I first met Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI in the mid-90s. He was still Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and midway through his 24-year tenure as a senior figure in the Vatican.
It was a chance meeting. Cardinal Ratzinger, who was inconspicuously walking down the Via della Conciliazione — the street directly in front of St Peter’s Square — was beckoned by two young German ladies I was sitting with to join us for coffee outside of a cafe. “Vater Josef” (Father Joseph) smiled at their invitation, swiftly changed direction and came to sit with us.
Within minutes, the two ladies, both theology students, had introduced me to the cardinal, whom they knew well from the close-knit German community in Rome. They explained that I was a convert to Catholicism and was working on a Vatican project.
Shortly after this, the two stood up and went on their way, leaving me in the company of the then-head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, possibly the second toughest position in the Vatican.
Cardinal Ratzinger turned to me with the steely gaze of his grey eyes and asked me, “What made you decide to become a Catholic?”
I explained that I had been adopted at six months old and raised in a loving Anglican family, and yet I had struggled deep beneath the surface to find peace with my identity. I was incessantly searching for answers.
I replied to Cardinal Ratzinger that, in taking on Christ’s mother, Mary, as my spiritual mother, I had found deep healing and resolution around having been abandoned at birth and the mother wound inflicted on my heart.
I then mentioned the Eucharist, the transubstantiated bread which Catholics have believed for two millennia becomes the true Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ. As an Anglican, I had been invited to believe whatever I wanted to about so-called Holy Communion. The Catholics, however, were absolute and unchanging in their belief. This is where the conversation took a turn.
Surprisingly, even to me at the time, I began to speak vulnerably on the open street with the future Pope how I had been sexually abused for several years through my late childhood. I discussed the shame, the betrayal, the powerlessness, the ambivalence, and a whole myriad of other crippling effects which had left my heart and my body imprisoned as a result of my past abuse. Father Joseph listened with profound intent. At one point, as he tenderly held my gaze, his eyes teared up. I felt his heart surface and join my own pained heart as I spoke.
I discussed how I was finding healing and restoration of my own tarnished flesh, of my own broken soul and my disfigured humanity through regular consumption of Christ’s Body in the Eucharist.
I recall him nodding and smiling in response to me, and the palpable freedom that began to rise up from within. Prior to this conversation, I had never discussed my past abuse with anybody whilst I was working in Rome. I couldn’t not trust this man. His genuine interest, his listening ear, his compassionate heart, his tangible empathy drew my story out with such ease and confidence in a way I had never experienced before. It was as though a new layer of healing began to envelop me.
Once I had finished, he thanked me graciously, assured me of his prayers for my ongoing healing, and we parted company.
Months later I began to weep, and to weep daily for up to half an hour every day for nearly 18 months. I didn’t understand the tears, but I had learnt to befriend them until suddenly they came to an abrupt end. I later realised that these were a release of the suppressed grief deep within me linked to the many times that my body had been horrendously and inappropriately abused. I also recalled the promise of Cardinal Ratzinger’s prayers for me.
I have since gone on to support many victims and survivors of childhood sexual abuse on their journeys of recovery and have created a state-wide support network in my home nation of Australia.
I accredit the most courageous steps I took to move beyond the myriad of crippling effects of childhood sexual abuse to the fatherly and tender care that Father Joseph demonstrated to me on the Via della Conciliazione that day and the assurance of his pleas to heaven on my behalf through his prayers.
Since the mid-90s, I have shared my abuse story numerous times in public, but no other sharing has ever impacted me and brought such significant inner release as the opportunity I was given to share with the priest whom we today know as the deceased Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI. No doubt the media will highlight whatever failings he might have had. But, in my lived experience, tenderness of heart is one quality he possessed in abundance.
Full story by James Parker, former gay rights’ activist, at Mercator.net
Thank you for posting this.
Thank you James Parker for sharing this.
Mary knew who to send to you.
God bless you.
The gift of tears in rarely understood and embraced.
Love to you.
May God bless James Parker today and always.
