The following email came to Bob McPhail, Cal Catholic editor, on July 31.
Archdiocese of Los Angeles
Moderator of the Curia/Vicar General
TO: Bob
FROM: Rev. Msgr. Joseph V. Brennan, Moderator of the Curia / Vicar General
DATE: July 31, 2013
SUBJECT: AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM ARCHBISHOP JOSÉ H. GOMEZ
Archbishop Gomez has asked me to send the following important message to you:
Friends, my brother bishops and I in the California Catholic Conference are asking all Catholics to contact their Assembly members and Senators and urge them to vote “No” on Senate Bill 131.
SB-131 fails to protect all victims of childhood sexual abuse, discriminates against Catholic schools and other private employers, and puts the Church’s social services and educational mission at risk. We have set up a website that will enable you to easily email your elected officials directly: https://bit.ly/18nEUiB.
More information on the bill can be found at
https://www.laarchdiocese.org/gov/Pages/SB131.aspx
It is urgent that we all act now. The State Legislature will take up SB-131 in the week of August 10th. Thank you for taking the time to communicate with your elected officials about this.
Please be assured of my prayers for you and your families.
In Christ,
Most Reverend José H. Gomez
Archbishop of Los Angeles
The following comes from a June 10 story in Cal Catholic about the bill. Information for that story came from Father Malloy’s blog, written by Gibbons Cooney.
Those wondering what Democratic supermajorities in the California Assembly and Senate will mean are finding out. In the June 7 issue of Catholic San Francisco, the newspaper of the archdiocese of San Francisco, Valerie Schmalz reported on California’s Senate Bill 131. The bill was authored by Democratic State Senator Jim Beall, (Planned Parenthood Mar Monte’s 2011 Legislator of the Year) and openly homosexual Democratic State Senator Ricardo Lara. Mrs. Schmalz’s story began:
“The California state Senate narrowly approved a waiver of the statute of limitations for child sex abuse damage lawsuits – a bill that could have a devastating effect on nonprofits including Catholic Charities and Catholic schools while exempting public employers. The legislation, SB 131, would force private schools to defend claims that may be 40 years old but forbid victims from suing any public school for abuse that may have occurred before 2009, the California Council of Nonprofit Organizations said.
Contacting legislators will do no good. The California Catholic Conference is a waste of time and money. The California Democrats will do whatever they want, regardless of what constituents say, and target number one is the Church. Catholics who live in California have targets painted on them.
Contacting Legislators, filing written opposition and speaking at the legislative hearing May Not produce much to help prevent passage of a bad bill (and there are so many of late)…
But (and like they say in frisco fashion circles, this is a Big Butt) – Failure of Anyone to Oppose a bad bill can be of Further Harm, as it gets reported (and later cited) as ‘Having No Opposition’ – which tends to provide a Pretext for radicals seeking to take it to the ‘implied’ extreme they claim.
Sometimes – it is necessary to Be the Opposition of Record, even if that is the only place where it matters… Because It can matter quite a bit, at times.
Michael,
So sum up what you just wrote succinctly. We sometimes win in fighting for what is right and losing!
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher, Founding Director
Concerned Roman Catholics of America, Inc.
Part 1 Reply:
While in Prison for a failed revolution, Adolf Hitler dictated much of his book “Mein Kampf” (my struggle) to his girlfriend, “Frauline Anna” (later Deputy Fuhrer Rudolph Hess), who added his own editorial touches too.
Hitler was a syphilitic homo-anal coprophile who had been gassed during service in WW-1 (he won an Iron Cross, but never rose above private because of his penchant for coprophile behaviors) – and in his book he not only spent pages on the subject of Syphilis – but also laid out a rough blueprint of his future Extermination Campaigns.
So much Evil could have been avoided or at least its opposition planned for, had people accepted that Hitler and his Homo-Anal Terrorist Thugs (like his boyfriend Ernst Rohm & his Homo-Nazi Storm Troopers, who opened Dachau in 1933) – were Serious – and meant what they had written. But denial is more than a river in Egypt, and often the easiest way out of moral dilemma, or so it seems a the moment.
