Philadelphia’s archbishop wants Pope Francis to answer the dubia submitted to him months ago for clarification on whether his apostolic exhortation on marriage is intended to circumvent Church teaching.
Archbishop Charles Chaput, O.F.M. Cap. cautioned that Amoris Laetitia has to be interpreted primarily through the teaching of Christ, which cannot be contradicted, and that one pope’s instruction cannot contradict that of another.
“Do you want the pope the answer the dubia?” CRUX’s John Allen asked the archbishop in a recent interview. The Philadelphia archbishop responded, “Yes. I think it’s always good to answer questions, clearly.”
The archbishop went on to say that we should take Christ at his word, “and his words about divorce and remarriage, about it being adultery, are very clear.” There’s “just no doubt about what Jesus said in the Gospels.”
Cardinals Raymond Burke, Joachim Meisner, Walter Brandmüller and Carlo Caffarra submitted the dubia, Latin for “doubts,” to Pope Francis last September in a plea to the pope for clarity on Amoris Laetitia.
The pope has yet to respond. Major confusion has resulted from Pope Francis’ document. One of the grave results is different bishops’ conferences around the world interpreting the document to varying degrees. Some see it as a green light for couples to receive Holy Communion while living in a state of objective sin.
In his interview with CRUX, Archbishop Chaput was very clear in saying there was no doubt in what Christ said about marriage, and also that Our Lord cannot be contradicted.
“St. Francis of Assisi encouraged the brothers, the Franciscan brothers, to accept the Gospel without gloss,” he said. “And glosses were convoluted efforts to make the Gospel say something that it didn’t say, or Jesus didn’t really mean what he said.”
“So it seems to me we ought to take Jesus at his word, and his words about divorce and remarriage, about it being adultery, are very clear,” the archbishop continued. “I mean, there’s just no doubt about what Jesus said in the Gospels.”
Archbishop Chaput is one of the bishops who remains clear on Church teaching with these issues, publishing guidelines for his archdiocese last summer clarifying that Catholics living in adulterous unions must remain abstinent from Communion. He took criticism from other prelates for doing so.
The archbishop continued to provide clarity in this week’s interview, explaining how the truth of the Christ’s teaching cannot change. He explained that a pope can neither alter Christ’s nor a previous pope’s teaching.
“It seems to me that it’s impossible for us to contradict the words of Jesus, and it’s also impossible for a teaching to be true 20 years ago not to be true today when it’s the teachings of the pope,” he stated. “The teachings of Pope Francis can’t contradict the teachings of John Paul II when it is a matter of official teaching.”
Amoris Laetitia must be taken in accord with Christ and the Church’s Magisterium, the archbishop emphasized, and it’s not possible for Catholics living in what has been called “irregular” unions to receive the sacrament of Holy Communion.
“So it seems to me we have to interpret Amoris Laetitia in the light of what’s gone before it, primarily the words of Jesus, but secondarily the teachings of the pope, the Magisterium of the Church,” he said. “And so how can it be true that people can receive Communion when they’re living in an adulterous union today. How is that possible, when the Church says it’s not possible?”
Archbishop Chaput also told Allen that Pope Francis’ approach to the papacy had been confusing for people.
He said bishops should help make the Holy Father aware of the confusion and disappointment that people are experiencing as a result of his approach, laying some responsibility for responding at the pope’s feet as well.
“As bishops, we can’t deal with that alone, we have to do it in conjunction with the Holy Father,” he stated. “He has to be aware of that confusion, and I think that he has a responsibility of responding to it as well as us responding to it.”
Archbishop Chaput said he “absolutely” wanted the pope to answer the dubia, even if the answer is not in the direction he would like.
Full story at LifeSiteNews.
Yeeeess.
Thank you, Archbishop Chaput! Where are the voices of the other faithful shepherds?
“He took criticism from other prelates for doing so.”
Of course, Archbishop Chaput took criticism from other prelates! It makes perfect sense, because their criticism reflects their own lax shepherding which explains and matches up to the very troubled state of the Church! Besides, this is not new in Church history! Wolves have always been known for running in packs.
John 10:13 And the hireling flieth, because he is a hireling: and he hath no care for the sheep.
