Cologne cathedral. “The vaults of the Sistine Chapel and the majestic spires of the Cologne Cathedral bear witness to the greatness of our past and faith in God.” (Photo by Pramio Garson Sembiring)[/caption]
The United States Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, delivered an important speech yesterday at the Munich Security Conference, in Munich (Germany), in a plenary session followed by a brief question and answer period.
The speech was an explicit reconstruction of the notion of the West in a Christian civilizational key. Not as a technical plea on security nor a conventional diplomatic piece: but as an identity-based claim. From a Catholic civilizational perspective, for Rubio the axis is not NATO nor the balance of power, but the historical consciousness of a shared spiritual tradition.
Thank you very much.
Today we gather as members of a historic alliance, an alliance that saved and changed the world. As you know, when this conference began in 1963, it was held in a nation — in fact, on a continent — divided against itself. The line separating communism from freedom ran through the heart of Germany. The first barbed wire barriers of the Berlin Wall had been erected just two years earlier. And only a few months before that first conference, before our predecessors gathered here for the first time, in Munich, the Cuban Missile Crisis had brought the world to the brink of nuclear destruction.
While World War II was still fresh in the memory of Americans and Europeans, we faced a new global catastrophe, carrying a type of destruction without precedent, more apocalyptic and final than anything humanity had known until then.
At the time of this first meeting, Soviet communism was in full expansion. Thousands of years of Western civilization were at stake. Victory was far from assured, but we were animated by a common goal.
We were united not only by what we fought against, but also by what we fought for.
Together, Europe and America triumphed, and a continent was rebuilt. Our peoples prospered. Over time, the Eastern and Western blocs reunified. A civilization became whole again.
The infamous wall that had divided this nation in two fell, and with it an evil empire, and East and West became one.
But the euphoria of this victory led us to a dangerous illusion: that we had entered, in the consecrated expression, the “end of history,” that from then on all nations would become liberal democracies, that the bonds created by trade would replace the very idea of nation, that the rules-based world order — a worn-out expression — would supplant national interest, and that we would live in a borderless world in which we would all be citizens of the world.
It was a harebrained idea that ignored human nature and the lessons of more than 5000 years of written history. And it has cost us dearly. In this illusion, we adopted a dogmatic vision of unrestricted free trade, while some nations protected their economies and subsidized their companies to systematically undermine ours, close our factories, deindustrialize broad sectors of our societies, offshoring millions of middle- and working-class jobs, and entrusting control of critical supply chains to adversaries and rivals.
We have outsourced our sovereignty more and more to international institutions, while many countries invested in massive welfare states at the expense of their ability to defend themselves. And this while other nations launched the fastest military rearmament in human history, not hesitating to use force to pursue their own interests.
To please a climate cult, we have imposed energy policies that impoverish our peoples, while our competitors exploit oil, coal, natural gas, and many other resources, not only to fuel their economies but also to use them as leverage against ours.
And, in the name of a borderless world, we opened our doors to an unprecedented wave of mass migration that threatens the cohesion of our societies, the continuity of our culture, and the future of our peoples. We have made these mistakes together, and together we must now face the truth and move forward to rebuild.
Under the presidency of Donald Trump, the United States of America will once again undertake the task of renewal and restoration, guided by a vision of the future as proud, sovereign, and vital as the past of our civilization.
And although we are willing, if necessary, to act alone, our preference and our hope is to do so with you, our friends here in Europe.
The United States and Europe are bound by indissoluble ties.
America was founded 250 years ago, but its roots exist much longer on this continent. The men who built the nation in which I was born arrived on our shores carrying the memories, traditions, and Christian faith of their ancestors, a sacred legacy and an unbreakable bond between the Old and New Worlds.
We belong to the same civilization: Western civilization.
We are united by the deepest bonds that nations can share, forged by centuries of common history, Christian faith, culture, heritage, language, ancestry, and by the sacrifices our ancestors made together for the civilization we have inherited. That is why, sometimes, Americans can seem a bit direct and pushy in our advice.
