A Costa Rican priest says he has been suspended, removed from his parish, and sent to psychological treatment by his bishop who is angry with him for celebrating the reformed liturgy in Latin and ad orientem.
Fr. Sixto Eduardo Varela Santamaría, who until very recently was the Chancellor of the Diocese of Alajuela, had been celebrating the Mass since 2019 for a community of hundreds of faithful who are devoted to the Catholic Church’s traditional Roman rite, known popularly as the “Tridentine Mass.” The liturgies were celebrated at the parish of San Jose, of which he was a pastor, with the blessing of his bishop.
Fr. Varela and other members of the faithful say that the priest obeyed his bishop’s refusal to grant him permission to continue celebrating the pre-reform “Tridentine” mass, but exercised his right under canon law to celebrate the reformed or “Novus Ordo” mass in Latin, stoking the ire of his prelate and leading to his ouster.
The removal of Fr. Varela leaves hundreds of devotees of the traditional liturgy in Costa Rica without a pastor and without the traditional sacraments.
The country’s episcopal conference declared a total ban on the ancient liturgy last month in response to Pope Francis’ recent letter Traditiones custodes, which imposes restrictions on the traditional rites but does not require their prohibition. However, the bishops also prohibited any practices “proper” to the pre-1970 liturgy, which appears to include the use of Latin as well as the custom of the priest facing the altar with the people. The Church’s ancient repertoire of Gregorian Chant would also be swept away in such a prohibition.
In an audio recording sent to his former parishioners and obtained by Catholic World Report, Fr. Varela said he has been sent to live with his parents for a half-year “sabbatical”, and has been prohibited from celebrating the sacraments in public. He added that his bishop, Bartolomé Buigues, will also be sending him to a clinic in Mexico that gives “psychological” and “medical” care.
“I’ll be going to Mexico for three months to an institute that the bishop has designated so that they can accompany me spiritually, psychologically, and medically – at least that is what the page says of this institute, which is run by the Missionaries of the Holy Spirit,” said Fr. Varela.
Fr. Varela explained that the decision to banish him from his parish was made after he submitted to the decision to prohibit the traditional liturgy, but sought to continue his ministry to his flock using the liturgical books of Pope Paul VI, commonly called the Novus Ordo, in Latin. “The bishop didn’t prefer that, didn’t like that either,” said the priest, adding that his bishop sees this as the act that “unleashed” the disciplinary measures against him.
As of this posting, Catholic World Report has not received a response to interview requests sent to the Costa Rican Episcopal Conference and to the Diocese of Alajuela by Catholic World Report.
Claim of “disobedience” denied by witnesses
A representative of the Diocese of Alajuela told the Costa Rican newspaper La Nación that the priest had continued celebrating the pre-1970 mass after he was denied permission, a claim that was contradicted by both Fr. Varela in his audio testimony and the president of the Summorum Pontificum Association of Costa Rica, José Pablo Arias Soto, as well as by a parishioner whose written testimony was obtained by Catholic World Report.
Arias Soto told La Nación that Fr. Varela had obeyed the prohibition of the pre-Vatican II rite and had begun to celebrate mass “according to the Missal of Saint Paul VI in Latin, as is established in canon 928, something that has never been prohibited nor can be prohibited by an Ordinary.”
He added that “any claim that Fr. Sixto has been disobedient regarding the celebration of a prohibited rite, is absolutely false and, out of respect for the truth and for justice, it must be rejected with the greatest forcefulness.”
A diocesan official told the newspaper that Pope Francis had “limited the use of the mass prior to Vatican II only to communities that existed before the reform of 1970,” and that the faithful were required to know Latin. However, neither restriction is found in the motu proprio Traditiones custodes nor its accompanying letter.
In a brief press release issued today the Diocese of Alajuela claimed that Fr. Varela had received three “admonitions” prior to his suspension but no details were given regarding their content, nor was any offense named to justify the actions taken against him.
Although he noted that he had committed “no offense named in the Code of Canon Law that corresponds to a punishment of this magnitude,” Fr. Varela said in his recorded statement that he had decided not to carry out any appeals but rather to accept the suspension. He said that he would use the time to reflect upon the future course of his life.
The “admonitions” referred to by the Diocese Alajuela of may refer to previous occasions when Fr. Varela generated controversy in Costa Rica for defending Catholic doctrine and morality.
