The following comes from n August 8 story on LifeSiteNews.com.
The British Medical Journal Case Reports journal has reported that a healthy 16-year-old Australian girl lost all ovarian function and went into menopause after being injected with the human papilloma virus vaccine Gardasil.
Dr. Deirdre Little, the Australian physician who treated the girl, provides solid evidence that Gardasil caused the destruction of the girl’s fertility.
She also pointed out that Merck Pharmaceutical, the manufacturer of Gardasil, has no supporting information on the effects of the vaccine on ovaries, suggesting that Merck had either done no safety testing on Gardasil in relation to its effects on women’s reproductive systems, or had suppressed the information.
Dr. Little’s report states that before the Gardasil vaccination, the girl had regular menstrual cycles, had been thoroughly examined and tested, and had no family or personal medical history that could explain the premature menopause.
The girl received the Gardasil vaccination in the fall of 2008. By January 2009, her cycle had become irregular. Over the course of the next two years, her menses became increasingly scant and irregular, until by 2011, she had ceased menstruating altogether.
“This patient presented with amenorrhoea after identifying a change from her regular cycle to irregular and scant periods following vaccinations against human papillomavirus,” Dr. Little wrote in the report.
Dr. Little carried out numerous tests on the girl, including checking hormone levels and internal organ function, and diagnosed her as having “premature ovarian failure.” She also found that the girl had no living egg cells.
After investigating other possible causes of the girl’s premature ovarian failure, Dr. Little was left with the Gardasil vaccination as the only remaining explanation.
“Although the cause is unknown in 90% of cases, the remaining chief identifiable causes of this condition were excluded. Premature ovarian failure was then notified as a possible adverse event following this vaccination,” Dr. Little stated.
In the report titled “Premature ovarian failure 3 years after menarche in a 16-year-old girl following human papillomavirus vaccination,” Little wrote that Merck had only tested Gardasil’s effects on the testes of rats.
Dr. Little contacted the Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia, the equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for information about the safety testing of Gardasil on women’s ovaries.
She found that the TGA had records of various tests on rat testes, but no records of the effect of the vaccine on rat ovaries in the Australian Public Assessment Report for Human Papillomavirus Quadrivalent Vaccine (Gardasil).
Dr. Little’s report states that, “It is not known whether this event of premature ovarian failure is linked to the quadrivalent HPV vaccine. More detailed information concerning rat ovarian histology and ongoing fecundity post-HPV vaccination was sought from the Therapeutic Goods Administration.”
It revealed that “no histological report has been available for vaccinated rat ovaries.”
In other words, the TGA had no safety information on the effect of Gardasil on female reproductive systems.
“This event could hold potential implications for population health and prompts further inquiry,” Dr. Little’s report concluded.
“Gardasil has been controversial from the beginning,” noted Steven Mosher of the Population Research Institute.
“While other vaccines protect against diseases spread by casual contact, Gardasil was developed to protect against a sexually transmitted disease,” Mosher said, adding that Merck Pharmaceutical has proven effective in lobbying governments around the world to make the vaccine mandatory for schoolchildren.
“Tens of millions of young girls have received the Gardasil vaccine since its approval by the FDA six years ago. If even a tiny fraction of them have experienced infertility as a result, then these girl children have been denied a very fundamental right, that is, the right to decide how many children they want to have,” Mosher said.
“In the case of the Australian girl the effect is irreversible. She has lost an integral part of her womanhood, while still but a child,” he said. “Women deserve better.”
An abstract, with link to the full text of the British Medical Journal Case Reports report by Dr. Deirdre Little titled “Premature ovarian failure 3 years after menarche in a 16-year-old girl following human papillomavirus vaccination” is available here.
To read original story, click here.
This is no surprise, just to the foolish people who rushed out to get their daughters injected before the vaccine had even been tried out a long enough time on adult women, and the politicians who rushed it through to line their own pockets and those of the pharmaceutical companies.
My apologies for not being clearer and “flying off the handle”, but I get very angry when some people try to force this untested vaccine on other people’s children.
One case does not make a trend nor an epidemic.
There are many more cases that are not reported…
There are too many cases unreported about devastating effects of vaccination on reproductive system and health in general – $$$$$ are involved here…
I stay away from vaccines.
I have not had any vaccinations since 1967.
Mr. McCrea, maybe you’d like to offer your daughter as the “one case”?
