The great Battle of Dodger Stadium is finally over, and the final score was Dodgers zero, Catholics one, and ugly men in clown paint and nun costumes negative 1 billion.
After all the sturm und drag surrounding the Dodgers’ “pride night” ceremony honoring a pornographic Catholic hate group known as the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, the pride event itself barely registered. The cowardly Dodgers executives buried the ceremony by holding it a full hour before the game even began and in front of a nearly empty stadium. Just TWO of the brave and proud Sisters dared to show their clown-painted faces! Sister Unity and Sister Dominia, middle-aged male drag queens clad in habits and crosses, stood still in their finery while the announcer welcomed them to a smattering of cheers and boos.
There was no strip show performance, no dancing, no twerking on the crucifix, and no rousing ovation by a packed crowd of rainbow-clad LGBT activists. There was zero fanfare. The Dodgers engineered a rainout for the guys who had caused them nothing but grief. I’m sure the executives just wanted to get it over with so they could move on and forget pride month ever happened.
Bad news for the team: We won’t forget. The thousands of Catholics who showed up at Dodger Stadium that afternoon for the peaceful protest won’t forget, either. I arrived at Dodger Stadium’s Lot 13 around 3 o’clock, and it was already packed with a thousand people. Another thousand or so came in after that, with a long line of cars waiting to get in. Many people wore red since Friday was the Feast of the Sacred Heart. People carried huge American and religious flags, held up large portraits of Jesus, and held signs saying things like “No Anti-Catholic Hate.”
I counted at least six news choppers hovering overhead, probably hoping to catch scenes of mayhem and violence they could splash on TV, proving to their audience that we were the bad guys.
If the local news crews were hoping to witness an insurrection at Chavez Ravine, they went home disappointed — because for hours, the huge crowd was quiet, reverent, and prayerful as they listened to the speakers. Nobody smoked a cigarette. Nobody even vaped. Nobody heckled the speakers. No one played on their phones. Instead, in the blazing afternoon sun, people knelt on their bare knees on old, broken asphalt to pray the Litany of the Sacred Heart. Some of the speeches and prayers were Spanish since the crowd was heavily Hispanic. For a white supremacist hate group, these L.A. Catholics sure are diverse!
Shamefully, the Los Angeles Archdiocese chose to “remain neutral” and refused to send any representatives to the event. Many Catholics I spoke to there were rightfully appalled by this — but not surprised. No one who follows local Catholic politics here should be surprised at this. After all, this is a city where disgraced pedophile enabler Cardinal (!) Roger Mahony — who cost the archdiocese $1 billion in victim settlements — lives in emeritus status on the campus of a North Hollywood parish school.
Not a single archdiocesan priest from L.A. was there as far as I could tell, although I saw a Carmelite monk I know. No Los Angeles bishops attended. The archbishop himself certainly wouldn’t have dared show his face. Originally, the prayer rally was going to start with a procession from the Cathedral in downtown L.A. to the stadium. It was called off. Why? Because the archdiocese, in their quest to “remain neutral,” refused to allow devout Catholics who were traveling from all over the country to park their cars in their huge, cavernous parking lot.
Official Catholicdom made it clear that this protest was not condoned. God forbid a judgmental priest accidentally offends the sensibilities of a male pole dancer from San Francisco pleasuring himself on a cross! We don’t want them to think we are judging them. That, after all, is the worst mortal sin you can commit.
But at least beloved conservative Bishop Joseph Strickland was there; he traveled to the event from his parish in Tyler, Texas. He opened the event with these words: “Most of us will not be called on to shed our blood. We need to live our martyrdom. We need to be audacious enough to speak the truth.”
In his own fiery speech, Catholic media maestro Jack Posobiec called the Sisters “the Sisters of Demonic Possession. We have gathered to perform an exorcism in Dodger Stadium. We love them, but they are scared of us, that’s why they wear the makeup — because they are too terrified to face themselves. This is a spiritual war against wickedness in high places. Put on the full armor!”
The crowd went wild at this. Everyone who spoke explained our position the same way: They hate us and think we are bigots, but we pray for them and do our best to love them — yes, even the Sisters, who mock and profane our religion.
