Your Excellency:
As the archbishop of Los Angeles, you have an unmatched opportunity to repel the growing influence of “woke” madness in your community.
You know of the Los Angeles Dodgers’ decision to re-invite the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence to the team’s Pride Night on June 16. It’s a decision The Stream covered. The “sisters,” as you well know, are a group of homosexual and transgender men who dress as nuns and wear heavy clown makeup in a campy, burlesque version of anti-Catholic blackface.
In The Beginning …
The “sisters” began as a gay comedy troupe in San Francisco in 1979 after receiving surplus habits from a production of The Sound of Music. Since then, the “order” has founded 53 “houses” and “missions” in 28 states and the District of Columbia, as well as 26 “houses” and “missions” in eight countries overseas.
The troupe made itself known for ridiculing Catholic faith and practice with such stunts as a “Foxy Mary” beauty contest, pole dancing on a cross and such stage names as Sister Marqesa de Sade and Sister Homocycle Motor Sexual.
Catholic motifs are pivotal to the act.
“We realized that the nun’s habit contains a lot of social stigmas all in one: gender issues, gender identity issues and religious bigotry issues,” said Sister Vicious Power Hungry B****. “So the habit is like a lightning bolt.”
Now a “Woke” Weapon
But since its founding, the group has adopted social activism in the name of community outreach. As such, the Sisters for Perpetual Indulgence has become a subtle yet powerful weapon in the “woke” arsenal.
The troupe raises money for grants ranging from $250 to $1,000. The groups it funds include:
Queer Rebel Productions, a group for LGBTQ artists “whose works challenge white supremacy, racism, trans-phobia, homophobia, and classism,” stated the troupe’s website.
Queer Expression Oakland, described as a “grassroots, volunteer and youth-led community organization facilitating inclusive creative movement and art-making spaces for queer and trans youth (ages 5-25) in the Bay Area.”
Valid USA, “which provides education, gender affirming clothing and resources to transgender youth and young adults.” The troupe’s grant paid for “chest binders and clothing for California Students,” the website said.
As part of its quest to “promulgate universal joy and expiate stigmatic guilt,” the troupe also links to various resources, including those offering “trans-affirming care.” One is Dimensions Clinic, which offers “free or low-cost healthcare for youth, ages 12 to 25, with services tailored specifically to serve transgender and gender non-binary young people.”
On June 24, the “sisters’ ” San Francisco “house” also will join seven other sponsors to support the “Trans-tastic Soccer Games,” designed to “celebrate queer, trans and non-binary power through sports,” to start the city’s Pride Weekend. The schedule includes activities not only for adults but also for children and teens between 8 and 16.
Okay, Groomer
In other words, the Sisters for Perpetual Indulgence ranks in the vanguard of the LGBTQ activists’ quest to groom children by confusing them about their sexuality. That statement is not paranoia.
A former LGBTQ activist told The Epoch Times that she left the movement when she discovered that grooming children for a transgender identity was its fundamental aim.
Not for nothing did the propaganda video that included the interview with Sister Vicious Power Hungry B**** take place during an Easter egg hunt for children.
First Come Words
Your archdiocese’s statement criticizing the Dodgers’ decision emphasized that ridicule, especially of legitimate nuns who dedicate themselves to community service. It called on “all Catholics and people of goodwill to stand against bigotry and hate in any form and to stand for respect for one another and for the religious beliefs of our communities of faith,” it said.
That is a good start, your excellency. But you must do more.
You must draw attention to the troupe’s attempt to groom children and its advocacy of sex-change surgery. On March 20, the United States Council of Catholic Bishops condemned such surgeries and the use of puberty blockers, especially for minors, as The Stream reported.
Considering that your three-year term as the USCCB’s president expired in November, you would own the kind of credibility few American bishops have.
Also, your excellency, you must assert that, for all intents and purposes, two civic institutions have declared Catholics to be non-persons.
One of those is the Dodgers. The other is the Los Angeles Times, which ran an article focusing on the troupe’s community work while ignoring its anti-Catholic performance art. L.Z. Granderson, one of the Times’ most “woke” columnists, went so far as to call any legitimate criticism “homophobic,” ignoring Catholic concerns in the process.
Then Action Must Follow
But firm, uncompromising action must accompany your words. You must encourage and organize a boycott of both the Dodgers and the Times. Fans must stop buying tickets and souvenirs. Season-ticket holders and subscribers to the team’s cable channel must cancel their packages. Newspaper subscribers should do likewise. Picketing or even staging a sit-in at Dodger Stadium on Pride Night certainly would attract attention.
As Bud Light and Target can attest, boycotts can be devastating.
Since promoting transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney, Bud Light sales fell by $110 million off last year’s pace as of May 13. In addition, consumers have stopped buying Anheuser-Busch’s other brands. Meanwhile, Target’s stock lost $9 billion in value one week after introducing LGBTQ-themed clothing for children.
Count the Cost
Rest assured, you will face melodramatic backlash from the LGBTQ activists and their corporate allies. However, you have centuries of church teaching on your side from Scripture and the catechism, not just the USCCB’s statement on transgender surgery. You even have on your side Pope Francis, who often calls gender theory “ideological colonization.”