There have also been other young girls who had serious problems or died right after taking the vaccine. Why aren’t all the older women who want their daughters or granddaughters to have it willing to be the guinea pigs first? One woman told me right after it was put on the market that she took her granddaughter down for the shot. “I told her, “I would not have wanted to be experimented on like that when I was young. They have not even tested the vaccine enough on adult women.” She answered, “Oh, I never thought about that.” This woman was living with her boyfriend outside of marriage, so no wonder she had problems with her granddaughter misbehaving. Some people think with their bottom half instead of their brains.
And the type of cancer that this shot is supposed to help stop is one of the most curable if checked in time.
Where is there evidence that women have died right after taking this vaccine? Where?
Natural News has the evidence and so does Dr. Mercola…they have facts on the harms caused by it.
Ah the Natural News. Everything will kill you and everything will heal but modern medicine. Then there is Mercola who says he isn’t for profit but will sell you his version of natural stuff. By the way his estate is bigger than any doctors house I know of. Try going with the 99.999% of doctors who know vaccines save lives.
If I had a daughter I would NEVER allow her to be injected with this stuff. I strongly felt this way even before reading this tragic story.
They are pushing this on boys now, too.
Yes, they are.
I was pressed by a Catholic pediatrician to have my daughter innoculated with Gardasil and came back armed with the statistics to show what a miniscule population is actually helped to prevent cervical cancer through this expensive three phase vaccination program. I also asked if their office had an abstinence education program to protect children from STDs – the answer was no. Since California law requires that children age 12 plus are allowed to see medical providers without an adult present I had to warn my daughter that she may very well be pressed at school to be vaccinated without my knowledge as well. FYI: I switched physicians.
Good job Karin! A parent who advocates for her child, what a concept these days! Everything you came up with in your research is true. As time passes, we will hear more horror stories I’m sure how this so called “helpful” vaccine has hurt more young girls.
CalCatholic I decided to not give a donation…I don’t understand why comments didn’t go through….Karin H I tried replying to you by saying you are a good mum and I admired that you spoke up, it was refreshing to read your comments because not many mums speak up or reject these things. I’m so tired to have to recall what I originally replied…..if CalCatholic is trying to discourage my comments, maybe they are selectively trying to end comments from the regulars…That is what I can assume ….perhaps your pro-gay commentators would be pleased . Rick Delano (a very valued and knowledgeable lay faithful Catholic) use to comment here but he was pushed to not want to comment here anymore….I wonder why? hmmmm
The organization Children of God for Life have been working to expose the lies about Gardasil. They also have exposed the presence of aborted fetal cells being used in many of our vaccines. These cells actually cross the blood-brain barrier and have been linked to many of the cases of autism that exist today. In addition, they have a list of companies which test their food products using aborted fetal tissue.
The sad thing is that because of the censorship in the media about all of these things, it is hard to even convince good priest of the facts of this issues.
This group is nothing more than an anti-vax group and not accepted by the Church. The group is putting so many kids at risk by it’s false claims. I have a solid Catholic convert friend who actually makes vaccines and has a Phd in this subject and the moms in their kids homeschooling group do not listen to him because they follow this group. We need to stop with the anti medicine in the prolife groups because we are making our side look foolish and antiscience. We are the Church that gave us modern medicine so let’s remember that!!!!
Oh, wowie zowie…a phd!? Must have all the answers then right? Why does everyone assume their daughters are going to be sexually active? I would think having them get this ‘innoculation’ is tandem to giving them sexual carte blanche and is not wise on the part of parents . It’s also ridiculous to make decisions on what the world thinks! Jesus told us we are to be in the world but not of the world. Do you think Jesus would approve of this drug? Frankly, parents who are following the leader and not their common sense and consciences are very remiss. This isn’t science,it’s technology and this is giving children the false illusion that having some vaccine is going to protect them from std’s and there are some terrible strains that this won’t begin to prevent.Talk about stupid! Just say NO! Chasitity is foolproof!
PS…I forgot to be specific, Annie. haha When I say ‘talk about stupid’ I didn’t mean you! but meant that the idea of feeling safe when receiving the innoculation. I forget my opinions can often be misinterpreted or taken in the wrong way. I did mean to imply that having a phd is no guarantee of knowing anything, however. ;o)
I don’t think anyone thinks that thinks this is a get out of jail card so to speak. Your kid can do everything right and the person they marry can do everything wrong. As I said before my dad’s friend is six feet under because of what his wife did. I would think the Lord would want to protect the innocent person or even the person who messed up. Std’s are consequences not punishments.