That is why President Trump demands seriousness and reciprocity from our European friends: because we care deeply about your future as much as our own. And if we sometimes disagree, those disagreements stem from our deep concern for a Europe to which we are linked not only economically and militarily, but also spiritually and culturally.
We want a strong Europe. We believe Europe must survive, because the two great wars of the last century constantly remind us that our destinies are and will remain indissolubly linked.
Because we know that Europe’s destiny will never cease to have consequences for our own national security. And this conference, which focuses largely on these issues, is not limited to technical considerations: how much we spend on defense, where and how we deploy it. These issues are important, no doubt, but they are not fundamental.
The fundamental question is: what exactly are we defending?
Armies do not fight for abstractions. They fight for a people, for a nation, for a way of life.
That is what we defend: a great civilization that has every reason to be proud of its history, confident in its future, and determined to remain master of its economic and political destiny.
Here, in Europe, the ideas that sowed the seeds of freedom and changed the world were born.
Here arose the rule of law, universities, and the scientific revolution.
This continent has given birth to geniuses like Mozart and Beethoven, Dante and Shakespeare, Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci, the Beatles and the Rolling Stones.
And it is here that the vaults of the Sistine Chapel and the majestic spires of the Cologne Cathedral not only bear witness to the greatness of our past and the faith in God that inspired these wonders, but also herald the wonders that await us in the future.
But only by fully embracing our legacy and being proud of this shared legacy can we begin to imagine and forge together our economic and political future.
Deindustrialization was not inevitable.
It was a deliberate political choice, a decades-long economic project that deprived our nations of their wealth, productive capacity, and independence.
And the loss of our sovereignty over supply chains was not the result of a healthy and prosperous trading system: it was a deliberate and senseless transformation of our economies that made us dependent on others and dangerously vulnerable to crises.
Mass migration is not, nor has it ever been, a marginal concern. It is a crisis that is transforming and destabilizing societies across the West.
Together we can reindustrialize our economies and rebuild our capacity to defend our peoples. But the work of this new alliance must not be limited to military cooperation or the reconquest of past industries: it must also aspire to promote our common interests and new frontiers together, to unleash our ingenuity, creativity, and entrepreneurial spirit to build a new Western century.
Commercial space travel, cutting-edge artificial intelligence, industrial automation, flexible production, Western supply chains for critical minerals, not vulnerable to blackmail from other powers, and a joint effort to conquer market shares in the economies of the Global South.
Together, we can regain control of our industries and supply chains and prosper in the fields that will define the 21st century. But we must also regain control of our national borders, controlling who enters our countries and in what numbers. This is not about xenophobia or hatred: it is a fundamental act of national sovereignty. Failing to do so not only means abandoning one of our most basic obligations to our peoples, but also poses an urgent threat to the very fabric of our societies and the survival of our civilization.
Finally, we cannot continue to prioritize the supposed world order over the vital interests of our peoples and nations.
We do not need to abandon the international cooperation system we have created, nor dismantle the global institutions of the old order that we built together. But they must be reformed. They must be rebuilt.
For example, the United Nations still has enormous potential to be a tool for good in the world.
But we cannot ignore that, today, on the most urgent issues we face, they provide no answers and play virtually no role.
They have not been able to resolve the war in Gaza. It has rather been American leadership that has freed the captives from the barbarians and allowed a fragile truce.
They have not resolved the war in Ukraine. American leadership has been necessary, in collaboration with many of the countries present here today, to bring both sides to the negotiating table in search of an elusive peace.
They have been powerless to stop the nuclear program of Tehran’s Shiite radicals. For that, 14 precision-launched bombs from American B-2 bombers were necessary.
And they have not been able to address the threat to our security posed by a narco-terrorist dictator in Venezuela. It was U.S. special forces that had to intervene to bring this fugitive to justice.
In an ideal world, all these problems and many others would be resolved with firm diplomats and resolutions. But we do not live in an ideal world, and we cannot continue to allow those who openly and brazenly threaten our citizens and global stability to hide behind abstractions of international law that they themselves regularly violate.