James Parker’s website has given me a fresh look at Amoris Laetitia, and that there is a lot of good in it, especially at the beginning, in spite of some later passages that might be more ambiguous. God bless and keep him on the right path.
Sounds ‘pastoral’ (in the best sense) to me. May God in His mercy take the humble and wise B16 swiftly to Himself!
What a beautiful encounter with the Pope Emeritus. Thank you for sharing your story. As a proud Catholic & conservative social worker, this story touched my heart & is very similar to the endless stories I have heard from the foster children I have served. May God continue to heal you in your journey. 🙏🏼
The other day I noted that Joseph Ratzinger had a lot of pastoral skills, and this article demonstrates that I was correct in that observation. Had he had a few years in a parish accompanying people like this for the long term, rather than just a chance encounter over coffee, imagine what a profound influence it would have had in his later career!
Wow 5 downvotes! I’m so close to a record! Can I get some more? Prove your small-mindedness and click that thumbs down!
Not in your wildest dreams could you hope to compete with “jon”. Nice try though.
“YFC” – Don’t flatter yourself — “jon” takes the “jaundiced eye” prize. Pun intended.
Long live Pope Francis!
Obey Vatican II.
That he may repent for the damage he has done to the Church.
He has not damaged the Church.
Have you been praying for him?
Do you actually read his homilies, angelus messages and the documents he has written?
He is not the problem.
Vat2,
Francis has rejected Vatican II, but he is in league with the “spirit” of Vatican II — which, of course, is not the Council.
What has Pope Francis rejected of those documents?
Anytime someone uses the term “Spirit of Vatican II” I think they do not know the Faith very well.
Be specific.
He obviously has not rejected Vatican II because that whole idea is ridiculous. What did he reject? The Bible? No. Apostolic tradition-no.
How well do you know the Faith? Not provoking, just trying to understand.
Have you read the Bible? Have you read the Fathers? the Catechism? the Roman Catechism?
Where did you learn the Faith? In your parent’s home? In Sunday School? Catholic school? Franciscan?
Give me some help to understand such a statement.
Be Specific,
Are you saying that a person must give a full background of their Catholic knowledge if they wish to comment on this website? I’m sorry, but that is unreasonable.
In regard to your legitimate question, I’ll give an answer:
Francis is clearly against the use of Latin at Mass. Yet, the Council required that Latin be retained in the Mass. Therefore, Francis has rejected this stipulation of the Council.
Secondly, the Second Vatican Council is one of 21 ecumenical councils that has clarified and expound on Catholic dogma. However, Francis is currently moving Catholicism away from this solid foundation. He is currently moving the Church into a breach with the past that rejects the core of Vatican II (e.g. Rejecting continuity with the teachings that have been handed down from Christ).
Your background matters when you say “Francis has rejected Vatican II but he is in league with the “spirit” of Vatican II.
My assumption would be that someone who says that knows very little about what they are talking about.
I know there are internet loudmouths who take advantage of people like that.
It is ridiculous to say that Francis is moving the Church into a breach with the past or away from Vatican II.
He is not rejecting any teaching that has been handed down from Christ.
(The Chapter 8 footnote is not a break with the past. If you don’t know, you should find an honest priest to tell you. There are not many left though and some are afraid to talk because of the Internet.)
Capital punishment-he did not do that. And John Paul II had a commission study what and what level of teaching that was before he wrote Evangelium Vitae which you may not have read either.
I am not picking on you. You are just saying things that make no sense.
If you say that Pope Francis is moving the Church away from the teachings handed down by Christ then I have to believe that you either do not know the Gospels or you do not know the words of Pope Francis. So I asked.
Got no answer so I assume it is probably both.
No general statement like that is going to be true.
If you are distrustful of him because of things you read on the Internet, please first verify that he actually did or said what they claim.
How is Pope Francis against the use of Latin at Mass? Did you watch the funeral Mass for Benedict? Lots of Latin at that Mass.
What Pope Francis is rightly against is not Latin at Mass, but the continued celebration and expansion of the preconciliar Mass, often called the Traditional Latin Mass. You can say the new Mass in Latin. That’s not what Pope Francis opposes; he opposes the TLM, and it’s time for the TLM to go away.
