The following July 3 story appeared on the website of U.S. News.
As the Supreme Court heard arguments in March for the two gay marriage cases it decided last week, one image was shared again and again, adorning the Facebook and Twitter pages of brands, celebrities and political leaders: an equal sign in red, the color synonymous with love.
It was only fitting that the logo of the Human Rights Campaign would become the symbol of the two gay marriage wins at the Supreme Court last week – on California’s same-sex marriage ban, and on federal benefits for gay couples. HRC, the largest LGBT group in the country, had thrown an enormous amount of resources behind the fight for gay marriage. Its “Millions for Marriage” campaign had, quite literally, raised millions.
But while the HRC has racked up win after win on marriage, it may be quietly losing another, harder battle, a battle some say it hasn’t fought very hard to win: the fight against HIV/AIDS.
In December 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released startling new data that showed HIV was still plaguing the gay community. While new HIV infections had remained steady in the general public between 2008 and 2010, infections had risen by an incredible 22 percent in young gay men. Gay men represented two-thirds of new infections. And nearly 6,000 gay men were dying of AIDS every year.
The Kaiser Health Foundation recently described the problem of HIV in the city of Washington, where the HRC and many other big LGBT groups are headquartered, as “as epidemic on par with some developing nations.”
“Gay and bisexual men remain at the epicenter of the HIV/AIDS epidemic,” says Jonathan Mermin, the director of the CDC’s division of HIV/AIDS prevention. “But HIV is not always at the top of the list of priorities for LGBT organizations.”
When HRC spokesman Michael Cole-Schwartz lists off the priorities for the organization, the list is long: gay marriage, workplace nondiscrimination protections, safe schools, corporate support and benefits for employees, fostering positive places of worship. He doesn’t name HIV/AIDS.
Choosing priorities, Cole-Schwartz says, is a “balancing act” and the issue of HIV/AIDS is one he says “thankfully we haven’t had to deal with too much.” Most of HRC’s work on the disease, he says, is done through partnerships or coalitions.
It’s not just the HRC. HIV/AIDS isn’t a top priority for any of the three major LGBT groups in the U.S.: not the HRC, or the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), or the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) – who together are somewhat pejoratively known as “Gay Inc.”
“‘Gay Inc.’ is interested in military, marriage, and money,” says Michael Petrelis, a gay and AIDS activist, in reference to the campaigns against the military policy of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” which was overturned in 2010, and the Defense of Marriage Act, which was ruled unconstitutional last week. “But for the millions of gay people who don’t want to be soldiers, who don’t want to get married, where’s the advocacy?” he says.
Peter Staley, a gay activist who founded the Treatment Action Group, a HIV/AIDS activist organization, also uses the term.
“The recent rise of HIV/AIDS … is huge and it’s not talked about because ‘Gay Inc.’ says nothing about it,” he says.
In a recent op-ed in The Washington Post, Staley urged ‘Gay Inc.’ to allocate 10 percent of its budget to fighting HIV. He estimates the groups currently spend less than 1 percent, a number HRC said it couldn’t confirm or deny because it doesn’t break down its spending by issue type, while GLAAD and NGLTF didn’t respond to request for comment. (HRC’s total budget is more than $40 million.)
To read original story, click here.
Gays are slave to their passions, even them dropping like flies makes no difference they must fulfill their carnal passions at any cost
Actually, people of your generation are are the ones dropping like flies, Canisius. Maybe 10% of people your age die every year. But I suppose it would be rude of me to point that out, huh?
His age includes those who are dropping like flies from some STD’s like AIDS, Anon, too. You forgot that fact.
You dont even know what generation I am part of
“At any cost!” the cost is ETERNAL DEATH! No liberal bishop, priest, or religious can change that!
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher
Quite right Kenneth….
gay men do not rape women and more straight men are contacting hiv as well as other std, get your fscts right bro
This lack of concern is most directly played out in the fact that a substantial proportion, by some measures a majority of HIV+ MSM withhold information of their epidemiological status from their casual contacts (lets avoid terms unworthy of mention), apparently acting as if activity central to their avowed lifestyle were of negligible importance to those for whom the purport to have so much care. Search: google.com/search?q=HIV+positive+gays+don’t+tell+partners
Really Rod, how would you know the “measures to which a majority of HIV+ MSM withold hinformation”, unless you were one who does so yourself?
YFC, maybe Rod is well read. It is not always necessary to have first hand experience of something to know of it’s existence.
Ahhh yes, schadenfreude as a good old fashioned Catholic value.
YFC – there are consequences to all actions.
Many homosexuals do not even care about each other – only about their ability to commit sodomy with whomever they wish, and push their lifestyle upon the innocent.
“HIV is not always at the top of the list of priorities for LGBT organizations.”
This is not only the saving of their physical human lives, but also the saving of their eternal Souls.
Rom 1:24-27; 1 Cor 6:9-10; 1 Tim 1:10.
Ahhh, yes, sodomy as a good old fashioned Satanic value.
still superior to gayness and its worship of the phallus….
YCF: “Men’s courses will foreshadow certain ends” (Dickens). If some gays treat both their salvation and their health so carelessly, how is my compassion to be effective? Could the Good Samaritan have helped a man who recklessly and relentlessly bruised himself? You appear to want the impossible (that unhealthy behavior not have unhealthy consequences) and the irrational (that those who point out such behavior accept some blame for consequences of behavior they have tried to forestall). “Good old fashioned Catholics” like me support an institution that takes care of more AIDS patients around the world than any other. That’s apparently not enough for you: we’re supposed to pretend that a horrid epidemic isn’t largely the consequence of immoral behavior. Sorry, YFC: the AIDS epidemic is a consequence of depraved conduct, and depravity can kill.
Tom, let me remind you once again: The typical AIDS patient is actually straight, not gay. Besides which, if it were God’s “consequence” for being gay, he could have inflicted it far more directly upon gay people, and tens of thousands of years sooner. So if we are to believe your God, he dallies for thousands of years and then sends a disease that ravishes entire continents, all the while still creating gay people in his own image and likeness.
My God is a lot smarter and more compassionate than your God.
YFC, your response to Tom has nothing to do with what he posted, “We’re supposed to pretend that a horrid epidemic isn’t largely the consequence of immoral behavior.”
YFC, let me remind you once again what the director of the CDC’s division of HIV/AIDS prevention, Jonathan Mermin said. “Gay and bisexual men remain at the epicenter of the HIV/AIDS epidemic but HIV is not always at the top of the list of priorities for LGBT organizations.”