Instead, it has been reported that even amongst those in line for the Gas Chambers themselves, that they clung to the Lies provided to quiet them down (its is a Shower / De-Lousing station…) – right up until the end. The Truth of such a Monstrous Extermination Pogrom – Aimed directly at Them – was simply too much to deal with, so they didn’t, right up until the End.
Part 2 Reply:
Hence – when I discuss the “Extermination” of Men as a goal of the Twysted Systerhood, and point to icons and documents similar to Hitler and ‘Mein Kampf’ – such as Valerie Solanas and the “SCUM” – Society for Cutting Up Men Manifesto…
I do so with the intent of drawing comparison to the Prior age of Abomination including pogroms that the Leaders of the Homo-Nazi Reich foretold – and the Current Similar Pogrom of “Death to the Patriarchy” found in bills like AB 1403.
Rohm’s Homosex Terrorist Storm Troopers were only needed until their komrades took over the Courts & Police – who were mostly Not H0mo-Nazis themselves but rather ‘Good Germans’ – who were “Only Following Orders” when they implemented the “Final Solution”.
Soo too with the stooges and enablers of the “Turkey Baster Creationist’ Gaystapo Today, who would rather take over and dictate to such institutions, than try and do the work themselves. The annual tax subsidized SF Dyke March Boasts (in legal pleadings no less) of a refusal to even Apply for Permits or pay any costs, as well as its Demand for creation of “A World Devoid of Men”…
And the good germyns of today all look away and pay for the extortion with tax money, lest the Dykes single them out for Gaystapo “tolerance training’,
“Tis better to have loved and lost, than to never have loved at all” (Elizabeth Barrett Browning) … goes for fighting spiritual battles as well.
I contacted both my senator, Hill, and assemblyman, Mullins. They both refused to debate the issue with me and just said “we agree to disagree.” Cowards. It does no good to contact your legislator. They are more or less all crooks. I wonder what Brown will do about this bill.
Stephanie,
Do you really wonder what Jesuit Demoncrat Moonbeam will do with this Bill?
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher
Unfortunately many of those targets are being placed by so called Catholics, even bishops. An example is the recent Immigration Mass Gomez held at the Rogmahal at which he gave THREE maybe more with their staffs counted pro-abortion, pro-sodomite politicians front seats in his Cathedral. At this event they (the politicos and their staffs) also made it clear that they were targeting pro-life, pro-family Republicans for defeat.
Archbishop Gomez will someday answer to God for these scandals!
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher
Archbishop Gomez will answer, but so will all the California bishops and all the well salaried bureacrats in the CCC. In addition to AB 131 there are other bills that the bishops should be vigorously fighting. There are, for instance, AB 154 which would authorize people who are not physicians to perform early abortions, and AB 980 which would lower standards for facilities where abortions are performed. The CCC and the bishops have shown nothing more than a face-saving perfunctory interest in any of those bills save AB 131.
The bills, of course, were sponsored by Democrats, essentially the same Democrats who introduced AB 131. There seems to be a tacit agreement between the bishops and the Democrats whereby if the bishops look the other way regardding these bills (and indeed all life issues, including gay marriage and Ammiano’s perverted altruism), the bishops would not have to worry about losing funding for their “Catholic” projects or their efforts pertaining to immigration. In their view, the money is more important than the protection of unborn life – obviously at odds with Church teaching. The corruption is rank.
The trouble is that AB 131 hits the bishops hard where it hurts most – in the pocketbook. AB 154 and AB 980 will cost them nothing in terms of money. In fact, by not opposing them, as their Christian leadership role requires them to do, they can save money. So they can quietly ignore those two bills, but they must fight AB 131 to safeguard their money. The corruption is rank.
The problem is caused by the CCC’s reliance on government money, which led to the grossly unholy, and spiritually damaging, alliance between the CCC and the Democrats
Too bad the archbishop and his brother bishops can’t move as fast on the pseudo-Catholic politicians, high schools and colleges, CCD programs and the CRS (as well as REC) within their own (arch-)dioceses or purview as they would have the laity move on their specific issues.