In 2016, he made headlines in the secular media when he refused to allow a practicing homosexual to act as a godparent in a baptism, applying a rule that has existed in the Church for many centuries, which requires baptism sponsors to be a good example to their godchildren. Although he received no public punishment for his stand, he was condemned strongly by pro-LGBT parliamentarians, and seems to have received no public defense from he episcopal hierarchy.
In 2018, Fr. Varela was openly condemned by the bishops’ conference of Costa Rica when he accused the country’s president and other public officials of being “disguised atheists” following their support for the legalization of abortion and homosexual marriage. Despite the president’s anti-Christian stance on such issues, he and other government officials continued to attend the Mass in public and to be given Holy Communion.
“We continue to participate in the political theater of these disguised atheists! Forgive us, O Lord, forgive us! If this man is Catholic, let him act like a Catholic! No more using the Church to tranquilize the masses!” an outraged Fr. Varela wrote on his Facebook page. He removed the post soon after, but it was re-published by local media.
“We profoundly regret the interpretation regarding this act that was made public by Fr. Sixto Eduardo Varela Santamaria, which differs totally from the motivations and sentiments that animated the celebration,” the bishops’ conference stated in response to Fr. Varela’s words. They added that they could not “judge the reasoning and the longings present in the heart of a child of God, and we are the first to recognize and respect the exercise of freedom of religion of all citizens, including the President.”
In less than two years, President Carlos Alvarado had signed a law legalizing abortion in a variety of circumstances. In 2020, after several years of effort, he succeeded in approving a law creating homosexual “marriage”.
Bishop Bartolomé Buigues, who was appointed by Pope Francis to the Diocese of Alajuela in March of 2018, has himself been the subject of controversy in Costa Rica due to his own statements regarding same-sex unions.
On the eve of the first such “marriage” under Costa Rican civil law, in May of 2020, the bishop stated in a public sermon that “we have to be tolerant. We live in an open society. We live our faith, we deepen our faith, but we rejoice that there are different types of human relationship, distinct ways of having a family and I think that where there is a manifestation of affection and of family in some form, there God is made manifest, and we have to favor it.”
The next day the bishop removed the video of the statements from his Facebook page and reaffirmed the Church’s teaching on marriage, but added, “As, in fact, these other unions have been recognized by our legislation, I have an inclusive view of them, far from any discrimination. And I hope that with their experience they will also provide ties of affection, care and protection to our society.”
Costa Rican bishops seek total prohibition of Latin, ancient liturgical customs
The bishops of Costa Rica, who have long stonewalled and rejected appeals for the traditional Mass by the Catholic faithful, have taken Pope Francis’ recent pastoral letter Traditiones custodes as a mandate to eliminate the traditional liturgy completely in their country, not only in its pre-1970 manifestations, but even in the “New Mass” of Pope Paul VI.
To the great disappointment of hundreds of Catholic faithful who have for years participated in the one traditional Mass available in the whole country, the bishops claimed that no group of faithful had ever existed in Costa Rica that met the description of Pope Benedict, those who “continued to be attached with such love and affection to the earlier liturgical forms which had deeply shaped their culture and spirit.”
They also accused those faithful who sought the traditional liturgy of not “always expressing their view regarding the validity and legitimacy of the liturgical reform, of the dictates of Vatican II and the Magisterium of the Supreme Pontiffs” and claimed that they didn’t meet the requirement of having to know Latin so that they could participate in the mass.
However, the bishops went further than this, adding that the reformed liturgy “must be protected from any element that originates in the ancient forms. The prayers, vestments and rites that were proper to the liturgy before the reform of 1970 must not be introduced.” It appears that they are including in this prohibition the use of Latin, the ad orientem orientation of the priest, and other traditional elements of the Roman rite.
The restrictions are a particularly bitter pill to swallow for the Catholic faithful who attended Fr. Varela’s Masses, because the group was formed specifically for those who did not wish to participate in the masses of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X (FSSPX), which functions without the approval of the bishops. When the country’s Una Voce leadership decided to participate in the masses of the FSSPX, a new organization was formed by those who wanted to remain attached to the bishops. Now they are being accused of the very disloyalty they sought to reject.
“The existing group of laity has received the strongest of blows from the pastoral staff,” wrote a laymen of the parish who wished to remain anonymous. “They are now without a priest to accompany them, without the the celebration of the Holy Mass now not only with the Mass of 1962, but also the new Mass in Latin”.
