The following comes from an April 17 Cardinal Newman Society Catholic Education Daily article by Justin Petrisek:
On Thursday, the first full day in office for San Diego’s new Catholic bishop, the Catholic University of San Diego (USD) hosted a “drag show” that the Vatican last year described as “scandalous.”
Last year, the Vatican’s Congregation for Catholic Education responded to the petition submitted by Thomas McKenna, founder and president of Catholic Action for Faith and Family, and Charles LiMandri. The Congregation’s letter deemed the drag show a “scandal” and declared its intentions “to act through administrative channels to the competent ecclesiastical authority in San Diego.”
But despite the Vatican’s response, the University held its fourth edition of the event on April 16, Bishop Robert McElroy’s first full day as the bishop of San Diego. The show was titled “Celebration of Gender Expression: Supreme Drag Superstar IV.”
Attorney Charles LiMandri, who founded Alumni for a Catholic USD and helped file a petition to the Vatican against the University’s annual cross-dressing event, spoke with The Cardinal Newman Society to discuss why USD is continuing to ignore the Vatican and even the recent words of Pope Francis.
“We have the opportunity and a clean slate with a new bishop and a new president,” LiMandri said. “I am hoping and praying that this is the last drag show at USD.”
The drag shows have sparked moments of advocacy and bordered on indoctrination with emcees, students and guests often pushing agendas contradictory to Church teaching, LiMandri said. Last year’s controversial emcee “Tootie Nefertootie,” who advocates same-sex marriage, was scheduled to return for Thursday’s event, the University confirmed.
In 2013, USD defended the drag show, stating that “the event supports the Church’s teaching on the innate dignity of the human person, and by illustrating cross-dressing, it does not promote either behavior or lifestyle that is contrary to the teachings of the Church.” The response from the Vatican seems to clearly debunk USD’s position that drag shows do not promote inappropriate behavior or lead to scandal.
Whether under the guise of diversity or not, there is no excuse for a Catholic college to ignore the Vatican, LiMandri explained:
People that supposedly share our beliefs are grossly misrepresenting them and are getting a free pass. Even after they’ve been told by the highest authority [in the Catholic Church] that what they’re doing is scandalous—which in Church parlance has specific meaning—that you are leading people away from the faith, it is causing a potential loss of faith. The people who are in a position to represent the faith are giving a bad example. In this case it is not just a bad example, but it is a fraudulent message. They’re misrepresenting what the Church teaches, and you can’t get away with that under the guise of diversity.
Even Pope Francis “is using very strong terms to say this can’t go on anymore. It’s too destructive to the faith,” said LiMandri.
Pander or Perish = the ‘gospel’ of the Gaystapo – and the hateful male Drag Queens who make such a grotesque mockery of Good Catholic Nuns are ‘poster bigots’ for the cause – of Depraved Perversions and Sick Hatreds.
WHO Hires and Subsidizes these types with the donations of the Faithful? Is it true that Homosexuals who have already infiltrated the Church are Hiring Homosexuals to finish the job of taking over – the buildings and bank accounts at least, not that they ever shared the Faith anyway.
SEE
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/catholic-relief-services-vice-president-is-in-a-gay-marriage-promotes-gay-a
BREAKING: Catholic Relief Services vice-president is in a gay ‘marriage’, promotes gay agenda
by Lisa Bourne
Critics say the news confirms Catholic Relief Services’ history of hiring high-level employees who openly oppose fundamental Catholic moral teachings, and raises further doubts about the organization’s stewardship of Catholic for
‘Flouting Catholic moral teaching’
Public records show that Rick Estridge, Catholic Relief Services’ Vice President of Overseas Finance, who has worked for the U.S. Bishops’ official international humanitarian agency since as long ago as 2001, “married” his homosexual partner in Baltimore, Maryland, on April 4, 2013.
Why, laws a mercy, is it that time of year all ready? The UofSD president /resident dominatrix has donned her leathers and is ready to crack the whip! And our old friend in lead paint and fiendish toothy grin is back, as well. Oh, the happy vision this conjures up of students learning to think, to become contributing citizens…and someday these lucky few, these chosen ones whose parents are paying so dearly for the unforgettable privilege , may actually become drag queens and gasp! maybe even high paid hookers! I’m sure they don’t pay the president nearly enough…it probably doesn’t even keep her in back issues of Cosmo magazines. That must be where she gets her clever ideas and witty reparte’. What a woman. What a Catholic witness to reinforcing the parables of Christ…you know which one , about the wise man building his house upon the rock? Well, these people show us pretty graphically what happens when you build on sand.