YFC, all you have is SPIN, DIVERT, SPIN, DIVERT, SPIN, DIVERT, SPIN, DIVERT……………………………………………….
Only the truth will set you free!
Tracy…the CDC was reporting numbers IN THE UNITED STATES. Worldwide, it is largely a straight disease. If AIDS is the wages for homosexuality, it is only such in the western countries of US and Europe. Funny that God would respect geo-political boundaries, isn’t it?
“God’s consequence”? You mean one’s own consequence as a result of abandoning God. We inflict evil on ourselves by walking away from Him rather than with Him. The Prodigal Son wasn’t punished by his father, who tried to talk him out of selfish and self-destructive behavior, and rejoiced when he abandoned it and came home. Oscar Wilde also lived a selfish life, but came home on his deathbed, and I rejoice for him.
You’re arguing a good point, YFC, but you’re executing your argument backwards. The punishment for sin initially is the Fall. There are dangers to our health because of the Fall. Dimmed consciences make poor behavior choices, and thus such people are more subject to diseases, other things being equal. Low immune systems make people more susceptible to diseases. Normal orientation people who have weakened immune systems and are in hiv environments are more numerous than gay people with lower immune systems, and thus the numbers of such people would be much greater. As to who is guilty of foisting AIDS on society, the argument is alive; however, the fact taught us by St Paul is that same sex attraction is the consequence of sin. Civilizationally, the Bible records over and over the pattern where a virtuous society may descend into institutionalized (popularized) adultery and idolatry (these seem to go hand in hand), and then from there it will drop into institutionalized sodomy and make its exeunt from the world of the living.
YFC, The catechism says God made you, it does not say God made the homosexual inclination. This is merely your interpretation of what the catechism says. God made us but Original Sin corrupted us. God did not create disordered inclinations. You assume some inclinations were created by God rather than being due to a consequence of Original Sin; catechism says God created our souls but that our bodies came into being through physical processes – as God intended after the creation of Adam and Eve. Pro-homosexuals maintain homosexuality has a biological component, since our bodies arise from physical processes, these processes are subject to the effects of Original Sin.
I see no reason to believe God created homosexuality in light of Church teaching on Original Sin and homosexuality. Original Sin brought about all sin and the inclination to sin, as well as death and disease in Man. These conditions may very well have biological components, but nevertheless, they are a result of Original Sin .Scripture too says Man is, by nature, sinful. Furthermore, your speculation does not explain why God would condemn all homosexual acts in both the Old and New Testaments if He made homosexuality. Nor does it explain why God did not create homosexual marriage in the Beginning as He did for man and woman. Your implying that God created homosexuality makes no sense in light of Church teaching. Death, disease, disorders keep on occuring but they are not part of God’s created internt.
God created order, not disorder, YFC. Homosexuality is disorder. Even if there is a gene that forces its carrier to act out sodomically, it is not God’s doing. You gay apologists are always maligning God by insinuating slyly that He created problems. The problem is the gay agenda and its rabid supporters, not “straights”.
YFC, “So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.
[1:28] God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply,”
I see talk of God’s image portrayed as male and female and of procreation here. I see nothing of heterosexual and homosexual and not procreating as your notion of God’s image implies. Nor do I see anything in Church teaching along the line of your notion.
To Your Fellow Catholic: the epithelium of the rectum is monostratified. The vagina is polystratified, meaning it has multiple cell layers. This is why semen deposited in the rectum gives you the STD known as AIDS. So go right ahead and condemn your life in this world and in the next one for a perversion. The only regret I have is that you gay homosexuals also pervert innocent ephebi. Enjoy it while it lasts.
YFC: I am slowly getting tired of your preposterous arguments. I wish you’d stop gracing the pages of this website with your hate-filled and perverted rhetoric.
Look in the mirror.Do you see a Catholic?Calumny is a mortal sin.
Discussing this topic last night with my wife, she brought up that we should not fall into using the language that “they” want us to use. There is no such thing as “gay marriage”. At best, it should be described as “homosexual union permit” or, better yet, “sodomy license”. I also agree with an earlier article about how we should use the term “Holy Matrimony” to describe our sacrament.
As I said in that other page, I agree that the Church should call the sacrament “holy matrimony”. So we agree there. And you and I are almost agreed when that same sex couples should be issued a license. But it is a marriage license, not a sodomy license. Why? Because “sodomy” doesn’t need a license. Both gay people and straight people commit sodomy every day with a marriage license and without a marriage license.
Straight people do not commit sodomy, YFC. There is some slang tradition that sodomy refers to a specific act, but the actual meaning of the word has to do with the ancient city of Sodom, where all the inhabitants were sexual perverts, all desiring to rape angels rather than the girls who were offered them if they’d go away. All sodomites, all homosexuals that is, which means man on man or woman on woman, are doomed unless they turn from their same sex perversion. Sodomy refers to same sex activity. If you use it in some legal sense and are also doing so in an advisory manner, then you could be arrested for practicing law without a license.
Keep your sacrament. What gays and lesbians want is CIVIL marriage that imparts CIVIL and SECULAR rights, benefits and, yes, responsibilities.
Just like they do in much of Europe and Latin Ameria and with which the RCC has learned to co-exist for a very long time now:
BTW, 35 years is a good start, but my partner and I have 41 years together … without benefit of church or state. I’ll match our commitment to yours anytime.
Jimbo, Are you lost again? This is a Catholic site and you are certainly not a Catholic.
Yes, Jim McCrea, St Peter keeps our Sacraments. You can strive against God’s will all you want; yet the Church strives for doing God’s will, which is to save souls. You may believe you are more powerful or more authoritative that God … but such vanity is shear foolishness. You gays actually think faithful Catholics believe your fables about monogamy … We believe St Paul who gives us the heads up that the consciences of sodomites are dim. But Jesus will light up your life if you open the door.
You will pay for your so called commitment in the next life!
May God have mercy on your soul,
Kenneth M. Fisher
Despair is a mortal sin.
I wonder how many so-called married homosexuals remain monogamous while in their so-called marriage compared to heterosexuals. It also seems that even in monogamous homosexual so-called marriages that sodomy would cause health issues not found with vaginal intercourse.
Jim McCrea writes, “BTW, 35 years is a good start, but my partner and I have 41 years together … without benefit of church or state. I’ll match our commitment to yours anytime.”
