This past weekend my (adult) son and I went to the Cincinnati Pride Parade. Did I suddenly become an advocate for All Things Rainbow? Is Fr. James Martin now my spiritual guide? No, we were there in order to pray in reparation and witness to the love of the Sacred Heart.
In Cincinnati, the Pride Parade begins right next to the Cathedral church of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati. My son and I and a few other Catholics felt that Catholicism should be represented at the Cathedral, so we held images of the Sacred Heart and prayed the Rosary and the Litany of the Sacred Heart. It was an intense experience, and it left me with many impressions.
First, the Parade was massive. Again, this was Cincinnati, not New York or Los Angeles or San Francisco. We are the most conservative of cities by all accounts. But estimates were that 175,000 people went downtown for the Parade and/or the Pride Festival that followed it. The Parade began at 11am, and it was still going by at 12:20pm, after we had left. And that only represents the participants in the Parade, not the thousands that lined the streets to cheer it on. To say that the Pride Movement has captured our culture is an understatement.
Seeing the sheer number of participants was saddening, of course, but what truly filled me with grief were the many “normal” families in attendance. There were of course the drag queens, the old obese men in leather, and even the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence on display. This is to be expected. But there were also suburban families—mom and dad bringing their young children, all dressed in rainbows. I’m sure many of them are church-going, and likely they believe they are like those who joined Martin Luther King, Jr. in his civil rights marches. Yet in reality they are sacrificing their children to the Satanic forces within the Pride Movement.
What struck me the most about the day, however, was the massive corporate sponsorship of the event. Every single float and display in the Parade was sponsored by some corporation, such as Spectrum or Toyota or Fifth Third Bank. As someone who has attended over a dozen Marches for Life, I found such a corporate presence in stark contrast to those events.
The most egregious example was at the very front of the Parade: Procter & Gamble. P&G is a Cincinnati institution, one of the area’s largest employers and a presence in the community since the 19th century. The company also has a reputation for being conservative and boring — it sells toothpaste and laundry detergent, for heaven’s sake, not anything flashy or controversial.
Yet P&G was all-in at the Pride Parade. They were a Diamond Sponsor and at the head of the Parade. Hundreds of P&G employees and their families were marching with matching t-shirts that said “Lead with Love” where the “o” was the P&G logo and the “v” was a rainbow heart.
But most startling were the “brand bicycles.” Perhaps a dozen bikes pulled individual chariots which held a drag queen with a brand such as Febreze or Tide advertised above his head.
Read that last sentence again. On the streets of one of the most conservative cities, one of the most conservative corporations—a blue-chip of blue-chip company—was using drag queens to promote their household goods. It’s not a matter of when we will fall; we’ve already fallen.
This of course reveals the lie that the Rainbow Crowd is somehow oppressed or persecuted. It has captured the media, government, academia, and corporate America. Any institution with power now bows the knee to the Rainbow god.
I won’t pretend that this isn’t discouraging. Seeing innocent young children being exposed to such depravity should fill any heart with righteous anger. Yet I still have hope in God’s action in the world. To my knowledge there had not been a Catholic presence at the Parade in previous years, but this year a couple dozen Catholics were there begging God for His mercy and witnessing to His love. May this mustard seed one day grow into a magnificent tree that overcomes the Satanic Rainbow Movement and brings many souls to Christ.
From Crisis magazine
Several years ago, there was a gay pride parade is San Jose that went in front of Saint Joseph’s Cathedral. Several Traditional Catholics in opposition to the depravity were standing on the steps of the Cathedral. I held a sign that simply said, “If you love God keep His commandments”. I was harassed more by the parishioners go in and out of the Cathedral than the participants in the parade. Eventually a Priest came out and kicked us off the steps of the Cathedral.
Ron, you want worldly power.
If you want them to love God, pray for them.
Everybody goes astray.
A Pride parade is nothing compared to the parade of marital infidelity, divorce, contraception, cohabitation that goes past you every day.
Nobody notices it anymore.
“Ron, you want worldly power.” What in the world gave you this idea? I see nothing in his post to warrant what appears to me as an extremely rash judgment on your part. If you can divine what led you to this conclusion, please help me and do tell. Finally, pride is one of the seven deadly sins. To say it is nothing compared to other sins–I cannot comprehend how this could be so. You may enlighten me on that as well, and thanks in advance.
Power is the ability to make others do what you want.