The poster, Dana, is very funny! But sadly, all of this is true! Our Church will tragically pay, for all the harm being done!
PS. Some wonderful news from a secular university…https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/colleges-transformed-church-hopes-to-help-students-be-saints-84284/
Its disgusting. So they hope that this will be the last one. Really? How will they correct all the problems they committed against the faith and its laymen? This secular University falsely calls itself Catholic. Join me in sending letters to this new bishop to act and help correct all the wrong this has caused. If we have to schedule an appointment too, then lets do but do not remain silent. Lets put the pressure on this bishop and express as well our concerns about past reports on where he stands on things. After pray and fast. Pray for his excellency.
The image of the person attending the drag show is truly demonic. These fools have given themselves to satan. And a “Catholic” university gives them license to do it. Sadly this is what has been allowed to happen given that the Church has had very weak leadership in the last 50 plus years.
I worked for the Catholic Diocese of San Diego for 22 years before my retirement and move to Nigeria to do missionary work. It has been no secret for many years that the University of San Diego is sadly “Catholic” in name only. All we can do about disgraceful, diabolical, shows like this are to respectfully and frequently write to the USD authorities protesting such activities. We should also be writing to the Congregation for Education in Rome, as well as to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome, and directly to the Holy Father. Another good way to protest is to withhold donations to the Diocese until either USD is cleaned up, or until the use of the name “Catholic” is removed from the university and USD becomes simply a private, secular school. May God and our Blessed Mother help us all.
Will the president of the university stand before God and plead their cause when He asks them on Judgement Day what they did for the souls of the young people in their charge as they attended that poor place to receive the benefits of a Catholic education? Are they willing to do that? If not, (I’d love to see that) then they ought to take the Vatican’s admonition and disavow such an event. In the End, that judgement would help them determine whether their scandalous break with the Church should continue.
“You can safely assume you’ve created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do.” ― Anne Lamott
Bishop McElroy will be a complete and utter disaster for San Diego (as he was in SF). A principle issue is that the “New Catholic Church” sees people like “Tootie Nefertootie” as “normal” and within the “welcome” responsibilities of the Church. This is the legacy of Francis, now under construction.
Just how stupid does the Vatican think American Cathoilcs are? The apparent answer is: substantially stupid and inattentive. And, this answer has two parts (at least): (1) stupid as to what the Catholic Faith demands for holiness and for salvation; and (2) stupid as to what should be tolerated in living life as a Catholic in America.
Yet, perhaps the Vatican is correct. Where is the Catholic uprising? Here and there an outrage in the Traditional blog world, but not really much (having heard mutterings at the N.O. Mass about “hurtful” behavior and all that). Instead “People That Call Themselves Catholic” (the dreaded PTCTCs, or “PTickTicks”) actually, in the main, seem to be able to accomodate sodomy as some flavor or normal.
PTickTicks pretty much accept the line that “well, God made them that way, so their behavior must be divinely inspired” (just look at how Marco Rubio and Scott Walker are positioning themselves on this issue). So, to the PTickTick, the Catholic Church simply got it wrong all these centuries (along with the Apostles and Disciples), and Sodom and Gomarroh were absolutely correct. Makes the USD administration look pretty smart.
Why don’t you kill them, St. Christopher, like Leviticus commands you?
Jonj, you sound so bitter and, to be frank, utterly ignorant of the Bible and Church teaching. Apparently, you don’t realize how much you reveal about yourself and your obstinate rebellion against God in those nasty little digs that are sooooo inappropriate to what was written. Do you honestly think Levitiicus commands Christians to kill homosexuals? You do understand why we can also eat pork and not have to be circumcised,etc.? You say you’re not a homosexual, but believe me, like a person driving a getaway car in a robbery, you’d serve just as much time in prison as the guy who held a gun at someone’s head. It amazes me how you and others like you take this sanctimonious tone in your defense of the indefensible. What motivates you? Do you even care what God commands? And then you probably go to Mass every week and receive communion. Thank God for confession.
To a certain extent, I am bitter.
My first real lesson in religion was hypocricy. I went to an “oh so catholic” grade school and I was the smallest kid in the class, with buck teeth, a high piercing voice, thick glasses due to a degenerative eye condition, plus I was the only non-white kid in the school (I am half-Filipino).
