The Supreme Court late Wednesday night barred restrictions on religious services in New York that Gov. Andrew Cuomo had imposed to combat the coronavirus.
The vote was 5 to 4, with Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and the court’s three liberal members in dissent. The order was the first in which the court’s newest member, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, played a decisive role.
The court’s ruling was at odds with earlier ones concerning churches in California and Nevada. In those cases, decided in May and July, the court allowed the states’ governors to restrict attendance at religious services….
In an unsigned opinion, the majority said Mr. Cuomo’s restrictions violated the First Amendment’s protection of the free exercise of religion.
In a concurring opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch said Mr. Cuomo had treated secular activities more favorably than religious ones.
“It is time — past time — to make plain that, while the pandemic poses many grave challenges, there is no world in which the Constitution tolerates color-coded executive edicts that reopen liquor stores and bike shops but shutter churches, synagogues and mosques,” Justice Gorsuch wrote.
The court’s order addressed two applications: one filed by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, the other by two synagogues, an Orthodox Jewish organization and two individuals. The applications both said Mr. Cuomo’s restrictions violated constitutional protections for the free exercise of religion, and the one from the synagogues added that Mr. Cuomo had “singled out a particular religion for blame and retribution for an uptick in a societywide pandemic….”
The above comes from a Nov. 26 story in the New York Times.
The San Diego case
Attorneys from the Thomas More Society filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari Before Judgment with the United States Supreme Court in a federal religious liberty lawsuit against California Governor Gavin Newsom. On November 24, 2020, attorneys filed the request on behalf of South Bay United Pentecostal Church and Bishop Arthur Hodges III – asking the high court to settle the circuit split concerning the constitutional standard for reviewing Free Exercise challenges to pandemic restrictions. The church and pastor are asking the Supreme Court to put a stop to the discriminatory abuses of religious freedom by Newsom and his administration in their handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Thomas More Society Special Counsel Charles LiMandri explained the crux of the lawsuit.
“Governor Newsom, in revising his reopening restrictions under his new California ‘Blueprint’ framework, has not only continued his disparate treatment of places of worship but has exacerbated the discrimination by targeting a core practice of South Bay’s religious expression – the ability to raise one’s voice to worship God in song,” LiMandri shared. “While millions of Californians across the state in a wide range of industries have been able to resume working and shopping applying new mask-wearing and social distancing protocols, church services remain a disfavored activity in the eyes of Governor Newsom and the County of San Diego.”
In the first few months following the widespread implementation of COVID-19 restrictions by various state governors, the high court rejected South Bay’s previous application for emergency injunctive relief from pandemic restrictions that prevented the Free Exercise of religious beliefs. That first application challenged the restrictions in Governor Newsom’s executive order and California’s “Resilience Roadmap,” against in-person worship services. Justices Kavanaugh, Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch would have granted the emergency application and enjoined the restrictions back in May 2020. Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored a vigorous dissent, which was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.
A similar application out of Nevada was also denied by the Supreme Court, accompanied by lengthy dissent from Justice Samuel Alito, which was joined by Justice Thomas and Justice Kavanaugh, and separate dissents by Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh.
“No one can deny that the founders of our country considered religious liberty to be a freedom that should be unassailable from attack by any government even in the case of an emergency,” noted LiMandri. “The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that an ‘emergency does not increase granted power,’ however, the coronavirus pandemic has been used to justify the broad overreach of the police power of the state with regard to religious expression, effectively removing our cherished freedom of worship as a ‘first class right.’ We cannot afford to let tyranny against religion rise in the guise of well-meaning governmental ‘protections.’”
Newsom’s new “Blueprint” has manipulated data and definitions to increase reported numbers of COVID cases. In the widespread category, churches are categorized as “non-essential” are not allowed to open. As the same time, countless activities and industries are permitted to open indoors at full capacity, including – but not limited to – liquor stores, cannabis dispensaries, appliance repair, convenience stores, carwashes, florists, dry cleaners, hair salons, and pet groomers.
The “Blueprint,” which has no provision for returning to full liberty, only permits 50% church capacity at its lowest risk tier, in which less than one case per day can be found per 100,000 people.
“We seek relief from this outrageous abuse of power in the name of our sacred religious freedom, on the eve of Thanksgiving,” added LiMandri. “This national holiday is the modern incarnation of the feast celebrated 400 years ago by the pilgrims who came to the New World fleeing the religious persecution they experienced in Europe. The irony is that four centuries later, we must seek affirmation from the Supreme Court of those same foundational liberties on which America was constructed.”
