Last month I returned from three weeks in the wilderness with an unshakable confidence in God’s providence. The fear that we will “wreck the planet” diminishes after a week among towering mountains and mighty redwoods. One gets the peaceful conviction under big skies that, long after our moment in history has come and gone, the sun will still rise over snowy peaks and shimmering rivers.
My few weeks hiking through the granite cathedrals of the Sierras also put our current ecclesiastical dramas in perspective. Doubtless, there’s plenty of malfeasance among the Catholic clergy, but God has made Holy Mother Church indefectible. We can’t sink this ship. One recalls Cardinal Ercole Consalvi’s moment with Napoleon in 1807. The undefeated emperor assured Pius VII’s eminent Secretary of State that he would “destroy the Church.” The Cardinal smiled. “Pas du tout, Emperor. Not even we cardinals have been able to do that.” Seventy-nine years after Consalvi’s observation, Leo XIII asked all priests to lead a prayer to St. Michael after every Mass. God sends this mighty champion of His angels to protect the Church, and it is St. Michael the Archangel we celebrate today. We must have every confidence that God will preserve the Sacred Body of His Son, strengthened each day by His Sacred Blood.
My peace was a little compromised last week, however, at a catered luncheon. I was chatting with the Mexican chef, a likeable fellow who produced the finest quesadillas I’ve ever tasted. “I was in the seminary myself,” he said. “But I don’t practice the faith anymore.” And he told me why. Another student, who happened to be the Cardinal’s nephew, demanded that he perform a sexual act on him, threatening to have him removed from the seminary if he refused. He did refuse, and was dismissed from the seminary and, as it were, from the Catholic Church. I’ve heard this same sad story told many times by many different people.
Same-sex attraction is a cross many people carry, especially in the current culture of chaotic sexual saturation. Many carry this burden heroically, with great sanctity, but some allow this weakness to dominate them. The current culture promotes sexual sin, and many suffer the misery of social disorder because of it. The priesthood, in particular, is not for a man with this particular weakness, as the Catholic Church has clarified in a 2005 document from the Congregation for Catholic Education:
“In the light of such teaching, this Dicastery, in accord with the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, believes it necessary to state clearly that the Church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question, cannot admit to the seminary or to holy orders those who practice homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called “’gay culture.’”
In 2002, a “gay friendly” bishop asked his priests for their input. He was on his way to a meeting of American bishops in Dallas to deal with the newly-revealed cases of clergy sexual abuse. One priest said, “if the bishops don’t talk about the significant number of actively homosexual priests, you won’t have much credibility.” Many priests bravely made the same point to this bishop, but his response was the same for each one: stony silence. The subsequent bishops’ meeting in Dallas did not talk about it either. Instead, a fairly open homosexual, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, was entrusted with drawing up a “Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People.”
“Where sin abounds,” St. Paul claims, “grace abounds all the more.” Two weeks ago, our troubled Catholic hierarchy beatified the Ulma family, all nine of whom were shot in 1944 for sheltering Jews. On March 23 of that year, Joseph and Victoria Ulma had six children and one on the way. They had taken in eight Jewish neighbors at the risk of their own lives, and sure enough, the Nazi police arrived that evening with guns drawn. First they shot all eight Jews in the head, and then shot the children’s parents, Joseph and Victoria, in front of their children and neighbors. Finally, the Nazis shot the screaming children, and their bodies were dumped into a pit in the front yard.
All nine members of the Ulma family were declared to be of heroic sanctity on September 10, the first beatification of an entire family (and one of them an unborn child). The names and faces of their killers have been forgotten, but the heroic goodness of the Ulma family will radiate through history. Good has overcome evil, and will always do so. Long after the particular sins and disorders of our historical moment have passed, the brilliant goodness of the saints will be remembered. No matter how bad things get within the Church and without, the goodness of God will prevail.
So strive to be a saint. Since we can’t sink this ship, let’s sail it bravely. We can be sure that our little crew of willing sailors can find a path through the stormiest of seas. Let’s all be saints together, like the joyful Ulma family, focusing our minds on God’s perfect order, and bending our energies to God’s perfect will. All the rest will pass.
From Father Illo’s Blog. Illo is pastor of Star of the Sea parish in San Francisco.
man…I’m gonna steal this sermon….
This story about the state of our hierarchy is tragic and true. The power of the lavender mafia among clergy to silence clergy and seminarians and remove them is incredible. Will the synod produce clear statements about the need for chastity for all? This includes those who identify as members of the LGBTQ community as well as all clergy, lay faithful (married and single) and Religious. Or, will we get statements of “studied ambiguity,” about which Pope Benedict warned us?
Or, might we even get worse?
Trust in the Lord.
Why would the synod produce a clear statement on the need for chastity?
Why would you need that?
“Why would you need that?” Do you mean to ask, ” Why would the Church need to produce such a statement?” Well if the Church needs to rededicate itself to the discipline of chastity, then ipso facto all its members need to hear the message and be urged to come on board. So the autonomous clergyman’s question makes perfect sense if the Church is serious about its moral standards. Then in contrast, is your point simply that the Church does not need to expound on chastity for the benefit of its members, as chastity is unimportant these days, or something different? Your question has me stumped.
No. My question is “Why does a clergyman need to be affirmed in chastity?”