“What will happen to those faithful? Many of them have been shunned in their parishes of origin. The Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X has insisted that they will continue celebrating the Traditional Mass, even in the diocese of Alajuela, and have invited people to disobey Pope Francis and the bishop.”
However, he rejected such a solution, calling instead for prayer. “May those who can, unite themselves in prayer, both for Fr. Sixto, and for the group of faithful,” he wrote. “That is the best weapon.”
The above comes from an Aug. 20 story in Catholic World Report.
God bless Fr. Varela and Fr. Altman, too. My prayers are with these two brave, honest, faithful priests!
This is the problem. Sorry Chrisifidelis, with all respect, you and I don’t define what faithful is. The Church does.
He made a promise to obey his bishop but he found a way that he could obey him while also defying him.
I applaud his obedience but I am concerned that he is just self-willed enough to give outward obedience while nurturing pride in his heart by thinking he is better than the bishop.
There are means for him to appeal the disciplinary decree of his bishop if he wants to.
cd– It’s true, Fr. Varela made a promise to obey his bishop, at Ordination. It is also sadly true, that “you and I don’t define what faithful is.” And the word “faithful” today, can mean wrong things, like accepting clerics such as gay-promoting Fr. James Martin, S.J., or giving Pres. Biden, Rep. Pelosi, and other “bad Catholics” Holy Communion– and the Vatican stalling and blocking efforts by faithful clerics such as Abp. Cordileone, to correct this wrong situation, and run the Catholic Church rightly, for Christ. We badly need good, authentically true and faithful Catholic leaders.
Fr. James Martin is faithful. He is careful to be. He is controversial because many, including myself, feel that his outreach to the LGBTQ (I have actually never seen him address bisexuality) is misleading.
President Biden, Rep. Pelosi, are not faithful.
The definition of faithful does not change. Manipulators may use it wrongly, though.
cd– You have it totally wrong, about Fr. James Martin! How did you get so wrong about that? Makes no sense!
It’s not just the Chinese who have re-education camps. Next on the list to be sent away for reprogramming will be those of us who refuse the covid jab, and the Church might be ok with that too. Sorry times we live in, must increase prayer for deliverance from those who would do us harm, particularly if they are within the Church.
Stay tuned. There may be more to the story regarding this situation as more information is disclosed about Fr. Varroa.
Oh yes the good old communist tactic send them to the psychological ward to the Gulag there’s something wrong with him he actually loves Our Lord Jesus Christ wow such a criminal. Are these archbishops and Cardinals and bishops not even afraid when they have to answer to Our Lord to what they’ve done to the Church and his Mass? I guess they don’t fear him
Just because someone says a Mass in Latin and faces toward the altar does not mean that they love Jesus. I think he does love Jesus but all of us have places where we struggle with loving ourselves or loving persons or loving things of this world more than Christ.
cd, The TLM is not about whether or not a priest “loves Jesus”. Please don’t confuse the issue by bringing in irrelevant information.
It was a response the the first sentence of RA’s post which appears to conflate saying Mass in Latin with loving Jesus.
What would happen if James Martin SJ celebrated a Novus Ordo Mass ad orientem as this priest did?
Would Rev. Martin be suspended?
Such would at least show a conversion, from “turning around” or “turning about” in Latin, of sorts on the part of this (in)famous Jesuit, often described as a media personality.
It’s interesting that a priest who denies the existence of gender is promoted, rather than sent for psychological treatment.
Father Martin does not deny the existence of gender.
He certainly does, by claiming that a person can be of one gender trapped in the body of the other and that gender can be changed. He denies biology as well as Divine revelation. Some people may feel that way, but they need our compassion and help, not an affirmation of their psychological disorder.
And, the double-standard that priests are held to is obvious.
If you’re okay with sexual immorality, one might become a Cardinal. If you prefer traditional liturgy or are otherwise deemed a bit too traditional or conservative, one is suspended.
Transgender people do not deny the existence of gender-by definition.
Father Martin does take issue with how the Vatican views gay and transgender people but he does not deny biology or Divine revelation. Father Martin is concerned mostly with how people are treated.
I have issues with Father Martin but he does not need to be lied about.
Rainbows are Teflon, so no, James Martin would skate were he to commit a similar deed.
“The removal of Fr. Varela leaves hundreds of devotees of the traditional liturgy in Costa Rica without a pastor and without the traditional sacraments.”
That makes no sense. I am sure they have a pastor and the sacraments are the same. All Sacraments are Tradition.
