good for you– they are inferior, and based on money, not talent. Their agents use all kinds of gimmicks, to promote the act. The performers must have a couple of catchy, cute songs– but if they just have one, they cannot go far. If they can’t sell enough records, then the record company and the agent drops them. The agents hired by the Beatles had promotional schemes, and paid teenage girls to run and scream after this act, just as with other teen acts– like Elvis. Many young, impressionable kids like the excitement of these fads– but they do not necessarily like or dislike the performers or songs, etc. — they only buy the records, Coke, blue jeans, etc.– because it is a fun fad. And kids grow up and outgrow fads, and adopt mature tastes. The Beatles ended their shows after their 1966 SF show bombed– few tickets were sold, and they were sick of it all. They couldn’t even hear their own music, due to the fad of fans screaming at them. A few years later, they broke up. On a good pop music talent show, an act with “I Wanna Hold Your Hand” may not even pass auditions to perform. Honestly, there are better songs– with real singers, with good voices.
May I ask your age?
Dear Wasteland, your comment about the Beatles is unbelievably asinine. The Beatles are not my favorite pop/rock band (that distinction goes to the Rolling Stones for me), but to deny that the Beatles are talented musicians is honestly one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard. I mean, breathtakingly ignorant. McCartney and Lennon’s lyrical and melodic abilities are other-worldly, and virtually every well-known and talented musician on earth acknowledges this and understands it. You literally have no clue what you are talking about. I would advise you to go read up a bit more: they put in 10,000 hours playing together in Germany before they were even famous. They were a fine-tuned machine before they were ever even promoted on a world stage.
This brings me to a deeper question: why do so many of you baddie traddies just whine and complain about everything and have such a penchant for moralizing and making poor ad hominem or circumstantial arguments that have nothing to do with the issue in question? “This guy did drugs, or sang about drugs, or this other guy was a Communist sympathizer.” Mozart was a known womanizer, a prideful libertine of epic proportions. Should we banish “Ave Verum,” one of the most beautiful pieces of music ever written? If I’m not mistaken, both Moses and St. Paul killed some people before they got underway in their vocations. Are their messages compromised? Shakespeare mentions bad stuff in virtually everyone of his plays., should we avoid his books? He was even poorly educated by his era’s standards with respect to playwrights and he couldn’t spell. Is he a poor writer?
Moreover, your comment has absolutely nothing to do with the good Bishop’s point in the article, which is a thoughtful one. So why would you even bother to share such ignorance publicly? And what are you trying to achieve here? What good are you accomplishing?
No. Sounds like you were effectively brainwashed by Capitol record execs.! They succeeded! None of the Beatles could sing. The electric guitar is not a musical instrument to study and master. They had some cute, catchy songs, which record execs. and promoters hoped to make money off of. And they marketed to kids another dumb fad, which of course, didn’t last– the group broke up. You need to learn about good popular music, and good popular musicians– both singers and instrumentalists– who have real talent, have taken lessons, and have worked hard, to be really good. Don’t settle for cheap media marketing and brainwashing of American kids, who never grow up, never study mature subjects well, never develop intellectually– and never acquire mature tastes. “A fool and his money are soon parted”— by the cunning, crooked, corrupt, immoral, cheap American, “make-a-buck” media.
Just cause you don’t like it don’t mean it ain’t no good.
In many foreign cultures, in addition to serious classical music, there are a variety of traditions, in which many talented musicians of different styles can participate in. Also, there are many traditional folk songs and dances from cultures around the world. It takes talent and good musical training, to master these different styles. And in the Church, in every parish and school, there are many good voices that can be trained to sing well, in good church choirs, for children and adults. Before the advent of television, Americans had more interest in attending local concerts of talented classical musicians, both local artists of whom they were very proud, and famous artists on tour. And they participated more in community activities like church choirs, musical theater productions, plays, operettas, dance bands, orchestras, string quartets, and various traditional folk groups, of song and dance, of different nationalities. We do not need destructive “musical” forms like rock “music.” Much better, for people to regularly either participate in or attend really good musical endeavors! This also greatly strengthens our families, churches, communities, and our country.
At the high school I attended, there was an award-winning concert choir, an outstanding orchestra– plus, an outstanding danceband, a jazz band that toured professionally. A few years before I attended this high school, the Music and Drama departments had the talented kids write and produce a wonderful musical comedy, which became a big hit! A wonderful endeavor for kids, and for the whole community! Get rid of TV, rock “music,” and bad movies– these kinds of endeavors are so much better! And how about a great big, annual community or church Christmas play, involving kids of all ages– with lots of beautiful scenery, costumes, Christmas music, vocal solos, choral and instrumental numbers, and unforgettable memories, for everyone? I have some friends whose children were involved in community plays and musical theater, growing up recently, in rural Northern Calif. The mothers sewed costumes and helped with scenery. Then, after their kids grew up– these mamas were still helping out with these wonderful productions– with grandchildren. Many were Catholics, and had children in Catholic school, also.
From Creative Minority Report on the issue of heartbeat:
“In a world when nothing means anything, everything means nothing. They will twist words and meaning into what works for them politically because there is no truth. There is only what works politically.”
Us old timers call it lying.
I prefer really good, talented British popular singers. I would much prefer hearing the talented, popular British WWII singing star, Vera Lynn, singing “We’ll Meet Again,” or “The White Cliffs of Dover.” Or British Broadway musical star, Julie Andrews, singing a song from “The Sound of Music.” Much better popular music!
I never bought any of the Beates records. I could not stand John Lennon. He was a Communist through and through. Mc Cartney seemed a little better. There seemed to be some hope for him. May he rest in peace. As for the other one, I will leave his judgement up to God. Hope he repented, but I doubt it.
Oops, my mistake Paul Mc Cartney has not passed away yet. I hope the best for him. I so disliked John Lennon that I never kept up with the Beatles. I did like “Hey, Jude” and “Mother Mary Comes to Me”. They seemed to have decent lyrics.
The Beatles were one of many participants in the cultural decline that occurred as a result of the Church’s sudden failure to condemn the anti-God cultural revolution taking place in music, literature, movies and television. “Opening the windows” of the Church (to the world, flesh and devil) at Vatican II shut Her Divine Mouth at a time when She needed to speak most clearly and firmly.
Great video on this very topic:
“Biden, Barron & Bergoglio: Rockin’ the Post-Catholic World”
I liked the Bishop’s take.
MrBill– you are 100% correct. Plus, it made me sick, when smart-aleck John Lennon brashly proclaimed, that his group “was more popular than Jesus”– causing Christians to protest their performances. And some countries banned them.
Another big government liberal surprised (again) when Big Brother Dearest does “to him” in direct proportion to what it does “for him.”
No slight on the Beatles but I don’t hear Shakespeare, Milton, et al. in Yea, yea, yea; She was just seventeen and you know what I mean; and Shake it up baby now, etc. (Though “Love Me Do” does sound Middle English.)
I’ll wager he drifts off to sleep humming “Imagine.”