The following comes from a June 15 story in Scientific American.
When Mats Brännström first dreamed of performing uterus transplants, he envisioned helping women who were born without the organ or had to have hysterectomies. He wanted to give them a chance at birthing their own children, especially in countries like his native Sweden where surrogacy is illegal.
He auditioned the procedure in female rodents. Then he moved on to sheep and baboons. Two years ago, in a medical first, he managed to help a human womb–transplant patient deliver her own baby boy. In other patients, four more babies followed.
But his monumental feats have had an unintended effect: igniting hopes among some transwomen (those whose birth certificates read “male” but who identify as female) that they might one day carry their own children.
Cecile Unger, a specialist in female pelvic medicine at Cleveland Clinic, says several of the roughly 40 male-to-female transgender patients she saw in the past year have asked her about uterine transplants. One patient, she says, asked if she should wait to have her sex reassignment surgery until she could have a uterine transplant at the same time. (Unger’s advice was no.) Marci Bowers, a gynecological surgeon in northern California at Mills–Peninsula Medical Center, says that a handful of her male-to-female patients—“fewer than 5 percent”— ask about transplants. Boston Medical Center endocrinologist Joshua Safer says he, too, has fielded such requests among a small number of his transgender patients. With each patient, the subsequent conversations were an exercise in tamping down expectations.
To date there are no hard answers about whether such a fantastical-sounding procedure could enable a transwoman to carry a child. The operation has not been explored in animal trials, let alone in humans. Yet with six planned uterine transplant clinical trials among natal female patients across the U.S. and Europe reproductive researchers are hoping to become more comfortable with the surgery in the coming years. A string of successes could set a precedent that—along with patient interest—may crack open the door for other applications, including helping transwomen. “A lot of this work [in women] is intended to go down that road but no one is talking about that,” says Mark Sauer, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Columbia University.
Such a future is hard to imagine, at least in the near term. The surgery is still very experimental, even among natal women. Just over a dozen uterus transplants have been performed so far—with mixed results. One day after the first U.S. attempt, for example, the 26-year-old Cleveland Clinic patient had to have the transplanted organ removed due to complications. And only the Brännström group’s procedures have led to babies. More efforts are expected in the United States: Cleveland Clinic, Baylor University Medical Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and the University of Nebraska Medical Center are all registered to perform small pilot trials with female patients who are hoping to carry their own children.
The trouble is that uterine transplants are extremely complex and resource-intensive, requiring dozens of health personnel and careful coordination. First a uterus and its accompanying veins and arteries must be removed from a donor, either a living volunteer or a cadaver. Then the organ must be quickly implanted and must function correctly—ultimately producing menstruation in its recipient. If the patient does not have further complications, a year later a doctor may then implant an embryo created via in vitro fertilization. The resulting baby would have to be born through cesarean section—as a safety precaution to limit stress on the transplanted organ, and because the patient cannot feel labor contractions (nerves are not transplanted with the uterus). Following the transplant and throughout the pregnancy the patient has to take powerful antirejection drugs that come with the risk of problematic side effects.
The dynamic process of pregnancy also requires much more than simply having a womb to host a fetus, so the hurdles would be even greater for a transwoman. To support a fetus through pregnancy a transgender recipient would also need the right hormonal milieu and the vasculature to feed the uterus, along with a vagina. For individuals who are willing to take these extreme steps, reproductive specialists say such a breakthrough could be theoretically possible—just not easy….
Hey CalCatholic – Just because these trashy articles are printed doesn’t mean you should pass them along to your readers. Spare us the sensational foolishness.
As far as I know, Scientific American is not known for publishing “trashy articles” or “sensational foolishness.” On the contrary, the publication is widely regarded as providing solid, fact-based information on trends in various scientific fields. Just because you don’t like the content doesn’t mean you should kill the messenger.
Wm Hamilton:
I stopped reading SA about 15 years ago, after reading it pretty continuously from about 1975-2000, because, yes indeed, it was changing its policies and publishing “wilder” articles. It was also edited by a snotty atheist who took potshots at believers every chance he could.
Kristin:
This may tell us less about science than about the appalling decline in morality among scientists, and that is news.
Not trying to kill the messenger. Simply pointing out that CalCatholic need not follow the ebb and flow of the cesspool of transgender issues currently overflowing in this secular world.
That ebb and flow is effecting what those pastors and religious instructors you may be subjecting your children to are teaching, preaching, and promoting, Kristen. Better to find out what is going on in the world in which we and our children are expected to uphold Catholic Faith and Morals than to be sideswiped later.
The cesspool often rises in direct correlation to the willful ignorance of those who would not be bothered.
Really Ann Malley – you are unclear of Catholic Faith and Morals concerning transgender and reproductive issues? Guess you will have to get into the details of a lot of horribly nasty stuff to feel informed. Sorry you feel the need to get into the mud, pray for Our Lady’s protection as you venture unto these demonic places.
CalCatholic is doing Catholics a service in keeping them apprised of what would otherwise seem absurd. Unthinkable. While we plod along in our little circles, there’s a whole world of weird that’s surrounding the neighborhood – like it or not.
Better to be made aware than kept dangerously ignorant.
Kristin,
Sounds like you need a “safe space” to spare you the trauma of reading about something that’s going on in the real world that should be of concern to all.
Ha Ha Barbara, obviously you believe the idea (proffered by intolerant lefties) that there is and should be such a thing as a “safe space”. No thanks, I’ll just continue, trama free, to filter the garbage this world offers.
Enjoy your share of the “real world”, you and all the CalCatholic readers who believe they must wade through the social and moral muck of the day. Ugh!
Kristin:
That’s because out of that muck are arising monsters that seek our destruction.
Call it Anti-Scientific American – as pandering to MIsandry (hatred of Men & boys, Masculinity & Normal Heterosexuality) is a PC Farce for too afraid to speak the truth to power.
T. Sparks (SF In-Human Rights chair person) actually spoke at St. Marys (I have video if interested) and admitted that His Voice remains Male, and yet He Discriminated against Men at the ‘HRC’ and just settled an AntiMale Discrimination suit.
Thomas Willis v. City & County of San Francisco, Theresa Sparks, Micki Callahan
https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=2499269&GUID=44A7534A-B983-4DA5-A6B0-B16D9409DB97
The Pronoun Police are as vicious as Larry Brinkin is to toddlers, although Sparks “Supports Him 100%”
San Francisco’s Gay Icon Larry…
Medical science is heading into the insanity of FRANKENSTEIN medicine. For a born woman, this is madness. For a Trans.’ woman’, it’s unholy & insane. Not every born woman is blessed to have children by God’s will. Accept His will! What is ‘medical science’ doing? Pandering with FRANKENSTEIN like surgery ‘pilots’ to mad requests of a very few?. What ever happened to just saying ‘no’ to crazy requests? May God stop the madness and rebellion against His natural law and His holy will.