Regarding the recent $ 1mil. study on ‘Child Sex Abuse’ via John Jay Kollege in NY – I wrote the Cardinal and offered to produce the same (predictable) results as Academentia, at a fraction of the price.
My methodology was simple – hold one meeting with all staff taking part, and ask for a show of hands by all who wanted to be Fired, Hounded, Stalked and Harassed as Unemployable Pariahs…
– By publicly admitting the Possibility that the ‘child abuse’ was Mostly Homosex Ephebophile Rape of Boys by Homosex Pederasts infiltrating the Catholic Priesthood? No Takers btw.
Having myself been the ‘lonely voice of opposition’ at far too many legislative hearings – I Will nonetheless Oppose SB 131
Although I can hear the Gaystapo – Without and Within the Church – laughing up their sleeves at what a bunch of clueless rubes sit in the pews and subsidize such a grotesque pogrom of Anti-Catholic Mockery & Ms.andry, thinking they are supporting ‘social justice’ no less.
The ‘timing’ of the latest stories about ‘father’ Martinez couldn’t be better – for hungry lawyers looking for a feast
And in return for his request, Abp Gomez promises to stop abortion, gay activities, and heretics speaking on behalf of the Church: Sounds like a great deal. Who goes first?
Skai,
If only that were true!
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher
When there’s archdiocesean money potentially involved, they’re all over it.
The Authors of SB 131 make quite clear their animus towards the Catholic Church:
“- This is fair given the history of the differences between public and private institutions. Public schools and teachers have been held to a higher standard of care when
it comes to the protection of children and reporting of
child sexual abuse, than have the clergy and private
youth[-]serving institutions.
Teachers were mandated
reporters in the State of California decades before clergy,
who became mandatory reporters only in 1997. Public
institutions are subject to greater transparency, under
laws such as the Freedom of Information Act, where they are
required to make certain information available to the
public and the media.
Not so for private institutions. In
fact the Catholic Church and many other religious
institutions have argued vehemently that they do not have
to make any disclosure of what they know and have known
because, they argue, the First Amendment to the
Constitution protects them from such disclosure.
We have seen the difference this has made.
Please test links before posting.
Server Error in ‘/’ Application.
The resource cannot be found.
Description: HTTP 404. The resource you are looking for (or one of its dependencies) could have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. Please review the following URL and make sure that it is spelled correctly.
Requested URL: /gov/Pages/SB131.aspx
Catholics elected the Democrat super majority that is on the verge of passing SB-131. Why the crocodile tears now from Archbishop Gomez & Co.? If they were sincerely grieved by SB-131, they would properly catechize the lay faithful in order to deter the election of such scoundrels in the first place.
Paul,
They not only do not deter these scoundrels’ elections they aid and abet them with such scandals as “Immigration Masses”!
It is probably too much to hope for that Gomez and company will learn from this who their real friends are. Come to think of it, they may already know who their real friends are and they aren’t friends of the Church!
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher
Dear Archbishop Gomez,
I suggest you stop and consider who it was that supported the liberal politicians we currently have in office. “Catholics” and “Catholic” politicians under your guidance are responsible for electing these people. You are also responsible for creating internal church policy that has encouraged and covered up decades of child sexual abuse. Now you want to stop liberal politicians? Now?! Dear Mr. Gomez, you are far too late. It’s called “selling your soul to the devil.” And then it’s time to pay. Sorry, I’m not paying anymore. You may want to put a “for sale” sign on your ugly cathedral. It might make a mediocre department store.
The bishops by and large are so irrational that they have made themselves a laughing stock to the public and a tool for the political power and money machines. What is it that is they do to bring this confusion onto themselves? Men cannot be that unintelligent, and so the cause has to be something else. What could it be?
Skai – Again, I agree with your comments – It seems that they do not want to or do not care to understand the harm that they are doing to the Church and to us – The cause of all this has to be keeping the money flowing in and keeping their jobs – Sad, very sad, but the Church is run by the old boy’s club and I do not see any changes until changes are made to leadership roles –
I suspect a flaw, a subtle flaw, in the power structure that has been formed over centuries. Not sure what it is though; by and by somebody will figure it out and lay it on the Church and the whole world.