Matthew 10:33 But he that shall deny me before men, I will also deny him before my Father who is in heaven.
This Disastrous Papacy
By Phil Lawler Mar 01, 2017
https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/otn.cfm?id=1207
“Day after day, in his homilies at morning Mass in the Vatican’s St. Martha residence, Pope Francis denounces the “doctors of the law” and the “rigid” application of Catholic moral doctrine. Sometimes his interpretation of the day’s Scripture readings is forced; often his characterization of tradition-minded Catholics is insulting. But in this case, the Pope turned the Gospel reading completely upside-down.”
continued,
continued,
“Reading the Vatican Radio account of that astonishing homily, I could no longer pretend that Pope Francis is merely offering a novel interpretation of Catholic doctrine. No; it is more than that. He is engaged in a deliberate effort to change what the Church teaches.”
https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/otn.cfm?id=1207
A TRUE SHEPHERD OF THE CHURCH!!!
PRAY FOR THE HOLY FATHER.
Three cheers for Archbishop Chaput!!! And while we are giving out kudos, lets also give three cheers for Archbishop Alexander Sample!!! Both of these holy and intelligent shepherds have set an example for other Bishops to follow.
PLEASE POPE FRANCIS, ANSWER THE DUBIA
Has Archbishop Sample said or done something noteworthy recently?
Hi Steve, Archbishop Alexander Sample has written a pastoral letter to all the clergy, religious, and laity in the Archdiocese of Portland, Oregon in which he states very clearly that the only way to read Amoris Laetitia is with reference to traditional Church teaching on marriage. If you log onto the website for the Archdiocese of Portland, Oregon you can read the pastoral letter.
The Pope has answered the dubia, although not directly. His words and actions are contrary to the teachings of the gospel, the Catholic Church and St. John Paul.
Burke always wanted to be the Pope and now we have Chaput!! Sorry boys it doesn’t work that way!! The Holy Father is a kind man I would have sent the five of them to a nice diocese in Libya, Yemen or Syria!!! Keep up the work Charles I’m sure the red hat is in the mail!
Sorry “boys” ??!!?? “…wanted to be pope..” !!??!! “…red hat is in the mail” !!??!!? Three clunkers in one post is a record even for you, TEM. Or shall we count the Libya reference as a fourth?
The ones desperately for the red hat are Wrong-way McElroy in SD and Dancing-conga-line Abp. Jose Gomez of LA (dancing on the stage at the Modesto Regional Meeting of World Popular Movements), the wandering pontiff already having addressed this group of socialist community organizers Nov 5, 2016. Jose got the message tout de suite.
Gomez has been in search of the red hat since appointed in April, 2010–7 years—yet he saw how quickly Cupich got his by mouthing the Red Pope’s line (Cupich appointed Sept, 2014 was made cardinal Nov, 2016–barely 2 years!): and Card. Tobin of unknown-Newark cardinalate got his by opposing Gov. Mike Pence on mass Syrian immigration in IN.
So, expect Tom Miles to badmouth Burke and Chaput: a…
..sure sign they must be telling the rare truth in the Church these days.
Thomas Miles,
I don’t quite follow the logic. How will angering Pope Francis help earn him a red hat?
In particular, Cardinal Sarah’s absolute silence on this topic is shameful. He’s supposed to be in charge of the administration of the Sacraments for the Church—and this issue involves both Marriage and Holy Communion.
He would become the first African cardinal in Siberia.
“He would become the first African cardinal in Siberia.” = Alert! Fear tactic! Please be a fisher of men instead of an artful fisher of fear!
Yes, that may be true, but it is better to lose your tongue from frostbite in Siberia than lose your immortal soul from showing consent or complicity through total silence. Where are the other faithful voices of priests and bishops or cardinals? The line in the sand is clearly drawn. So are the consequences and choices. Jesus said, “You are with me, OR, you are against me.”
continued,
continued,
Matthew 10:31-35 Fear not therefore: better are you than many sparrows. Every one therefore that shall confess me before men, I will also confess him before my Father who is in heaven. But he that shall deny me before men, I will also deny him before my Father who is in heaven. Do not think that I came to send peace upon earth: I came not to send peace, but the sword. For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. – Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible