They came by the hundreds, perhaps thousands, easily exceeding the capacity of the legislative committee hearing room and making their presence felt throughout the State Capitol. And at the end of a very long day, homeschooling families scored a major victory—defeat of a bill with serious privacy and safety implications.
For more than three hours, families and freedom advocates streamed in front of microphones to state their opposition to California State Assembly Bill 2756. Pacific Justice Institute was also represented and voiced its opposition. Large numbers of opponents made the trek from Southern California, the Bay Area, and every other part of the state. The opponents included a number of professionals, state-credentialed teachers, and self-described progressives and liberal Democrats.
AB 2756 originally sought to require fire inspections of all homeschooling families. Not surprisingly, firefighters objected to this sweeping new job requirement, and the bill was amended. It then sought to mandate state disclosure of the names and addresses of homeschool families. Currently, this requirement only applies to private schools with six or more students.
Just prior to yesterday’s hearing, the author of the bill, Asm. Jose Medina, announced that he was dropping the public disclosure requirements but still insisted that the State needed to gather more data on homeschoolers.
After hours of hearing from concerned families, Asm. Medina made a last-ditch plea for the bill by invoking James Madison. The irony was not lost on listeners aware of the fact that homeschooling was the norm during the founding era.
Nor was it lost on attendees that, while countless families traveled across the state and waited for hours to make their voices heard, many with small children in tow, the lawmakers on the committee disappeared during the proceedings and did not have a quorum to take a vote at the conclusion of the testimony. Later, it was revealed that no member of the committee was willing to make a motion for a vote, so the bill was defeated without any legislator having to take a firm position.
Full story at Pacific Justice Institute.
Don’t worry — Satan never sleeps.
He and his children will be back.
Stay alert.
Thank you Lord Jesus and all who protested.
I have lingering thought regarding this matter of Homeschooling for the young ones, I’m just thinking that will lessen their social time with other kids and other people around them which usually makes them better individuals as they grow.
Most homeschooled kids are blessed by their parents, with wonderful opportunities to socialize and do things with homeschooled kids from other families, with the same excellent upbringing, and solid religious values. They do not make friends with, nor participate in anything, with kids brought up in the filthy “Death Culture.”. They are usually more mature kids!
Most homeschooled kids enter good colleges, and excell, academically! And go on to excell in their chosen fields of endeavor! Many also who are Catholic, choose to enter the priesthood or religious life!
Most homeschoolers have outside activities with other church families and sports and other clubs. Many go to private classes or have teachers come to the home for certain subjects. As far as I have seen, there is just as much socializing among homeschoolers as among public school children, sometimes more.. Many home school families just do not get involved with organizations that they disapprove. This law would haved invaded the homes of people from many different religions, professions and vocations.
Correction: homeschool parents just keep their children away from organizations they do not approve or people they think will encourage them in the wrong direction. Many public school teachers and principals have home schooled their children for awhile.
I can only give one person’s experience but we home schooled and my offspring feels that it was detrimental to him socially. (I do not agree.) He goes to college with many other home schooled kids and their social skills vary. The negative characteristic we see most in them is elitism. The positive characteristic we see most is a respect for those in authority like teachers (but not for their peers.)
I don’t understand how the gay political movement threatens the progressives.
Vince:
Read the history of the Sturmarbeiters and Ernst Rohm. Fanatical Nazis, true, but after a series of murders within Rohm’s circle of “boyfriends” and former lovers, Hitler concluded they were loyal chiefly to themselves and their own sexual cliques and not to him. Lenin also allowed a lot of libertinism in communist Russia, but Stalin shut it down (except for his favorites of course as the recent movie indicates). If the progressives aim at total power, they can’t allow special relationships (traditional or perverse) to stand in the way. I personally think their own obsessions will trip them up, but it could get very nasty before that end.
Assemblyman Jose Medina is just doing what his freemasonic bosses tell him do.
This is excellent news!
I agree that parents are responsible to educate their children, at home if they so choose. Part of that responsibility is providing a broad education, so that after high school, the children can successfully complete a university program.
One of the devil’s ploys to shutdown homeschooling in CA and take our childrens souls to hell in the CA Public School System run by his demons.