And…. holding up a sign gives you such a window into his soul?? Astonishing!
“Power is the ability to make others do what you want.” Just so. But what does this have to do with Ron holding up a sign from John’s gospel? Try as I might, I fail to see the connection that is so obvious to you. Does Ron desire the conversion of the pride crowd? Surely he does. Is this evidence of a desire for worldly power? If Jesus’ kingdom were of this world, you might have a case if you could show Ron thought the mere presence of the sign would force people in the parade to sign on to this worldly kingdom. But Jesus’ kingdom is not of this world, and the scriptural sign is just that, a sign pointing to the One whose words appear there. If any power is to be exercised, it is that of the Holy Spirit bringing to mind Jesus’ words to the heart. So it cannot be concluded that Ron desires worldly power. Now if I have misconstrued your thoughts or misunderstood your argument, please advise.
I believe he was hoping that the sign would shame people into changing the way they have sex.
If he did not mean that, he can tell us.
“I believe he was hoping that the sign would shame people into changing the way they have sex. If he did not mean that, he can tell us.” But now how is this in any way a desire for worldly power? Only God can shame souls unto salvation, which is why the sign contained a scriptural reference. The desire to see people amend their lives is a holy thing and should not be disparaged.
Straw man.
“Straw man.” A straw man fallacy is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion. I don’t know what this post is in reference to, and without any documentation or specification it is impossible to know why it was posted. Could the poster make his point clearly and unambiguously for the sake of discussion?
It can also be reducing the argument or truncating the argument so that it becomes a different subject.
Worldly power is wanting to control things of the world, including people.
His sign could have said “Come to me all who are weary and find life burdensome and I will refresh you.’
So giving of the Lord and his fullness rather than something that could be seen as an ultimatum.
And really it did not say “if you want me to love you, keep my commandments” but I think the circumstances might have led people to interpret it that way.
People at first are much more concerned with whether God loves them than if they love God.
Learning to love God well is a lifelong task.
There are a lot of fake Catholics in San Jose. And a lot of closeted gay priests.
Bow only to Almighty God!
I don’t think there are any urban areas that are conservative.
Cinci votes Democrat.
“Yet I still have hope in God’s action in the world.”
Keep it up. God is more powerful, more beautiful than anything in the world. In time, “Pride”, too, shall pass.
I was telling my spouse about this. We found it interesting because Proctor and Gamble would not hire an older family member because they were Catholic. (1960 ish).
But my spouse also said to me: I never hear about gay or trans except from you telling me what you see on the Internet.
The home page this week has almost all stories about gay or trans.
You might be spreading what you are trying to contain.
I believe in one God, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The Holy Trinity.
There is no rainbow god.
Doing another dive I found this from an organization.
“We believe in the Catholic Church’s traditional teachings on faith and morals and acknowledge that the Catholic Church has, since its founding by our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, had a universal mission to bring each individual to sanctity and ultimate salvation”
That is not the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church.
“That is not the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church.” Then I must not understand the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church. How is this organization’s mission statement not Catholic? Please advise, and thanks in advance.
“Jesus Christ had a universal mission to bring each individual to sanctity and ultimate salvation.”
That is not Catholic.
i do not know any Christian denomination that teaches this.
I think it is just error, maybe heresy.
Jesus Christ came to save sinners. Period.
Sanctification is a life-long process.
This statement makes it seem like you need to be sanctified before being saved which is not even possible.
“This statement makes it seem like you need to be sanctified before being saved which is not even possible.” You missed the word “ultimate.” The end result of sanctification is ultimately salvation. I see no heresy in this.
Catholics do not believe that.
Salvation is a free gift from God.
You do not earn it.
SALVATION
In biblical language the deliverance from straitened circumstances or oppression by some evil to a state of freedom and security. As sin is the greatest evil, salvation is mainly liberation from sin and its consequences. This can be deliverance by way of preservation, or by offering the means for being delivered, or by removing the oppressive evil or diffculty, or by rewarding the effort spent in co-operating with grace in order to be delivered. All four aspects of salvation are found in the Scriptures and are taught by the Church.