Hate Springs Eternal
But let’s be honest: There is only one hate group in this dispute, and the LAPD knew what was up. The cops were out in full force at Lot 13. There were dozens of officers guarding the street outside the parking lot. We knew, and the cops knew we knew, that they were not protecting pride night attendees from us, but protecting us from the pride night attendees.
It’s OK to say this now: The most terrifying newly minted hate group in America is the militant pride activists. “Transtifa,” as one wag on Twitter dubbed them. The Rainbow Supremacists. The Pronouns Uber Alles people. You know who they are: They are the ones who called in multiple bomb threats to Target after some stores moved pride displays away from the front entrances. They’re the ones who want the state of California to kidnap children from parents who don’t immediately accept a teenager’s so-called “transition.” They’re the ones who accuse Catholics of bigotry and hatred for not wanting to worship a blasphemous drag group. They’re the “love is love” people, only they hate you and everything you believe.
After the speeches, we processed up the hill to Vin Scully Drive, which leads directly to the main gate of Dodger Stadium. A line of police officers along the sidewalk kept the huge crowd safe. As they passed the officers, everyone said thank you to them. A lovely young female police officer, an Amazonian goddess who stood at least six foot three, kept saying “God bless you” as people passed her, thanking her profusely for her help, clutching their signs and crosses….
From The Federalist
you call a police officer an Amazonian goddess?
Mel? Is that you?
I’m sure it was a very profitable 15 minutes for all involved. But it is over…and it’s boring.
“But it is over…and it’s boring.” Boring to whom, if I might be so bold to ask?
Boring, and yet here you are taking the time to read the article and leave a comment. Yes, I’m laughing at you.
Another unchristian person.
Even their own people did not show up to “honor” them. Two of the men in clown drag were there. They are always pictured with 6 or 7 others.
I am guessing that they were embarrassed that none of the LGBTQIA+ crowd bothered to show up and applaud.
This was a personal disaster for these narcissists. No one paid attention to them.
Another proof than an organized minority can fight back and win. Now, if only we had more leaders like Mons. Strickland!
What’s with Gomez? He could have allowed the use of the cathedral’s parking lot. He could have led an opening Mass, then held a Holy Hour in the cathedral for e.g elderly or infirm folks, or families with small children for whom it would be hard to spend time in the heat at the stadium with Strickland. Was it disinterest or were there threats to him or the Archdiocese (which frankly would not have deterred Cordileone)?
Lesbians who are gay-married work in high positions in the archdiocesan chancery office, and Gomez knows who they are. He doesn’t dare cross them.
If they are married in California, that’s a matter of public record. Who are they?
That gomez was AWOL tells everything ! .
It says he is holier than thou.
-Very possible that Archbishop Gomez is still smarting from a possible personal upbraiding from Pope Francis after his wonderful speech against the deep state and deep church given in Spain. In any case, it seem he has been immobilized by something
God hates false witness.
There were no winners in this.
The Giants beat the Dodgers 7-5 in eleven innings. So there was a winner.
I stand corrected.
God Bless all those that were there!!!
This Is pretty funny. Most of these kinds of honors take place long before game time. The star Spangled Banner is buried several minutes before game time. The kids pitching competitions are about 45 minutes before game time. Do the Dodgers bury their kids? By the time the attendance was taken, 49,000 people showed their support for the Dodgers and the Giants – about Fifty Times the number who showed their support for Bishop Strickland. And by the end of the weekend, the Giants (their opponents for this game and the weekend series, arguably the more LGBT and Sisters friendly of the two) swept the Dodgers and by a greater score margin than anytime in the rivalry’s history. I don’t know, indicating Gods blessing on the gayer team? The week before at the SF Giants Pride game, the Sisters were prominently featured. Almost no protests. They appeared for pics afterwords at Willie Mays Stadium. Nobody Batted an eye as their kids files out of Oracle Park —- feet from them. There was no pornography (the sisters don’t do porn). Does that make that game Giants 1 Catholics 0? No. It makes Angelinos and San Franciscans understand the truth: parody sometimes offends but when done well inspires people to laugh and work for a better and less hypocritical world.