This is the path that President Trump and the United States have taken.
This is the path we ask you, here in Europe, to follow with us. It is a path we have already traveled together and that we hope to travel together again.
For five centuries, before the end of World War II, the West did not cease to expand. Its missionaries, pilgrims, soldiers, and explorers left its shores to cross the oceans, colonize new continents, and build vast empires around the world.
But in 1945, for the first time since the time of Christopher Columbus, it began to contract. Europe was in ruins. Half of its territory lived behind an Iron Curtain, and the rest seemed on the verge of following. The great Western empires had entered an irreversible phase of decline. This decline was accelerated by atheistic communist revolutions and anticolonial uprisings that would transform the world and cover vast areas of the map with the red sickle and hammer in the years to come.
In this context, both then and now, many came to believe that the era of Western dominance had come to an end and that our future was doomed to be a weak and pale echo of our past.
But together, our predecessors recognized that decline was a choice, and it was a choice they refused to make. That is what we did together in the past, and that is what President Trump and the United States want to do again today, with you. And that is why we do not want our allies to be weak.
Because that weakens us. We want allies capable of defending themselves so that no adversary feels tempted to test our collective strength.
That is why we do not want our allies to be hindered by guilt and shame. We want allies who are proud of their culture and legacy, who understand that we are heirs to the same great and noble civilization, and who, along with us, are willing and able to defend it.
And that is why we do not want our allies to rationalize the failed status quo instead of recognizing what is necessary to remedy it.
Because we Americans have no interest in being the polite and orderly guardians of the controlled decline of the West. We do not seek to separate, but to revitalize an old friendship and renew the greatest civilization in human history.
What we want is a revitalized alliance that recognizes that what afflicts our societies is not just a set of bad policies, but a malaise related to hopelessness and complacency.
The alliance we want is one that is not paralyzed by fear. Fear of climate change, fear of war, fear of technology.
On the contrary, we want an alliance that boldly charges toward the future, and the only fear we have is that of not leaving our children nations that are prouder, stronger, and richer.
An alliance willing to defend our peoples, protect our interests, and preserve the freedom of action that allows us to forge our own destiny. Not an alliance that exists to manage a global welfare state and atone for the supposed sins of past generations.
An alliance that does not allow its power to be outsourced, coerced, or subordinated to systems beyond its control, that does not depend on others for the essential needs of its national life, and that does not maintain the courteous pretense that our way of life is just one among many and asks permission before acting.
And, above all, an alliance based on the recognition that we, the West, what we have inherited together is unique, distinctive, and irreplaceable. Because that is, after all, the very foundation of the transatlantic bond.
By acting together in this way, we will not only contribute to restoring a sensible foreign policy. It will give us back a clear image of ourselves. It will give us back a place in the world.
And, in doing so, we will confront and deter the forces that today threaten to make civilization disappear, both in America and in Europe. Now that headlines announce the end of the transatlantic era, let it be clear to all that this is not our goal or our desire.
Because for us Americans, our home may be in the Western Hemisphere, but we will always be sons of Europe.
Our history began with an Italian explorer whose adventure into the unknown to discover a new world brought Christianity to America and became the legend that defined the imaginary of our pioneering nation.
Our first colonies were founded by English settlers, to whom we owe not only the language we speak, but also our entire political and legal system.
Our borders were shaped by the Scots-Irish, that proud and sturdy clan from the hills of Ulster that gave us Davy Crockett, Mark Twain, Teddy Roosevelt, and Neil Armstrong.
The great heart of the Midwest was built by German farmers and artisans. They transformed the empty plains into a global agricultural powerhouse. And, by the way, they greatly improved the quality of American beer.
Our expansion inland followed in the footsteps of French fur traders and explorers whose names still adorn traffic signs and city names throughout the Mississippi Valley.
Our horses, our ranches, our rodeos, all the romance of the cowboy archetype, which has become synonymous with the American West, were born in Spain. And our largest and most iconic city was called New Amsterdam before taking the name New York.