Let me get this straight: The Catholic Church stays silent on electing a rabidly Pro-abortion, pro-homosexual president. They indirectly support a communist/socialist Democrat Party nationwide. They support stealing through amnesty. AND NOW THEY HAVE THE NERVE TO ASK FOR HELP IN ORDER TO COVER THEIR OWN…?
You have GOT to be kidding….
At this point no one will listen to the American bishops as they have lost all credibility in the Department of Faith and Morals.
What good are faith and morals for bishops, when they can better run the Church on power and money?
Their credibility comes from the deposit of faith.
So, Anonymo, you’re saying in effect that they have no credibility, because they have nothing to do with the “deposit of faith”? “Faith is like a mustard seed” … Anonymo, seeds dry up and wither eventually if they are not sowed into good ground. Why are you so ignorant of the Gospel parables and instructions of Jesus?
Yes, Noelle, it’s all a bad dream, and there is nothing to worry about over that sodomite kreeping up on you while you are busy enjoying life.
How about urging action on Canon 915? Oh, yeah, that would adversely affect all those abortionist/homosexualist/Democrats, and we don’t want any of that, do we?
Bishop Soto can contact his pal, Assemblyman Perez (who was allowed to use his cathedral), and Archbishop Gomez can contact Assemblywoman Mitchell (who once sat on the Verbum Dei board) and see how much traction they can get on this bill.
Two more travesties of Gaystapo Thought Policing in the legislative pipeline are:
AB 460 (By rabidly Anti-Catholic Coprophile Misandrist ‘Tommy T.P.’ Ammiano, D-Sodom by the Sea) – set for hearing on 8/12, and SB 115 by Hill on 8/13.
Both push the Gaystapo pogrom of Misandry (Separatist / Neo-Exterminationist Hatred of Men & Boys, Masculinity and Normal Heterosexuality) through various tweakings of Family & Gender Law
#460 is typical of ‘Tommy T.P.’ and his viciously twysted Hatred for… Just about everything that isn’t as deeply depraved as him and his pals in Frisco’s Larry Brinkin Homo-Anal Racist Toddler Boy Rape Posse.
Like a bill to ‘repeal gravity’, the Anti-Scientific Orwellian ‘Double Think’ of TTP Requires the rest of us to Believe that those of the same gender (there are only two – XX & XY) who choose to mimic Heterosexual Foreplay, and fail to ‘make a baby’ despite their desire to produce one…
Are “infertile” – and thus eligible for ‘reproductive assistance’ at State Expense – to help bring about their Turkey Baster Creationist child.
The Big Thrill for the Gaystapo here is in Humiliation of the ‘Vanilla’ – who know it is all a grotesque lie – but must pretend to agree with Emperor Tommy and his tax subsidized tailors that his new clothes are all the rage.
Kind of like ordering Pigs to Fly – and watching them struggle to pretend to stay aloft, only different.
By Contrast – SB 115 further trashes Presumed Male (XY) Fathers, as if they matter anyway.
The Democrat Party in California has become a left wing hate group!
John,
I knew that in the early 60’s when Congressman Clyde Doyle, then ranking members of the House Committee on Un-American Activities recruited me to go and try to stop the Communist takeover of that Party at the California Young Democrats (Demoncrats)!
Many of us tried to warn the public, but we were squashed!
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher
I suspect that the same forces that kick started the Soviet regime is riding high after starting the same old thing in the USA.
“This legislation would provide a one-year revival window from 2014-14 for certain victions who were previously barred to seek justice for the abuse they suffered as children.”
There’s nothing to fear; there was no wrong doing. Please tell me I am correct in believing that my Church did nothing wrong.
The Church has itself to blame for laws like this being proposed. They’re going after our Church because the Church found itself unable and unwilling to deal with the problem of child abuse, cover up, obstruction of justice, perjury, etc., inside it own churches and schools. So secular authorities had to come in to clean up the mess with their usual ham handed approach. Yet the Church complains. Where was the Church 20 years ago on these issues?