“Catholics do not believe that. Salvation is a free gift from God. You do not earn it.” I do not earn salvation by regarding God as an employer with me as an employee. The Judaizers in Galatians gloried in their observance of the ceremonial law, as typified by circumcision, and that by keeping these “works of the law” they earned approval from God — God paid them for their works with salvation. So yes, salvation cannot be earned as an employee earns wages from an employer. Yet without the obedience of faith, or, as Paul says in Galatians 5:6, faith working through love, there is no salvation. It would seem there is a contradiction here. But now permit me to consider God as a doctor, and I his patient. I am dreadfully ill and have not the means to get well except to follow the doctor’s prescription on how to get well. The obedience of faith is following the prescription. I am working, but under the stewardship of grace, with faith in the doctor’s power to bring healing. Now I have to follow the doctor’s orders, but I cannot say my doing so has become a point of pride and has reduced God to the status of an employer. Rather, I am cooperating with the Doctor, with Divine Grace. The reward of this obedience is my getting well, that is, eternal life.
You are given eternal life when you are baptized. You can lose it through mortal sin.
This is the 50th year of Pride in Cincinnati.
A lot of pride parades did not happen in 2020 and 2021. They came back in 2022. This year, possibly, more people attended because there is now a sense that they are having to fight for their civil rights.
If the anti’s hadn’t done all their stuff this year, it might have been less.
I had the sense that this would be the year when Pride got old and so 2000’s and start to become like the ho-hum parades.
But the anti’s just ramped every thing up so badly this year that it became more meaningful and a cause celebre again.
Oh well.
This had not occurred to me. In fact, the LGBT parade movement was divided and splintering into multiple parades over too much corporate support, too much police presence, too little trans presence, too few people of color, etc etc. Religious denominations and congregations far outnumbered Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence in the parades, and that too caused division within the movement, though they got tons of applause when they would go past.
Now all the LGBT people realize that there is a bigger (non-violent) battle to be faught, united against those who would ban our speech, forbid our drag outfits, outlaw our relationships, burn our symbols, harass and bully our kids, take away our health care, lie about our intentions, accuse us falsely —- all the while continuing to pretend that it wasn’t priests with the history of grooming sexual predatory and abuse behavior and a hierarchy to cover it all up.
You forgot denying you the love of God.
Your Fellow Catholic — Here’s an inconvenient truth for you: Statistically, predatory priests molested boys 80% of the time. This means that the majority of predatory priests were homosexuals. Now your LGBTQ activist friends are chanting “We’re coming for your children”. It’s repugnant that homosexual activists (dressed as men or women) despicably proclaim their desire to seduce and molest our children. You need to get real with this and condemn it, or shed your faux Catholic skin.
We’re coming for your children is obviously a stupid sarcastic joking retort to the mean, nasty things that are said about them.
It’s done all the time by people who feel falsely accused.
They are not proclaiming their desire to seduce and molest children.
But I agree that when someone tells you who they are, you should believe them.
Falsely Accused — The LGBTQ activists just confirmed the stereotype with that war cry. As you stated, when someone tells you who they are, you should believe them. Well, we believe the activists when they scream who they are and what they want. Ask parents if they think it was just a sarcastic joke or a threat.
Wilt Chamberlain thought he could trust the Nazis. You can’t trust LGBT, but when they say they are coming for your children, you’d better believe it. Why else are they so insistent on infiltrating schools, libraries, children’s TV shows and movies? They are after children.
However I may take exception, along with Axiom, to some things on the list, I have to hand it to you YFC, you have ably set forth grievances of your side of the culture war in a way that makes me take notice and think. Well done YFC.
“Wilt Chamberlain thought he could trust the Nazis.” Neville Chamberlain–and no relation to Wilt, the NBA’s greatest of all time, who was born in 1936 and died in 1999.
Gays and trans should not have special rights apart from any other citizen. Their gay and trans identities should not be celebrated nor preferred. There should not be gay marriage or unions. People should not be allowed to change the appearance of their bodies to resemble the opposite sex. Such surgeries should be illegal. Gay and trans civil rights is a fraud.
It used to be unwed mothers that got railed against. Now they make clinics to help them.
Maybe we need clinics for LGBTQ youth where they can get whatever help they need. Without judgement. Without manipulation.
You are asking us to swallow that one-half the population of Cincinnati attended this?
The population is 308,000.
Going the Goebbels route I see. The bigger the lie the more it will be believed.
Hamilton County has about 900,000 people.
But yes, it is a really high number.
I assume the author has never been to a Pride event before?
Of course there are suburban families.
Of course there is corporate sponsorship.
What did he think it was going to be?