But do you, your excellency, have the imagination and courage to take such a step? Catholics in Los Angeles await your answer—and, with all due respect, you have very little time to provide one.
From The Stream
Thank God for Bishop Strickland and Archbishop Cordileone having the guts to stand up for our Holy Catholic faith. Where are the other bishops, especially Archbishop Gomez where this sacrilege is occurring? Oh that’s right, they’re hiding behind their miters, hoping to get promoted to Cardinal, like the one in San Diego.
I suspect that if Archbishop Gomez really wanted the Red Hat, he would have actively promoted Francis’ encyclicals as McElroy has done. Hiding behind a mitre will not impress the pope.
He won’t. And even if he did, the predominantly Latino fan base of the Dodgers wouldn’t care. How embarrassing would it be to call for a boycott and have it fail?
The article is spot on. It is very hard to imagine a better time for ABp Gomez to be, well, archbishop, than right now. It is time for the mouse to roar! If he fails to act I believe it is because for reasons unknown to us, he is afraid to act, for from my armchair here at home, I cannot for the life of me consider inaction as in any way the more prudent option. At the very least, if he does nothing he owes us a reason for this, IMHO.
Because it is not the job of a bishop.
The Archdiocese made its statement.
That is all that is going to happen.
Dan, it is not really the archbishop’s business who the Dodger give awards to.
They took a measured approach in their statement, condemning all bigotry and asking for those who are offended to support Catholic nuns.
For those of you who only read headline-good move.
McElroy was promoted due to his following of Pope Francis’ agenda. I was appalled that Cordileone and Gomez were both passed over.
And, Archbishops Chaput and Vigneron, from traditionally cardinalate sees (like LA).
Big Mac!
No SF bishop has ever been created Cardinal except Levada and only after he was no longer the ordinary but had been sent to Rome as CDF chief. And with former parts of the Metropolitan getting chiseled off, as Las Vegas (I believe it was, this week), it’s less and less likely SF will ever become a cardinal see.
The Pope made Cupich a cardinal before he was archbishop of Chicago. No Spokane bishop had ever before been named a cardinal. And, Newark never had a cardinal until the Pope wanted Joseph Tobin to be one. The Pope seems not interested in cardinalate sees, or as noted, Chaput and Vigneron would have been made cardinals.
Yes And…You are correct but I’m not sure Francis penchant for ignoring cardinalate sees will last beyond him. Power and size tend to accumulate together. But who knows? I suppose there could be a case to be made for large diocese to be run by great administrators but advisors to the Pope (Cardinals) who have smaller diocese with bishops closer to the people instead of their own curia. I’m guessing, I don’t have an opinion. What do you think?
Archbishop Gomez had that “anti-woke” speech to a seminary in Spain, but his Excellency is all talk no action
I’m not reading or commenting on any more trans or gay articles.
I never see this stuff except for here and one other website.
Church Militant? LifeSiteNews?
Yep.
If you were asking me where else I see trans or gay it is youtube.
I learned a long time ago to not go to CM. I only go to lifesitenews when it is linked here.
And You conclude what from this…?
This is an appalling letter to the Archbishop. Is this how a person should write to a bishop or archbishop?
People, if you want someone to do something, you don’t try to be goading (“do you have the imagination and courage to take such a step”), uncourteous (“that is a good start…but you must do more”), and patronizing (“you even have on your side Pope Francis”).
People, do you like being told what to do? Do you like to be painted into a corner? Do you like being told publicly, “hey, you must do X.” Doing all of that is a good recipe to get the person to do exactly the opposite.
“This is an appalling letter to the Archbishop.” Au contraire, jon, this is a most excellent letter. It is not disrespectful to voice an opinion as to a prudential move by Abp Gomez. I find it astonishing that you would think so little of Abp Gomez that he would take offence at being told what to do. A mature man could either agree or disagree; only an immature person would take umbrage, pout, and consider doing the opposite. Are you projecting some persona onto Gomez that surely must be foreign to the man? So it seems to me. He doesn’t need your very questionable defense.
Again, “Dan” here needs guidance it seems. It is not the voicing of opinion that is “disrespectful” in this case, but the manner in which it was voiced, which is discourteous and goading.
“…the manner in which it was voiced, … jon, a real man worries not about the manner, but the substance of the opinion. It’s a matter of maturity, which Abp. Gomez has plenty of.
Now it is Dan who is patronizing towards the Archbishop (“a matter of maturity, [he] has plenty of”).
Rudeness and discourtesy to our bishops and priests is a discourtesy and rudeness to Christ Himself.
“Rudeness and discourtesy to our bishops and priests is a discourtesy and rudeness to Christ Himself.” A final thought, jon. You interpret the letter as disrespectful, but that is your subjective take. Someone else, like maybe myself, does not read into the motives or content of the letter the same contumacious or supercilious attitude that you find. Just like I cannot fathom how you adjudge me patronizing of Gomez. It makes me wonder why we see things so differently. I shall leave it at that.
“Dan” says “It makes me wonder why we see things so differently.”
