The following comes from a July 23 story by James Poulos on thefederalist.com.
Americans dimly grasp that the new American regime has jettisoned the venerable public-private divide at the heart of classical liberalism. But most of us remain in the dark about what exactly is taking its place.
Despite the avalanche of regulations, rules, and guidance issued by our state and federal governments, no official—elected or otherwise—has done for Americans what President Dwight Eisenhower did in his farewell remarks on the military-industrial complex. Eisenhower was the last president to speak to us (much less warn us!) about the changing character of the American regime.
Today, it is perhaps too much to ask a president to do the same. Eisenhower was intimately familiar with America’s military and civilian bureaucracy. He recognized how a “scientific technological elite” could use both branches of federal organization to make “public policy” its “captive.” Which presumptive occupant of the White House has such a sweeping, personal grasp of the new officialdom—yet opposes it enough to bear witness?
Today, the public policy elite has captured the very idea of public policy. Far exceeding the bounds of the old regime—the industrial, managerial, and male-yet-sterile form of rule portrayed by The Man In The Gray Flannel Suit—today’s elite has superseded the 21st-century logics of industry, management, and, perhaps most importantly, of the neutral or neutered male intellect first attributed to proper social science by Max Weber.
The logic of industry required men to fill factories and work in linear fashion to construct machines. The new logic of officialdom requires men and women—or boys and girls, depending on where we date the onset of maturity—to work in hive fashion to deconstruct, and sometimes rearrange, knowledge….
The logic of neutral male rationality, gendered but sexless, has given way to the logic of therapeutic administration—prefigured by Nurse Ratched in One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest. Big Nurse, as she’s otherwise known, is a transitional figure between the old American regime and the new. A former Army nurse, Ratched is machine-like, robotic, bent on total control and orthogonal order. In that sense, she still inhabits the world of unsexed, male-gendered rationalism. But that should not mask the sea change that Ken Kesey detected. Goethe, as Philip Rieff reminds us, considered it “a fact that humanity will ultimately triumph”; he only feared, however, “that at the same time the world will become one great hospital in which one man will be the other’s humane nurse….”
Today, in the new officialdom, this position is completely reversed. The most forceful strain of female-gendered political thought embraces postindustrial corporatism and condemns the economics of domesticity. To be sure, the ardent appreciation for birth control in the sick-dangerous realm, outside the precincts of health-and-safety regulation, betokens a mischievous sort of fearful admiration for the ultimate in deranged risk: conceiving a child not only out of wedlock but outside of love and even out of “like.”
Within the realm of health and safety, however, the mania for birth control is of a strikingly different quality. Rather than demanding consumption, it demands production; rather than a license to access the realm of transgression in which nothing is ever completely supervised or completely predictable, it is an ideological mandate to enforce healthy and safe conduct among the ruled, right down to the most intimate details and choices of their lives.
Here, there is no better example than the sea change in the status of LGBTQ individuals and the whole concept of diverse sexual identities. Big government and big business elites have more or less rushed with open arms to wave the rainbow flag—increasingly, in a literal sense. Today it does not really count as news that a Bank of America branch in the heart of West Hollywood has decorated its lobby with lots of festive little rainbow flags. There was, however, a minor stir when the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv recently hoisted the rainbow flag just below the Stars and Stripes itself.
To read the entire posting, click here.
To see how to manipulate the public read: “RULES for RADICALS” by Saul Alinsky – which was studied by Obama and Hillary Clinton.
https://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm
&
https://www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals
Satan, Satan, Satan, and, oh yes, Satan. It is interesting to consider what “female-gendered political thought” means, particularly, from a Catholic perspective, the timing of its emergence, growth, and acceptance, and the issuance of “Humane Vitae” (July 25, 1968). The “freedom” of pure sexual expression, without worries of conception — thanks to birth control — is widely recognized as encouraging the rise of other forms of sexual “freedom” now most openly seen in the LGBTQ arena. Too bad America’s bishops, and the entire Church, in reality, rejected Paul VI’s absolutely brilliant encyclical (which is continuing proof of the presence of the Holy Ghost in the Church). Now the same disbelieving Office of Bishops, and their lapdogs, are clamoring for recognition of homosexual sexual relationships (to be more fully understood in October’s Synod). One wonders what the circumstances would be in America, and the world, if the Church’s bishops would have fully lived up to their offices and lived the gospel, including the direction of the Holy Ghost (in Humanae Vitae and other things). Instead, we have a largely apostate Office of Bishops, and a crumbling Church, the largest portion of which may well be in the road to perdition. Holy Mother of God, pray for us that have recourse to thee. And Mary will answer, do whatever He tells you to do.
