The following comes from a Dec. 3 story on Life SiteNews.com.
A California school district committed to massively overhauling its harassment policy after a viral YouTube video showed a transgender boy having a spat with three girls – but there’s a twist: Police and school officials say the fight was not a “hate crime,” and that the transgender student started the fight.
The West Contra Costa Unified School District voted to draft a new anti-bullying policy last night after a 22-second video of the boy and three girls went viral on YouTube.
Jewelyes Guitierrez, a biological male, got into a heated discussion with a female student on November 13 in the courtyard at Hercules High School in the city of Hercules, about 10 miles north of Berkeley.
The Hercules Police Department investigated the altercation and found that Guitierrez slapped a girl in the face, prompting two girls to come to the female student’s aid. They briefly pulled the boy’s hair before he ran off.
All four students – the boy and three girls – are 16-year-old sophomores. All were briefly suspended and have returned to school.
After an official investigation, police said the incident was not an anti-transgender “hate crime.” School officials agreed. Adam Taylor, executive director of K-12 Schools for the district, said the fight was “not about the transgender issue. It’s really about friendships or allegiances.”
But the school released a clip of the short incident that was recorded on a cell phone. The transgender student was portrayed in national and social media as a victim, bringing new pressure on a school district that already has a troubled past.
Guitierrez gave his side of the story at last night’s public meeting.
“As I was telling [the female student] how she was being disrespectful and rude, she spits gum in her hand and throws it in my face,” he said. That prompted him to turn physical.
If Guitierrez was remorseful, the media did not report it. Instead, he appeared to defend his actions Monday night.
“People who are different, I feel, should stand up for themselves,” he said at the meeting. He then told a local NBC affiliate, “I was just sticking up for myself,” Gutierrez told the local NBC affiliate.
In August, Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill allowing students who call themselves transgender to use the restrooms, locker rooms, and hotel rooms of their professed sex. Pro-family forces have attempted to place an initiative before voters to overturn the law.
The result, they warned, would be uncomfortable moments, physical altercations or, as has happened numerous times in Canada, sexual abuse.
Similarly the media have not reported the females’ side of the story, or why they felt the need to help a young woman in a fight with a young biological male.
The school board voted to revise its bullying policy, with a final document coming up for ratification on January 29.
The former president of this Bay-area school board, Karin Fiffer (who is a lesbian) said that during her tenure on the board 2004-8, she aimed at “raising staff members’ sensitivity.”
Others hoped, regardless of the facts of the incident, that the new policy would change young people’s views and alter society’s views of sex and gender….
To read the original story, click here.
Many of these new rules regarding the so-called transgender kids are going to blow up in the state government’s faces. With whose money do they build the new restrooms for them ? Incidents like the one in this article will require another Solomon to make a “fair” judgment. Sanity requires limits on behavior. Accommodating every variety of weirdness is impossible, especially when normality is found to be just another form of weirdness by the all-wise state legislature. Time to hit the brakes and tell some groups to just shut up, for crying out loud !!!
Ted, there are some people who do have genital deformities, and these poor souls should not have to dress or use the restroom in front of others, and a lockable unisex restroom and private changing room should be provided for such students, so they are not teased nor made the butt of jokes. This law goes overboard, though, the other way. My objection to it is that it does not require a physicians notice but allows any boy or girl to use the opposite sex’s facilities just because the “feel” they are of the opposite sex. It is a recipe for disaster.
Correction: “they feel” in my second to last sentence.
Anne, I agree.
If people have a reason such as a deformity it would be a wise school administrator to do the compassionate thing and they should. But this is not aimed at them, it’s the ones who would like to be treated as “special” that schools will be forced to accommodate that I object to.
My daughter is a teacher. Already the high school in her small district (strapped for cash as well) has a boy demanding a transgender restroom. He has no deformity, and odds are he just wants to cause trouble for the district and school authorities. Making it a matter of law they must provide separate facilities or allow him to use the girls’ locker room is nothing short of asinine.
My son, when he heard about it said he wished he had the smarts to demand it so HE could use the girls’ locker room. He would have loved it. (making a point, he would not have done it)
This is why I left the State Asylum of Kalifornia.
I still life here, and I call it Tax-i-fornia the land of fruits and nuts!
May God have mercy on an amoral Amerika!
Viva Cristo Rey!