Want to know why we’re in the mess we’re in? Just look in the mirror….
g.c., you’re to blame for not doing something to solve the problems.
*My own submission to AB #460 (in 2 Parts):
OPPOSITION TO AB # 460 – INFERTILITY INSANITY
I herewith register my deep opposition to the depraved, hateful and insulting scam of Orwellian ‘Double-Think’ at the heart of AB – 460 (Ammiano).
The depths of Absurdity plumbed by the CA Legislature in service of political correctness, have never taken it so far off the deep end as when it tries to Defy the Scientific facts of Gender and Genetics. AB 460 says that when two people of the Same Gender who Mimic Heterosexual foreplay, fail to conceive a child – they are somehow “infertile’, and deserving of government tax assistance to overcome the facts of nature.
Given that All Procreation is Heterosexual (regardless of medium used), and the Bills Author and supporters understand such scientific facts (including Mendel’s laws, which may need to be Banned in Public School under SB#48) – the only ‘logical’ purpose for this Bogus Bill is to enforce a politically correct lie on society for numerous reasons.
One motivation for 460 is to promote the animus of Misandry (the Separatist / Neo-Exterminationist Hatred of Men & Boys, Masculinity and Normal Heterosexuality) – that pervades the party in power like fluoride in the water. Anther is the more sinister aspect of Thought Policing behind such laws, designed to make Liars of the ‘enemy’….
Part 2 – AB 460:
Dr. Anthony Daniels (“Anything Goes”) offered the most succinct explanation for the imposition of such an Obvious Anti-Scientific Lie, when he observed that:
“When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity.
To assent to obvious lies is to cooperate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed.
A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.
I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.
One reason why some people become extremely hostile to anyone who violates a political correctness speech rule and utters some taboo truth is that the utterance of the truth serves as a reminder that others have been emasculated and silenced.
For some it is humiliating to be reminded of one’s own submission to the enforcers of taboos. So they lash out at those who speak the unspeakable.”
Author TTP Ammiano would have the whole world laugh even more at ‘The Peoples Republik of Kalifornia’ – and Further Confuse Gender Law based on political whim that defies Science.
Perhaps next he will Repeal Gravity, and demand winged turkey basters to deliver the anonymous genderless ‘donor material’ to – whomever Hates Men Most.
I Oppose This Hateful Anti-Scientific Insanity.
Michael J. McDermott mjm1usa@aol.com
California Family Council has a list of Bills being heard when the legislature returns, including some more of the same Draconian Thought Police laws favored by ‘catholic’ activist Tommy T.P. Ammiano – whose Hate for the Church is only excelled by his love of all forms of depravity.
SEE – “AB 1403 (Judiciary Committee) Family law. (hearing Mon 8/12)
The Uniform Parentage Act defines the parent and child relationship as the legal relationship existing between a child and the child’s parents, including the mother and child relationship and the father and child relationship, and governs proceedings to establish that relationship.
The bill would define “natural parent” as a nonadoptive parent, as specified, whether biologically related to the child or not. The bill would also make certain provisions gender neutral and refer instead to a “presumed parent” or “parent.”
The bill would make other conforming changes.
Passed Assembly, 65-11
Passed Senate Judiciary Committee, 6-1
Senate Appropriations Committee
Talking points:
The law not only redefines the definition of a parent, it redefines the meaning of the world “natural.”
The law expands, at will, who qualifies to become a child’s parent.
The bill waters down the vital roles mothers and fathers play in child development by rendering their gender meaningless.
The law can arbitrarily infringe upon a biological parent’s rights in favor of a “presumed parent.”
More at – https://www.californiafamilyalliance.org/Pub2.html
Ah Brevity, All is Brevity… Or was that Vanity, in brief.
To Sum up – Succinctly – There is a planned Synergy between various Bills headed through the legislative ‘process’ (always subject to last moment “Gut & Amend” scams) – which promotes the agenda of Misandry…
Separatist / Neo-Exterminationist Hatred of Men & Boys, Masculinity and Normal Heterosexuality.