I do take major issue of your putting down a person who has spent their adult life making vaccines to protect people from illnesses. This person has the degree and KNOWS how the immune system works. The same goes for the majority of doctors. They want people to get well and prevent illness. They know more than someone with a blog!
Dana, eventually almost all women are going to have sex. And sex is going to expose them to viruses that can cause cancer. If we can prevent just a few of these deaths with a single injection, with little or no side affects, then, yes, in my opinion, Jesus would approve of this vaccine.
Just because the US government says (new and untested) vaccines are “safe”, they should not be believed at that point.
They were using our female children as guinea pigs.
This is not the first time the federal government has used humans for experimentation purposes – remember Tuskegee.
When the government tries to find ways for teens and young adults to circumvent health problems so they can have more sexual activity, rather than teaching abstinence – you know to be on your guard.
I agreee, Pete. Who is profiting from this? Who is pushing it? Perhaps it’s perfectly safe, but since it is our children’s very future at stake here, it certainly should be thoroughly studied. It all sounds like mass hysteria to me. When we had the polio vaccines, we couldn’t get them fast enough…people we knew were dying of it and it was like a miracle to be able to be innoculated against catching it. But this vaccine is basically given as an antidote to wrong choices and bad behavior, isn’t it? Basically it is given as an innoculation against the consequences of sin…which, when you think about it, is impossible. Something tells me there are goint to be some very sad consequences to all this. We’re to be the protectors of our children and teach them self-discipline and the wages of sin. What is this teaching them?
What makes you think this vaccine was not tested?
That is evil, done for $$$$$$……..
One case does not prove anything. The patient should be treated by another doctor and one with more experience in the field. Anyone who has gone through fertilty problems knows that the majority of the time they have no idea what the problem is. There is no eveidence to prove the vaccine did this. As to the other claims about this vaccine no amount or real medical studies will change the anti-vax crowd. The real issue should be if you think this causes chaste kids to suddenly start messing around. Well let me tell you your kid could do everything right and the one who they marry could do everything wrong. My parent’s good friend died of AIDS due to what his wife brought home from other men. They are both in a grave.
Annie,
I could be wrong, but you sound very bitter and willing to except everything science says!
Viva Cristo Rey!
God bless, yours in Their Hearts,
Kenneth M. Fisher Founding Director
Concerned Roman Catholics of America, Inc.
I am not a bitter person. I am passionate about saving lives and keeping people healthy. Vaccines have been tested and are proven to do that. Yes I do go with science. My Dad had a Phd in Botany and Ecology. He also had a leg amputation on both sides due to mealses/rubella exposure in the womb. Modern medicine saved my premature baby’s life and vaccines are part of that. So many in Catholic circles seem to accept the anti vax claims without consulting with people who have been to years and years of med school. When 99.9 % of the doctors believe in vaccination than I would go with that.
Annie, I am not against all vaccines. I have been vaccinated, my children have been vaccinated, my grandchildren have been vaccinated. I am just wary of vaccines that have not been tested enough, or of putting too much of this stuff in ones body. We cannot vaccinate for everything. The thalidomide situation was in my lifetime too, so please excuse me if I sometimes doubt what doctors and nurses are telling me. Also, when I was younger my grandmother refused to let a physician take out my tonsils because they were not that bad. It was the “thing” to take out tonsils “just in case”. Later they found out that those who still how their tonsils did not get polio or did not get it as severe as those who did not have their tonsils. I am sure I was exposed to it, but I never got it before the vaccine for polio came out. Also, I have eaten eggs almost every day of my life in some form and have never had high cholestrol. Physicians used to tell us to avoid eggs, now they are telling us they can be good for us. Go figure!
Believe me, I have the highest respect for good doctors and nurses and all the wonderful things some pharmaceutical companies over here have done, but I do know they are not infallable.
Another thing, a Catholic doctor gave me some sample birthcontrol pill over twenty years ago to take for what he said was medical reasons. When I talked to a priest, he said it sounded like birthcontrol and not for medial reasons and talked me into Natural Family Planning. I did not know it at that time, but I had cancer that was susceptible to estrogent right then. Had I taken those pills, it very doubtful I would be typing this now but ould have died over twenty years ago.
By the way, when I was about three, my aunt had let me use a pencil as a child, and I fell and ran it through my tonsils. They shriveled and seemed dead but evidently the roots were still there and they grew back. Is it any wonder I have felt the hand of God all through my life?