The year my country was founded, Lorenzo and Catalina Giraldi lived in Casal Monferrato, in the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia. José and Manuela Reina lived in Seville, Spain. I don’t know what they knew about the 13 colonies that had gained independence from the British Empire. But there is one thing I am sure of: they never would have imagined that, 250 years later, one of their direct descendants would return to this continent as the chief diplomat of this young nation.
And yet, here I am, recalling my own history, that our stories and our destinies will always be intertwined. Together we rebuilt a continent shattered after two devastating world wars.
When we found ourselves divided again by the Iron Curtain, the free West joined the brave dissidents fighting tyranny in the East. To defeat Soviet communism. We fought each other, then reconciled, then fought, then reconciled again.
And we shed our blood and died shoulder to shoulder on battlefields from Pyongyang to Kandahar.
Today I am here to clearly affirm that the United States is charting the path toward a new century of prosperity. And that, once again, we want to do it with you, our valuable allies and our oldest friends.
We want to do it with you, with a Europe proud of its legacy and its history.
With a Europe that possesses the spirit of creation and freedom that sent ships to unknown seas and gave birth to our civilization.
With a Europe that has the means to defend itself and the will to survive.
We must be proud of what we have achieved together over the last century, but now we must face and seize the opportunities of a new century.
Because yesterday is gone, the future is inevitable, and our common destiny awaits us.
Thank you.
From Infovaticana
Watch adress live here.
Click here to read how media and Gavin Newsom and AOC interprest Rubio’s remarks.







Secretary Rubio’s statement, “… we Americans have no interest in being the polite and orderly guardians of the controlled decline of the West” is true and important.
It seems a few words of that sentence could be changed and applied to pastors and bishops: “… we bishops and pastors have no interest in being the polite and orderly guardians of the controlled decline of the Church.”
Yet, it seems many do. A Church in maintenance mode at this time is a dying Church. Only a Church with missionary disciples will grow in our post-Christian, yet apostolic, age. “Business”/ministry as usual is failing. Our Faith will never change. Its truths are eternal. Yet, how we live it with others and in the world needs to change. No more happy talk. Kindness is a virtue. Being nice is not a fruit of the Holy Spirit. Bishops and pastors, please look around and see growing, successful examples and try them in your parish or diocese. God will provide the necessary grace. What have you got to lose? If something doesn’t work, well, at least you’ll know two things that don’t work (because what we’re currently doing in most places is not working). Remember our Lord’s promise that the gates of hell will not prevail against the Church. Gates don’t move and attack the Church. Rather, we are called to advance against the gates of hell, smash them and set captives free. By His grace, let’s be spiritual doorkickers for the kingdom of God and His glory.
Msrco Rubio– you need a new, well-educated speech-writer. One never places great geniuses like Mozart, Beethoven, Shakespeare, Dante, Michaelangelo, and Leonardo da Vinci in the same category as degenerate, ignorant, untalented rock “music” groups, making a bunch of noise for fame and money– a horrible, Godless, immoral influence on Western civilization. Great geniuses are extrenely gifted and rare– their truly great art glorifies God. Commercial endeavors for fame and money– selling cheap, non-nutritional Coca-Cola to drink, cigarettes that cause lung cancer, or selling destructive, loud noise and filth in rock “music” — like Bad Bunny, the Rolling Stones, or the anti-Christian, dope-selling Beatles– no. Please re-write your speech. The rest of it is pretty good.
As you said, “filth in rock music”, I assume you mean only the bad, vulgar kind. There is a difference between what is called “light rock” and “hard rock”. The latter is usually extremely vulgar with bad content or gestures. It is the same with classical music. Some of the musicians and authors led or lead fairly decent lives, and their music is good, and others were or are very sinful, and their music’s meaning is bad, so we should not put all music of the same genre in the same category.