Please show me where the Office of Bishops (and where is that office, exactly?) is clamoring for a recognition of same sex relationships? Please show me one active American Bishop who has even come close to this.
Their silence speaks.
Volumes.
SandraD, every time another states wins marraige equality, the Bishops issue another statement. They march on Washington, they meet at their regualr USCCB meetings to decry same sex relationships. The Bishops have HARDLY been silent.
The term ‘marriage equality’ is a false and misleading term as those states that caved to allow so called homosexual ‘marriage’ are just stripping the word marriage from having any meaning whatsoever.
Much like if one promoted ‘female equality’ as the basis for claiming that a man with a sex change is now, in reality, female. Not so.
‘Marriage equality’ is a reference to the fact that the US Supreme Court has called marriage a fundamental right something like 14 times. Only gay and (some) bi people are told they can’t marry the person they love. Hence, in dozens of states still, some people can get marriage licenses, while others cannot. Until everyone can get a marriage license, we will not have marriage equality. Either marriage is a fundamental freedom for everyone, or it is a fundamental freedom for no one.
Marriage is a union between a man and a woman.
Marriage is between a man and a woman. Always was and always will be.
In Italy, marriage is union between one man and one woman. End of story.
But only if we ignore all the other stories that differ. For instance, the ones told in the Bible. David – an actual Biblical Author (of portions of the book of Psalms) was had multiple wives, as did his son Solomon, another Biblical Author (Song of Solomon).
Saudi Arabia agrees with the Biblical conception of marriage, and acknowledges marriage to be a union between a man and anywhere from one and four women. In Canada, this is reprehensible! A marriage is simply a union is between one man and one woman, or between two men, or between two women. In Tibet, at least prior to the Chinese take-over, marriage was between one woman and a set of brothers.
Well, whatever one thinks about polygamy, and the Lord Jesus Christ forbade it, David did not marry Jonathan.
The term marriage equality is the euphemism used to misdirect people from the unsavory marketing of sodomy. Kind of like Planned Parenthood uses that name instead of being up front by calling themselves Baby Killers.
Would have the same ring to it.
Starting with Hilary, one of Clinton’s foreign policy tenets was LGBT rights and this has continued to “influence” assistance programs by Kerry (a CINO).
This is among the reasons that US foreign policy is in shambles. Other countries don’t take us seriously when we broadcast such nonsense and then we appoint ambassadors (who gave a lot of campaign contributions to Obama) who are gay to countries who don’t appreciate our interference and ponder why the 2% run everything.
Good question. Why do the 2% run everything? And why do the 2% commit 33% of all child sex abuse? The two are related: the 2% seek power to lower the age of consent and increase that lowly 33% figure. See article below documenting the proven connection between homosexuality and child sex abuse, with 76 footnotes citing scientific journals.
http://www.tinyurl.com/HomoAbusers
Clinton and many of his minions where eloquent speakers, they knew how to attract a crowd…..and still do unfortunately.
Better than that “Your Fellow Catholic,” let’s do your homework for you worldwide. Take a look at the June 17, 2014, issue of “Bondings 2.0” in the article, “Church Leaders Supporting Same-Gender Couples” (from the following: https://newwaysministryblog.wordpress.com/church-leaders-supporting-same-gender-couples/). Lots of names there, and the literature, both homosexual and normal, is chock full of clerical names all drooling over supporting perversion as the norm in the Church. But, you miss the broader point: the Good Nazi syndrome. Where the King gives a signal of royal pleasure, that is deep and abiding affection with the promise of future advancement, then every knave at Court will try to out do the other in achieving what is anticipated as being the Royal will. You saw this with the unnecessary cruelity of the Nazis and you see this with the absolute craziness in the Obama Administration. Of course, no one knows for certain what this will is, and there is always that pesky Holy Ghost to deal with, but you get the picture. President Clinton worried his deposers about what the meaning of “is” is, and the good Pope worries his bootlickers about what he means by, “who am I to judge?” One has to be careful of course, or you could end up badly. Say, what happened to Henry II and the four happy knights that killed St. Thomas Becket in 1170? Better be sure.