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher, Founding Director
Concerned Roman Catholics of America, Inc.
I am living in Indiana. Indiana has more sane people than California, and there are “only” about 5 million living here ! It’s an exercise in making one’s self sad to reflect on what California once was in contrast to what it is today. Thank the Democratic Party for it all.
No and yes, thank the Demoncrat Party of course, but what about the idiot voters and the “bishops” who pose for photo ops with the pro-abortion, pro-sodomite politicos, thus helping them get re-elected and elected?
We have just been disgusted with a front page story in the Tidings with Arch. Gomes portraying just that. If he ever tries to tell me he is pro-life, God help him!
We intend to have a large blow up of that picture ready for the March REC. By the way, if all goes well, I will be on “Church MilitantTV’s Mic’d up on January 8 to expose the REC to the world!
May God have mercy on an amoral Amerika!
Viva Cristo Rey!
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher, Founding Director
Concerned Roman Catholics of America, Inc.
Thank you Mr, Fisher for letting us know. Its sad that if our Bishops keep posing in pictures with those who defy the faith, its no different from someone who thinks of himself as a celebrity posing with their fans.
God bless you and Ill try to remember to watch church militant. Also sorry I haven’t contacted you as of yet, have been busy but Ill try to look you up soon. God bless you always.
The “anti-bullying” movement is a front for the sodomites. They use it to get children to be “non-judgmental” and “tolerant” and “loving” and “accepting” of “others”, with “others” being defined as sodomites and lesbians. Once they learn to love and accept sodomites and lesbians, they become open to trying it, which of course is what the sodomites and lesbians want, as they lust for nothing more than sex with children.
juergensen this is nothing but disgusting slander of gay people. You make up accusations out of your imagination and pass them off as facts. Disgusting.
YFC, your response to juergensen’s truthful post IS INDEED SLANDEROUS and inflammatory! But then again, when you are on the side of the “Kingdom of Deception” this is really all you have! Sadly, not everyone pushing this so called “anti-bullying” movement is queer or even supporters of the queer agenda! Some are, sad to say, merely “useful idiots”. Whether the movement was “started” by Queers or not, does not change the fact that they are currently the primary proponents and beneficiaries of the movement!
@ “Fellow Catholic” – What is disgusting is your lack of disgust at the fact that sodomites make up only 2% of the population but yet make up 33% of all child sex abusers, making them 16.5 times (1,650%) more likely to sexually abuse children than are heterosexuals. That’s disgusting, as is your lack of disgust. Shame on you.
The empirical research does not show that gay or bisexual men are any more likely than heterosexual men to molest children. This is not to argue that homosexual and bisexual men never molest children. But there is no scientific basis for asserting that they are more likely than heterosexual men to do so. And, as explained above, many child molesters cannot be characterized as having an adult sexual orientation at all; they are fixated on children.
Is it any wonder why more and more parents who are in a position to educate their children at home choose to do so? Children who are homeschooled have higher rates of successful admission to first rate colleges and do better in college once they are there. To increase your child’s chances of surviving childhood with body, mind and spirit intact, as well as maintaining his or her Catholic values, consider homeschooling.
Lets See now… He Hit Her, but She wont be charged with a ‘Hate Crime’ (See the Matthew Shepard Meth Dealer Thought Crime Law) – unlike Him, if Her weren’t a Her. sort of , only different.
Remember – Tommy T.P. Ammiano’s ‘Tranny-Potty’ Bill is coming up for a Vote (even f your local ‘news’ media censors any Debate – allowing only cheerleading) –
Besides – punch outs in the ‘Ladies Room’ are better done in the gym, where the Gaystapo can enforce the examples of their ‘tolerance’ pogroms more openly.
‘We shall either nobly save or meanly lose this last best hope on earth. A. Lincoln 1862
Have you ever heard of Graham’s Hierarchy of Disagreement?
There goes McDermott and his “gaystapo” libel again. Someday he and the editors will be sued for their crime. You can’t just make up untrue things about people and expect to get away with it forever.
YFC, You seem to conveniently ignore that one day you will have you answer for your choice of culpable ignorance…. Only you are allowed to say anything you want on this blog even when it is injurious to the teachings of the Church and the hearts and minds of others.
#1. YFC writes: “You can’t just make up untrue things about people and expect to get away with it forever.”