In addition to Newsom, in his gubernatorial office, the complaint also names California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, Acting California Public Health Officer Sandra Shewry, San Diego County Director of Emergency Services Helen Robbins-Meyer, San Diego County Public Health Officer Wilma J. Wooten, and San Diego County Sherriff William Gore, each in his or her official capacity.
Read the Thomas More Society’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari Before Judgment submitted to the United States Supreme Court in South Bay United Pentecostal Church, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al., on November 24, 2020, here.
The above was emailed to Cal Catholic by the Thomas More Society on Nov. 25.
Very encouraging Catholics to fight back at anti-religious political dictators. Kudos to Bishop DiMarzio for taking the fight to the Supreme Court. Some bishops get it, and we should be thankful for them!
Cuomo and his ilk cannot shut down churches if we fight back. I’d rather see Catholic money spent on defending our rights to go to Mass than to pay out for clerical homosexual abuse lawsuits.
If all the churches opened tomorrow, I would not go. I don’t consider them safe at this time, when we are having the worst breakout since spring. But that being said, there should be fairness in the regulations. If Walmart can have 100 people inside at once, that a large church should be able to do the same. If a tattoo parlor is considered an essential business, then churches should be open. But, even in church people should wear a mask, stay six feet apart, and not sing and pray out loud. Remember “Low Mass?”
So stay home and pray, the rest of us will go to Mass.
Bob One:
Agreed. Churches should have rules comparable to other spaces of the same size and ventilation. I have no problem with that.
“If all the churches opened tomorrow, I would not go. I don’t consider them safe at this time, when we are having the worst breakout since spring.”
Cold and flu cases always go up during winter and late spring. This is because most people have to stay home indoors when it’s cold. And, pass around all those germs. This is info readily available on the CDC site. This is tracked every year and year after year.
Stay home Bob, wrap yourself in styrofoam if you think that will help you. The rest us will attend Mass in person. Thanks.
Been attending Mass since late June. Get over your paranoia & fear. If you practice social distancing & wear masks there is nothing to worry about.
So very curious…Actual Total Deaths From All Causes has remained at the same normal baseline level, around 58,000 per week, for two months now, since the Pandemic has subsided in September. This is NOT the same as total covid cases testing positive. Testing positive does not usually mean death, so all of these alarm bells about the large number of positive cases has not resulted in an increase in total deaths. This is based on CDC data tables, now, not what CDC is stating. Since you can’t seem to find this data table, Bob, eventually the URL will be posted here. Why CDC cannot present the facts from this data table is a question. One assumes it comes from tremendous political pressure from the Media. Eventually, the true data and facts will emerge, and the Media noise will also die back, probably very quietly.
Once again anon, formerly known as anonb, has got many facts wrong. Let’s go through this again, since ad nauseum doesn’t seem to be enough.
He is correct, a positive COVID test is not a death sentence, and because the population getting infected today is on average younger than those getting the illness earlier in the year, the case death rate has declined. But the number of deaths due to COVID is not at “baseline”, they are soaring according to the predicted month plus lag between getting the virus and dieing a horrible death unable to breathe in an ICU ward. We have already established that CDC death data is delayed by 8 weeks, so that means the deaths that are now showing in their “data tables” represents people who got the virus THREE MONTHS AGO. Now he complains that CDC’s statements contradict its own data tables.
Since anonb can’t give you a link to reliable CDC data, take a look at Johns Hopkins University data. I think you have to click on US, then on deaths in lower right corner, but you eventually get a graph that conclusively shows that deaths are soaring and are at an all time high in the US due to COVID. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html
YFC we know what you want a complete lockdown of everything and everyone while your leftist friends lord over us with iron fist.
What I want is to save lives.
I haven’t even said anything about a complete lockdown at all.
Whether you said or it not you support it…..
Bob One.. good don’t go…. want you to know I never wear a mask in church, ever.
Deo Gratis for prayers answered.
Over to you, Kevin T.
Ha! This is hardly back to normal. Get back to me when the pandemic is over and parish life and the celebration of Mass are back to normal. Talk about moving the goalposts or being desperate for something to cling to as a win or a sign. This Supreme Court ruling was correct, but it merely says that government cannot have more restrictive capacity limits for churches than it does for comparable secular establishments. Government may still impose a total prohibition of indoor worship if it imposes the same restriction on comparable secular establishments, such as in much of California in the purple zones right now. Ask the people of San Francisco whether going to purple in that city today is an answer to prayer. Indoor worship is now prohibited in S.F. and in about 94% of California. Answer to prayers? Back to you, sir.
God bless Bishop Di Marzio, for his courage and legal actions as a caring Shepherd. Perhaps he can wake some of the other bishops out of their slumber.
Great news!
Justice Barrett is already earning her wings.
God bless her.
Right, cuz politics is religion now…