Forty-one years of sulfuric stench is absolutely nothing to be proud of unless you enjoy pleasing the devil.
Jim, YFC and others advocating sinful lifestyles here is a message I have for you…all in charity:
“Tolerance is an attitude of reasoned patience toward evil … a forbearance that restrains us from showing anger or inflicting punishment. Tolerance applies only to persons … never to truth. Tolerance applies to the erring, intolerance to the error … Architects are as intolerant about sand as foundations for skyscrapers as doctors are intolerant about germs in the laboratory. Tolerance does not apply to truth or principles. About these things we must be intolerant, and for this kind of intolerance, so much needed to rouse us from sentimental gush, I make a plea. Intolerance of this kind is the foundation of all stability.”
― Fulton J. Sheen
“The world may disagree with the Church, but the world knows very definitely with what it is disagreeing. In the future as in the past, the Church will be intolerant about the sanctity of marriage, for what God has joined together no man shall put asunder; she will be intolerant about her creed, and be ready to die for it, for she fears not those who kill the body, but rather those who have the power to cast body and soul into hell.”
― Fulton J. Sheen
Abeca, thank you for posting these quotes from Servant of God, Bishop Fulton Sheen. His explanation of the definition of tolerance is the best I’ve heard.
How you gonna make gay sex “normal” if your talk of dying and AIDS? The movement is on a roll convincing the culture to buy in big time including everybody from the first grade to the Supreme Court. We are nearing the final stages of national re-education. It’s kind of like communism — many millions may have to die to accomplish the greater social outcome.
Note how even the US Center for Disease Control is controlled by euphemisms like “MSM” (‘happy – men who have sex with men’) – even when the facts of the transmission route (homo=anal buggery) are well established and widely known.
Dan Savage – the tax subsidized ‘it gets better’ spokesman for the US Government on ‘Happy’ issues – has explicitly stated that that it is the “Frothy Mix of Feces & Lube” that is the shared common bond / attraction amongst his comrades…
And yet, despite the fact that such is being pushed on Boys as young as Larry Brinkin’s Victims –
The Lamesteam Media and even CDC just can’t quite bring themselves to openly discuss the behavioral root of a pandemic that has killed unknown millions to date, and with expected mutations threatens many times that number.
>>>”CDC warns gay men of ‘epidemic’ HIV rates
WASHINGTON, DC, July 8, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A fact sheet released at the end of June by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) warns that HIV rates, already at epidemic proportions, are continuing to climb steadily among men who have sex with men (MSM).
“Gay and bisexual men remain at the epicenter of the HIV/AIDS epidemic,” says Jonathan Mermin, the director of the CDC’s division of HIV/AIDS prevention.
The CDC notes that while homosexual men make up only a very small percentage of the male population (4%), MSM account for over three-quarters of all new HIV infections, and nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of all new infections in 2010 (29,800).
“Men who have sex with men remain the group most heavily affected by HIV in the United States,” the fact sheet states…
I’m not following you at all Michael. You think the CDC is “controlled” by an acronym? Hardly. They invented it to describe people who engage in a set of behaviors, irresepctive of how they identify, who they live with, whether or not they are primarily straight or primarily gay. And it is the CDC itself that points out that is among men who have sex with men that HIV is most commonly spread in the US. What makes you think they aren’t discussing the behavior root of the issue?
YFC, you fail to come to grips with the fact that gayness “sears the conscience”; so how do you expect to be able to follow much at all, until you turn away from your gayness?
It is not possible to turn away from something that is innate, Skai. I can no more turn away from my “gayness” than you can turn away from your “straightness”. “Gayness” doesn’t sear my conscience, by the way, it simply makes it more fabulous.
will see how fabulous it is when you face Christ in judgment
YFC… sorry no, homosexuality is not innate. It is a choice. You have been convinced otherwise, of course, and research proves that your brain is altered once you become intrenched in the lifestyle (seared), but yes, you can stop having homosexual sex. No one ever died from sex deprivation. You, my friend, have a choice. God didn’t make you that way… someone groomed you into it, but it wasn’t God.
YFC, Jesus says to pluck out your eye and cut off your hand if it causes you to sin. He also says to deny yourself, and take up your cross and follow him.
Pope Emeritus Benedict has said that it is “still an open question whether these inclinations are innate or whether they arise in early childhood” Light of the World p. 152
The Pope Emeritus is not an authority in early childhood development or sexual identity formation. Just because he says something, doesn’t necessarily mean it is so.
peter, sounds like you’re in your spiritual death grip.
YFC, regardless of the origin of your gayness, you can turn away from it. If it is stronger than you are, then you can trust Jesus to help you do get away from it. Why do you insist on the idea that God is ok with you doing whatever you are attracted to doing? Don’t you know that it is a mockery of God to call yourself a believer and yet believe that God does not love you enough to keep you from sin? You need to exchange your gay idol for the real God, whom you will find in Jesus.
YFC you are an authority on nothing …
“Anonymous” 5:21 and 5:35 are Skai.
“Dan Savage – the tax subsidized ‘it gets better’ spokesman for the US Government on ‘Happy’ issues – has explicitly stated that that it is the “Frothy Mix of Feces & Lube” that is the shared common bond / attraction amongst his comrades…” This is a bold faced lie. Dan Savage said no such thing. What he did do is re-define the word “santorum” to mean the above stated mess. The political undertone is obvious . . . .
peter, it also describes your tone … see my comment about the dead bloated cow ready to explode into the universe.
Dan Savage is vile bug to be stepped on…..
Dan ‘the Savage Lickspittle’ is indeed a frothy mix of Bio-Terrorist & Bold Faced Liar & Election Faudster, and those are his better points. Anyone who remembers the facts (since then heavily censored by the bought and paid for ‘free press’) of his ‘goo-gool bomb’ in the 2012 election, knows how much the Savage Lickspittle loves to ‘Spread Soetoro’.
Savage showed he was an Out & Proud Bio-Terrorist – when he fraudulently registering as a Republican in Iowa in order to infiltrate and harm the Gary Bauer presidential campaign – and wrote about his trying to infect the staff there with whatever physical sickness he could – via licking toilet fixtures and then ‘clean’ coffee cups in the staff break room – and handing the candidate a spittle coated pen, hoping he would become ill.
After his Guilty Plea to Fraud in falsely registering (think of it as Chicago style voting), savage tried to downplay his Bio-Terrorist activism by claiming it was all made up, or at least a lot of it. However, this type of lie ignores the “Terrorist” intent behind his ‘it gets sicker’ scam – as the purpose of Terrorizing the ‘enemy’ (you know who you are, and so do they) is accomplished by making them think they have been poisoned.
