More than a thousand Catholics from around the Bay Area gathered Sunday morning in San Francisco for a eucharistic procession to protest the city’s restrictions on religious gatherings. Led by Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone, the crowd walked from Civic Center Plaza across from City Hall to St. Mary’s Cathedral before spreading across the plaza and parking lots to attend one of 18 Masses being offered.
“We have been patiently putting up with unjust treatment long enough and now it is time to come together to witness to our faith and to the primacy of God and to tell City Hall, no more,” Archbishop Cordileone said.
The archbishop invited Catholics to join him for the procession Sept. 13, a few days after Mayor London Breed published a reopening plan that allowed for more indoor businesses to resume but restricted worship sites to one indoor visitor and up to 50 congregants for services outdoors. Indoor worship with up to 25 people could resume by October, according to her plan.
In a highly charged homily delivered in Spanish and then English, Archbishop Cordileone called the city’s restrictions on religious worship “unrealistic and suffocating,” and said Catholics in San Francisco have been discriminated against as the city loosens its restrictions on public activities. Indoor gyms, malls, nail salons, museums, aquariums and grades K-6 have all been approved to reopen, while an archdiocesan coronavirus safety plan submitted in May has not received an official response.
The archbishop said he has met with city and county officials to advocate for the ability to worship publicly without result. “For months, City Hall ignored us, City Hall ignored you,” he said. “It has become clear to me that they just don’t care about you. To them, you are nothing. To them, you don’t matter.”
The single visitor limit on a building like the 2,500-person capacity is “an insult” and “a mockery,” done out of a desire “to put Catholics at the back of the line,” he said.
“Our people are hurting because they cannot come to church, they cannot receive the sacraments, they cannot exercise their natural right, protected by the first amendment, to worship without suffering punishment from our city,” he said.
Archbishop Cordileone encouraged Catholics to continue to be strong in their faith and practice love for the poor, and requested the archdiocesan faithful to continue to live out the consecration to the Immaculate Heart by praying the rosary, adoring the Eucharist, fasting and going to confession.
In closing his homily, the archbishop called on Catholics “to continue to exercise responsible citizenship, to abide by reasonable public health rules and to continue to serve our community despite the mockery to which we are being subject in so many different ways.”
The day began with several hundred Catholics walking in a eucharistic procession from St. Anthony of Padua Church in the Mission District to Civic Center Plaza, where hundreds more Catholics from the archdiocese and Bay Area had gathered. A mix of printed and handmade signs dotted the crowd, along with large banners in English and Spanish that said “We are essential: free the Mass!”
…. Archbishop Cordileone has been arguing that religious groups should receive accommodations similar to other reopened activities in San Francisco, which tend to open with limited capacity rather than capped numbers.
San Francisco has reopened at a more conservative pace than many other counties in the state: until Sept. 14, outdoor religious gatherings were limited to 12 persons. Additional guidance from San Francisco’s Department of Public Health released Sept. 14 prohibits hosting simultaneous outdoor religious services, like those the cathedral has held since Aug. 15….
The above comes from a Sept. 21 story in Catholic San Francisco.
Just violate the order, already. Enough talk. Open the churches to Masses. Allow 25% capacity. See what the mayor and the governor do.
are the rules the same for other faiths?
yes
Time for the bishops and the faithful to obey God and not man.
I am a Catholic Priest and Pastor of a parish near Los Angeles. Write the mayor at her office. Calvary Chapel in So. CA is open with 5,000 people in their “Worship Space” with no problem. Pastor Jack Hibbs is not putting up with squashing the rights of Christians and ignoring “Freedom of Religion”. We are a huge and powerful Church. We are Catholics! Why are we not stepping in in great number to oppose these draconian measures?
No the rules are NOT the same for other faiths, Mosques are open “of course” because could you imagine the outcry from the religion of “peace” if they could not go down on all fours and pray to Mecca? Yes, this is targeted and the target is Christianity Newsom and the Socialist Democrat party have their perfect excuse to destroy the Churches and the “China virus” is the excuse! I agree with Kevin T. enough already open our Churches for Holy Mass and resist these demonic barbarians.
Romulus Augustus is completely wrong. Houses of worship, including mosques and synagogues, are in the same public health order as Christian churches. Please, at least inform/check the facts yourself before you write.