If anyone needed a Primer on the reason for an explosion of Evangelical Protestantism and the mass apostasy from the Catholic Church in Latin America, this article is the one.
What a spiritual garbage dump Latin America has become, starting with the Catholic Hierarchy.
So this poor priest committed the number one sin in the Church today: celebrating the Latin Mass. James Martin goes around promoting many types of sexual perversions without a rebuke from the bishops. The smoke of Satan has indeed entered the Church.
The Costa Rican bishops noted “that our liturgy, celebrated according to the books promulgated by Saints Paul VI and John Paul II, must be preserved from any element originating from the old forms … In our celebrations, prayers, vestments or rites that were typical of the liturgy prior to the 1970 reform must not be introduced,” they added.
That has nothing to do with praying the Mass ad orientem or in Latin (which still has pride of place, according to the documents of the Second Vatican Council). This priest was not praying the Extraordinary Form Mass (let alone trying to introduce elements of it into the Novus Ordo).
If you click on the link, there is another link to the bishop’s statement.
I agree that the priest did nothing against Canon Law by saying Mass in Latin and facing away from the people. But you don’t have to break a canon law to get suspended.
Priests don’t work for themselves. They are ordained in a diocese to help the bishop in his ministry. If the bishop can’t trust him…
He is choosing not to appeal and to obey.
cd– “…must be preserved from any element originating from the old forms?” Vatican II certainly did not say that. These bishops badly need correction.
Christifidelis, this has nothing to do with Vatican II. And yes, had this priest appealed, it might be decided that the bishop was wrong. Another person, clergy or lay, could write the Vatican for it’s opinion on it. That usually takes a while, though.
cd– Sorry, these bishops badly need correction! Their statement is all wrong! Stop twisting words and concepts– look at the truth! These bishops are deceiving their Catholics!
There are processes and procedures in the Church and sometimes one must endure bad decisions. I am sure that Una Voce or another group will take it up with whoever it is that one takes these things up with.
Pope Francis quickly accepted the resignation of Mons. Xavier Novell Goma, the Spanish bishop of Solsona, in Catalonia, in Spain. The bishop resigned after intense pressure from homosexual activists in the Vatican, because he called gay sex acts a “crime,” and compared abortion to the Holocaust.
Hey CD… when the Arian heresy was rampant in the Church,did St. Athanasius deserved to be disciplined.? Just because it comes from the Bishop does not mean its correct. We have a legion of unfaithful Bishops running around the Church and they do not deserve obedience. This priest offered the Novus Ordo in Latin and is sent to mental institution, this beyond unjust. But the homo-heresy reigns supreme, schism is inevitable
He is not being sent to a mental institution.
St. Athanasius, venerated by Catholics and Protestants, was sent into exile 5 times. But not by bishops.
This priest has promised to obey his bishop and he has.
Schism is a mortal sin.
Schism will purify of leftwing modernist and they can have the Church they have been dreaming of gay, abortion, contraception, felt banners and rainbow flags.. Imagine no liberals…
Whoever leaves the Church is guilty of a mortal sin, even if not in schism. Missing Mass is a mortal sin. You know this.
cd– not all schisms are formally recognized. The German bishops who do not accept the Church’s moral teachings are in a schism, but have not formally declared it– and the Vatican has not formally declared it, either. Many of today’s liberal priests and nuns who support such evils as abortion and same sex “marriage,” as well as supporting married priests and women priests, are also in schism, although it has not been formally declared. The Vatican itself has many clerics who believe in and support these heretical issues, also. And the Vatican is very questionable in its current suppression of
the USCCB’s actions to prevent “bad Catholic” public figures such as Pelosi, Biden, etc., from receiving Communion.
Disobedience and dissent are not schism.
cd– these situations are very serious– much more than “disobedience and dissent!”
Schism is the refusal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him. Canon 751
Imagine a new SF Archbishop doing the same as the Tridentine Latin Mass-bigoted Costa Rican bishops– what on earth would the priests and parishioners do, at SF’s Star of the Sea church? Would poor Fr. Illo and his priests get “removed” and sent for “psychological treatment?” (As in Communist “re-education” camps.) All for serving the Catholic Faithful by offering the old Latin Mass.
Fr. Illo and Star of the Sea have both forms of the Roman Rite. I am sure that Father Illo would obey.
cd– Go ask Fr. Illo what he thinks. Fr. Varela also said Mass in both forms. Look at Fr. James Martin, S.J.– never disciplined.