Consider – if someone mails an envelope with a small amount of talcum powder, and a note inside saying it is a deadly poison – it doesn’t actually have to be a poison, to achieve the desired goal – Promoting Tolerance.
With a record of such ‘tolerance’ the Savage Lickspittle was embraced by the Abomination of Barry (Soetoro / Marshall Davis / ObamAcorn,,, Whoever the guy really is) and many others (including SFPD Subsidy) to Spread Soetoro nationwide.
Savage took a poll of his Homo-Anal Coprophile constituents as part of his ‘cover amerika – with spittle’ pogrom of attacking various candidates as a surrogate for Soetoro. The poll was significant because it sought Consensus amongst Coprophiles – and achieved it.
Savage reported that it was the “Frothy Mix of Feces & Lube” that accompanied Homo-Anal Buggery – that was the Number 1 choice of those who get their giggles from playing in Number 2…
And tried to smear others with their byproduct of ‘love’ – while leaving out the connection to Soetoro and his days as a stall stallion in Chicago’s notorious Homo-Anal Bathhouse = ‘Man Country”.
But then it is not as if anybody in the lamesteam media dare report on that either, save a few brave sources like:
SEE – The Doorknob Chronicles of Dan Savage
If you haven’t already done so, add this regulation to your rules for living: Never take sex advice from a man who licks doorknobs.
The reasoning—as if a reason needed to be given—is that a man who doesn’t understand the telos of a doorknob isn’t likely to understand the telos of sex. Unfortunately, many people seem to disagree with me, which is why Dan Savage has become one of the most influential sex-advice columnists in America…
Women are a firebreak for heterosexual men.It is almost impossible for a man to become infected by an HIV positive woman who was probably infected by a bi-sexual man.
Why are the percentages so skewed when in Africa it nears 50-50 men and women ? Anthropological studies have shown that male sodomy (while vociferously denied by the MEN who claim exclusive heterosexuality) is common,and that heterosexual sodomy between a bi-sexual man and heterosexual woman is also common.
I just read your three articles. They do not support your conclusion that women are a firebreak for heterosexual men, or that most women were infected by bisexual men. There is no data anywhere close to supporting your conclusions in these papers. The first comes the closest, but it is not an epidemeological paper. I presents an hypothesis about transmission but offers ZERO evidence to support it.
Gordon Campbell, you write about male sodomy in Africa but most of the sodomy that occurs in Africa is between men and women. I doubt that it is almost impossible for a man to become infected by a HIV positive woman that he is engaging in sodomy with. In Africa a large percentage of men with AIDS were infected by having sex with prostitutes so your statement that it is almost impossible for a man to become infected by an HIV positive woman is not true. Many African women got the AIDS virus from their husbands who were infected by female prostitutes. So promiscuity with women is a risk factor in men getting AIDS.
PA, even in monogamous homosexual relationships where neither partner carries HIV, sodomy causes other many more health issues compared to vaginal intercourse. The anus was structured for exit not entry. Why would anyone condone people (either homosexual or hetersexual) engaging in sodomy. And then there anal sex acts which are even more unhealthy.
PA, sodomy is same sex engagement, not man on woman. You know that because we’ve been over it dozens of times on this site. Yet, you do manifest the odd trait of not remembering very much other than your mantras … you should seek treatment for it.
Anonymous, the word sodomy means different things to different people. To some, it means anything other than penile-vaginal sex. So, oral sex, frottage, anal penetration, masturbation, are all sodomy. To others, only anal sex qualifies as sodomy. YOU interpret sodomy as any sex between two people of the same sex, but this is not a commonly understood definition of the word.
The main concept of the word “sodomy” has to do with the entire population of the city called Sodom, its people who all pressured God’s two angels to submit to gang rape, and rejected the two virgin daughters offered them by Lott in his attempt to protect the angels. Sodomy, the root concept, means to attack God by sexual perversion.
Excuse, me, are you saying that if a man and a woman engage in anal sex than that isn’t sodomy? Do they get some kind of dispensation because they are the opposite sex? Are you saying that the same acts are OK if engaged in by people of the opposite sex?
Mark, reread what Anonymous wrote.
PA, like your butt buddy YFC, you confuse legal terminology with religious terminology on a religious forum. But gays are confused, so we understand how you mix up words and meanings in your life and de facto project this corruption on others.
Skai, the word sodomy derives from the city Sodom in the English language but we are only one language. The words for this in many other languages are other words which are not related to the city of Sodom. You have a fixation with this word.
“Fire break”? Women? Seems more that they are the fire than the break.
In fact, I don’t think women are the “break” at all, only the fire. Can’t think of any woman ever giving me a break; rather they’ve always tried to break me :) :)
YFC’s semantic sophistry is emblematic of the bankruptcy of substance in Gaystapo Propaganda – and the reliance of bait & switch obfuscation to avoid stating and or dealing with the obvious…
In Other words, it is a crock of (excrement deleted) designed to cover up even more of the same…
Which is what the CDC has largely done in its heavily sanitized discussion of the types of Behaviors behind the massive STD / Aids / Rectal Gonorrhea explosion… – with the “Conga Line of Buggery” leading in development of even more treatment resistant strains …
– Most vectoring forth from the Homo-Anal Coprophlle population going about their dirty business with gay abandon, particularly in nexus locations like my ole home town of Frisco – now better known as Sodom by the Sea.
For those ‘Lurkers’ out there (you know who you are) who are a bit confused by the ‘Politics of Adversarial Terminology’ going on with the ‘question’, here is how it plays out:
I discussed the CDC terminology regarding the Spread of Aids / STD as being controlled by Sanitized Euphemism (Def: euphemism = 1. the deliberate or polite use of a pleasant or neutral word or expression to avoid the emotional implications of a plain term, as passed over for died”).
Controlled is used in the Orwellian ‘Newspeak’ sense of limiting Thoughts on a subject by limiting the permitted vocabulary. No more good and bad, just good and Un-Good, at first.
This avoidance of discussion of the Actual Mechanism of transmission is done to avoid the anger of the Homo-Anal Coprophile activist population, who prefer to keep the “Frothy Mix of Feces & Lube” that defines their ‘love’ (according to Dan Savage – White House spokesman, Bio-Terrorist lickspittle, election fraudster & frothy mixer himself) – an ‘open secret’.