It didn’t help that I had a tested IQ of 155. But, I was consistently placed in the “special ed” group in school b/c I’m also a dyslexic with A.D.D. I was walking bully target for most of my childhood.
For example, a large group of my peers, rather symbolically, enjoyed throwing me in the trash dumpster after school masses. So I have a lot of poor associations with religious practice.
Now, one of the few people who actually bothered to tell bullies to bug off was a kid who shot up fast so was relatively big. That person really helped me when I needed it.
Now, go forward to high school. Braces fixed my teeth, contacts replaced the glasses, I had become a national-level judo competitor, and starting lifting weights. I played football, and everyone LOVED how I blew up guys twice my size.
My childhood good Samaritan comes out as gay, (he stopped growing around age 12), and becomes the butt of abuse and jokes. I was too much of a coward to risk my newfound “popularity” to return the favor he did me as a child.
(cont.)
Many years later, one of the priests connected to my grade school faced a lot of accusations of pedophilia. This kid that had helped me out as a child had been part of a group that did school activities that involved this priest.
No one ever knew if he had been molested b/c he committed suicide our junior year of high school.
So, I get angry when people here tell lies like “all homosexuals have ever done is help people to hell” or try to claim that homosexuals haven’t been wronged by society, or that the Church culture that turned a blind eye to this everyday abuse is blameless for their poor treatment by society.
I’m familiar with the standard answers to the problems with Old Testament scriptures. I still think there remain some rather hanging questions. Such as, no matter if the New Covenant absolved us from many Old Testament commands, that legal regime MUST have been moral under the circumstances of the ancient Middle East—or else it could not have come from God.
So how is a brutal code that suggests, for example, that genocide was a moral act within conquered cities in the Holy Land at all moral? There are a number of answers to this question, but I think looking at the circumstances, the Sermon on the Mount, and how circumstances changed after Israel was conquered by Rome caused God to issue what seems to be a vastly different regime of moral guidance.
(cont.)
Consequently, I tend to see the people hurling these lies as the same kind of pious hypocrites who enjoyed humiliating me as a child. And, I tend to see standing up for homosexuals vs. abuse as a penance of sorts.
Now, that’s not to say that homosexual activists are doing no wrong. Any time you try to apply social force such as law, or more limited forms such as social rejection and various shaming tactics, it seems to me Satan gets into the mix to tern a kernal of truth (abusive behavior to homosexuals) as a way to justify sin.
However, the same thing can happen when religion attempts to use social or legal force to engineer society as well. To me, I think Christ put his Church into a weak social position in terms of worldly authority. It forced his disciples to persuade, rather than compel acceptance of Christ’s gospel.
There is, I think, a largely underdeveloped theology with respect to using socio/political force to compel obedience to what we view as God’s will. instead, me mostly skate past these questions, and go right to advocating tactics to compel what we see as better behavior.
Yet, does making people conform through social force really improve their spiritual standing? Remember, he who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery.
Similarly, how much good do we accomplish by compelling obedience to God through various levels of social force?
JonJ, you have a free will to choose HELL if you want.
We promise not to stand in the way of your free will.
You are a very hateful person, and will never get to Heaven with your lack of forgiveness – especially when you blame the entire Catholic Church for your childhood problems perpetrated by a handful of people. – even through I do not believe your post for a minute.
The homosexuals are the ones who are trying to FORCE everyone to bend to their sodomy actions.
And if you can not see that, you are truly blind as a bat.
JonJ, thank you for sharing your story and the motivation behind your posts. I realize now why you sometimes take a “poke ’em in the eye” approach here but I encourage you to continue to write truth as you just did rather than bait people.
I am grievously sorry that you were bullied. I am glad that you had a person help you. I know you will always feel guilty about not helping him back. Sometimes, we really disappoint ourselves in life. You were a kid. I am sure that he forgives you and of course, Jesus does. I am sure they are both glad that you stand up to bullies now. The people who bully you now-these are adults who have real problems. Please forgive them.
I hope you understand the Church’s teaching on human sexuality and on marriage. This isn’t the place to learn it if you don’t.
Peter C,
I actually agree with you that the cases of the caterer and baker were wrong.
Were I the sitting judge for these cases, I would have ruled that 1st amendment freedom of religion trumps civil rights laws about public accommodations because the baker and the caterer would have to, at least tangentially, participate in religious practices contrary to their beliefs.