Your points about Catholics ignoring all the other “pride” nights at MLB and other major sports leagues is well taken. There was even a prominent Catholic apologist suggesting that Dodger fans become Giants or Padres fans which is so stupid because those teams also hold pride nights and as you said the Giants are the gayer team.
But the “Sisters” are beyond parody. Parody is supposed to be funny, you can laugh at it. The sisters are not pointing out the silliness of serious Catholics, but actively work to change the perennial teaching of the Church and her founder Jesus Christ. The whole “pride month” is meant to mock, like a bully, simply to gain power and change minds.
They are not trying to change the teaching of the Church. There are some things they do that I believe would offend God. That is all that matters. People just keep making up more and more lies about them.
Satan is the father of all lies.
Catholics have been diminished by the way the enemies of the Sisters lie.
” It makes Angelinos and San Franciscans understand the truth: parody sometimes offends but when done well inspires people to laugh and work for a better and less hypocritical world.”: YFC, what do you consider to be the principal hypocrisy in the world today? Or, what do you see as the principal hypocrisy with regards to the present issue of this thread?
Why do you consistently defend this obscene anti-Catholic drag queen group? Vulgarity is their business. No pornography, you say? The Palm Springs SOPI invited 15 porn stars to their latest gig. “Go and sin some more” is the motto of Sister T’aint-a-Virgin and Sister Porn Again, and all the other sexual deviants in that group. Stand up and defend the assaults against the Catholic church and women Religious, and stop being an apologist for perversion.
You don’t get their schtick. That’s ok. It’s also ok that you find them offensive. But they really aren’t porn. That’s all I’m saying.
If you read my earlier comments, I’ve said the dodgers gig wasn’t the best place for them. In that venue, divorced from their charitable work, all that’s left is a parody of nuns, and parodies often aim to offend in order to make a broader point. Too bad the object of parodies rarely get it, but there you have it. But they really aren’t porn.
Please explain the “broader point” of this, ahem, parody of women Religious and of Catholicism itself. I’m all ears.
It has no broader point. Stop taking it so seriously.
Hey, YFC, You’re conflating the gate sales with the attendance. Sometimes they’re close but not this time. Did you watch the game or see highlights? No way there were anywhere near 49000 people there.
YFC, it was 3000 less than last year’s Pride Night so maybe the boycott had some effect. But that is tickets sold not turnstile numbers.
Axiom-they do not assault the Catholic Church or women religious.
The whole drummed up controversy has made over a million dollars for one of the organizations calling for the boycott. haven’t heard about the others.
YFC, I think it was Rolling Stone that called this homophobia and transphobia masquerading as religious indignation. If you look at the Youtube channels of these groups, you can see why they would say that.
I find it curious that they put out a video of this horrible blasphemy and it gets millions of views and they include in their TV commercial (which some outlets rejected). So every time it gets viewed, the Lord is blasphemed again. Which makes them responsible for more acts of blasphemy than possible anyone in the history of Catholicism.
Hard to read.
This is a phase in becoming a disciple of Christ that many feel is necessary.
I remember going through it maybe about 20-30 years ago.
Some people never move past it.
Patience. Do not judge.
Do not follow lay people and you will get through it faster.
with all due respect to “patience”, hard to know where that comment is coming from. Saying ‘do not follow lay people’ would derail a couple of the most formidable legitimate reformations in Church history. If there is a reformation in the Church coming, it will come from the laity and involve them taking control from compromised churchmen in the hierarchy in matters not pertaining to the expression of faith and morals ie, they’ll go to the police themselves instead of waiting for prelates to cover for a law breaking priest or blow the whistle publicly on those that while not breaking the law are sexually misbehaving both in the seminaries and the parishes. The bishops need to know that’s coming…
I think the period when lay people would save the church is accomplished.
Now there are many lay people who cannot be trusted.
Once people start to be able to make money or have political or social power, things get corrupted.
Go back to clergy; maybe some lay people who are united with the Church.