By Contrast – an “Acronym” is an Abbreviation – but if it abbreviates a sanitized Euphemism it is as empty as the original – as with Men Sexing Men / MSM, which fails to carry the specific excremental content of a more clinically accurate description.
Nor is the distinction simply scatalogical – as the medical science shows that the Lower Colon is one of the most vulnerable locations to insert infectious agents (almost as good as sharing a dirty needle), and Coprophile Behaviors themselves has pave a pathological component (Hepititas…) inherent in human fecal contamination (including outbreaks of Typhoid, Cholera…)
One ‘Happy’ commenter wrote yeas ago of the need for caution in such discussions, particularly concerning what he termed the “Mechanical Difficulties associated with the Anatomical Mechanics” of happy behaviors. Meaning that if the ‘Vanilla’ (clueless suburban taxpayer / voters) actually got wind of what they were subsidizing, they would toss their cookies – and elected reps authorizing it too.
Soooo… The CDC screens outright mention of the Coprophile Behaviors behind the spread of ever newer treatment resistant diseases, transmitted primarily by Homo-Anal Behavior – primarily because of the ‘ick’ factor that candid analysis generates in most people sane enough to remember their basic hygiene training in regard to human waste handling – or more to the point, Not Handling… Or playing with, or whipping in to a “Frothy Mix…” Etc.
Michael, you are really humourous when you write, “YFC’s semantic sophistry is emblematic of the bankruptcy of substance in Gaystapo Propaganda – and the reliance of bait & switch obfuscation to avoid stating and or dealing with the obvious…”
As though the creation and use of nicknames isn’t itself a bankrupt obfuscation !
But, Gay leatherman, sure looks like McDermott clocked your inner self, doesn’t it. Hit some kind of a nerve … which is a good thing, because it means you are still alive and can still turn away from your life of sin and depravity.
Wow, Michael that was amazing! You have a truly unique way of making your unarguable points.
Gay medical research should be defunded, and private funding should be made illegal.
Michael McDermott: You have provided you usual brilliant and definitive analysis! Vincit veritas!
Your Fellow Catholic: Well, Anton, Michael McDermott has tried his best to use his “usual brilliant and definitive analysis” to litigate against gay folks, whereupon he was quite thoroughly laughed out of court. His arguments use made up words and concepts (“gaystapo”), talk in circles, and drones on and on. It would be nice if he actually stuck to facts and logical argument, but that may be too much to ask.
McDermott is speaking to your inner self, YFC. You know what he is saying, and yet you are denying that you know.
You want facts, YFC? Gay men in the US are 80 times more likely to get a STD than straight men, and 60 times more for AIDs. You can’t deny this – these are facts from CDC and the California Dept. Health. More facts, pictures: Google “Folsom Street Fair” in San Francisco, and look at what gays are doing, on a public street with families. Even worse, “Up your Alley”, at which men openly engage in sex. How can you deny this YFC? Well, you go to Africa and say, “See – look at what happens to straight guys !- they get AIDS!, so therefore, this excuses us gay guys!” In fact, the behavior of the men in Africa is the exact analog of the behavior of gay men here – uncontrolled and unthinking sex. In fact, it’s compounded by strange beliefs, for example, that if one engages in rape, it will prevent AIDS! Ignorance not too much different from that of the Gays here….
Gosh Campers – such continued sweet talking might turn my pretty head, if I weren’t already used to adulation from the masses and denigration from the A__ex. Ahem.
As for the Term GAYSTAPO – aside from the direct link to the Homo-Nazi Predecessors of the ‘third’ reich, the term itself is growing in modern usage simply because it fits the phenomenon so well.
Authors across the spectrum, from UNCW Law Professor Mike Adams to Johan Hari writing for ‘huff-poo’ can all agree – we are seeing a repeat of history (with better costumes and a new musical score, although the script only needed minor modifications to target the Pigs of the Patriarchy (You know who you are, and so does the Gaystapo – and silence is not an option)
The Strange, Strange Story of Gay Fascists. by Johann Hari.
The lost boys of Afghanistan by: JOEL BRINKLEY.
The Pink Swastika
A Queer and Present Danger by Mike Adams
It looks like the Gaystapo is really up in arms over my recent series of articles on Cisco’s firing of Frank Turek…
YFC, after you admitted that you are not all that familiar with your own field of science, how can anyone credit you with much familiarity with the various forms of rhetoric … even when they merge with poetry, the form pretty much which is used by McDermott? Why is it, YFC, that so many professionals are educated in extremely narrow areas, and do not understand why they come off as ignoramouses when opining on almost any other area of experience or knowledge?
Skai, what the bleep are you talking about now? Where did I admit that I’m not familiar with my own field? When I exposed your ridiculous appeal to “gene pooling”. Which, by the way, you STILL haven’t provided a single reference that even includes this made-up word?
McDermott isn’t a poet, he’s an attorney. He’s an attorney whose briefs are so full of made up long winded nonsense that judges roll their eyes when his cases are before them. Maybe he SHOULD try poetry.
YFC, A. McDermott’s style is heavy on the poetic side of rhetoric. B. Attorney’s can be poets. C. You apparently do not know what poetry is. D. I provided the definition references to “gene pooling” twice already … Wikipedia even has a page on it, and googling “gene pooling” brings forth millions of entries. I know how science works, what it is, and how it is funded in universities. I also understand the semantics games that people play, although you seem to be unaware of this. If you do not like the phrase, “gene pooling”, then look at “gene pool”: To me there is not much difference at all between the two concepts; although you might have a different opinion.
Gollyinski Lurkers (*you know who you are, and apparently so does the NSA of the Abomination) – talk about tossing ‘pink bricks’ from the porch of your own glass outhouse…
Goshen – But hasn’t the Anonymous Troll ‘YFC’ – (Yer Foolin Catholics, Not’) just gone and thrown down the gauntlet to start a ‘flame war’ with some serious nastiness – as in calling your ever forthright correspondent a dirty name: “Attorney”.
I had hoped to avoid the descent in to such unhealthy depths, but one thing I did learn in law school is that the winner in the “Race to the Bottom” (most dirty and underhanded player) – Usually gets the biggest payday… And if they are really clever ‘Attorneys’, the people they ripped off (aka ‘Clients’) will afterwards thank them for the fleecing (see Vonnegut – “God Bless You Mr. Rosewater”).
