The Bishop of San Diego has explained why he did not respond to a 2016 letter alleging sexual misconduct on the part of Archbishop Theodore McCarrick and other Catholic clerics.
The letter was sent to Bishop Robert McElroy by psychotherapist Richard Sipe.
McElroy has been reported as a frontrunner to succeed Cardinal Donald Wuerl of Washington, DC. Calls in recent weeks for the cardinal’s resignation follow an Aug. 14 Pennsylvania grand jury report on clerical sexual abuse, which questions the cardinal’s handling of sexual abuse allegations during his tenure as Bishop of Pittsburgh.
McElroy now faces questions regarding accountability and transparency surrounding abuse reports.
A former Benedictine priest, Sipe left the priesthood in the 1970s and married a former nun. He then spent several decades studying clerical sex abuse and calling for reform, and was a source for the Boston Globe team of reporters who broke the story of the 2002 Church sex abuse scandal.
Sipe wrote to Bishop McElroy in 2016, listing allegations against half a dozen bishops – including then-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick – and warning of a broader problem of chastity violations among clergy.
“Sooner or later it will become broadly obvious that there is a systemic connection between the sexual activity by, among and between clerics in positions of authority and control, and the abuse of children,” Sipe wrote in the letter.
“When men in authority – cardinals, bishops, rectors, abbots, confessors, professors –are having or have had an unacknowledged-secret-active-sex life under the guise of celibacy an atmosphere of tolerance of behaviors within the system is made operative.”
The letter, which was published on Sipe’s website, drew media attention following the psychotherapist’s death earlier this month.
On Aug. 17, McElroy issued a public statement on the matter, noting Sipe’s death on Aug. 8. He said that Sipe had requested to meet with him about clergy sex abuse in 2016.
Over the course of “two long, substantive, cordial and frank discussions about the history of clergy sexual abuse in the United States,” McElroy said, Sipe made allegations against several bishops – including some who were then in ministry – and said that he was planning to approach the apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, about the issue.
McElroy said he raised concerns that some of the Sipe information may be inaccurate.
“In two instances we discussed, I had certain knowledge of individuals being investigated and cleared yet he still leveled accusations against them,” the bishop said.
“Dr. Sipe stated that he was making many of his allegations against existing bishops based on information that he had received from his work in legal cases on behalf of survivors of abuse,” McElroy said, but asked if he could share specific corroborating documents, Sipe said he was unable to do so.
After Sipe requested a third meeting but was told by the McElroy’s assistant that the bishop could not meet with him that month, he hired a process server who came to the office, posing as a donor wishing to hand-deliver a check, McElroy said. The process server delivered a letter from Sipe.
McElroy said he did not respond to that letter because Sipe’s use of a process server, and apparent dissemination of the letter, made him untrustworthy.
“After I read it, I wrote to Dr. Sipe and told him that his decision to engage a process server who operated under false pretenses, and his decision to copy his letter to me to a wide audience, made further conversations at a level of trust impossible.”
In a recent letter to diocesan clergy, responding to the Pennsylvania grand jury report, Bishop McElroy lamented “the complicity of the leadership of the Church, which magnified abuse in so many instances by placing fear of scandal and a clerical culture above the foundational need to protect minors at all costs.”
He added that “(e)very bishop in our land bears a collective debt of guilt for these acts of abuse,” and called for cooperation in creating “not only a new structure, but also a new culture within the life of the Church.”
Reports that McElroy might succeed Wuerl in Washington first surfaced in the fall of 2017. Wuerl, 77, submitted a letter of resignation to Pope Francis in 2015, at the customary age of 75, though it has not yet been accepted by the pope.
Full story at Catholic News Agency.
Something about not counting chickens before they hatch.
Because this scandal could simmer on for years more with revelations and repercussions,washington might be the last place m should be stationed.its heavy media exposure and concentration of reporters from everywhere would somersault any story upward and outward. The average Catholic in the DC metro tends to want solid Catholic teaching and not someone who will be prone to speak out against government policy.
Will Sipe’s communication be discussed at the various town hall mwwtings Bp. McElroy is proposing? It is doubtful.
Looks like being the successor to Cdl. Wuerl and that red hat which will eventually go with being the D.C. archbishop will be out of reach.
I’m seeing a pattern that is 100% consistent among bishops: if a bishop supports the pope, supports James Martin, and opposes Trump, he’s a bad man.
McElroy should spend the rest of his life in a remote monastery doing penance. No way should be be promoted to the see in Washington.
Maybe his rant directed at Vigano is because he realizes his chances of being Cardinal Archbishop of D.C. just died.
Bishop McElroy should be among the long “short” list of bishops and cardinals that need to be immediately expunged from the clergy. The idea of B. McElroy succeeding Cardinal Wuerl is laughable, and outrageous. B. McElroy needs to go.
Wow. People sure forgot all about that world meeting of families, didn’t they? Like it never even happened.
McCarrick, Wuerl, McElroy — The perfect trifecta to advance Francis’s legacy.
You forget to mention Cupich who has shown his incompetency in this matter.
McElroy and James Martin both make me sick.
Evan……You can also add Cardinal Mahony to the llist of people who make us sick! Cardinal Mahony is the one who pushed Bishop McElroy up the ladder! No one will miss them when they leave along with McCarrick and Wuerl.
For so many of these prelates is about amassing power.
