The following comes from an Apr. 21 story posted on the website of the Catholic News Agency.
A promise from the governor of Illinois to veto an abortion funding bill drew the gratitude of Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago, who called it a “principled stand.”
“Abortion is a controversial issue in this country, but using public money to provide abortions should not be,” the cardinal said April 19. “The federal government prohibits the practice, and polls show a substantial segment of the American public reject it.”
Governor Bruce Rauner had pledged to veto Illinois House Bill 40. The legislation would fund elective abortions throughout pregnancy for any reason through the Medicaid and employee health insurance programs. It would also make a symbolic commitment to maintain legal abortion if the U.S. Supreme Court overturns the decisions mandating legal abortion nationwide.
A spokesperson said last week the governor is committed to protecting current abortion law but recognizes the “sharp divisions of opinion” on taxpayer funding of abortion, the Associated Press reports.
“I thank him for this principled stand,” Cardinal Cupich said of the governor. “I pray that this divisive issue will be put behind us and our government officials will now concentrate on the many difficult challenges facing Illinois.”
He stressed the importance of unity in seeking a budget “that serves all our people” and pledged help for this effort.
Gov. Rauner, a Republican, actively campaigned as a supporter of legal abortion. He and his wife are listed as $50,000 sponsors of a Planned Parenthood of Illinois fundraiser next week marking the abortion organization’s 100th anniversary, the Chicago Tribune reports.
Cardinal Cupich against Abortion miracles are still possible.
See this just shows how much folks aren’t interested in actually learning where people stand. They’d usually rather pretend they know based on their prejudices. You THINK Cupich wouldn’t take this position because you think he is a liberal/homosexual and a Francis appointee. But you would be wrong. And you were.
I’m not certain he said he was “against” abortion. I suppose I should go look up the total quote. It sounds like he’s talking about the funding, not the practice.