Soooo… Time for some Veritas. I did graduate (w/ Dist) from McGeorge Law School in 03, where I founded the ‘Campus Men’s Caucus’ as a counterpart to the very strong ‘Womyn’s Caucus”, and caught the expected flack over that presumption of ‘equality’.
Although I passed the CA Bar exam right away (they say it is ‘tough’ -although I found it demanding but not truly difficult) – I did not get my license until 2005 (#235984 – on line at CA Bar). This was in large measure due to the Gaystapo (both at School and the Bar) Thought Police, who do not like Diversity of Viewpoints…
– Meaning they don’t like (and heavily Censor / Punish) – different Views that might interfere with their pogrom of promoting Diverse Looking Lawyers – marching in rigid linear non-bending (aka “straight’) lockstep to the same funky tune of PC MISANDRY (Hatred of Men & Boys, Masculinity and Normal Heterosexuality) that is the Tenure Track in the pathetic farce of Academentia, and particularly law school.
Funny Thing – Not, but the Womyn assigned as my alleged ‘moral character’ analyst by the CA Bar, was not only a butch buzz kut snake eyed Misandrist, but I had apparently gotten video of her marching amidst the screaming Dyke Misandrists during the Annual Tax Subsidized Anti Male Hate riot in Frisco – Known as the SF Dyke March (which I have recorded for many years now, and could use help editing for a short video).
Men told not to rain on parade Unity key to Dyke March / 50,000 expected at S.F. Dyke March 50,000 expected — men not advised.
Long and convoluted story (as expected with the ‘law’) shortened considerably – When I complained to the Bar about ‘my moral character analyst’ violating Bar rules to delay my licensing (and provided copies of the Dyke March Video I had made) – they did not respond about her marching in the video – but just sent an unsigned letter Admitting my “Good Moral Character” (kind of like a ‘satanist’ giving absolution, only not as sincere) and admitting me to the exalted ranks of the Bar.
Mind – I have never made a nickel off the license, and it has cost a lot to keep it – but I know from personal experience obtained at great hardship that the ‘legal profession’ will Not Defend the Rights of Men such as I, at least when it involves the cost of taking on the Twysted Systerhood that runs the system according to rules of the ‘Gaystapo Coin Toss’ = Heads they Win, Tails You Lose.
Having been punished by the Govt. for public service in the past ( I was the Sole Official Designated Public Interest Representative for the Citizens of CA on its initial ‘Coastal Oil & Haz-Mat Storage & Transfer Disaster Study ‘ By SL Ross 1990, and also helped write an NFPA National Standard on Marine Fire fighting) – which despite the thanks of the program leaders, none the less became a part of the secret ‘star chamber’ proceeding that cost my career as a Fireman…
_ This was done Because (as the Govt. claimed – in secret) I had “Written numerous Letters to the Editor expressing Negative Views on Current Women’s Issues” It took getting fired just to find out the secret charges, and I could find no lawyer willing to even challenge this egregious First Amendment Violation. Afterwards I decided that the only way to protect my own Civil Rights was to learn the ‘law’ (haw, what a naive notion, as if such a thing as ‘the Law’ actually exists) and get a license so as to be able to defend myself as well as file Amicus (friend of the court) Briefs in defense of Goodness & Niceness – for a change.
(BTW – the Judge in the FD case was an Employee of the County of Santa Barbara (the Defendants), temporarily assigned to Superior Court. He showed up late for court one day – apologizing to all present that he had been held up across the street at the County Board of Supervisors (his bosses) while making a plea for funding for his job. In other words the judge who ruled for the defendants, also worked for them, and was late to the trial because he was busy begging them for money to continue to pay his wages. It is called ‘Justice’ – in post Weimar Kalifornia)
Hence – I did file 2 Prop 9. Amicus Briefs (one on the winning side in the CA Supreme court, and one in the farce of a ‘trial’ over Prop. 8 in ‘von-walker’s’ circus, which was only a bit more surreal than the ‘trial’ in Hollyweird’s movie “Chicago”). I provided a copy of the brief to CA Catholic Daily, and perhaps they will link it to this reply.
The bottom line to all this – is that trading flames with anonymous ‘fellows’ over “How Often Do You Beat Your Wife” type distractions (for the record, like any good humanitarian male pork byproduct of post weimar amerika – Only on the Weekends, and then in places where the bruising won’t show in public, provided she dresses ‘modestly’. Ahem) – is like betting in Vegas; a losing game only for those too easily amused to begin with.
It has been said that “Those who respect the law And Or enjoy sausage’, should never watch either being made.” I submit that the same is true for Lawyers – who are molded by a system that has to be experienced to understand, no matter how distasteful the education may be.
BTW – Favorite Lawyer Joke:
Q – What is the difference between a Catfish and an Attorney?
A – One is a bottom dwelling scum sucker, and the other – a fish.
McDermott, the part about the hazardous conflict between oil and environment is particulately interesting.
Well, now that this thread has moved into the arena, rather fishbowl, what with mention of catfish and all, it seems appropro to bring up noodling. Whereas any good redneck would tackle catfish with the fine art of noodling, the problem is the gay man who’d prefer to noodle the attorneys. I bring this forth only to show the difference between natural and unnatural, in terms of nature.
Skai is indeed astute to recognize that the medium of message board posting, and its constraints in size and content of posts, encourages the use of the wide brush of metaphor for such a canvass – such as to approach a poetically succinct in summation of the bigger picture before us with painted image of greater vistas…
– And should Not be confused with a lazy approach to using proper grammar and sentence / paragraph construction.
Besidz, use of a automatik SpoolChucker maks rigting sooo eazeee that any fuuul ken douit….
Lesssn sayd spookchucker done been korrupted bi the kulture two.
Sides – Its presumptiouious – Whoozeee thunk Heeizz – Goin all EE like that?
(with appropriate kudos if not apologies to mr. cummings.)
*BTW _ I do have Two Published Poems, and once won $10 (donated the library) for my ‘Beach Poem’ titled SURF.
A beach poem is a specific style, written on a beach as the tide goes out and provides a clean slate, It must be finished before the tide erases it, and remembered if worthy.
DON’t Try this at home, and beware of high surf and undertow at the beach, which can really ruin the muse of the moment.