A very insightful article about the pervasive nature of the “Lavender Mafia” and the harm wrecked throughout the Church. N0 – We should not have a ‘Civil War’ or Schism – but follow clearly written teachings and remove those who refuse to accept the Protection of the Young as second only to Saving Souls
How The Pederasty Cover-Up Will Make Civil War Within The Catholic Church
https://thefederalist.com/2018/08/30/pederasty-cover-will-make-civil-war-within-catholic-church/#disqus_thread
Since his election, Pope Francis has done everything within his power to soften and subvert the church’s teaching concerning human sexuality. He also packed the College of Cardinals with the Lavender Mafia.
God help us! Might as well get one of the filthy, outrageous “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence” as Cardinal Wuerl’s successor! Christ’s holy Church is now the “Gay Catholic Church??”– a total DISGRACE!! Mahoney, Cupich, Tobin (of New Jersey), McCarrick, McElroy, Wuerl, and many others ought to be KICKED OUT, ASAP!! No child is SAFE with these fraudulent Church leaders!!
There might be a replacement for Cdl. Wuerl sooner than we think if the following article is true:
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/breaking-news-exclusive-wuerl-bombshell
Since.Wuerl is a Cardinal of the Catholic Church, he already holds the diplomatic rank of a royal prince of a sovereign nation. Thus, he has a Vatican passport and is a citizen of the Vatican.
This is similar to the way the late Cdl.Law escaped the U.S. justice system.
Iggy,
That’s very interesting. If the article is accurate and the Pope does attempt to get Wuerl out of the country, this would only add credence to the Vigano letter.
This is feeling more and more like the feudal period.
Steve,
Life Site new is also reporting on the Church Militant article, with some more amplification. Jete is the link:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-wuerl-fleeing-to-rome-to-avoid-u.s.-arrest-for-abuse-cover-up
Just one of many Bishops, Archbishops, and Cardinals who need to be removed from their positions and sent packing. Then we have the matter of the current Pope.
Xavier,
I think it’s too early to tell what Francis will do, but I predict the following: the longer he hangs on, the more of a mess he’ll make. Therefore, if the last conclave serves as an example, our next pope will likely be elected to be both beyond moral reproach and have the moral will to clean-up the Vatican. Consequently, I think the next pope might be from Africa.
[My only rejoinder is that the lavender mafia will front a man who has the appearance of spiritual gravitas but who is secretly gay (i.e. support no one who Mahony or Wuerl support)]
If Francis were to resign tomorrow, there’ll be a strong move to elect a moral, spiritual candidate, but it won’t be as strong as another decade in the swamp.
Is Denver a more important place than San Diego? Why do they get great bishops like Chaput and Aquila in succession? Why did little La Crosse, Wisconsin get Cardinal Burke? Why does lowly Madison Wisconsin get a giant like Morlino? Santa Rosa is nice, but not a major metropolitan area and they get a faithful shepherd like Vasa?
We are “America’s Finest City” and we get stuck with the succession of Prom, Flores and McElroy? Who is it in the Vatican that hates San Diego?
Bishop Watcher
I wish I could answer that. In my old parish in L.A., we’ve been assigned inferior and pompous priests for the past 30 years. We now have a truly excellent priest – I ask myself the same question – Why did it take so long?
Maybe God brought the inferior and pompous to you because he knew that is where they would be prayed for. God bless you.
We got a priest-finally -that I thought was great but over time his interest in priestly things is diminishing a little and he is doing a lot of things just for himself, like traveling. A lot of the parishioners support him and encourage him to treat himself to “me-time”.Another priest told me that once you start to do things for yourself, you start doing everything for yourself.
Like attracts like. Where you have a diocese or province where the powers that put forward the names for bishop want liberal thinking bishops, that is who is on the list. Where there are more traditional thinking people, those are on the list. Occasionally, the Pope does his own thing like when Pope John Paul II sent Justin Rigali to be Archbishop of St. Louis. Prayer is really necessary.
https://www.usccb.org/about/leadership/appointing-bishops.cfm
Archbishop Viaganò revealed that the classic process of selection of bishops has changed under Francis. The vetting and recommendations of the nuncio are being ignored. Persons higher up, that Francis trusts more than the nuncios, are recommending to the Holy Father priests for the episcopacy who think like these higher ups think in order that their agenda be promoted . Under Pope Francis and those he has put in charge of bishop selection, Washington DC is not necessarily out for Bishop McElroy. A priest from the east coast says that their rumor is Cardinal Tobin for DC. Both men reference Pope Francis’ novelties frequently as an appeal to authority, and both promote Francis’ agenda. As you rightly say, “prayer is really necessary…
Prayer is why this is happening. To you, O Blessed Joseph…
You are correct that Archbishop Vigano’s letter said that they were not on the list. One of the surprising things about Pope Francis is how swiftly her accepts resignations and appoints new bishops.
Do you mind if I cull some of your old posts which said things about McElroy? I wouldn’t want you to have to go into hiding like Archbishop Vigano.
Here is the litmus test on where McElroy stands:
https://faithfulshepherds.com/bishop/robert-w-mcelroy/
Here is Bp. Schneider’s standing for the Church’s teaching:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/clergy-who-promote-lgbt-are-committing-a-kind-of-apostasy-bishop-schneider
How true is this quote, not only for San Diego, but in many other places: “Priests who were ignored before because of their lifestyles are now on boards and giving talks and photographed with the bishop; others are promoted in the diocese.” The progressives have been greatly emboldened by Francis sitting on the Seat of Peter. Some of the guys I know with shaky reputations now boldly take the public limelight and even chancery positions and don’t fear expressing dissent in semi-public gatherings.
https://cal-catholic.com/most-courageous-parish-priest-plans-to-leave-san-diego-and-become-hermit/
“Other than be faithful myself, I am unable to influence my fellow clergy except for about ten priests here,”
Fr. Richard Perozich