Thank you for posting the link Christopher. What aberrations will the Modernist Church come up with next?
Pray that the upcoming Synod called by Pope Francis will not prove to be the modernist hey day and drive a stake in the Hearts of Christ and His Mother through Their Church!
May God have mercy on an amoral Amerika and His Church!
Viva Cristo Rey!
Yours in
Their Hearts,
Kenneth M.
Fisher, Founding Director
Concerned
Roman Catholics of America, Inc
Kenneth, I do not believe Pope Francis is going to change a thing. After all he IS Catholic. He cannot change marriage any more than he can ordain women as priestesses. It “ain’t” going to happen, and when it does not, the left will be furious. Just as they were furious with Pope Paul’s Humanae Vitae. They will twist and turn and foam at the mouth, but in the end, true marriage will prevail.
The left “will twist and turn and foam at the mouth”?
Funny how my left leaning friends say that about conservatives. It’s almost as if both side are relying on the polemics of vilification rather than open, honest, Charitable discussion.
There was not one active American bishop on that list, though it is a pretty good summary of the European thought on the matter.
St. Christopher,
Didn’t you know that St. Christopher has been de-canonized by the modernist cabal?
We at CRCOA are constantly quoted Pope Francis’s remarks to try to beat us down!
May God have mercy on an amoral Amerika and His Church!
Viva Cristo Rey!
Yours in
Their Hearts,
Kenneth M.
Fisher, Founding Director
Concerned Roman Catholics of America, Inc
No he was not de-canonized. (How would you do that?) He just lost his feast day. You can still get St. Christopher medals.
Is there any possible way to make this country more ridiculous, weak, impotent or utterly preposterous than to have a rainbow flag flying with Old Glory? Can you picture Russia, China or Japan…or even Denmark, doing such a pathetically emasculated thing? This is not just without precedent, it is without honor, prestige or dignity! With such a wimp sashaying his way from fundraiser to golf course, and his vp continuously putting his foot in his mouth and the Secretary of State drooping about the planet doing who knows what or why, it’s truly a wonder if anyone takes this country seriously anymore. We have this 1% of moneyed sociopaths and 2% of homoeroticobsessedneuriotics running this country. We should be wearing sackcloth and ashes and fasting as we pray for the deliverance of our nation from the hands of those who do not honor God, or religious conscience or life! Mary, pray for us. Inspire us with true strength of purpose and hearts burning with a desire to serve our Lord Jesus Christ and a hunger for righteousness for His name’s sake.
When Kerry had that flag raised at our embassy, I just shuddered. Mea culpa Mea culpa Our Dear Lord, Holy Mother Church, Blessed Virgin Mary……pray for us.
Yes Dana, the wolves are indeed running the hen house. Pass the sackcloth.
Can two flags represent such polar opposite ideas? Look at our beautiful flag of the United States of America…….can she be taken seriously ever again?
Its anarchy, isn’t Sandra? A deliberate ploy to diminish and tarnish a cherished symbol and to undermine the identity and unity the flag represents. Polar opposites indeed!
How to avoid confusing the “rainbow peace flag” with the “gay pride flag?”
Here’s how: The seven-color peace flag is not to be confused with the similar six-color gay pride flag, which does not have turquoise and has red at the top instead of the bottom.
The most common recent design is a rainbow flag representing peace, first used in Italy at a peace march in 1961. The flag was inspired by similar multi-coloured flags used in demonstrations against nuclear weapons. A previous version had featured a dove drawn by Pablo Picasso.[10]
The most common variety has seven colours — purple, blue, azure, green, yellow, orange, and red — and is emblazoned in bold with the Italian word PACE, meaning “peace”.