Some you would have trusted many years ago have fallen.
Everyone falls and those who can accept admonishment can rise again.
I agree with you asdf. I had the following questions of patience’ post: 1. What is it that is Hard to Read? 2. What is the “This” in This is a phase..” 3. What is the “it” in the third sentence? ..and the fourth sentence? 5. What act of judging is patience referring to? 6. What in the world has prompted the disparaging of lay people? Did not Fulton Sheen predict lay people would save the Church? Sheen aside, patience seems to espouse a clericalism beyond measure. If I am wrong, I invite patience to correct me.
Christians who lie, who bully, who divide the world into good guys and bad guys, are not really disciples yet.
They need to have the humility to say “I am a servant of no worth.”
They would not be seeking honors nor would anyone receiving worldly honors offend them.
Vainglory is traditionally considered a sin.
“Christians who lie, who bully, who divide the world into good guys and bad guys…” vainglory, anyone who lies or bullies has unfortunate character defects to be sure. But then you add the bit about dividing the world between the good guys and the bad guys, and with this I have some difficulty. St. Paul in Philippians 1:9-10 prays his readers’ love to grow “with knowledge and all discernment.” And why? So that they may approve the things that are excellent, or better (Greek “diapheronta”) and thus be pure and blameless at judgment. To be able to distinguish vice from virtue (what Paul commands here), while at the same time paying no heed to those who bring forth either vicious or virtuous acts, is impossible. And the apostle speaks of the enemies of Christ in this letter (1:28, for example). So commensurate with distinguishing the good and the bad, is the distinguishing of people who champion the good and the bad. I see no contradiction with this discernment and the requirement to eschew vainglory, vainglory.
Good guy/bad guy is a logical fallacy.
it is different than discerning vice from virtue.
St. Paul was at one time a “bad guy” to the Christians but a “good guy” to the Pharisees.
Not everyone that is labeled a bad guy is bad and as we know all too well in the Catholic Church the good guys aren’t always good.
Most people are neither-they are just people trying to get through the day.
“Good guy/bad guy is a logical fallacy.” I’m afraid you’ll have to point out the breakdown in logic, which I fail to see from your explanation. The issue is not whether a person is good for some and bad for others. That is not St. Paul’s concern in Philippians. His concern is that from God’s point of view, it is necessary for Christian growth for believers to recognize what is truly excellent, so that they may become “children of God above reproach in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation..” (Phi. 2:15). This is part of St. Paul’s imitation of Christ– to be conformed to the cross, not enemies of the cross, headed for destruction. (Phi. 3:18). The apostle would have none of the idea that the Philippians were “just people trying to get through the day.” The end of 2:15–“among whom you appear as lights in the world.” With God there is no contradiction between discerning vice and virtue, and the people who own these traits. Remember what Jesus said about the good and bad tree.Matt. 7:17-20, where he ends: “you shall know them by their fruits.”
Seems like you’re dividing the world into good and bad with your comment.
No. Not at all.
I have been admonished for saying that they are not disciples. They are disciples- a disciple is a student, Some of them are evangelists.
I think they are followers of Jesus Christ that were faced with something new.
Obviously, some who attended are better followers than others.
They need to follow Jesus Christ, only.
The author of the article does not represent everyone there.
I saw people with Divine Mercy pictures, Sacred Heart and Immaculate Heart images.
Not everyone was seeking to harm the Dodgers or the Sisters.
I do not know why each person showed up.
So the Archbishop of Los Angeles Gomez and his auxiliary bishops and not one priest shows up. How sad and how weak and scared are they? They did not stand up for Our Lord on His Feast Day yet Bishop Strickland from Texas shows up. Don’t look to the clergy for help or to stand up for the Roman Catholic Faith but simple lay people like Jack Posobiec who stood on stage to defend Our Lord on His Feast day and he said all who wish the Traditional Latin Mass. It’s simple folks Our Lord said, if you are not for me you are against me. Simple as that. Ya’ll think you’re living forever and there are no consequences when you take your last breath.
They (we) did what the Church asked. and we did it in keeping with God’s Will as related in the Gospel.
