With the Donald Trump presidency, we’re in a through-the-looking-glass moment in America, in which the previously implausible on multiple fronts has become the new normal. That includes the political profile of the U.S. Catholic bishops, and perhaps no one illustrates the point better than Archbishop José H. Gomez of Los Angeles.
On March 8, Archbishop Gomez was in Washington to speak to a symposium of the Napa Institute, which would generally be considered one of the leading forums for conservative Catholic thought in the country. His topic, however, was anything but a standard conservative canard: why immigration reform needs to happen now.
His bottom line was that comprehensive reform is long overdue, and he left little doubt that he doesn’t believe the moves of the Trump administration so far are coming anywhere close to accomplishing it.
If one knew nothing else about Archbishop Gomez, it might have been tempting to conclude that he’s a fairly typical center-left, peace-and-justice style Catholic, very much in keeping with the ethos of the Pope Francis era.
The comedy is that for most of his career, Archbishop Gomez actually has been known as a strong conservative.
In part, that’s because he’s a member of Opus Dei, a Catholic organization with a profile of being conservative both on matters of theology and secular politics, at one point serving as the group’s vicar in Texas. In part, too, it’s because he began his episcopal run as a protégé of Archbishop Charles Chaput, then of Denver and now of Philadelphia, who’s considered a hero by the conservative wing of the American church and something of a bête noir to liberals.
I recall vividly that when Archbishop Gomez was named the Archbishop of San Antonio in 2004, succeeding the charismatic Archbishop Patrick Flores, considered a hero on civil rights, there was fear among more progressive elements of the local church that Archbishop Gomez would lead some kind of purge. The same thing happened in 2010 when he was named to Los Angeles, following the more liberal Cardinal Roger Mahony.
There certainly were moments along the way that reinforced those impressions. In 2008, for instance, he went public with his unhappiness that St. Mary’s University in San Antonio was hosting Hillary Clinton, who at the time was on the campaign trail.
Here’s the thing: In some important ways, José H. Gomez is what most Americans would regard as a “conservative.” One of his points of emphasis over his bishops’ career has always been catechesis, believing that people need to be better educated in the basic principles of the faith. He’s mostly by-the-book when it comes to issues such as doctrine and liturgical practice, and he’s nobody’s idea of a wide-eyed reformer.
Yet he also believes deeply in the Church’s teaching on issues such as immigrants, refugees and the poor, and is fully supportive of Pope Francis’ leadership on those topics.
In other words, Archbishop Gomez illustrates a core insight about Catholic social teaching: It’s just not a good fit for the binary dynamics of American politics, and whether its exponents appear “conservative” or “liberal” generally has more to do with the questions being thrown up by the culture in any given moment than with what these people truly believe.
The good news is that Archbishop Gomez doesn’t appear terribly worried about whether he strikes people as leaning left or right. He’s forging ahead, flinging down a clear Catholic gauntlet in defense of America’s immigrant population.
Full story at Angelus.
He endorses that awful Los Angeles Religion Congress, embraces the rightly discredited “seamless garment” theory, holds out his personal opinions on immigration as doctrine, refuses to banish Cardinal Mahony from the diocese, accepts gay friendly everything, allows liturgical abuses such as communion in the hand and dancers during Mass, etc etc.
Clearly Archbishop Gomez is not a “conservative”, which by the way should be applied as a political, not clerical distinction. President Trump has not pushed Gomez to the left, the Archbishop is merely returning to type. Another weak spiritual leader in need of retirement.
Thanks for your clarifications, Kristin.
Clear thinking!
Excellent words. Let’s pray for our leaders. Putting immigration over destroying life and killing babies is oxymoron over immigration. Unfortunately our priorities are missed especially with the clergy. However, we all are not perfect. Praise the Lord he has loved us first! Amen?
https://www.cnn.com/2017/03/21/us/maryland-undocumented-student-rape/index.html
https://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/03/23/four-time-deported-ms-13-gang-member-charged-child-rape-stabbing-2-women/
https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/08/08/illegal-alien-crime-accounts-for-over-30-of-murders-in-some-states/
I could keep going with the long list of murder, rape, theft, etc from illegal aliens. People like Gomez and McElroy, who promote Sanctuary Cities where felons live freely should be liable for all crimes committed in their Diocese. They have blood on their hands.