It became popular with the Pace da tutti i balconi (“peace from every balcony”) campaign in 2002, started as a protest against the impending war in Iraq. The flag was flown from balconies in all Italian cities by citizens against the war. Its use spread to other countries too, and the Italian Pace was replaced with the corresponding translation in the local languages.
According to Amnesty International, producer Franco Belsito had produced about 1,000 flags per year for 18 years, and suddenly had to cope with a demand in the range of millions.
Common variations include moving the purple stripe down below the azure one, and adding a white stripe on top.
I don’t know why you contributed this max, as the US hasn’t passed any Congressional approval of flying any flag over our embassies with our flag that I know of and flying an obscure so-called peace flag that originated in Italy that the majority of Americans never heard of (it’s the ONLY flag you see in Seattle, for example and it looked nothing like the one in this photo) would still be inappropriate! Please don’t give credence to the lie that what you’re seeing in the photo is a peace flag.
Dana, those who read English can clearly see I was saying this is NOT the peace flag.
Well, gee whiz, Max, I must have just been pickin’ fer a fight! ;0) Has anyone seen this in the news yet? If anyone had ANY doubts about this administration…https://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/28/Obama-Celebrates-Muslim-Contributions-to-the-USA
I remember learning the important influence muslims had on our history by the barbary pirates that attack our ships in the early 19th century. I suppose the new CORE revisionist history will teach that muslims didn’t attack our ships but were showing us the way to peace and prosperity through islum.
(sic)
The only way you could possibly take offense at the President’s statement is if you were truly anti-Muslim. Here is the quote you cited with a bit more of its context: “In the United States, Eid also reminds us of the many achievements and contributions of Muslim Americans to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy. That is why we stand with people of all faiths, here at home and around the world, to protect and advance their rights to prosper, and we welcome their commitment to giving back to their communities.”
You and Breitbart want to make it seem as though he is saying that Muslims and Muslims alone built our country which of course would be a damnable statement, and you would prefer that he say that the only thing Muslims have brought was treachery. But what he ACTUALLY said is completely reasonable and appropriate, and in fact, tries to lay groundwork for ALL FAITHS working together for the continual betterment of our country. Both your anti-Muslim attitude and your lack of respect for our President are horrifying.
YFC,,, just so you know Islam is a heresy which is currently cleansing the middle east of my Christian brethren. You are so typical of liberals, Islam is a threat and I know because I fought against them in the Balkans,, if they were in charge you would not stand a chance.
Canisius, I hope you never give up your *horrifying* revelation of reality. The way people with eyes that work actually see it.
God bless!
p.s. If I were President, I’d elect Obama to be my chief adviser. Why? Because I would know for certain that I should do exactly the opposite of what comes forth from that man. Instant precision in foreign and domestic policy. The same could be said with regard to others who favor being horrified above all else. Good gravy.
YFC, dear boy! I hope there was someone there to catch you before you swooned! Might I suggest a sabbatical in Syria or some R&R in Iraq? ISIS would adore you darling, and you could go as obama’s goodwill ambassador. Look how well gay ambassadors are treated in the middle east.
Canisius: I agree with you that Islam is an heretical offshoot of Christianity. Being heretical is not, however, something for an American President to give his opinion on, or fail to praise their civic contributions. American Presidents preside over the faithful and the unfaithful, over Christians and jews, over Muslims and atheists. And the first amendment requires that he not favor one over the other.
Ann Malley: Can you see Putin rearing his ugly head from your house?
Dana dear girl: A gay ambassador recently gave his life in the service of his country. Or did you not read the news?
YFC I do not need a civics lesson from you
No, YFC, I cannot see Putin rearing his ugly head from my house. But if you could from your house, I cannot imagine you’d be anything but delightfully horrified. He is, after all, a 19th century man. Be still my horrified heart!
I find it interesting that Putin has rebuilt every Orthodox Cathedral and Church destroyed by Stalin while Obama and Congress have been funding Islamic rebel group killing Christians in the middle east.
Ps, I meant to say welcome back…isn’t this max that used to share jokes with JLS? We miss him. Hope he’s alright!
