One of the great discussions surrounding the issue of abortion is that of fetal suffering. A famous documentary film, released in 1984, entitled The Silent Scream, and directed by Bernard Nathanson, an abortionist who repented before the images he had observed, was the subject of heated controversy….
Scientific progress has made it possible to clarify which structures of the brain are necessary for the fetus to feel pain.
Scientists have long and almost universally agreed that connections between the fetal spinal cord and the brain form between 12 and 18 weeks. But growing evidence shows that these connections, which develop quite late, are not necessary to feel pain. It is accepted that the fetus can and does feel pain as early as the onset of the second trimester, which is between 12 to 14 weeks. .
One of the subject matter experts, Stuart Derbyshire, was one of only two neuroscientists who dismissed the possibility of fetal pain before 22 weeks in a famous American report. But, in the face of accumulating scientific evidence to the contrary, he has abandoned his previous position.
Derbyshire now maintains that “the evidence, and a balanced reading of this evidence, points to an immediate and instinctive experience of pain, through developing nervous system functions, from the age of 12 weeks.”
There are five ways to prove that the connection between the cortex – the upper part of the brain – and the spinal cord, is not necessary for the perception of pain. Thus, multiple studies show that animals and humans suffer even if the cerebral cortex is altered, immature, or absent.
Complete removal of the cortex in mammals such as cats and rodents does not erase their response to painful stimuli; likewise, children born without all or most of the cortex are aware of and perceive suffering and pain.
Four other sources of data show that the feelings and emotions of the fetus appear long before the cortical circuits are established. Studies show that the cortex is not responsible for the emergence of human emotions. Rather, it is regions of the brain that develop earlier, such as the thalamus, which are present from the twelfth week of gestation, which can support consciousness and emotions.
Brain imaging and brain stimulation studies in animals and humans show that loss of consciousness and pain perception is associated with suppression of thalamic function. Experimental evidence of suppression of specific regions of the brain also refutes the claim that suffering requires cortical activity.
Finally, three sets of factual observations of fetal and newborn responses to stimuli provide direct and irrefutable evidence of fetal sensitivity to painful stimuli.
First, fetuses delivered prematurely – as early as 21 weeks – exhibit pain-related behaviors, and the younger they are, the stronger they are. This observation suggests that cortical circuits that develop later moderate or even inhibit suffering.
Consistent with these observations, a recent review of the evidence concluded that, starting at 13 weeks, “the fetus is extremely sensitive to painful stimuli,” making “the application of adequate analgesia necessary to prevent [fetal] distress” in cases of intrauterine surgery.
Second, recent reviews of the literature indicate that presence in the uterus has no numbing effect and that, therefore, as in the case of a premature child, a fetus can be aroused by painful stimuli.
Finally, and most compellingly, 4-D ultrasound observations confirm that the fetus responds to painful stimuli. A study published in January 2021 shows that 29-week-old fetuses injected with anesthetic before intrauterine surgery make facial gestures (grimaces, etc.) that are specifically associated with the experience of pain.
These pain-related gestures do not occur when the fetus is at rest or after a “surprising” stimulus such as loud noise. A case study from June 2021 replicated these results in an even younger, 21-week-old fetus.
While facial expressions reveal the experience of pain in people with limited ability to communicate verbally, such as young children, people with dementia, and many animal species, these responses do not occur in unconscious patients, in other words, those in a coma.
The fetus therefore not only “reacts to pain unconsciously and reflexively,” but communicates “a conscious experience of suffering through a universal language of pain.”
In summary, the twelve sources of evidence summarized here support the following conclusions:
(a) Contrary to the assumption of professional associations of physicians, a connection between the thalamus and the cortex is not necessary for a fetus to be conscious and to experience pain;
and (b) a fetus is probably conscious and able to comprehend pain at or before 18 weeks – and possibly as early as 12 weeks.
This supposes a terrible suffering when this child is put to death by the will of those who begot him.
It remains to be seen how these findings will be received in pro-abortion circles, and how the truth will be kept away from women who want to have an abortion.
But as for the other women, these courageous mothers, they did not need this scientific pageantry to know it in the depths of their hearts: this child that they are carrying, as soon as they feel it moving, is very much alive and can feel emotions, they cannot doubt it.
The above comes from a Nov. 18 posting on FSSPX News.
Will liberals “follow the science” even when it’s “an inconvenient truth” (to borrow a phrase from a once pro-life Democrat who caved in to the abortion lobby when he wanted to be president)?
You could say the fetus doesn’t feel pain at any stage. Does that give a license to kill?
To: Just wondering
Me too !
Like, if they killed the baby painlessly, then it’s ok.
Huh????
Of course, it’s not okay to kill a child at any age, even the earliest. My point: even most of those who support abortion have some sense of humanity left. They wouldn’t let a veterinarian put a dog down painfully or a serial murderer be executed painfully. Even “pro-choice” persons should see human pain as some type of threshold that should not be crossed. It’s good that some lives are saved, while we work to save all.
Can Stuart have a baby…the answer is no …don’t ever tell a women what to do with their body….shame on all …who have not bought formular and diapers for years….men who think babies are a blessing…man up..don’t see you Catholic men giving any $…for single mothers.
Arrogant…so many women now. Do they think that men have wonderful pain free lives? Maybe women need to do a heavy plumbing, roofing, or carpentry job, or carry bags of concrete for a while, or do house repairs. And why do women feel that they alone bear the responsibility of raising family children? More arrogance. And there was one decision in my family, made solely by my wife, her alone, as she told me point blank about her upcoming abortion. She made it clear that this was her choice alone, and my opinion did not matter. (Yes, don’t ever tell a woman what to do with HER body).
Condolences and prayers.
Hd. How many husbands carry bags of concrete or other heavy lifting jobs? Maybe one in 50. How many mothers go through labor? All of them.
I did not go through labor. I am sure that I am not the only one. Apparently my body is lacking in whatever hormone does that. My miscarriage did not come out on its own either.
Not to be argumentative but I also used to work with a young lady who lifted 50 pound bags. It was not concrete. They did their own house repairs too.
Fair points
Dear Don’t, many men and women, including myself, have contributed time, talent and treasure to support single mothers. Please meet, and join, some at your local life-affirming crisis pregnancy center. And, are you a woman? If so, are you permitted no opinion about wars because you’re not subject to the draft? One does not need direct experience of something in order to have an informed opinion. (Most reading this have never been slaves or slave holders or elected to national public office or a variety of other things, yet, we can still work toward justice and the common good, regardless of our relatively limited experience of such).
Can Stuart have a baby? No way to tell. He could be a transgender man who could have a baby.
Don’t ever tell a woman what to do with her body? Why not? The advertising industry will collapse if no one can tell a woman what to do with her body.
Shame on all. Why do feel the need to shame people? Are you trying to diminish them?
Who have not bought formula or diapers for years? In America, people do not need to make a purchase in order to exercise freedom of speech.
Men who think babies are a blessing Those are the good men. Men who think babies are a curse aren’t the ones to run things.
Man up…Another demeaning expression
Don’t see you Catholic men giving any $… You are not going to Mass are you?
for single mothers…A single mother can go to any Catholic Church and get help. (Plus, it reminds me of the old Steve Martin joke about how he was doing a lot of work with unwed mothers. It was the 70s. Probably doesn’t have the same zing now that most babies are born to unwed mothers)
Does your demand apply to transwomen too?
i wanna find out ….when do neuroscientists
feel pain ???