“litigate”, YFC: Your entire thrust on a religious forum is legal … when are you going to realize it? Your only defense for gayness is secular legal … I’d say “get a grip” but we’re trying to break the grip that’s got hold of you, the grip of doom. Let go of it, YFC, and then pray God release the devil’s grip on you. While you’re at it, throw out your legal cheat sheets and try dealing on a religious level with the topic of gayness. But you’re afraid to do that, because there is nothing on the religious level that speaks up for it. Thus, the only way one can talk about gayness is either secular legal or in PA’s case, the perversion of Catholic tenets, doctrines, dogmas, faith and reason. So, YFC, where as you are speaking rationally you are however omitting religion. On the other hand, PA, speaks irrationally because he works it in the religious sphere. Those two methodologies are clear. We’re awaiting someone to take it up on the level of marxist rhetoric … oh wait, those trolls chimed in for a year and then evaporated back into the abyss. My conclusion is that marxism does not hold a candle to denial of God or to perversion of God’s creation.
Skai, if you’d like for me to talk about the spirituality of being gay, I’d be happy to do that. Is that what you’d like?
“More souls go to Hell because of the sins of the flesh than for any other reason.” Our Lady of Fatima
YFC, repent and believe in the Gospel so that you and your descendants may live!
O Mary conceived without sin pray for us who have recourse to thee. And pray for those who do not have recourse to thee especially the enemies of the Church.
No, YFC. Two of the “Seven Letters to the Seven Churches”, which are found in the Book of Revelation, warn against delving into such darkness.
Thanks Tracy, I do repent and believe in the Gospel. Hence the name.
YFC there is no such thing as “gay spirituality” the very term betrays Christ, as He is not the focus but the phallus as it always is with sodomites….
There are others who post here who are not Christian and they are gay, so maybe you could help them learn of the love of the Lord. I do not know what you will say but I know a lot of other people struggle with issues which put them outside traditional Catholic teaching on goodness (in older days it was rape victims and children of unwed parents, adoptees now it is more gay, IVF children) so yes, I would like to hear your spirituality. I know you will take a lot of flak for it. Of course, you get flak if you post the time and temperature so yes, go for it. The Lord has brought you to it.
YFC, if you repent and are still gay, you can try to explain this to us.
YFC, your response sounded quite flippant to me. None of us will escape standing before the Judgement seat of God. I urge you to meditate, repeating what you just told me here, “I do repent and believe in the Gospel.”, but this time to Christ our King upon meeting him after your death. Before you make this meditation first read Mt. 7:21.
I don’t know about you, YFC, but I ponder this moment in my life quite a bit. It is always a quite sobering exercise.
I don’t understand why homosexuals are mad at HIV cells or call HIV a disease. That is not a very “tolerant” or “accepting” treatment of cells that happen to be proudly different. All HIV cells want to do is to convert normal cells into being HIV cells too. What’s wrong with that?
God always forgives (after repentance).
People sometimes forgive.
Nature never forgives.
I Agree that Proposition 8 Remains CA State Constitutional Law and State Courts are bound by it – along with the Definition of Male (XY) and Female (XX) fixed in the State Constitution too.
However, as said by other sage observers (and is particularly relevant to the politically corrupted CA Courts): “Those who respect the ‘law’ And Or enjoy sausage, should never watch either being made.”
“Prop 8 Fight Returns to California Supreme Court (Prop.8 LDF)
Moments ago, we filed a new petition in the California Supreme Court against all of California’s 58 county clerks, and state officials, seeking to restore the enforcement of Proposition 8, the state’s constitutional amendment limiting marriage to a man and a woman.
The undeniable fact is, the man-woman definition of marriage, as passed by a majority the voters, is still a valid part of our state constitution…
– today’s case is remarkably similar to former San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom’s unsuccessful attempt to order the county clerk to disregard the man-woman legal definition of marriage in 2004. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Mayor Newsom had no authority to instruct the county clerk to defy state law, and today we contend that the governor and attorney general don’t have that authority either.
That is because, under California Law, county clerks are independent local officials with the exclusive responsibility and authority to issue marriage licenses. The governor and attorney general are not the county clerks’ “bosses.”
As you can see, this has become more than just a fight over marriage. The authority of local government officials, and the future of the initiative process itself, is put at grave risk if state officials are allowed to nullify a proposition by executive order, backed by no binding legal precedent. Now it is up to California’s highest court to breathe life back into the people’s power of initiative.
And, unlike in federal court, we unquestionably have legal standing to bring today’s request to the State Supreme Court. In 2011, the California Supreme Court unanimously designated us, as the Official Proponents, to defend Prop 8 in lieu of government officials who refused to do so.”
Finally, someone (McDermott) has explained the gay marriage courts issue. The media gets it so screwed up that there was no point reading it for its stupidity and confused gay trickery.
As Fr. Marx of Human Life International — may he rest in peace — once said: “Man forgives and God forgives, but Nature never forgives.” You cannot do such damaging things to your bodies or those of others and expect good results. It just “ain’t” going to happen, “marriage” or non.
Brainstorm just hit hours ago. Holy Matrimony along with a contract waiving all legal rights to share property in event of a break up! The contract can be written up in the manner of a business partnership, or corporation, which would divide the business proceeds but spare any personal property. Wouldn’t this sort of thing pretty much make secular marriage laws obsolete? Wouldn’t it work better? Are they already doing it? Thus, the gays could enter contracts as sex business partners.
Pander or Perish = the new ‘tolerance’ for an Age of Abomination. I submit it is time for the Catholic Church to consider the Next step n the attack by the Evil one and his minions – through the Courts directly to the Altar.
As for the ‘irrational’ fear of Imprisonment (of Priests, Deacons, Ministers, Teachers, Parishoners… )for failure to pander to such Evil as the MISANDRY (Separatist / Neo-Exterminationist Hatred of Men & Boys, Masculinity and Normal Heterosexuality) – at the core of the ‘tolerance’ posse…
– there will Probably Not be any ‘laws’ created by the new Abomination that are directly on point, and thus can be read and denounced (not in the lamesteam media of course) as ‘rong’, as that would be a little too ‘transparent’ for the Chicago mob…
Instead – the radical activist ‘judges’ appointed over us by Barry (Soetoro / Marshall Davis / ObamAcorn,, Whoever the guy really is) pushing the Gaystapo Agenda –
Can use their “Contempt Power” to imprison whoever they want, for as long as they want – Solely Because They Want.
Such is called ‘justice’ – in post weimar amerika.
Churches Fear Lawsuits over Gay Weddings – By Todd Starnes
Joe Carr believes a day is fast approaching when pastors will be charged with hate crimes for preaching that homosexuality is a sin and churches will face lawsuits for refusing to host same-sex weddings…
And that’s why the congregation will be voting next month to change their church bylaws – to officially ban the usage of their facilities for gay marriages.