#2. YFC, You should not make up untrue things about the teachings of the Catholic Church and expect to get away with it forever. = Culpable ignorance
#3. Catholic Dictionary – VINCIBLE IGNORANCE
“Lack of knowledge for which a person is morally responsible. It is culpable ignorance because it could be cleared up if the person used sufficient diligence. One is said to be simply (but culpably) ignorant if one fails to make enough effort to learn what should be known; guilt then depends on one’s lack of effort to clear up the ignorance. That person is crassly ignorant when the lack of knowledge is not directly willed but rather due to neglect or laziness; as a result the guilt is somewhat lessened, but in grave matters a person would still be gravely responsible. A person has affected ignorance when one deliberately fosters it in order not to be inhibited in what one wants to do; such ignorance is gravely wrong when it concerns serious matters. (Etym. Latin vincibilis, easily overcome; ignorantia, want of knowledge or information.)”
1) You site “culpable ignorance”. Is this not an oxymoron? Does not ignorance itself mitigate culpability?, per the teaching our Church? I am not “crassly ignorant” of what the Church teaches. I merely ask whether, in the case of same sex marriage, whether there is sufficient biblical and traditional support for the positiont hat the church takes. Surely, the church cannot create teachings out of whole clothe. If the fathers and the scriptures made no opinion about same sex marriage then there can be no condemnation of it in the present day without complete accordance with the people of God.
2) you completely ignore my points in my post about the libel that CCD and its posters continually commit against specific people. Someday, they may seek recourse in law. You do not address this.
“If the fathers and the scriptures made no opinion about same sex marriage then there can be no condemnation of it in the present day without complete accordance with the people of God.”
YFC, No games. You are definitely CULPABLE and aware of the immoral activism that you are choosing to partake in. I do believe that you probably think that you are a hero for the ill fated followers (loss of eternal life) cause of same sex marriage but Sacred Scripture is clear. Homosexual acts were always considered such an abomination in Sacred Scripture. The modern day joining of an abominations and calling it marriage is only a modern day attack on Jesus Christ, no matter how legal the courts may say it is. Many of the so called people of God vote for abortion and it is legal too. The people of God once voted for slavery and that was legal too. There is no invincible ignorance taking place here. Just the false worshipping of the false god of homosexuality.
YFC, Also there is no such thing as a rainbow bible. Certain habitual sins such as pornography and same sex acts alter one’s brain chemistry and thinking. It becomes an addiction. As johnsiple said, “It took the desiring of the GRACE of wanting to not offend God and with the help of Our Lady and a good priest for him to choose eternal life over homosexual acts. If johnsiple can reach out for the grace and receive the help that he needed to stop hurting himself and offending God then others can too. You have a free will. Choose the joining of your temporary earthly abomination here or choose eternal life. OUCH that hurts me because now you are even more culpable.
Romans 1:26-32: For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a base mind and to improper conduct. They were filled with all manner of wickedness, evil, covetousness, malice. Full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity, they are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. Though they know God’s decree that those who do such things deserve to die, they not only do them but approve those who practice them.
1 Timothy 1:8-11: Now we know that the law is good, if any one uses it lawfully, understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, immoral persons, sodomites, kidnapers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, in accordance with the glorious gospel of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted.’
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
792 Ignorance of Christ and his Gospel, bad example given by others, enslavement to one’s passions, assertion of a mistaken notion of autonomy of conscience, rejection of the Church’s authority and her teaching, lack of conversion and of charity: these can be at the source of errors of judgment in moral conduct.
1793 If – on the contrary – the ignorance is invincible, or the moral subject is not responsible for his erroneous judgment, the evil committed by the person cannot be imputed to him. It remains no less an evil, a privation, a disorder. One must therefore work to correct the errors of moral conscience.
1794 A good and pure conscience is enlightened by true faith, for charity proceeds at the same time “from a pure heart and a good conscience and sincere faith.”60
The more a correct conscience prevails, the more do persons and groups turn aside from blind choice and try to be guided by objective standards of moral conduct.61
YFC, you said “If the fathers and the scriptures made no opinion about ________________, THEN there can be NO CONDEMNATION of it in the PRESENT day WITHOUT COMPLETE ACCORDANCE with the people of God.”
Accordance — To make conform or agree. To be in agreement, unity, or harmony.
YFC, I would be interested in knowing from where you derive this particular theology.