So “Dan” if you make a more deliberate effort to think with the Church (“sentire cum Ecclesia”), you’ll get it.
The letter isn’t really to the Archbishop. It is to the people who are ticked off.
Everybody knows this is not what an archbishop should do.
Stage a sit-in?
The archdiocese statement was not criticizing the Dodgers. They are too dumb to figure that out.
… there you go again … attacking style and ignoring substance. You couldn’t bring yourself to condemn the anti-Catholic sleaze of the SOPI; no, you’d rather harangue fellow Catholics for their seeming imperfections.
yes. Exactly. I want Christians to obey the Lord.
obey/jon – Give us your opinion about the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence and how they disobey the Lord. Can you?
I am not going to judge them.
I have never met them.
I don’t think anyone who is trashing them online has met them either.
I know there are some that are catholic and I leave it to them to correct their fellow sisters.
Some people in them now are being falsely accused of doing things they never did.
Maybe a sister in another town did it 30 years ago but not them.
they support homosexuality
And who said we cannot critique the style but only the substance of a piece of writing?
Folks, any writer worth his salt knows that his message will be more effective if he is not patronizing, goading, nor discourteous to the intended audience (in this case Gomez) as that writer was.
jon, folk, people, listen to yourself – patronizing, goading, discourteous, your words not mine.
Pot calling kettle black.
This thug deserves the death penalty:
An Indiana man accused of killing and attempting to dismember a woman in late July allegedly stabbed her 51 times after discovering text messages indicating she was seeing another man, according to court records. The room smelled of human decomposition, court documents said. Police allegedly found a red dolly by the front door, a grocery cart, a trash can, a cut-off GPS monitoring device on the floor, and no bedding on the bed. Garvin eventually admitted to stabbing and killing Holt, reportedly saying that he was sorry but that “she deserved it,” according to the affidavit. Garvin was required to wear a GPS tracking device following a Dec. 26, 2020, arrest for battery by means of a deadly weapon, authorities said. He allegedly stabbed a customer who was taking too long in a restroom at a Circle K where he worked as a cashier, according to FOX59. After the stabbing in 2020, Garvin reportedly returned to the cash register, threw the knife onto the counter, and said, “D—, that was satisfying,” the affidavit said.
There is a lot in this article that deserves a thorough reading and response but for now I will note that The Epoch Times is well known as a tool of the Chinese Communist Party.
YFC, your post is a very subtle ad hominem argument. I hope your more later, thoughtful response is deeper and avoids all logical errors. I’m sure I can count on you.
No it is not an ad hominem or a mistake in logic. Critical thinking demands we look to the sources and their biases. But I did make a mistake. Epoch Times is an arm of the group Falun Gong who some have accused of being a Chinese cult. I apologize for the honest mistake in fact, which I correct here.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/24/technology/epoch-times-influence-falun-gong.html
” Critical thinking demands we look to the sources and their biases.” Sorry YFC, but critical thinking,or honest intellectual discourse, requires you to understand and weigh the arguments in and of themselves regardless of the source. Read Mortimer J. Adler’s How to Read a Book for a more thorough discussion of key terms, propositions and arguments with their fallacies. The book is a classic.
Arguments ok but when you are being given facts you need to verify those.
They are antiCommunists
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Epoch_Times
Manuel, I just posted a reply to Dan which corrects my mistake. I hope CCD publishes it.
Arnold Schwarzenegger was raised Catholic and went to Catholic school. Now he denies heaven. So much for Catholic education. We don’t have bishops who stand up for the faith. So much for the Church. Crash and burn.
Arnold may crash and burn, but not the Church. His failure is not the Church’s fault or anyone in the Church; the fault is his to own. He has saturated himself in the entertainment industry, in politics and high society — sources of potentially massive corruption. I believe his is the sin of pride, given his contempt of those of faith.
My husband’s radio alarm (yes, we still have those) went off this morning and when I went in to turn it off, the talk radio host or guest was saying “Just when you think it is getting quiet, somebody does something so unbelievably stupid that you just go “How in the world did that happen?”
The only people who care about this event at the Dodger game are the Catholic right-wing muckrakers. Nobody else cares. When it’s over, it will be forgotten.
Gomez knows how powerful the gays are. They’ve already told him his place, and they’ve told him not to cross the line.
Yep, the Jesuits run this state
Christians are held to the highest standards.
They should be kind and loving no matter what is done to them.
Jesus said “Offer no resistance to evil.”
Christianity is not for wimps.
You are not to retaliate.
You are not to gossip and spread talk about others.
So were the crusades wrong?
It is not a matter of whether it is wrong.
It is a matter of whether it was God’s will.
They were considered an abuse of power when I was growing up and a sign of the hypocrisy of the Catholic Church.
Some Catholics try to justify them. some Catholics are embarrassed by them.
God has judged those who did them and who ordered them.
St. John Eudes said they failed because the soldiers were doing them for the wrong reasons-vainglory instead of for God.
God permitted them.
His will now is “never again war.”
I think God does not like people killing each other in any century.
He probably does not like people using them to nullify His Word, either.
Does the State bear the sword in vain?
Kind of curious.
Is there anyone here who has never even met a religious sister or nun?