California will become the first state in the nation to require public universities to provide access to abortion pills on campus under a bill signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday.
Senate Bill 24 by state Sen. Connie Leyva (D-Chino) will go into effect in 2023, with the University of California and California State University systems required to offer students medical abortions. A medical abortion is a nonsurgical way to terminate a pregnancy that involves taking two prescription pills hours apart during a woman’s first 10 weeks of pregnancy to induce a miscarriage. It is different than the morning-after pill, which releases a high dose of a synthetic hormone found in birth control pills that delays or stops the release of an egg.
“As other states and the federal government go backward, restricting reproductive freedom, in California we are moving forward, expanding access and reaffirming a woman’s right to choose,” Newsom said in a written statement….
University healthcare centers currently refer students to off-campus facilities for abortion services when requested. Supporters of the bill said students, particularly those without cars, have a difficult time getting to off-campus health facilities or paying for the cost of the medication….
Last year, then-Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed a similar measure, saying the bill was “not necessary” because abortion services were “widely available” to students at off-campus clinics.
The above comes from an Oct. 11 story in the L.A. Times under the headline: “Abortion medication to be available at California’s college health centers under new law.”
Abortion medication??? — Sounds like an oxymoron.
Sort of like . . . Zyklon B pain reliever.
The California Catholic Conference and bishops urged opposition to this law and to Newsom signing it. Shows that the church in California has no political clout. Democrats are going to advance the culture of death. Better realize that sooner than later. Then realize being a Democrat is incompatible with being Catholic.
Mine is only the second comment on Governor Newsom’s signing of SB 24? This is pretty indicative of the general lack of coverage, hence of awareness, but in any case of interest in the meaning of this new law, set to take effect in 2023, which, thanks be to God, gives time for CA state colleges and universities to file whatever types of lawsuits they can to prevent its going into effect. Why this bill, and the previous one mysteriously vetoed by pro-abortion Jerry Brown, seemed to excite no media or popular interest is beyond me. One of the most politically savvy people I know in my area was a little mystified when I brought it up…”Oh, isn’t that just the Plan B?” No, it is not. Plan B is bad enough. This is a big step beyond. And it is a very happy event for Planned Parenthood. The Church encouraged opposition in an effective way, but my understanding is that not all parishes participated. The Republican Party, aside from voting correctly (as usual, abortion pro and con falls along party lines) did little to fight it beyond voting properly. And I don’t think there was any coordinated effort in parishes to contact the governor once SB 24 landed on his desk.
It is certainly OVERTIME for Newsom and the like (Pelosi, Speier, Kevin Mullen etc. etc…..sadly the list could go on and on…..Excommunication time. If this is not a case for it, I sure can’t tell you what is!!!!!!
For excommunication, I believe that decision would be made by Bishop Soto of Sacramento. I used to consider Bishop Soto to be orthodox. Unfortunately, something seems to have forced him off the rails. He needs our prayers.
Who pays for this joke on our kids? Catholic taxpayers? Sounds like “Taxation without Representation.” We are sure not being well represented by our elected reps.
California a blight on the United States of America
look at them beady eyes
it’s your governor, Cali