The following comes from a January 6 Catholic News Agency article by Matt Hadro:
Religious sisters should not be forced to choose between caring for the poor and obeying their conscience, the Little Sisters of the Poor told the Supreme Court in a recent legal brief, adding that this is what the government is demanding of them through the HHS mandate.
“We perform this loving ministry because of our faith,” said Sister Loraine Marie Maguire, mother provincial of the Little Sisters of the Poor, adding that the Little Sisters “cannot possibly choose between our care for the elderly poor and our faith, and we shouldn’t have to.”
Sister Maguire’s comments came January 4, as the Little Sisters filed their Supreme Court brief against the federal contraception mandate.
The case will be heard this Supreme Court term as part of a bundle of cases against the administration’s contraceptive mandate. Representing the Little Sisters and several other plaintiffs in the case is the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which filed the brief before the court on Monday.
At issue is a mandate from the Department of Health and Human Services requiring employers to offer health plans covering free contraception, sterilization and some drugs that can cause early abortions.
The federal law in question, the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act, provides that when a government action violates a person’s sincerely-held religious beliefs, the burden of proof is on the government to establish that the action furthers a compelling state interest and is the least-restrictive means of doing so.
Furthermore, though the government may disagree with the person’s religious objections, it may not determine for that person that his conscientious objection is groundless, the brief says.
Additionally, the fact that the administration exempted some employers from the mandate for other reasons undermines their claim that contraception coverage is a compelling interest, since they are not requiring all employers to provide it, the brief claims.
Furthermore, houses of worship – even those that do not object to the mandate – are exempt from it, meaning that a church could refuse to provide contraception coverage simply out of convenience and not face a penalty.
“All we ask is that our rights not be taken away,” Sister Maguire said. “The government exempts large corporations, small businesses, and other religious ministries from what they are imposing on us – we just want to keep serving the elderly poor as we have always done for 175 years.”
Those in authority in the secular world, no longer take religion seriously, and laugh at the weak, post-Vatican II Church!! How I wish our Church would once again stand up strongly for Christ, as a Moral Authority for all Catholics— and all the rest of the world– to listen to!! And how I wish, that all Catholic clergy, nuns, and religious orders, as well as all Catholic parishes, schools, hospitals, charities, and institutions of our Church, would be told, “No more babyish freedoms!! You have a big responsibility for the Church! If you refuse your responsibility to Our Lord — out you go!” That is what it will take, for the world to take Christ and His Church seriously!
You are correct, “Linda Maria.” The “modern” Catholic Church does not really care much at all about this, as it has essentially taken on the belief system of the Democratic Party. Catholic leaders absolutely love homosexual partnering, fornicator partnering, and all that, if done in the name of love. And, abortion is just another extension of one’s beliefs, so that is OK, too. Let the Little Sisters alone.
Obama has over stepped his bounds. This shows the low level of morals President Obama has in his person.
The choice comes down to choosing evil or choosing good and taking the consequences. The choice should be easy; the consequences difficult.
Such ‘Pander or Perish’ Pogroms are Typical Alinskyite Tactics, abusing people in a base and hateful manner for the purposes of political manipulation – and blaming the Target for the ‘need’ to punish them and all others with similar views.
The Gaystapo hates the Catholic Church with ‘True Glee’ – and anything they can do to damage or denigrate the Church is fair game in their BAMN BAMN (Bash Marriage – By Any Means Necessary) campaign of intimidation and eventual liquidation.
How SSAD that there are those within the ‘professional bureaucratic’ Church who also enable such Misandry (Hatred of Men & Boys, Masculinity & Normal Heterosexuality) – but bureaucratic nest feathering is not restricted to govt., although they do set a…
Kim Davis:‘I’m Just First of What’s Going to be Very Many’ Attacks on Christians
https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/ky-clerk-kim-davis-im-just-first-whats-going-be-very-many-attacks-christians
Kim Davis, the Rowan County, Ky., clerk who refused to issue homosexual “marriage” licenses because it violated her Christian beliefs, said that in her meeting with Pope Francis he thanked her for her “courage” and told her to “stay strong.”
Davis added that the persecution she faced because of her beliefs represented “the first of what’s going” to happen to many faithful believers in America.
The Speaker of the House has invited two Little Sisters of the Poor to attend tonight’s State of the Union Address by President Obama, and to sit in his personal box. Should be interesting.
LGBT groups urge Supreme Court to overturn Texas pro-life law because ‘men’ have abortions
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lgbt-groups-abortion-is-indispensable-because-men-have-abortions
A group of homosexual, bisexual, and transgender activists have urged the Supreme Court to overturn a Texas abortion restriction, because transgender men desperately need to have abortions.
Last week, the Obama administration and numerous state attorneys general filed briefs opposing more stringent health and safety regulations…
The legal plea puts the justices at the intersection of two competing priorities of the sexual revolution: abortion and transgender theory.
In the last several years, a number of social activists have begun to insist…