This is why I wrote, ” that’s not to say that homosexual activists are doing no wrong.” We can also cite the gay pride parades that have become have become displays of extreme public lewdness. I support none of these things and will readily admit they are wrong.
Yet, to claim the Church and religious individuals are nothing but victims is some serious revisionist history. The first law criminalizing homosexuality in Anglo Saxon law goes back to 1533 and provided that the guilty party were to be buried alive. As recently as 2003, states could criminalize sodomy targeting only at homosexuals. Sodomy by heterosexuals (in four states) was legal while criminal for homosexuals.
We can also talk about being banned from the military, legal to be fired from jobs for homosexuality, as well as getting purged from government jobs by the Eisenhower administration who would pull government contracts from companies that did not fire homosexuals.
All of this was supported, and endorsed, by Churches across America. The bigotry was obvious when you realize that fornicators, maturbators, and gluttons suffered none of these legal penalties.
Peter,
The question I asked isn’t whether we have free will. The question is if I hold a metaphorical gun at someone’s head to stop them from sinning, do we really prevent sin from staining their soul?
Remember, if a man who lusts after a woman has already committed adultery, does preventing the act change the state of his soul?
To a certain extent it might. People who are forming their ideas are often receptive to authority and will internalize the accepted social consensus. Yet the sinner who desperately WANTS to commit sin but stops not due to any moral reasons, but simply out of a desire to avoid worldly punishment is just as evil as a person who succeeds in committing the act.
Thus, the worldly failure has as much opportunity to commit adultery as the most successful, and attractive, members of society. Yet, utilizing force to compel social obedience (to, for example, surpress adultery) does have costs, not the least of which is enticing authority figures to abuse their power.
Jon J., sodomy might have been legal (decriminalized is a better word) for heterosexual people, but it has never been encouraged by any church, synagogue or other moral religion that is concerned for society, as it is, quite simply put, biologically dangerous for the body. Perhaps laws against it for heterosexuals were not enforced as much as it is common sense that most heterosexuals would not be engaging in that kind of behavior as often as two people of the same sex would, and therefore the behavior might not be as harmful to them. I do not know.
I, too, felt like you did when sodomy was decriminalized around the 1970;s, I thought the police had better things to do than invade peoples bedrooms. Sadly, my thinking was a great mistake. Right after it was decriminalized the men went wild in those bathhouses in large cities like San Francisco. One nurse told me some of the horrific things that those men were doing to each other’s bodies. She said that when the doctors and nurses tried to tell them how unhealthy and dangerous their practices were, they tried to get them fired. She finally left that city in disgust. Surgeon General Koop and some ministers, such as the Rev. McIllnery tried to talk some sense, very charitably, into the practicing homosexual community, but instead most chose to listen to Harvey Milk and others like the “Rev.” Jim Jones and ran the good Rev. McIllnery out of town, and we all know what took place next — a whole lot of dead young men from AIDS and many other diseases.
Also, Jon J., in the Old Testament there were no hospitals, no good sanitary conditions nor prisons for prisoners of war, so punishment was much stronger back then among all nations, and even in some primitives places now, so the whole tribe or country would not be wiped out by disease, viruses, etc. Many times, too, some of the stronger punishments in the law were not enforced as strict as one might think. One cannot compare the past with the present conditions in this country.
Something tells me that some of the drag queens are professors and others in charge at the school.
I was just thinking this morning how strange it is that this wouldn’t take place at a secular school. Why do parents send their children to these universities that are virtual snake pits and witches covens? It must be quite expensive to attend USD, so why go there…it has to be very mediocre academically, as well. Maybe the students can’t get accepted anywhere else? I’d be so embarrassed to attend a school that put on tacky, bizarre things like this. When people starte voting with their pocket books this school either shut down or be forced to be more Catholic.
The new bishop probably will never stop this disgusting display. Keep writing and calling… Who? The Church has an infestation of these men and women who are literally possessed by the demonic! They are in charge of many dioceses and so called Catholic schools and Universities. They are working in the Vatican as gate keepers to many dicasteries. Full page ads need to be taken out in Roman newspapers addressed to the pope showing these disgusting displays and demanding he remove these negligent bishops that allow the Catholic Faith to be trampled upon and abused.
The voice of silence is the loudest. Because the bishop of San Diego has been silent, many souls will probably go to hell because of the scandal this has caused.