PPS…this just popped into my email box. It would save you a hazardous peace mission and give you apparently new insights into Islam that you’ve heretofore left unexplored but of which many of us here have known for many years. Peace, brother! (And, no, I’m not being sarcastic)
https://www.crisismagazine.com/2014/looks-like-duck-islamist-nazi-connection?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CrisisMagazine+%28Crisis+Magazine%29
Harsh Words – You Betcha, and about @#$%^ Time:
The Road to Hell Obama is taking the world down created by U.S. Catholic Bishops (CFP)
This is the real, little known trajectory Obama took into the Oval Office
The Catholic Church—through the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Migration—both paved the road for Barack Hussein Obama’s ultimate takeover of Free West society and continues to actively enable the Fundamental Transformation of America by sinking the US in a tsunami of illegal aliens.
In coming to Obama’s aid in erasing forever America’s borders, the bishops sold the USA out, including its Catholics, for the proverbial 30 pieces of silver.
In biblical terms, Obama and the Catholic bishops—who both birthed his progress to the seat of power and back him on his Fundamental Transformation mission—are in in league with the devil. The certain-to-come protestations of the bishops should fall on the same deaf ears they use to shun all pleas of mercy from Americans overwhelmed by invaders in their home towns and cities.
How dare these phony paragons of the pulpit ascribe to our Savior the manufactured invasion of America by millions of U.S. government made-to-order ‘refugees’?
It’s a crock that the bishops are saving illegal aliens rushing the U.S. border based on lofty claims of altruism or charity, when they are doing it for power and filthy lucre:
https://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/64878?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=faa0818d0f-Call_to_Champions&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d8f503f036-faa0818d0f-291122069
Read 1 Corinthians 15:33
32If from human motives I fought with wild beasts at Ephesus, what does it profit me? If the dead are not raised, LET US EAT AND DRINK, FOR TOMORROW WE DIE. 33Do not be deceived: “Bad company corrupts good morals.” 34Become sober-minded as you ought, and stop sinning; for some have no knowledge of God. I speak this to your shame.
Fight against vice, take custody of your eye, take custody of your senses etc. The key here is to dissolve what harms the soul and mind. Gay agenda’s do not save, they do not lead a society to fear the Lord, then its laws will only enslave its citizens and will only adopt more secular views away from God.
People return to God, save your children by returning to God!
CCC 407 The doctrine of original sin, closely connected with that of redemption by Christ, provides lucid discernment of man’s situation and activity in the world. By our first parents’ sin, the devil has acquired a certain domination over man, even though man remains free. Original sin entails “captivity under the power of him who thenceforth had the power of death, that is, the devil”.298 Ignorance of the fact that man has a wounded nature inclined to evil gives rise to serious errors in the areas of education, politics, social action299 and morals.
CCC 408 The consequences of original sin and of all men’s personal sins put the world as a whole in the sinful condition aptly described in St. John’s expression, “the sin of the world”.300 This expression can also refer to the negative influence exerted on people by communal situations and social structures that are the fruit of men’s sins.301
CCC 409 This dramatic situation of “the whole world [which] is in the power of the evil one”302 makes man’s life a battle:
George Washington would be ashamed by how this great country is now being run by sinful agenda’s. George Washington was not Catholic but he lived life morally especially followed the great advice from a priest book, in his time that wrote the book called The Rules of Civility on Catholic etiquette. He followed this priests guidelines and that is why he was a correct and moral man. Something that many schools today do not teach children. In fact this book was used even in schools until I believe it was no longer used in the 70’s or sooner. I can’t recall the date, but that is when good common sense and common decency was already declining to what it is today. Pretty bad. Our modern day issues we face today started back in the 20’s, the roaring 20’s, when many people took their faith for granted. People speak of the good ole days but it was the good ole days that reaped the adults we have to deal with from the age called the baby boomers of the 50’s. Why have they not taught the faith, their fruit is what we are dealing with, even from the immorality of Hollywood.
Here is another tragic story about the over reach of government and how the plethora of rules and regulations are imprisoning good Americans. “Why Was This Legal Gun Owner Charged?” July 23, 2014 https://webmailb.juno.com/webmail/new/6?count=1406672790&randid=1551408163