Light pop music, performed well, is good for a culture. What is so bad, is that since the 1960s, many kids have been way too involved following musically untalented, untrained, bad “rock stars” — as a fad–not as real, excellent, beautiful and good music– just as a fad. They created dangerous “kid cults,” of mindless zombies– imitating all of the “rock stars'” horrible sins– ruining their lives– and destroying our culture. The “rock stars” got the “mindless zombies” to be rebellious, lawless, hooked on drugs, promiscuous, using obscenities, and abnornally mentally and physically degenerate, sick and completely destroyed in body and soul. By contrast– classical music, art and literature may also have some terribly immoral figures– but they are followed by intellectual fans and critics who would never imitate the artists’ “lifestyles” — like stupid, non-intellectual, mindless zombies. They always feel sorry for classical artists of any kind, who are immoral and do stupid things, and ruin their lives. Franz Schubert, the musical genius who wrote the music to vwhich the “Ave Maria” prayer was later set– lived a poor life, visited prostitutes, and died young, of syphilis. People felt sorry for him and his sins. True geniuses, like Michaelangelo and Mozart, are very rare, and greatly uplift a culture. They deserves our deep admiration and respect.
Long ago, when young, I knew young people who auditioned for good high school musicals, like “The Sound of Music,” and musical talent was discovered and trained– and future musical careers were born– both classical and good, traditional popular musical styles. I knew this one girl who was picked to play the role of the Mother Superior in “The Sound of Music”– and everyone beheld a sudden operatic talent being born, that this girl never knew she had! She got a scholarship as a music major in college, and ended up joining the San Diego Opera. Likewise, it is wonderful for young people to get involved in “Messiah” productions at Christmas. Or audition to join the chorus for a production of Beethoven’s “9th Symphony.” You will just love it! All of this is good for everyone in our culture. The horrible, degenerate, “Bad Bunny”- type of bad rock “music”– should be unwanted, and not be allowed to flourish.
Hispanic parents and Catholic nuns and lay teachers in Mexican and Latin American Catholic schools, have all been deeply concerned about their children listening to Bad Bunny songs and imitating him. Apparently, Bad Bunny cleaned up his Spanish songs in his all-Spanish Superbowl halftime show. It is said that Bad Bunny uses the most filthy obscene Spanish slang words of the lowest gutters, explicitly describing sex acts, gay sex acts, drug experiences, and similar trash– and sometimes dresses and acts as a transgender. None of this filthy material is known to English speakers who may study Spanish in school– thank God! It should all be strictly illegal. Bad Bunny and all others in commercial music are only there to make money off dummies who will buy it. Commercial music– good or bad– is based on what they can sell to the public– it is not based on talent. As is said with drugs and human trafficking– no buyers, no business– end of business. Go do something else to make money.
Franz Schubert, who had a famous musical composition paired with the “Ave Maria” prayer, was born in Vienna, Austria, to a musical family, and was a huge musical genius, from birth. He won musical scholarships, and became a brilliant musician and composer–but suffered in poverty, and could not figure out how to earn a living. His friends helped him, and supported him. He fell in love with a girl in his late teens, but could not qualify for marriage, due to impoverishment, sadly. This girl was a Catholic singer, and Schubert, also Catholic, wrote some beautiful liturgical works in her honor. Schubert eventually got disillusioned, and historians say that he went on a “pleasure jaunt” with some friends one evening– to a very bad place… and died soon after, of syphilis, aged 31. His loss was greatly mourned.
I like Marco Rubio’s speech. I am not offended by his mention of popular musicians. I figured that he was trying to expand his reach to those who are not able to appreciate the importance of classical geniuses. What Marco Rubio might not understand however, is that most of Europe has rejected Jesus Christ. Even though his speech is good, the Europeans are likely to be offended by it, since they have rejected Jesus Christ.
There are timeless, memorable, beautiful popular love songs, patriotic songs, story-telling songs, songs for particular traditional dances, and other types of songs, in every language and culture, beloved and cherished for generations, by all. When young, my Italian grandfather taught me to sing beautiful, traditional Neapolitan (Italian dialect) songs from his native Naples, Italy, and I sang one of his favorites at his funeral. I bet Msrco Rubio has some beautiful, timeless Spanish love songs that he knows and loves, from his tremendous Cuban cultural heritage.