The problem, Catherine, is that you make up things when you say that I, for example, worship homosexuality. That is utter nonsense. Utter insulting nonsense.
What I am aware of is that the Church has no right to add to the deposit of faith. The Church got off to a bad start on the issue of marriage as soon as Saint Paul opined about not taking on a wife for the sake of the Kingdom. Well, perhaps I followed Paul’s advice a little too closely?
It inherited an Old Testament view of marriage which often involved multiple wives, concubinage, and other such notions that you would condemn as being outside of God’s plan.
And, it pretty much stayed out of the marriage business for almost a millennium, and only got into the marriage business mostly as a result of property rights issues.
So really, the claims that the Church always and everywhere declared marriage to be between one man and one woman do not hold up to any scrutiny whatsoever. Once one knows the history of marriage, one cannot go back and insist that God’s plan always and everywhere has been one-man-one-woman. To say otherwise is to create new doctrine, which is not permissible.
Were the Kings of the Old Testament damned to hell for having multiple wives?
Culpable ignorance, YFC: Seeing the train wreck coming, but putting your head in the black sack anyway so as not to upset yourself and to remove the discomfort of the nagging obligation to advise the truly unwitting to get out of the way.
Therefore the first natural bond of human society is man and wife. Nor did God create these each by himself, and join them together as alien by birth: but He created the one out of the other, setting a sign also of the power of the union in the side, whence she was drawn, was formed. For they are joined one to another side by side, who walk together, and look together whither they walk. Then follows the connection of fellowship in children, which is the one alone worthy fruit, not of the union of male and female, but of the sexual intercourse. For it were possible that there should exist in either sex, even without such intercourse, a certain friendly and true union of the one ruling, and the other obeying.
St Ausgustine, c. 401 AD
It may seem strange that the Council of Nicaea, (in 325 AD )known for affirming the divinity of Christ, also dealt with such matters [as marriage].. But, this is not so surprising given the context. According to Roman law (which applied throughout the empire) marriage was a private contract like any other contract—dissolvable by one or both parties. “Consequently, divorce was not difficult to obtain.” So Church leaders took a counter-culture stance, at odds even with practice within their congregations. When Chrysostom preached on divorce, he noted that some members of his congregation “hung their heads in shame,” and Ambrose found it necessary to instruct his readers not to make use of the government’s divorce laws. In fact (and likely with the empire’s toleration in mind), the Fathers were steadfast in their defence of marriage, which they saw both as a sacrament (symbolic of Christ’s relationship with the Church) and as a means of witnessing to God’s steadfast love for humanity.” Mystogogy website, John Sanidopoulos
YFC, the Catholic Church has always taught that marriage is between one man and one woman. It is dogma. Divine revelation in Holy Scripture and in Tradition: From Genesis Chapter 2:
21 So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh;
22 and the rib which the LORD God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man.
23 Then the man said, “This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.”
24 Therefore a man leaves his father and his mother and cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh.
From Matthew 19:
3 And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?”
4 He answered, “Have you not read that he who made them from the beginning made them male and female,
5 and said, `For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’?
6 So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder.”
7 They said to him, “Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce, and to put her away?”
8 He said to them, “For your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so.
9 And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another, commits adultery.”
10 The disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is not expedient to marry.”
11 But he said to them, “Not all men can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given.
12 For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. He who is able to receive this, let him receive it.”
YFC, Don’t feel alone or insulted. Misery has always loved company. Historically and tragically there are many other individuals just like you who are just as afraid to stop their slave-like worship of the false god of homosexuality. Your last post excellently showcased the terrible lies that have been taught and encouraged by those who also worship this same false god of homosexuality. These are often the lies that are being taught and protected under the guise of “being in full communion” but it is only a modern day version of the ages old attack and rejection of Jesus Christ Crucified. You are tragically following the father of lies who for generations has plotted to deceive the vulnerable and who also said, I will not serve. You reject Christ Crucified and choose lies because you reject anything that will interfere with your desire to serve your false god of homosexuality first. In order to justify choosing homosexual acts and same sex marriage, you must follow in the footsteps of others who also said, “I will not serve so I will create a new philosophy of thought and distraction and undermine Revealed Truths in order to call the ages old grievous sin and abomination of homosexual acts a new good to be considered for marriage.” Yes, YFC the father of lies has a very cruel shackle around your very worn and raw ankle and you are so consumed with protecting that particular vice that you are flailing out new lies and distractions and striking back at the One True God who suffered and died on the Cross to set you free of that particular chain. In this brief passing and temporary life you still prefer at this time to soothe that cruel death gripped shackle instead of soothing your immortal soul in preparation of your sharing in Eternal Life.
