The following essay by Ross Douthat appeared in the New York Times on August 11.
So far, Romney has said very little about his faith in this campaign, which is clearly how he likes it. Indeed, his campaign has pushed back vigorously against even innocuous press coverage of Mormon folkways and beliefs, on the theory that trying to explain a much-distrusted, much-misunderstood religion could only distract from the economic message.
But across a long summer of negative attacks, the Obama campaign has succeeded in weakening that message, and turning the conversation to Romney’s character instead. This means the Republican convention can’t just offer an extended indictment of the Obama record; it also needs to reintroduce Romney in a more thoroughgoing way. And if his faith ends up on the cutting-room floor, this reintroduction will be missing something that’s not only essential to the candidate’s life story, but also helps makes the case for his worldview.
Start with Romney the man, so often dismissed as hollow, cynical and inauthentic. His various political reinventions notwithstanding, Romney clearly does have deep convictions: the evidence is in his intense commitment to his church, as a local leader and as a philanthropist. Between the endless hours of unpaid, “love thy neighbor” efforts required of a Mormon bishop and the scope of his private generosity, the caricature of the Republican candidate as a conviction-free mannequin mostly collapses.
If Romney were a Presbyterian, Methodist or Jew, this would be an obvious part of his campaign narrative. Like George W. Bush’s midlife conversion or Barack Obama’s tale of “race and inheritance,” Romney’s years as a bishop would be woven into a biography that emphasized his piety and decency, introducing Americans to the Romney who shut down his business to hunt for a colleague’s missing daughter, the Romney who helped build a memorial park when a friend’s son died of cystic fibrosis, the Romney who lent money to renters to help them buy a house he owned, and so on down a list of generous gestures and good deeds.
The broader Mormon experience, meanwhile, could help make the case for his philosophy as well as illuminate his human core. The presumptive Republican nominee is not naturally ideological, but he’s running as a critic of Obama’s expansive liberalism, and as a standard-bearer for a conservative alternative.
Conservatism sometimes makes an idol of the rugged individual, but at its richest and deepest it valorizes local community instead — defending the family and the neighborhood, the civic association and the church. And there is no population in America that lives out this vision of the good society quite like the Latter-day Saints.
Mormonism is a worldlier, more business-friendly religion than traditional Christianity, but it does not glorify wealth for wealth’s sake, in the style of many contemporary prosperity preachers. Instead, as Walter Kirn suggested in an essay in The New Republic, Mormonism represents “our country’s longest experiment with communitarian idealism, promoting an ethic of frontier-era burden-sharing that has been lost in contemporary America.”
To spend some time in Salt Lake City and its environs, as I did earlier this summer, is to enter a world where faith, family and neighborliness really do seem to fill the role that liberals usually assign to the state. There you can tour the church-run welfare centers, with supermarkets filled with (Mormon-brand) products available to the poor of any faith and assembly lines where Mormon neurosurgeons and lawyers volunteer to can goods or run a bread machine. You can visit inner-city congregations where bank vice presidents from the suburbs spend their weekends helping drifters find steady work, and tour the missionary training center where Mormons from every background share a small-d democratic coming-of-age experience.
And then you can read the statistics: the life expectancy numbers showing that Mormons live much longer than other Americans, the extraordinary rate at which they volunteer and donate, their high marriage rates and low out-of-wedlock birthrates — even the recent Gallup survey showing Utah leading all other states in a range of measures of livability.
To read entire story, click here.
OMgosh lets not get in the topic of Morman, I prefer to stay out of this one for now…..lets just focus on getting Obama out!
Get the man elected. We need his time and expertise. The alternative is earthshaking!
The Mormon religion may be strange, but what I do know from experience is that they are pro-family, Pro-marriage (real marriage not the make believe same sex idea of marriage), and pro-life. Vast improvement to the murderous Marxist we have in office now.
Mormon theology is like countless pre-Christian theologies, only with a Christian aspect. Find any typical protestant or Catholic and compare/contrast their lives to Catholic theology: Like much of Islam, much of Christianity lives a rather pagan life filled with countless little idols and adultries. And look at the practical lives of Catholic bishops … money, money, money. So then, what is the argument once again that Mormons focus on worldly concerns more than Catholics or Protestants?