“Do not demand data in order to accept a person’s individual perspective or to utilize that perspective in decision-making.”
To the fist person: sorry I micro-agressed.
I found this on the diversity article with the gingerperson.
I did not understand but now I do.
I apologize.
To not anti-Latin, what Pope Francis opposes is error and schism and heresy. He does not oppose the TLM but that, through the devil of course, this holy prayer was being used as an occasion of sin.
Bad people and bad ideas flourish where it should be good people and good ideas.
Always happens.
“Prove your small-mindedness and click that thumbs down!” YFC, when you rebuke those who disagree with you as small minded, you position yourself as a moral superior to many of us here on the forum. Having read your posts for years now, may I suggest a little humility on your part is advised. The frequent criticism of the left is that they believe in free speech as long as it is speech agreeable to them. All else is one form or another of hate speech and must be censored. I submit that your comment here is approaching the slippery slope that leads leftist censoring.
If the thumbs downs actually Bothered me you might have a point Dan. The thing is that no one proferred a disagreement with my post, they just lazily clicked thumbs down, probably not out of disagreement with the post but just because they saw who posted. I didn’t try to censor anyone. In fact, I encouraged people to come forward with their disagreements, albeit through a tongue in cheek sort of way. And those who have replied since haven’t referenced my comment, they reference other articles or other comments, as Anne TE does. I don’t even know what articles she is talking about but she uses them against me. If you are interested in denouncing silencing, you ought to play more attention to the way some people respond to my posts. Apparently some even want to use their fists to silence me.
“…they just lazily clicked thumbs down, probably not out of disagreement with the post but just because they saw who posted….” I’m not sure I can go with you on this claim. I gave a reason for my unhappiness with your evaluation of Benedict XVI and I saw at least one other who did the same. It was not hard to divine what you were trying to say without actually your saying it plainly. Had you said plainly where you think Benedict’s increased pastoral work would have led, viz. to a more liberal stance toward LGBTQ+ people, others could have answered you more plainly as well.
YFC, you do not get to control how people respond to you.
YFC, to me the dislikes on your post are simply because you were not positive enough about Pope Benedict XVI.
Many people want him canonized and they do not want to hear anything other than how wonderful he was.
I think I wrote a post that did not get posted saying I did not agree that a Pope needs that kind of experience.
Dan you never posted a criticism of my evaluation of Benedict’s experience that I posted on 1/3 at 9:44 PM. Maybe you posted on another blog entry or under another name? You criticized my encouragement of thumbs downing that post. I’d also like to suggest that you are not as good at “divining” what people actually mean as you think you are.”May I suggest a little humility on your part is advised,” as you like to say.
Yfc. King of the ccd ratio.
Maybe it is because your writings are so like a secular news site post that was entitled “Now that Pope Emeritus Benedict is dead, maybe gay bashing can stop”. When I saw that I wanted to put my fist through the computer, but I did not give the writer so much as the “time of day” by clicking on it.
If you want to know why some dislike your posts so much, just watch Jordan Peterson’s interview with Abigail Shrier, the young woman who is retransitioning back into being a woman, and how the so-called “experts” helped her destroy her body at her most vulnerable time of life.
This post of mine was meant for the poster on Jan. 3, 2023, at 9:44 pm who calls himself “your fellow Catholic”.
A correction: Jordon Peterson’s interview with Abigail Shrier is a good one, but the one I really meant to post was his interview with Chloe Cole the young woman who is transitioning back into a woman. Both interviews are excellent, though.
What a heat-warming story. So nice to read something positive in the midst of so much negative.
“Prove your small-mindedness and click that thumbs down!” this comment is the very essence of the modern day homosexual.
In this article, this same author, discusses how as a non-Catholic he used Catholic confession as a safe place that he could discuss his experience of being sexually abused by a teacher.
https://mercatornet.com/how-the-seal-of-confession-can-aid-child-sex-abuse-victims/64898/