“We needed to have a clear statement,” Carr told Fox News. “It’s to protect us from being forced to allow someone to use our facilities who does not believe what we believe the Bible teaches.”
“These facilities may only be used for weddings that adhere to the Biblical definition of marriage and are solely reserved for use by members and their immediate family members,” the amended bylaws read. “These facilities may not be used by any individual, group, or organization that advocate, endorse, or promote homosexuality as an alternative or acceptable lifestyle. This policy also applies to birthday parties, reunions, anniversaries, wedding or baby showers, etc.”
The church also included a passage to protect their pastor noting that he is not obligated to perform any wedding ceremony that would cause him to violate his conscience or conviction.
“Under no circumstances is the pastor to officiate, participate, or endorse any wedding ceremony that violates the belief and teaching of this church body in accordance with the Bible,” the statement read…
Alliance Defending Freedom, a religious liberty legal organization, has already provided churches with sample bylaws that define marriage.
“I think we’re in a day where every church needs to have a statement in its bylaws of its doctrinal beliefs on marriage and sexuality,” attorney Erik Stanley told Baptist Press. “This is a proactive approach that churches can take to head off any claims of discrimination in the future, should they occur.”
… “I believe pastors will be charged with hate crimes and promoting violence against homosexuality by just preaching what the Bible teaches,” he told Fox News. “I don’t believe they are going to pass any legislation protecting pastors.”
Oh Mr. Mc D. I don’t know who Joe Carr is or why his preposterous idea that pastors will be charged with hatecrimes for preaqching. In any event, we Catholics don’t believe homosexuality is a sin. See the Catechism
Phony Tony Kennedy isn’t so baffling as babbling. All one need to to understand the ‘logic’ behind his Pander or Perish Pogroms (Romer, Lawrence…) is to read the guiding example of ‘reason’ his rulings repeatedly pay homage to – Dred Scott
“The DOMA Decision and the Inscrutable Anthony Kennedy | Public Discourse
When Justice Anthony Kennedy writes a majority opinion for the Supreme Court, he is famous for baffling his fellow justices (particularly Justice Antonin Scalia) as well as lower court judges.
The fallout from the Supreme Court’s Defense of Marriage Act decision (U.S.v. Windsor) rapidly took shape just days later…
“Obama quietly institutes mandatory HIV testing – By Thomas Lifson (American Thinker)
With almost no public notice, President Obama has issued an imperial decree executive order requiring universal HIV testing.
Yasmeen Abutaleb of Reuters published a blandly-title dispatch, “Obama orders stepped up effort against U.S. HIV/AIDS epidemic” that takes seven paragraphs before getting to what should be the lead:
If you’ve never engaged in receptive anal intercourse or shared a needle, the odds of you getting AIDS are very low, now that blood for transfusions is tested. Nevertheless, Kathleen Sebelius going to be coming up with a plan to order you to report for the blood draw the government will now require…
Were it true that the ‘Rule of Constitutional Law’ were the guiding legal paradigm in California, the following suit would succeed.
However – given the endemic corruption of the entire system; from a blackmailed Governot (Der Arnold – his ‘secret’ Extra Son) to a quasi media-kloseted Judge (whose boyfriend was known to only one side, who would ‘never’ use him as a conduit)… To a Court of Appeals better known as the 9th Circus…
One can only expect True Justice – of the 4th Reich of the Abomination, of course.
“San Diego County Clerk Sues to Uphold Constitution and Prop. 8
Ernie Dronenburg commended for ‘true faith and allegiance’ to California Constitution (Save California)
Great news! SaveCalifornia.com’s hope for at least one California county clerk to sue Jerry Brown over the illegal, unconstitutional homosexual “marriages” has been realized.
Today, San Diego County Clerk Ernie Dronenburg filed a new lawsuit at the California Supreme Court with the goal of enforcing Prop. 8.
This is significant. As SaveCalifornia.com has been saying, California county clerks are statutory marriage officials and have the absolutely best chance of being accepted by (achieving “standing”) and being ultimately victorious in court to restore Proposition 8, reserving marriage licenses for “a man and a woman.”
ACT NOW: Please email, fax, or write San Diego’s Ernie Dronenburg. Thank him for keeping his oath of office to support and defend the California Constitution and to enforce Prop. 8 as the law of the land:
Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr.
San Diego County Clerk
County Administration Center
1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260
San Diego, CA 92101
SAVECALIFORNIA.COM NEWS RELEASE
July 19, 2013
Sacramento, California — Randy Thomasson, president of SaveCalifornia.com, a leading pro-family organization that has been calling upon California county clerks to uphold the written Constitution, enforce Proposition 8, and cease issuing homosexual “marriage” licenses, has issued the following statement in response to San Diego County Clerk Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr. today filing a petition for an immediate temporary stay and writ of mandate asking the California Supreme Court to order Governor Jerry Brown and Attorney General Kamala Harris to uphold Prop. 8, defining marriage as only between “a man and a woman.”
Randy Thomasson’s statement:
“Every clerk, as a county’s statutory marriage officer, should keep his or her oath of office, stop breaking the written law, and faithfully uphold the state constitution by enforcing Prop. 8.
The California Constitution, Article 3, Section 3.5, clearly prohibits any state law from being declared unenforceable or unconstitutional unless an appellate court has first issued a binding ruling.
That hasn’t occurred. What’s more, the case construction of Judge Walker’s 2010 ruling clearly limits these homosexual “marriages’ to four individual plaintiffs, or at the most, to the two counties that were parties to the suit.
“SaveCalifornia.com commends Ernie Dronenburg for keeping his oath to ‘support and defend’ and ‘bear true faith and allegiance’ to the California Constitution. Every clerk should realize that these unnatural homosexual ‘marriages’ are completely illegal and unconstitutional, despite what tyrannical statewide officials or judges have opined. The written Constitution is the supreme law of the State of California and the foundation of our republic. Public servants who abide by the plainly-written constitution should not only to be applauded, but be supported; those who don’t are unfaithful to the Constitution and derelict of duty.”
Read the petition filed today: Dronenburg v. Brown
SaveCalifornia.com is a leading West Coast nonprofit, nonpartisan organization standing strong for moral virtues for the common good. We represent children and families in the areas of marriage and family, parental rights, the sanctity of human life, religious freedom, financial freedom, and back-to-basics education.