The word communitarian has strong association with socialism at least politically. Communitarian also is described as “the third way,” or political compromise. So, I don’t see the connection between Romney’s Mormon faith or political beliefs and communitarianism. I think Mr. Douthat is trying subtly to introduce the subject of the Mormon faith into the political dialogue. I sometimes believe that the Mormons are now the keepers of the flame of Love thy neighbor as thyself for the love of God.
The history of the Mormon Church’s early prophets is almost entertaining to read because of the ignorance, for example, of geography by Joseph Smith who revealed it in the first book. His church has also been forbidden by law to practice marriage to more than one wife-a fact which shows that we really can’t practice religion legally free from government intrusion. While shuddering at the likes of hypocrite Nancy Pelosi, we also can’t ignore an EFFECTIVE person at her goals-which are pretty obvious-and we MUST appreciate that the PERSON is the one we are faced with choosing, not the creed that MAY POSSIBLY have some influence on them.
I find Mormons sincere and they DO love their neighbour.I would have no complaints with a Mormon President,or a Jewish one or a REAL Catholic one either.
Gordon, that’s why we desperately need Romney / RYAN!!
Please let’s all do a novena between St. Jude’s feast day (Oct. 28 and Nov. 5 pre-election day !) We really need to storm heaven!
I believe that Satan holds sway over this present administration and 4 more years and there will be a shell,a grotesque caricature of America and I say this as a CANADIAN Catholic who DOES have a dog in this fight.My best friend is in trouble and my Faith is under siege whether in Nigeria or the USA.
I will join you in your Novena,Sue.
Thank you Canada’s Gordon Campbell. You are so right!
Yes pray, fast and offer up offerings that our Lord will forgive us and help us bring back America in honoring Him….fearing the Lord…..There was once a time when USA citizens may have been sinners and sinned but they never stopped acknowledging that there was a God…They feared the Lord….it showed in their actions, writings etc…it showed but today, we hardly see good common sense and common decency.. Blame it on the perversion of Sodomy and all unnatural demise.
The question of whether church and state are truly separate is answered by the word, “No.” When those who practice a religion which advocates the breaking of the law are brought to justice, the state has jurisdiction. In other words, Mormons were require to cease practicing polygamy because it was against the law, just as they, or any other religious group, would be prohibited from practicing murder, rape, or any other scourge upon the community. In our society, it was agreed and presently remains agreed that more than one wife or husband at a time is detrimental to society and to individual members thereof; therefore, that aspect of religious practice was and remains illegal, and being a member of a specific church or other religious institution does not exempt one from obeying the law of the land. Church and state co-exist separately within the same society, and the state has primacy. Church hierarchy put itself above the law when it failed to report serious sex crimes against children (and women, for that matter), and I think they now realize that state law cannot be ignored simply because one is ordained, as they should have, of course, all along.
Good comments, Maryanne, I agree.
MaryAnne,
You need to explain yourself better. From what I read in your statement, we should obey the primacy of the State and allow the killing of the unborn. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher
My allegiance is to God and His Church-not Caesar.According to the John Hopkins Study Catholic priests are the least culpable and most unlikely to offend.The family is the most dangerous place with 4-5 per cent inclined to pedophelia and hebephelia.The public school system is the absolute worst.
Your posit leaks like a pot without a bottom.
Man did not create the world in which he llives
and can not function properly without his God.
While I am no great Romney fan I have yet to meet a Mormon who didn’t seem to be a very decent human being in comparison to others.
Romey’s religion is a ‘ red herring ‘ argument.
Surely ANY man who has a healthy respect for God is better than this Godless one who dictates to us now.
Devout Irish Catholic.
Well said Mr. McCrory!
Yes, Kenneth, I mean exactly that. Much as I hate abortion, and believe me, I have extreme personal reasons to hate it as well as personal philosophical and profoundly religious reasons to hate it, as law-abiding persons, we cannot interfere with a woman’s right to murder her child. All we can do is work against the law, and failing that, all that remains for us to do is to work as hard as we can to sway public opinion so decisively against abortion as for it to become as rare as killing one’s mother – in other words, engaged in only by the deranged and mentally ill. I do not advocate the breaking of the law under any circumstances, but I do agree that abortion is murder and that we must work hard and unceasingly to stop it – stopping short, ourselves, of criminality. To do otherwise would harm ourselves as individuals, harm our standing in the community as Catholics and advocates of life, and harm our cause irretrievably in the eyes of the public.