“We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.”
“Faith is the strength by which a shattered world shall emerge into the light.” – Helen Keller
St. Alphonsus Liguori — “He who trusts himself is lost. He who trusts God can do all things.”
OK, who’s gonna tell her/him about Plato?
“OK, who’s gonna tell her/him about Plato?”
How about the same kanonymous poster who selectively told us about the “reported flaws” of courageous and faithful priests who did not crumble when it came to upholding Church teaching on homosexuality!
Every priest does that.
“…Every priest does that.” If you truly believe that every priest upholds Church teaching on homosexuality, Anonymous, you are deluded. Or, and I repeat myself, you do not get out much, or read, or look beyond your own parish which must be a veritable gem.
Thank God for the grace you’ve received in the blessings you have. For if your priests are all faithful, you are gifted beyond imagining!
“Every priest does that.”
“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Lying in bed would be an altogether perfect and supreme experience if only one had a colored pencil long enough to draw on the ceiling.
― G K Chesterton
CONSISTENT FAITHFUL EXAMPLE AND CONSISTENT FAITHFUL ACTIONS ALWAYS SPEAK LOUDER THAN OCCASIONAL WORDS
“The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see Cardinals opposing Cardinals, Bishops against other Bishops. The priests who venerate Me will be scorned and opposed by their confreres (other priests). Churches and altars will be sacked. The Church will be full of those who accept compromises, and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord.
“The demon will be especially implacable against the souls consecrated to God. The thought of the loss of so many souls is the cause of My sadness. If sins increase in number and gravity, there will no longer be pardon for them.” – Message of Our Lady of Akita
SEE RORATE CÆLI – Burke out, Wuerl in at Congregation for Bishops
YFC, REMOVE CATHOLIC FROM YOUR TITLE! THERE IS NOTHING CATHOLIC ABOUT YOU! YOU ARE COMMITTING FRAUD AND SACRILEGE!
Ron, please stop screaming at me. I sit next to you in your pew, every single Sunday. I am therefore your fellow catholic.
YFC, if the Angels are present at Holy Mass are they also our “fellow Catholics”? How about if devils are present at Holy Mass are they too our “fellow Catholics”? A few years ago there was a con man who convinced a bishop in Arizona that he was a Catholic priest. He was assigned pastor of a parish. A few years later they discovered that not only had he never attended a seminary, he wasn’t even a Baptized Catholic! Was he also our “fellow Catholic”?
You may call yourself Catholic…et suppositio nil ponit in esse. My fellow Catholic is one who adheres to the Magisterial teaching of the Catholic Church.
Renewal of Baptismal Promises
A partial indulgence is granted to the faithful, who renew their baptismal promises according to formula in use; but a plenary indulgence is granted, if this is done either: 1) in the celebration of the Paschal Vigil or 2) on the anniversary of one’s baptism.
I, N. N., who through the tender mercy of the Eternal Father was privileged to be baptized “in the name of the Lord Jesus” (Acts 19, 5) and thus to share in the dignity of his divine Sonship, wish now in the presence of this same loving Father and of his only-begotten Son to renew in all sincerity the promises I solemnly made at the time of my holy Baptism.
I, therefore, now do once again renounce Satan; I renounce all his works; I renounce all his allurements.
I believe in God, the Father almighty, Creator of heaven and earth. I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord, who was born into this world and who suffered and died for my sins and rose again. I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of Saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body and life everlasting.
Having been buried with Christ unto death and raised up with him unto a new life, I promise to live no longer for myself or for that world which is the enemy of God but for him who died for me and rose again, serving God, my heavenly Father, faithfully and unto death in the holy Catholic Church.
Taught by our Savior’s command and formed by the word of God, I now dare to say:
Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name; thy kingdom come; thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread; and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us; and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen.
Prayer Source: Enchiridion of Indulgences , June 29, 1968
YFC….No you are not, never have been, never will be
Canisius never say never….people can and do repent and have conversions. We need to have hope for that, for their sake and salvation. Its called charity my friend but for now, in these threads, I can see why you feel so strong about his calling himself a Catholic….lets just say he is a fallen away Catholic for now and we can pray for the Prodigal son to return with a loving zeal to honor God!