I agree that turning a blind eye to immorality has damaging consequences.
I many ways, the promotion of public lewdness and general social support leaning toward homosexuals is probably the result of the “good people” turning a blind eye to decades of abuse and bigotry heaped upon such individuals.
Now that the internet has made people realize that they know many homosexuals rather than such people being a seemingly non-existent fiction, public opinion has turned. That might not have happened so suddenly, and with such an extreme backlash, if traditional moral authorities had not allowed bigots who enjoyed abusing others to claim moral cover for their actions in religious faith.
Similarly, the abortion tragedy might not have happened if abusive members of society had not vindictively ridiculed and shamed single mothers and stigmatized children born out of wedlock (who had no say in their parentage). Preventing such vituperative phony moralizing, which was really about crawling up the social pecking order at the expense their neighbors, provided the justification for terrible sin.
The Church has always taught against abortion. Single mothers were encouraged and still are – to keep their children or give them up for adoption.
One can not hold the Church responsible for society at large.
Fornication, Adultery, and Homosexual Acts have always been mortal sins, and will always be mortal sins.
The Church has always taught to love the sinners, but HATE the SIN.
We must never TOLERATE the SIN.
USD President (Admiral / Doctor / Twysted Syster) Mary Lyons is leaving at the end of the year. Perhaps the incoming President will be more attuned to the notion of a Catholic University than Lyons… Or at least one that doesn’t openly grotesquely mock Catholic Nuns on campus.
Lyons played a similar role as ‘Admiral’ at the California Maritime Academy, although her Merchant Shipping experience was scant – she sure cleaned house of the lingering pork byproducts (males) not sufficiently ashamed of their male gender – and on behalf of their male gender. Hence, her penchant for pandering to Drag shows and such aberrations is a resume builder for even ‘higher’ Education positions, hopefully outside of the Catholic System.
Praise Be to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit that Bishop Finn has resigned!
Why are you here, “Elmer”? This is a Catholic website. Your comment is one of sedition to the Faith.
Bishop Finn is a holy man, and was a fine Catholic Bishop. Not only was he friendly to Tradition, but he practiced it too. His removal — two years after the fact — leaves many questions. (Yes, the Bishop made a big mistake, but his mistake was one, and did not involve him personally — unless there are facts we do not yet know.)
Also, Bishop Finn protected and helped to grow a truly remarkable order of Catholic religions: Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles. Give them your prayers. Satan is truly powerful on Earth. One wonders if this Order was among his key targets.
Further, Bishop Finn is no where in the same league as the Pope’s personal choice of Juan Barros as Bishop of Osorno (Chile). Here is a man that openly protected a vicious homosexual predator-priest (and records suggest may have also personally viewed at least one sexual event). Chilean clergy, parishioners, Catholic people, a large number of the elected Assembly, have written to the Pope in protest. Of course, the Pope could care less, making his “Zero Tolerance” policy meaningless (accept as to its true meaning, which is, “I have Zero Tolerance for Tradition and for those who oppose me”.)
In this, Francis is little more than any Latin American dictator. Remember, the Church has suffered bad popes before and survived. Prayer and protest are the answers. You are wrong, “Elmer” about Bishop Finn; he was a fine bishop.
Bishop Finn was a faithful and holy man. The secular media despised him, as did the miscreants posing as Catholics in his diocese. Shame on you!
PS Apparently this is how the Vatican is going to be purging the Church of orthodox bishops around the world. It’s odd how herterodox bishops and cardinals are being installed when even proven to be guilty of subverting the faith, child pornography etc. and where thousands of Catholics protest to no avail. As long as we hear soothing lullabyes of evangelism and mercy all is well, right?
PPS As St. Pope John Paul II said “Faith and reason are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth…” We have too many believers who are dodo birds with two wings and unable to fly. Don’t mistake faith for gullibility.
“An excuse is worse and more terrible than a lie; for an excuse is a lie guarded.” Alexander Pope
Excellent posts St. Christopher and Dana!
As for the REAL NUNS at Marin Catholic High School:
“The nuns at Marin Catholic High in Kentfield walked out their classes in protest over gay non-profit sponsoring anti-bullying Day of Silence.
“The divisions within the Bay Area’s Catholic community over gay rights hit Marin Catholic High School full force the other day, when a group of nuns walked out of their classes to protest the sponsors of a program intended to protect gay and lesbian teens from bullying.