wow this is not good……looks like Obama will have another shot at staying President due to the lack of good reasoning here…
I live not far from Oberlin, which in the days of slavery was a major center for taking in runaway slaves in the ‘underground railroad’ and sending them to safety in Canada. Many brave souls in WWII took in Jews and hid them in their homes until they could eventually find transportation to safety. These people were breaking the law of their land as well as risking their own safety. When laws are in contradiction to God’s laws, we are not called to obey them. It’s just common sense. It could be said that 55 million babies have been killed because we’re all so law abiding. People have become so obedient they will probably be lining up to be euthanized when it becomes not only legalized but mandatory. Also, apropos of nothing, we are not only called to protect life but to spread the good news. We’ve become so respectful of other people’s religion that few are sharing the Gospel message because we might offend those that don’t agree with us. We’re not just ‘some other denomination”. We’re not just one religion among many. Either we believe what Jesus told us, that He is the Way and the Truth and only through Him may people come to the Father or we’re living a lie. To be truly obeying Christ’s command to go out unto all the nations means we’re going to be 1.unpopular and 2. probably breaking a law somewhere.
The Evil one has a strong hold on many, he is fooling us and wants more of Obama’s of this world to rule…..
Read the crux of the story folks – rather than OBAMA telling us all the good things he has accomplished in almost 4 years ? ? ?,
plus what he intends to do in the future, he merely attacks Romney –
and uses the secular media to do it.
Let’s get back to the real issues, rather than allowing Obama to dictate our conversations. Make Obama run on his own record.
I would vote for an atheist-for-life over any abortion-and-homosexual-loving-“Catholic”, no matter what the USCCB says.
Juergensen, abortion is an action, homosexuals are human beings. Are you saying that an atheist that hates homosexuals is better than a devout Catholic who feels homosexuals should be treated with dignity and kindness?
PA, in the case you describe, the atheist would be the more honest of the two types, and thus closer to the truth. Why? Because the hypocrite Catholic spits in the eye of God, whereas the atheist says he sees no evidence of God. One says he believes in God but defies God, and the other says he does not believe in God and proceeds according to his profession. In other words, PA, the Catholic hypocrite acts against his or her profession, whereas the atheist does not but acts according to his or her profession. The hypocrite is unethical and the atheist is ethical. An animist will gain Heaven long before a Catholic hypocrite who will never gain Heaven.
JLS, you say an animist will go to Heaven long before a Catholic. I never heard anyone say such a thing. By our belief in Our Lord Jesus Christ we are saved by His mercy. Jesus said that to love our neighbor as ourselves was one of the great commandments. So if a Catholic loves gay people he is not being a hypocrite but is following the teachings of Jesus Christ.
That is not what I posted, PA.
if a catholic country like austria had a jewish chancellor, bruno kreisky, from 1970 to 1983, i guess we can have a mormon president.
given what the jews suffrered in austria, it continues to amaze me that they elec5ted a jewish chancellor, but there you have it.
England had a Jewish prime minister…Benjamin Disraeli, 1st Earl of Beaconsfield, and a favorite advisor to Queen Victoria. He also wrote some very popular novels. I have no problem with a mormon president, as long as he is Mitt Romney. I draw the line at another mormon, Harry Reid. It’s a man’s morals and principles that matter. John Kennedy, for all that was not very Catholic at all. He as much as said his Catholicism won’t interfere with his decision making and he was basically right. I hope Catholics aren’t going to sit out this election because of Romney’s mormonism! That is tantamount to voting for obama, isn’t it?
FROM THE WEBSITE OF E.W.T.N. ON WHY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DOES NOT RECOGNIZE MORMON BAPTISM:
“Difference of views:
“Mormons hold that there is no real Trinity, no original sin, that Christ did not institute baptism
“Summing up, we can say:
“The Baptism of the Catholic Church and that of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints differ essentially, both for what concerns faith in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, in whose name Baptism is conferred, and for what concerns the relationship to Christ who instituted it. As a result of all this, it is understood that the Catholic Church has to consider invalid, that is to say, cannot consider true Baptism, the rite given that name by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday Saints.”
Why is CCD reprinting the tripe and policially biased material from the New Yuk Times?
By the way Romney was on EWTN, Raymond Arroyo’s News show – “World Over Live’ this evening. Very good show.
He’s a good and moral man.
Obama and his attack dogs only attack Romney personally because they can not run on Obama’s record for the past 3 1/2 years – which is abysmal on every level. Obama can not tell us what Obama has done that is good for our Country, and for his 1st two years his Party held the House and Senate.