The Male (Y-DNA BioManPigOppressor) Gender is targeted for Legal and later Physical Elimination by groups of rabidly Misandrist Hatemongers – such as those supporting bills like AB 1403 – which was allegedly ‘authored’ by the Assembly Judiciary Committee as a whole – to clean up a few problems with the Uniform Parentage Act, like Maleness.
Note that when dealing with “Paternity” (Male Fathers) the law will change terms to Gender Neutral language like “parentage” – including when discussing (anonymous genderless) Sperm Sources for “Insemination” – which is now “Assisted Reproduction”.
Hence – in conjunction with Other Bills (some not even identified in the legislation, but probably including SB 115) – the Law Exterminates Male Fathers, and promotes the denial of Paternity to Men in favor of the types of Misandrists activists and Steroid Dykes who share the Annual Tax Subsidized SF Dyke March Goal of creating “A World Devoid of Men”.
McD, doesn’t all this crapola you keep laying into make you want to go out and kick @$$? There’s gotta be a solution, but what is it? Dude, it’s like my aluminum foil hat liner friend, who keeps pointing out all the shinola … no wait … that’s the good part … the other stuff that you have to wash off with the garden hose … or in the political garden, it’d be the fire hose. Now, where was I? Oh yes, about three quarters of the way through the bottle (Yuh know, I ran this beer scam on some blog about ten or so years ago and some nutter of a woman started crooning about … well, she took it seriously and figured she’d found a soul mate with the sacrament of booze :) ). Geez, it’s a literary means of communicating with those who cannot be reached otherwise, for cryin’ out loud. Now where was I? Solution? Let’s help the Pope figure out how to get rid of the gays.
“Pig oppressor”? McD, you’ve gone too far. We should not be out there oppressing pigs. Bacon? Anyone around here ever heard of bacon? Or better yet, let’s all meet at that old retired fort along the 101 and go pig huntin’. PA, you bring the knife, ’cause you’re gonna be the stick man, awright dude. The dogs’ll pin the sucker .. or is that suckling … down and you do the coup d’ grace, right mate?? Somebody is sure to know how to dress the porker out, and then we’ll all get down and roast it up on a spit. Nothing symbolic at all … put the whole event on youtube with ads, and send the money in for the bishop to start up his pope helping machinery. You know try to induce him to go private money instead of govt money? I write symbolically here … youse readers best now git with it and try and unnerstand, ok?
My Opposition to AB 1403 (submitted by “The Committee” of Assembly Juriciary) – is longer than 250 words (PDF available on request), and thus I will cut it up in to shorter segments – with the understanding that what is left out is not unimportant, but rather by now should be part of the background of this thread:
OPPOSITION TO AB# 1403 = LEGALLY EXTERMINATE HETEROSEXUAL FATHERHOOD
MISANDRY – the Separatist / Neo-Exterminationist Hatred of Men & Boys, Masculinity and Normal Heterosexuality, pervades this set of Bills working their way through the legislature, like fluoride in the water supply.
The Target of this campaign of Hate is the Male Minority (aka the Hated ‘Y-DNA Bio-Man-Pig-Oppressor of the Patriarchy’), who are to be legally exterminated as having no Male (XY) Gender and thus No Standing as Male Parents in the Law – even in regard to His own Biological Children.
AB 1403 is intended to work in Conjunction with other Misandrist Bills (SB 274, 131, AB 460 & 115 etc…) – all oriented towards Denying the Scientific Facts of Male (XY) Gender and Male Fatherhood, as part of an Otwellian ‘Double Think’ Pogrom pushed by hyper militant Misandrists.
The ultimate Goal of these type Pogroms is to bring about what the leaders of the annual tax subsidized Anti-Male Hate Riot / S.F. Dyke March asserted in legal pleadings as their agenda: “A World Devoid of Men”.
…The Pre-Prop 8 Court had ruled on three absurdly Anti-Scientific cases in 2005 and their claims for reading the UPA / Uniform Parenting Act in a “Gender Neutral” manner, have also been superseded by the Constitutional Recognition of Two Genders in Prop 8.
By attempting to create a suspect class with rights superior to all others, based solely on the choice to perceive themselves as oriented towards engaging in homosex behaviors, the Court violates the Equal Protection Rights of all other citizens, particularly Heterosexual Males.