Anonymous, thank you. The renewal of the baptismal vows is one of my favorite rituals of the year. The Triduum.
Even before I was a catholic, i participated in an entire reamke of the litugrical year in one week. Which is of course a reunion of the entire life of the Church. Which itself is the entire life of Christ.
As it is. As it should be. As it always will be. Thanks be to God.
Praise Be to Jesus Christ. in This life and the Next.
May all Gods children attend.
I guess that means you won’t be there
YFC see how Canisius cares about your salvation. He did not say that out of spite but it was a good honest question. It means that you have free will….he challenged you to make a choice….we continue to pray for you, we pray that you will choose Christ. If you can’t fight your flesh….then invite Jesus to help you…..ask with an honest heart, filled with love, humility and obedience. Ever heard of die of yourself? Be vulnerable unto our Lord, trust in His living blood.
“YFC” — You don’t have much of a grasp of libel law. You must first libel an identifiable person (in some rare cases a business) — not some general class of people, say all teachers or all redheads — and what you say must be provably false and not an expression of legitimate opinion. And, if you are able to establish libel, you must then prove you were economically damaged by it in some specific and calculable way if you hope to get a monetary judgment. What you are suggesting is an entirely different animal and it goes by a different name: CENSORSHIP.
YFC, the gaystapo wants 2 things 1) Validation 2) Control bet on it
YFC why do you hate freedom of speech? Freedom to reason! YOU want to censor people of faith! Let me tell you something, if you don’t like it, then go somewhere else where you will find like minded people…..there you will not be challenged to think but you will fit in, it won’t be hard to find that because as you can see…there are many more “gay” friendly spots you can find and join. Here we are only suppose to be honoring God, as imperfect as we are but we do try our best.
This is one of the few places where people should feel free to speak their faith, their honorable convictions….we need a place to escape from the harsh world who just wishes to censor us and condemn us for our morals. We need a special place and I hope that this is the website’s mission, is to allow the faithful do it peacefully, freely without censorship and without persecution, its worst enough that outside we are already being persecuted for our faith and morals…..but we need a place to allow us to share, speak and not be censored and its OK to censor trash that goes against our faith….because they have many more other places where they are not censored but they are so greedy that they want to take away the little that we have BUT who cares, I have Christ to answer to and He is my salvation…….
thereare human beings who are born with the organs of both male and female during my years at georgetown university, one of my professors, father john thomas, a jesuit was often consulted by us bishops when such a case came up ant person wanted to be baptized, they have souls just like you and me, anti bullying bullyin a ny form should not be tolerated people who bully some one who is different will not be taken to heavebheavebwhen their time arrives, let us love each other no matter the cost and leave the rest to the good lord
Thomas nawn, people who have actual deformities, and there are not that many, should be given a permission slip by their physician and/or the school supervisor to use the bathroom of their choice, according to their condition at the time, but allowing any child to use the opposite sex bathroom just because they “feel” like they are the opposite sex is just crazy and an opening for pure chaos. Quite frankly, I think a lockable unisex bathroom is the best for those with such problems. That way they will not be teased or embarrased. The same should be for changing stalls and showers. Have one lockable one in the boys’ and girls’ areas and only allow those with doctor’s slips to use them.
If I had to advise parents, I should tell them to take great care about the people with whom their children associate . . . Much harm may result from bad company, and we are inclined by nature to follow what is worse than what is better.
St. Elizabeth Ann Seton
I had to reread this and revisit because this is so true…..Praise God for St. Seton and all the saints.
You may have noticed, that for the most part, I have stopped quoting scriptural passages to these sodomites because: : “they will have eyes, but will not see, and ears but will not hear”!
The sad fact is that Our Blessed Mother, and even Her Divine Son, could tell them that they are in sin, and they would quote some sinful off the wall theologian, possibly from the REC, to justify their sins. In other words, they would even tell Our Blessed Mother and Her Son to get lost!
May God have mercy on an amoral Amerika!
Viva Cristo Rey!
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher, Founding Director
Concerned Roman Catholics of America, Inc.
Yes it may be true but to me quoting scripture is like saying an exorcism prayer…the word of God…also protects us and protects this website too….also encourages the rest who do listen