If you want to effect change people, why don’t you write to the Governor, write to the public health officer of your county, write to your mayor–write or speak to them—rather than egging on your pastor. There are many folks writing here who feel “brave” behind their anonymity saying “violate the order already!” Would you pay the fine personally instead of your parish? Would you volunteer to go to jail in place of your priest?
Yes, wouldn’t you?
I will believe Anonymous’ “Yes” when I begin reading news stories saying: “but instead of arresting the pastor of the parish, authorities instead put in jail one of his parishioners who volunteered to be arrested in the priest’s place,” then I will believe you. And when I begin to hear stories of parishioners pulling their monies to pay for fines levied by the county, then I’ll believe you. Otherwise your words Anonymous are just a load of chest-thumping fake bravado.
Answer your own questions, what about you? Would you be willing to do those things?
Let’s make this clear Anonymous: It is the unwritten rule in blogs that any commentor in any blog may ask question, as I just did. One is free to respond or not. But no one should be “bullied” into responding/commenting.
And besides, Anonymous, anyone–any “anonymous”–here can type in “yes” as many times as he wants to your question. In the end it would be worthless. What counts is action. I really hope that the “courageous” commenters here egging the clergy for bold leadership and to break the public health order will pay the fine themselves or present themselves to be arrested, if it comes to that.
I’ll take that as a No. Thanks for the clarity.
Anonymous has just presumed to answer for another commenter here. I can imagine this is most likely how the bullies of Antifa work, people. Don’t adopt their MO or attitude. What is important to be made clear here is that those who publicly egg on their own priests to “disobey the order now” should find it in their conscience to be willing to take on the consequences themselves.
Filling the void left by a non answer, not bullying you since you are anonymous too. You presume others won’t take on consequences, you don’t know that.
What is this legal humbug of substituting yourself for someone else’s arrest ? This does not exist, if you are arrested no one else can take your place. Paying the fines and bail, yes if we see a leader, bishop, priest, etc. taking this step it could be a rallying point for the faithful that this abuse and bias will be answered, it would shame the government to arrest non-violent religious voters, while letting violent thugs run rampant.
So Anonymous, where in my comments did I “presume” that you people will not volunteer to take the consequences? However, Rick W’s comment up there has justified any presumption that any anonymous “yes” here is essentially useless, which is what I had thought so.
More misrepresentation jon , my comments did not justify any yes , that is your misunderstanding of a simple post through your own biases , not my words or my inference. I notice that you did not address the substitution of an arrestee by someone else , hyperbole and distortion tells more of your paucity in reasoning ,analysis and commentary and the weight your fellow posters should give them.
Romulus , I believe that you are advocating for civil disobedience as was done in the civil rights struggle , and in the past by church leaders . Look to the history of the church , as well as today in China , bishops and other religious are under confinement for their advocation of the faith . We have had priests and nuns present themselves for arrest in promotion of various causes , so this is not unheard of , read of the martyrs under communism and what they willing went through , thank God we are not at that point yet . This could be a rallying cry to the faithful that good brave men and women will stand for the faith, it could also be a moment to shame the government for the inconsistencies and clear bias against the faithful. Church history is replete with stories of the faithful standing against various oppressors, it seems that too many are ignorant of this.
Jesus Christ is the higher power and Archbishop Cordileone is one very good man and I am amazed at his patience. Enough patience! It is time for all Catholics to stand up to our Governor and local policy makers. I am very disappointed that our Bishops in Northern California, with the exception of Archbishop Cordileone, aren’t speaking out. Fortunately, I have been welcomed at St. Catherine’s by registering weekly to attend Sunday mass and I am grateful that I am able to attend.
Pray the Our Lady of Fatima Crusade Rosary found on LifeSite News daily–it has helped me cope with the injustice of our State of California and local governments in their attempt to suppress our practicing of our Faith. I need my Church and I cherish receiving Communion. I am disappointed that my own parish for over 25 years has restricted attendance to people under age 65–I am 68. Do not let the government attack our faith. Be strong.
Where is your evidence that Mosques are open in San Francisco?
Do You know? Do you have evidence they are not open?
Yes I do. I’ve seen the public health order. \\
But it’s not my job to prove that they are not open. It is the person making the accusation that mosques are open while churches are not ought to be able to prove their point with facts and evidence rather than just blind accusation.