As demonstrated in the set of cases foundational to the Court’s Marriage jurisprudence, announced together on August 22, 2005 (K.M., v. E.G.: S125643 / Elisa B. v. Superior Court; S125912 / Kristine H. v. Lisa R.: S126945) – the Court attempted to permanently deny the Equal Protection Rights of Heterosexual Males, and All Their Children. Proposition 8 has invalidated all such attempts to disfavor Heterosexuality and reaffirmed the Equal Protection Rights of Heterosexual Males.
Indeed, even justice Werdegar in her dissent touched on one aspect of such Violations of Equal Protection when she said: “Although the majority denies that its rule depends on sexual orientation the opinion speaks for itself; The majority has chosen to use the term lesbian no less than six times in articulating its holding. Moreover, the majority prevents future courts from applying its holding automatically to persons other than lesbians. I see no rational basis, and the majority articulates none for permitting the enforceability of an ovum donation agreement to depend on the sexual orientation of the parties.” K.M., v. E.G.; Werdegar Dissenting at 6.
Because Proposition 8 makes it clear that Marriage is between a Man (XY) and a Woman (XX), all such ersatz attempts to create Fatherless Children as a matter of law, must fail.
To do otherwise would be to set up such a bizarre double standard that says amongst other things, that Fraternal Twin Brothers have different paternity. Consider the case of a Woman who uses a sperm bank to conceive one Male (XY) Son, and then later engages in Heterosexual Intercourse with the same Man, and conceives another Male (XY) Son – his Fraternal Twin Brother.
The First Boy (who Inherited His Father’s Y Chromosome) is held to have No Father – not an absent one or a deadbeat, but No Legally Existent Male Parent, despite the scientific evidence of his own genes. His Twin Brother (exact same Y Chromosome), because he was conceived by Heterosexual Intercourse, does have a Father – and that Man can be sent to prison for failure to pay support for His Son, based on scientific proof of parentage from the same Y Chromosome.
Such insanely contradictory anti scientific Misandry Is made invalid by Proposition 8, which clearly instructs the legal system to recognize Gender as an Inherited and Immutable Characteristic – Because regardless of ‘marriage’ All Procreation is Heterosexual (between a Man (XY) and a Woman (XX), and denying the Scientific Fact of either is simply a Lie.
The Pogrom of MISANDRY behind this Bill is Evil – as a Targeted member of the Despised and Disposable Male Minority – I Oppose It & Related Bills.
Just contacted the office of Senator Beall about SB 131 – and the word is that it is Set for a Hearing on Wednesday 8/14 – and then to be placed in the “Suspense File”. Apparently the prospect of Lawsuits and Worse (just kidding, little is worse than lawyers tearing at your hide) impacting the budget and such, have made handling of this hot potato more delicate.
The ‘Suspense File’ is kind of like a sargasso sea of legislation, where things are left to ripen until they have grown a fine beard of slime, and then are expected to ooze on by through a legislative body in itself otherwise unfit to pass gas.
Of course there is also the ‘suspense’ of whether the Bill will emerge as anything resembling its prior incarnation, as the “Gut and Amend” system in place allows wholesale replacement of Bill Contents – After they have already passed, and thus are beyond further change by the legislature that endorsed something completely different.
What this means in Practical Terms – is that there will be a chance to Speak to the Bill before the Appropriations Committee on 8/14 – before it disappears down a legislative rabbit hole dug by the ‘Friends of Dorothy’.
“Mystery priest” from Missouri: What do bishops have to do in their jurisdictions to produce the occasional “mystery priest”?
Multitudes come from cultures where family power rules. Families fight power struggles. The waning Constitutional system developed in the USA relies on intelligence and education and not on the wind changes of family power struggles. The bishops keep uptalking the family but they minimize the head of the family, God, by joining the varoious and sundry family power struggles. It takes a great deal of intellect, guts, faith, and love for fellow human being to surmount this petty system the bishops are usually part and parcel of. It is what happens when bishops fail to rise to the levels of God’s house and instead wallow in relativistic social structures.