You can add this to the list. The woman killed was a distant relative of mine in Ohio, a Catholic.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/21/illegal-alien-allowed-to-stay-in-usa-pleads-guilty-to-rape-murder-kidnapping/
Diane, felons don’t live freely in sanctuary cities. Being undocumented is not a felony. People who actually commit felonies should be prosecuted. Everyone agrees to that.
I want you to grab your Catholic bible and build a case against President Trump. First, site a published fact against him. Second, use your bible to condemn him.
Good luck.
Thank you Kristin for your excellent comments on AB Gomez. You are so correct about that horrible Los Angeles Religion Congress. It should have been abolished many years ago. And banishing Cardinal Mahony is the best idea yet. A monk’s cell in the middle of the Mojave Desert would be far too good for the Cardinal. But it would give him time to reflect on all the harm he did as a Cardinal. Both the Archbishop and
Cardinal have much to repent for. They know what they have done and so does our good and loving Lord.
Gabriella,
As I recall, the Los Angeles religious education conference has had highly questionable instruction going all the way back to Cardinal Manning. AB Gomez strikes me as an orthodox bishop who doesn’t have the will to stand up to the entrenched Mahoney apparatus.
Personally, I think he needs to strengthen himself and to develop some edge to take on the system. Pray for him.
Yes, I was thinking the above … the LA Religious Education Congress is as wacko as ever, and he’s constantly hung up on illegal immigrant stuff. I think this turns many potential converts off the Church.
Steve,
If AB does not have the backbone to stand up for what is the true teaching of the One, Holy,
Catholic, Apostolic Church then he should resign. Having Bishop McElroy is bad enough. Having Bishop McElroy perform at the Conference in Modesto was a mortal sin. Standing up for PICO leaves one speechless. He should be sent back to the seminary for retraining. Somewhere along the line, Bishop McElroy became twisted on what is right and wrong. Both Cardinal Gomez and Bishop McElroy are in desperate need of our prayers…..and best of all…..the Rosary.
I also question his support of “Encuentro,” a new program in the Church to invite Latinos and make things more hospitable. However, they way it is designed, I see it as causing a new marginalizing, but this time of Anglos. Redemption doesn’t marginalize anyone. It is for all without prejudice. God rains on the good and the bad…. so our ministry should be equal for all without anything that focuses on one groups over another.
Two thoughts come to mind as I read the above comments: 1) I have not attended the REC, but everyone I know who has attended speak about the quality of speakers, the new ideas for teaching the faith, and the joy of the liturgies. 2) What I have read about “Encuentro” (Meeting) seems pretty positive. I think that it is worth realizing that the Catholic Church in the U.S. is fast becoming populated by a near majority of people of Hispanic heritage. They meet differently, the pray differently, they do parish differently, etc., and we need to welcome them. The U.S. is no longer a white Anglo-Saxon northern European immigrant country. We now come from all over the world and the cultures mix to form new approaches to things, even in the…
Then Bob One, I suggest you broaden your circle of friends!
The four marks of the Church, “One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic” – look Bobby, it’s the first one mentioned – ONE. Stop accepting the divisions some would have us accept. “Heritage” doesn’t matter, the Church transcends nationality or place of origin. Look especially to the Latin Mass, which is the same everywhere, as the answer to your concern.
Bob One—- Less strident dissent from authoritative and binding Church teaching would be nice.
Keep in mind the article was by the oily John Allen, formerly of NPR. As for Gomez’s conservative credentials, well, they were always chimerical; a clear case of Wishful Thinking. After Gomez pitched his teepee in L.A., why even Cal-Catholic was initially infatuated with and defensive of His Grace. I’ve felt the same about a supermodel or two myself (but they never call).
We’ve all heard of the man who without bad luck would have no luck at all. So it is with wishful thinkers who without their dreamy Dreamboat, wouldn’t have prayer.