“The five members of the Dominican Sisters of Mary order exited their classrooms Friday as students began handing out flyers at the Kentfield school promoting a nationwide Day of Silence.
“Their walkout came one day after 100 prominent local Catholics attracted national attention by taking out a full-page ad in The Chronicle calling on the pope to oust Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone, in part for trying to get teachers at Catholic schools to sign off on a morality clause that characterizes homosexual relations as “gravely evil.”
“Marin Catholic High President Tim Navone and Principal Chris Valdez tried to put out the latest brushfire with a letter to parents about “a challenging day on our campus resulting in both students and faculty feeling confused about our mission.”
“At issue was Friday’s annual Day of Silence, promoted by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network — whose corporate sponsors include McDonald’s, Target, Disney/ABC, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, Google and the NBA. It bills itself as a group of “students, parents, and teachers that tries to effect positive change in schools,” but the nuns at Marin Catholic High see it as anti-Catholic. https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/matier-ross/article/Marin-nuns-walk-out-of-school-to-protest-6214898.php
Let me ask you this question, should gay teens be bullied?
If gay teens should not be bullied, then how is this event immoral? It would seem to me to be a better position to say that bullying gay people is immoral, but also that engaging in gay sex is also immoral according to the Catholic faith.
No one should be bullied, including fat kids, kids with crooked teeth, short kids, etc.
Those who support homosexual acts should not be singled out for exceptional treatment.
When something is publically pushed by the homosexual community – it is a great time to teach teens about the sinfulness of homosexual acts as well as fornication – using both Sacred Scripture and the CCC. :)
By simply walking out, without making clear that they do not support bullying gay teens, the nuns tacitly support bullying gay teens.
Or, at least, it could be seen that way by those who despise homosexuals not for anything to do with God, but simply because they enjoy having someone to kick.
JonJ, should have sisters cowed the gaystapo and the rest of homo-fascist who demand conformity…or is gay sex something you think is moral???
No, the Sisters should have cowed to the Truth and conformed to the CCC, which tells us that homosexuals should be treated with dignity and respect.
While we know the ultimate purpose of the campaign, to the extent that it conforms to the Truth we must support that.
If, for example, someone is a glutton, that does not mean they deserve to be ridiculed and abuse. Just like supporting a campaign against workplace discrimination and bullying of fat people does not condone gluttony, supporting a campaign against bullying gay teens is not supporting homosexuality.
Of course, Canisius, you enjoy hurling abuse and kicking homosexuals. You like to conflate morality with delivering such abuse. This is not moral, or ethical in any way.
Perhaps they should be given tickets to a preview of the New Disney / ABC TV show featuring the Administration’s Tax Subsidized Bio-Terrorist / Convicted Election Fraudster – Dan ‘The Savage Lickspittle’, who will be promoting ‘Disney Values’ on the boob tube.
SEE
Disney Teams Up With Hate-Filled, Profane Activist For New Sitcom
https://www.westernjournalism.com/disney-teams-hate-filled-profane-gay-activist-new-sitcom/
As though Disney-owned ABC intentionally sought out the most divisive public figure available for its most recently announced venture, recent reports indicate Dan Savage has been slated to head up a television program based on his life… The outspokenly gay activist is not satisfied with merely touting the ostensible virtues of his own lifestyle choices; he repeatedly advocates pain and death for those who dare oppose his radical agenda.
Newsbusters compiled a truncated list of his objectionable remarks, including his daydreams about “f—king the s—t out of” former Sen. Rick Santorum and suggesting that another politician he opposed should be “dragged behind a pickup truck until there’s nothing left but the rope.”
Savage, who has teamed up with the Obama administration to raise money for his social program, also infamously proclaimed his belief that “abortion should be mandatory for about 30 years” to address overpopulation concerns.
His new exposure via a personally tailored vehicle currently titled Family of the Year is sure to make the foul-mouthed activist even more recognizable.
It gets more and more bizarre everyday, doesn’t it Michael?? Walt Disney would simply not believe what they’ve done to his dream. Nightmare doesn’t quite cover it.
Don’t think USD is a catholic institution, “By their fruits you shall know them” says the Lord! It is not! Don’t send your kids there as you will be held at least partially copable by our just and merciful God if your children fall for or just sympathize for the evil ones.
Faithful CATHOLIC kids should not be bullied either !