Thank you Archbishop Cordileone for speaking out. My suggestion is to go ahead and open the churches, hold indoor mass for all that will attend, and let the chips fall where they may. If we can shop for groceries, liqueur, clothes, etc we should be allowed to worship God. If Protesters can freely wander the streets in large groups, even destroy, why can’t we peacefully attend Mass in the church. Should the local authorities control church and the worship of God? Man needs to turn to God in these stressful, crazy times.
Catholics are looking for strong and bold leadership.
“Open the Churches, let the chips fall where they may”. Hmmm People. People’s lives. Are not chips to fall where they may.
If you consider yourself pro-life, this is not the proper attitude. And it’s not the attitude, by the way, that the Archbishop has taken. He is trying to be responsible about how to keep the virus from spreading, and he is facing health officials who have been overly conservative in every aspect of this disease. And guess what, San Francisco has the lowest death rate of infected people due to COVID of any major city in the US, and almost anywhere else in the world. And we have some of the lowest infection rates. Those things don’t happen by accident. They didn’t happen because city officials “let the chips fall where they may”. They happenned because smart dedicated healthcare workers gave i their all, because officials kept us distant from infected people, and are trying to slowly re-open to preserve life. City officials are tyring to be pro-life.
If you believe San Francisco city leaders are pro life then it’s time to turn in your Catholic card. There’s nothing pro life about allowing a city turn into a nasty litter box surrounded by all the accompanying chaos.
More Mosque discussion:
This is from the Al Masjid Darussalem Mosque website: (located on Jones street in San Francisco)
Statement 1, from the website: “All services suspended due to the Pandemic”
Statement 2, from the website: “The Mosque is open for all five prayers, during the day”
“The sermon (Khutbah) begins promptly at 1:15”
“Prayer is concluded by 1:45”
Your job: (if you don’t know the meaning): Look up the meaning of Taqiyya (in a non-muslim) website
Anonymous, good post Dhimmitude and it’s variations are worth looking up as well.
As far as writing to the elected officials, jon that has it’s time and place, I don’t think that they respect us so further action is needed. With priests and bishops showing a physical presence with the faithful it will have the gravitas needed to be an example of peaceful protest.. Look at the rioters, they have cowed the politicians and media to a great extent, and they are not punished, we as peaceful Catholics should make the better case for our position. Egging them on? No, telling them to do their job as the “anointed shepherds.” This is what they are called to do. Look to the saints of the Cristeros War in Mexico as examples of what the faithful can and have done. The antifa comment is casuistry, this shows the quality of your arguments and the reasoning behind them .
Rick W’s argumentation is still wrong. Firstly, you have just presumed that local elected officials “do not respect us, so further action is needed.” Even Cordileone did not go that far. And then the further action you are proposing is to egg on the clergy to violate the order. Not only that; but you seem to be proposing that they imitate the MO of the Antifa/BLM rioters? And you are saying that this is the clergy’s “job”?
My comment on the elected officials is based on what I have seen and read , including stories on this site, if the Archbishop would like the calm, reasoned observations of a Catholic layman I would be happy to assist. Egging them on, I prefer encouragement to live up to their office, to look at church history and how other bishops and priests dealt with worse times and adversities , telling them to have the courage of the apostles and to do their job. The MO of antifa /blm rioters ? again your ludicrous thinking on how a peaceful catholic expression of dissent as in a procession or peaceful assemblage is like the rioters, indicates deficiencies of your analysis, with the rioters there is violence and damage , with a catholic demonstration the worst may be some spilled holy water and blessed salt. You jon you brought up antifa, my last comment , read it again was on your speculation comparing peaceful dissent with anarchists and terrorists. Still waiting for your legal citation of how someone can take the place of an arrestee, your positions are not in harmony with church history and the acts of the martyrs , look to them for moral clarity and encouragement.
Rick W., when a person is pressuring another person to do something, even for something that looks innocuous such as commenting on a blog, that person has become a low-grade thug and bully. The high-grade thugs and bullies most apparent in our time are Antifa and BLM. Don’t be like them. And Rick W., your insistence to present you with a “legal citation” proves my point to “Anonymous.” Any response here of “Yes, I’ll volunteer to be arrested in place of my priest,” is essentially worthless. However, when I do hear of news-stories of that happening, then I’ll believe it.
Very thin skinned Jon. Pray for courage.
