The battle over abortion has clearly left the country divided. Pro-life lawmakers have been passing laws to save lives, while pro-abortion lawmakers have been working to expand abortion as quickly as possible. In some cases, like in California and Maryland, this has even led to bills containing language that many legal experts believe allow loopholes for legal infanticide. It begs the question of just how far abortion activists are willing to go to protect the killing of preborn children — and judging by one video, the answer is disturbing.
Savanah Hernandez is a conservative content creator known for her man-on-the-street series, Sav Says. In a recent installment, Hernandez polled several people about their responses to California’s bill, AB 2223, which has been dubbed the ‘infanticide’ bill….
While this would seem to be an offensive prospect, Hernandez’s video shows otherwise.
“So I prefer that most women make their decisions at eight weeks, but if — I’m also in support of 10 months out of the womb,” the first man told Hernandez. Visibly stunned, Hernandez responded, “So you think babies should be aborted 10 months after they’re born?” The man answered, “If, if the mother wants to, yes.”
Hernandez’s next interview was with two women who were quick with profanity. “I think… f*** them kids,” the first woman said, laughing. “So, if like, you wanna get a late-term abortion, like that’s up to you. You know, I’ve had an abortion too, and it’s — it was my choice, and I’m happy I had that choice.”
The second woman then chimed in. “If you’re talking about, like, post-birth… um, that’s not considered an abortion,” she said. “You could look up abortion in the dictionary.”
“Would it be considered murder at that point?” Hernandez interjected.
“Um, I mean, if somebody — if somebody were to, um, you know, abandon the child in a dumpster, they would be — and they were found, yes, they would be charged,” she said, as the first woman made a face. “There are actual cases of that happening. That’s child neglect. And, um, anyone who’s putting their child in harm’s way, like, I think there should be definitely, like, things put in place to make sure that children are safe.”
But this stance didn’t stop her from supporting killing children prior to birth. “Anything that is, you know, pre-birth, if it involves, uh, termination of a fetus, uh, that’s considered an abortion. I 100% support it,” she continued. “I’ve had an abortion myself, and I’m not a bad person because I made the choice that was right for me and now I have a life that I enjoy. And I wouldn’t take it back.”
Hernandez then asked the women if they would get an abortion again, to which both responded strongly.
“Yes!” the first woman responded. “100 times. I’d do it multiple times.”
“100%, yeah,” the second woman agreed. “Until I feel I’m ready to parent, that’s the choice I’ll continue to make….”
The above comes from an April 28 story on LiveAction.org.
To watch video of this interview, click here.
Pro-life advocates are going to have to face the matter that women who seek abortions should be punished for being complicit in murder, not just the doctor performing the abortion. Pro-lifers don’t want to hold women who seek abortions criminally responsible because that would be the death of the pro-life movement in America and ensure legal abortion on the books from conception to the end of gestation. But logical consistency requires that if abortion is murder, any accomplice to that act should be considered a criminal and punished for the crime. Pro-life won’t go there because they know it doesn’t sell with voters or donors. And Big Pro Life isn’t concerned with consistency, Big Pro Life is just concerned with ensuring they keep their organizations flush with donations. Oh, they say that women who seek abortions are “victims” of men, which is why they shouldn’t be punished. That’s a ridiculous excuse. Women who are accomplices to crimes such as robbery and murder face the full force of legal punishment for their criminal acts. Should be the same with abortion, if abortion is deemed a criminal act. But nobody in pro-life has strong enough convictions to carry the reasoning and the legal implications to their logical ethical conclusion.
“….nobody….”?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10787149/Louisiana-legislators-advance-bill-classifying-abortion-homicide.html
” “Until I feel I’m ready to parent, that’s the choice I’ll continue to make….” ” Translated: “I will continue to have sex when and where I want it and kill my unborn baby as often as is necessary for me to continue to enjoy life. Nothing else matters.” The humanity of the unborn baby carries no weight, even up to birth. A country that elevates to the Supreme Court a person who can’t define what a woman is will also plead ignorance as to when life begins, although to both questions the answer is trivially obvious. This is a pass for these women and their men to revel in promiscuity. And the man who argue for infanticide 10 months out of the womb may well himself have wanted to kill an unwanted baby his mother would not abort. It is hard to understand his barbarism otherwise.
Unfortunately………..
a pretty fair representation of the culture
Only on Venice Beach in CA. That’s where all the crazies hang out.
A pretty fair representation of today’s Venice Beach, unfortunately. Particularly in the area of the boardwalk.
Ghouls unworthy of being mothers. Further proof I hope the reconquest of California by Mexico.
sad very sad and so “ignorant” I feel sorry for them. They have no idea what the heck they’re talking about. I’m literally SMH. Praying for their conversion.
Sin welcomes sin. ‘Misery loves company’. We justify our actions.
Exactly two ways to deal with sin, rationalization or repentance these ghouls choose the former