The Church has already made a statement on chastity in the Catechism.
Does it need to be revisited?
That is not what this synod is about. But it may be appropriate to address it in terms of what might make people more or less confident in the Catholic mission. Also, in terms of “spiritual energy” as St. John Paul II talks about in Familiaris Consortio (a document from Synod V) He also talks about the need for ongoing education in chastity.
Pastores Dabo Vobis mentions chastity often but it is about priestly formation. (Synod VIII)
If I look at the comment below, I do not know who these people are. I would think that most of the delegates live chastely, but you never know, do you? I have never seen anything from the Church give an inch on chastity.
Are you talking about Cardinal McElroy wanting to give communion to people in mortal sin?
I don’t need to be affirmed in my chastity. Yet, it’s obvious some of my brothers have failed tragically and miserably in living chastely, at the expense of the lives of others and the witness of the Church. Many Catholics who identify as LGBTQ are not living chastely (and some are), some are even in civil “marriages.” Many straight Catholic couples are “living together” before marriage. All Christians need to be reminded that we’re followers of Christ, not our hormones or attractions. If we were all already doing that, we wouldn’t have seen the abuse that is so terribly destructive to all.
At what point in the synod would this come up?
Why would we need another Vatican statement?
If people don’t obey the Catechism, why would they obey the Synod?
I do understand that there should be a continuing education in chastity.
But priests don’t do that and it makes you wonder why.
Why is a clear statement on Chastity needed at the Synod? Because so many people invited to participate in the Synod have publicly expressed that they reject Catholic teachings on the holy Virtue of Chastity.
No they have not.
Because all clergy, priests, nuns, brothers, bishops and cardinals are human and subject to frailties of Original Sin and human nature.
Now wait…
How was he “dismissed from the Catholic Church?”
And what Cardinal was the gay (or gay for stay) seminarian a nephew of?
Sounds like it was Cardinal McCarrick. And it sounds like the poor guy was evilly intimidated and rejected from the group of gays at the seminary, because he refused to participate in their sex acts. The poor guy then must have felt that his vocation, and being a part of the Church itself– was horrifically ended. This situation was probably traumatic– a form of psychological clerical sex abuse and psychological torture.
Cardinal McCarrick has no brothers or sisters.
I think I’ve wasted my life being devoted to the church. If all it is is a gay men’s club in which they get donations from gullible sheep to support their lifestyles, what a racket.
It is the Body of Christ. All Salvation comes through Her.
Don’t let the turkeys get you down.
The Church is the most humanly corrupt, mismanaged, bureaucratic, and downright awful hodgepodge of an institution. Many prevalent homosexuals, Masons, maybe even Satanists reside within its merciful protection.
And yet, it stands, because, as Jesus proclaimed, “the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it”. The fact that it is still here is a miracle, and a sign of God’s providence! Don’t put your devotion into the church of men, put it into the Church of Christ, which is guided by the Holy Spirit and by the vicars of Christ who, though time and time again, have proven their infidelity to good morals and sense, have yet to prove their breaking with the Truth when it matters.
What is a prevalent homosexual?
Your devotion to the Church stands heroically and saintly in contrast to the sins of its clergy. The Church has always been and always will be God’s bride on earth. Without people such as you, hope would grow dim. So carry on as you have and don’t be discouraged. Pray for all sinners, not just the clergy. Remember the parable of the Prodigal Son, when the good son became discouraged by how his father lavished his love on the prodigal. His father replied with something like, “you have been with me always and all I have is yours.” Your life of service is a beacon to all Church members as an example of the theological virtues of faith, hope and love. Not all saints have professed vows or taken Holy Orders. Some are not even scholars of the Bible and Theology. But they received the gift of faith from the Holy Spirit and responded with all their creativity and intelligence. They shall reap what they have sown. Your reward shall be commensurate.
That was inspirational, but I do not know that any of us are saints.
It is said of the Blessed Virgin, Refuge of Sinners: A Mother makes little of how dirty her children are. She just takes them in her arms and cleans them.
True also of Holy Mother Church.
The headline made it seem it would be much more unseemly than it was.
There’s going to be a lot more sexual evil in the church. Pope Francis and Tucho Fernandez have tipped their hands with their response to a new set of dubia. They believe blessings for same sex unions could be a pastoral response that would have the church’s blessing.
If the church approves same-sex blessings, I’m out. Might as well approve blessing of stealing and cheating and gluttony then too.
Francis is turning the church into a joke.
How many gays will be voting in the syod?
James Martin said his superior told him not to say if he was gay. Have any delegates identified as such or will some “come out” at the synod? That would give a person quite a spotlight in the news for a while and maybe a job offer at some Catholic schools.
You got that right. And if they support abortion they can even be hired for administration at Archbishop Mitty High School. Such a candidate would be fast tracked and receive Bishop Cantu’s blessing.
Oh, you better watch out
You better not cry
You better not pout
I’m telling you why
Blessing gays is coming to Rome
Pope’s making a list
And checking it twice
Gonna proclaim
Those sins they now like
Blessing gays is coming to Rome
They’re gath’ring for the synod
The fix is surely in
They know which sins will be called good
Then gay blessings will begin
Oh, you better watch out
You better not cry
You better not pout
I’m telling you why
Blessing gays is coming to Rome
He said no.
But later he said maybe.
No he did not.