Some were pleasing to God on that day. Some were not.
Man looks at the appearance but God looks at the heart.
God loves everyone.
The picture is blurry but if you go to the Twitter that it is taken from you can see how many police officers were there because they (the Sisters) had recieved so many threats of violence.
Catholics did that to them.
The articles brags how the police were there to protect the protesters. They were there to protect everybody.
I prayed a lot that there would be no one hurt and God and Mary heard the prayers.
Just wow. What a twist of the facts to suit your agenda.
I have no agenda.
God wishes not one to perish but to Repent.
Romans 1:24-32
24Wherefore God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness, to dishonour their own bodies among themselves. 25Who changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. 27And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error.
28And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; 29Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, 30Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31Foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. 32Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.
They are filled with every form of wickedness, evil, greed, and malice; full of envy, murder, rivalry, treachery, and spite. They are gossips
and scandalmongers and they hate God. They are insolent, haughty, boastful, ingenious in their wickedness, and rebellious toward their parents.
They are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless
Now please read Romans 2
Many secular news sources actually spoke with the Sisters.
Catholic news sources just talked about them.
Not Christian.
“Catholic news sources just talked about them.Not Christian.” How in the world is this not christian??!!?? Secular sources are in agreement with the LGBTQ+ agenda and speak with them as friends. Hard to find anything virtuous in this. But the Sisters are enemies of the Church, and what would be accomplished by Catholic sources speaking with them? The only reason Catholic news might is to convert them, but the Sisters are very bad soil for conversion (referencing the parable of the sower) and the secular wing would pillory the Church for trying.
They are not enemies of the Church.
How do Christians treat their enemies? By loving them. Is it loving to talk about people? To accuse? to label?
People have a right to tell their side of the story.
Over and over, “we are not mocking nuns.”.” “We are not against Christ.” “We are not anti-Catholic”
The Sisters are great soil for conversion. Some are Catholic.
“Over and over, “we are not mocking nuns.”.” “We are not against Christ.” “We are not anti-Catholic”” If they promote the LGBTQ+ agenda, they are enemies of Christ. If the most important goal in their lives is not honoring Jesus Christ, they are his enemies. If they defy Church teaching on sex and gender, they are his enemies. If they glory in anything other than the cross of Christ, they may become enemies of the cross, and if so their souls are in great peril. How does one love an enemy? Among other things, by speaking the truth clearly and compassionately.
They are probably not as bad as you think they are.
Father John Riccardo reminds us, “The enemy is not another political party. It’s not another socio-economic class. It’s not another race. As a disciple of Jesus, no human being is my enemy (though I may be the enemy of another human being). The enemy is the enemy. That is to say; the enemy is hell, the devil, and his minions.”
I can very much oppose the ideas and actions of someone. I can say: “These people are doing horrible things!” As a Church we should have learned that lesson in the abuse scandal. I’ve reported three cases of that myself. I didn’t say that they had the right to express their ideas or that I shouldn’t judge them. I was and still am angry about their actions. I vehemently oppose their actions and ideas.
The same is true here. I’m certainly not going to smile and say: “Well they have a right to hate us and mock us and Jesus Christ.” God gave them the ability to sin and they are doing so. That’s not the God given “right” to sin.
Who is going to stand up for the right to sin? Or shall we love the sinner and hate the sin?
They don’t hate you and they don’t mock you.
I doubt most of them know enough about Catholicism to mock it.
I don’t expect Catholics to like the group although I have heard one of them is a deacon.
You are supposed to understand that all people sin, that all people tend to sin, that all goodness comes from God.
You are supposed to support goodness in anyone, even in someone who does other things that are wrong.
Those priests baptized people, said Mass for deceased people, and living people.
The baptisms are good, the Masses are good, the Communions are good.
All that they did that was good was of God.
They had a defect which was not discovered before ordination. It prohibits them from presenting themselves as priests but they still are priests.
There is no right to sin but there are times when all but the most holy of us choose sin.
St. John Paul II went to confession every week.
This is just further proof that Jesus is coming soon. California repent!
Dodger Stadium should also have an exorcism!