What pressure do you speak of? How is this pressure applied via a blog post?
Anonymous, Amen! Courage? Yes I would ad civility, better reasoning, kindness and charity, look below at the fun exchange I had with Anonymous, light hearted and a pleasure.
If you want America to look like Portland, Seattle, Chicago, New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, then vote democrat biden/camela.
I am so glad that jon lives up to a much higher standard than everyone else who comments here. jon never hides behind his anonymity while he needlessly antagonizes other commenters and jon never expresses contempt and hostility for other commenters. jon never bullied anyone who disagreed with his living magisterium. If everyone here could be better like jon is, the discussions here would be much more civilized and edifying.
And if everyone here were appropriately reverent, respectful, and obedient to the Holy Father, the bishops, and the rest of the clergy of the Church–such as by not egging them on or pressuring them (“violate the order already”), such as by impertinently telling them to “do your job”, and by adhering to the Magisterium’s teachings such as the Second Vatican Council–the Church would be “much more civilized and edifying.”
Jon, accept that not everyone agrees with you on everything and it doesn’t mean they’re wrong. What you see as impertinence others see as duty. Vatican II did not tell the laity to shut up, on the contrary, it asked for their participation.
Anonymous, Amen !, Amen !, Amen ! I nominate you for Poster of the Year , your wit brought me much needed laughter , in your levitas you have demonstrated gravitas . Read his response it’s hysterical ! ” if everyone here were appropriately reverent ” ! ? should we be in our Sunday best when responding to his posts ? , he has referred to my impertinence several times ,I am of course filled with doleful lamentations and hysterical laughter . That the collective “everyone here ” ( does that include our kind and generous host and moderators , I try to keep in their good graces) is disappointing to jon speaks to his ignorance of the “unwritten rule ” of the blogosphere that not everyone is of one accord . His chucklesome posts indicate to me that this has more to do with his personal validation then a respectful exchange , Anonymous God bless you , keeping you and yours in my prayers, cheers ! , looking forward to more of your posts, keep that sense of humor !.
Sorry to disappoint you, but my life is too busy for me spend much time commenting here. Besides, my interest in the comments section here has decreased since JLS no longer comments here. Since I have no way of knowing what happened to JLS, I pray for him like he is in purgatory. I pray that you will be able to keep yourself in a state of sanctifying grace so that you will be able to win the prize.
I understand , you will be missed , keep in touch as time and interest allow , God bless
P.S. I am a different Anonymous than the one that was commenting in this article before September 25, 2020.
Sorry, but Roman and Rick W., are still wrong. Firstly, the Second Vatican Council did enjoin all Catholics to adhere to all of the teachings of the Pope and his bishops especially with respect to faith and morals, no exceptions. Dissent, people, is a sin. In fact, Pope St. Paul VI said that the Council “provided its teaching with the authority of the supreme ordinary magisterium. This ordinary magisterium, which is so obviously official, has to be accepted with docility, and sincerity by all the faithful, in accordance with the mind of the Council.”
Jon, disagreeing with the personal opinion of a bishop or pope is not dissent because personal beliefs are not Church teaching. You seem unwilling to make that distinction, which makes you wrong.
When the Holy Father or a bishop preaches, writes a pastoral letter, delivers a speech on matters of faith and morals, he is not merely offering a “personal opinion,” but the ordinary magisterial teaching of the Church. And to disagree with such teachings is, you guessed it, dissent. And dissent is always a sin, people. All Catholics are bound to accept the teachings of the Magisterium on matters of faith and morals. Read it from Lumen Gentium itself: “Bishops, teaching in communion with the Roman Pontiff, are to be respected by all as witnesses to divine and Catholic truth. In matters of faith and morals, the bishops speak in the name of Christ and the faithful are to accept their teaching and adhere to it with a religious assent.” (25).
Additionally, Roman is indeed wrong because it is in fact impertinence to tell bishops and the rest of the clergy to “do your job” by “violating the order now.” Violating the secular law with respect to a public health order during the time of pandemic is not exactly what the Conciliar Father meant by “participation” of the laity. People, do think things through before you type.
Jon get back on track. We’re talking about covid responses and the Church has not had a council on that. Bishops have taken a variety of actions and none are sacrosanct and beyond discussion or opposition. Government imposed rules are not in the same category as Church rules.