All I am saying, Annie, is that the government should not force parents to give this untested vaccine to their daughters. It should be tested on adult women first, who can choose to be used for experimentation, then those parents who feel it is safe and want it for their daughters can use it. I myself have used experimental drugs (newer ones), doctor prescribed of course, and had newer more experimental operations, which possibly can help my daughters in the future and other women, but those were my very own adult decisions.
There is another thing that makes many of us distrust some doctors. There is an interview of ex President Clinton on line by a physician, I think Dr. Gupta. Bill Clinton repeatedly says in the interview that we should not use embryos for research if they ARE fertilized, and the doctor never corrects him at any time. All embryos ARE FERTILIZED eggs. Either those two were very uninformed, to say the least, about human reproduction or deliberately trying to deceive the public. You can find it by googgling something such as “Bill Clinton interviewed about embryonic research by a doctor”.
I googgled “Bill Clinton interviewed about human embryos”, and it was Dr. Sanjay Gupta who did the interview.
This is not a matter of NOT trusting good science.
It is not a matter of NOT trusting Doctors.
It is a matter of understanding bad science, and the greed of pharmaceutical companies along with their need for human guinea pigs.
Money should not be spent encouraging young people to act immorally. They must all be taught that STDs have become an epidemic due to terrible/sinful behavior, and that good behavior can completely circumvent or stop them from getting STDs.
Cause & Effect: True science – stop the cause (sexual behavior outside of marriage) then you will have fewer illnesses.
Dottie, you make a lot of sense, although a woman can get an STD or cancer from an unfaithful spouse, this shot will NOT protect from STD’s or all types of cancers, and the cancer it supposedly protects against is one of the most curable ones. By the time someone who is a teen now gets that type of cancer it most likely will be totally curable. Another thing, how many vaccines are they going to want to inject into our teens’s bodies to supposedly protect them from certain diseases? I say “supposedly” because other STD’s pop up all the time. There were only about four, or five at the most, when I was younger, all curable, now they are many more, not curable, brought in by the sexual revolution. The strains keep changing and growing, and the only real protection is chastity, no sex outside marriage and faithfulness within marriage. To me the risks of putting so much “junk” in ones body out weigh the benefits.
Oops! “There” not “they” in my fifth to last line. Got to use spell check more.
Anne, very few STDs are “new”. Even HIV has been found among human blood going back many decades, and is a cousin of other viruses that have been around forever. The difference is that STDs that killed past generations (syphillis and ghonorrea , most notably), are mostly curable now if caught. Others, like HPV, have been around for a very very long time probably centuries, it’s just that the linkage of certain strains to certain cancers was relatively recently discovered. Women died of these diseases a hundred years ago and more, its just that no one knew what caused them.
HPVs are endemic in the population. Meaning that they have achieved a high level of presence nearly such that most people get exposed to the virus in question, just like the bacteria that cause cavities and strep throat, the viruses that cause colds, warts, and pink eye, and the parasites that cause jock itch and in some parts of the world, intestinal parasites.
Of course it is up to you to decide for yourself whether you judge the risks worth the shot for yourself. But I think you might aim your moral outrage at organisms with a conscience instead of a virus. Many other people understand that preventing disease is a realistic option for people who know that a single exposure to a virus, perhaps through no fault of their own, is worth any risk that someone ELSE might judge their moral choices or those of their daughter.
YFC, I do not like to tell too much about myself on here, but I am 71 years old, and by the grace of God and some self discipline on my part I have never had an STD in my entire life, including genital warts or herpes of the mouth (cold sores). I have no intention of getting such a shot for myself for various reasons. I am quite aware that there probably were epidemics of AIDS (a wasting disease) back in Old Testament days as I have said all along on these websites since the Old Testament says, “If you keep these Commandments, you shall have none of these diseases.” One such disease was a wasting disease which sounded like AIDS. Believe me, I keep up on all this as I took some Latin in high school because I wanted to be a doctor. One of the things about taking too many vaccines is that they can possiblly help destroy ones immune system as one gets older. I have never taken the flu shot, and rarely get the flu, and if so, get it lightly, even if it is a newer strain. Thus my primary physcian, one who is old enough to have taken the Hypocratic oath or a reasonable fascimile and who is the chief doctor at his facility, does not insist that I do take it, nor has he recommended Gardasil to me. He knows my medical history. I think he is of the mind “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”
Well, as I said, the decision is up to you (and your doctor if you choose to include him) as to the HPV vaccine or the flu vaccine. I am 50, and I only started getting the flu to protect my mother when she was in such failing health I was worried I would give her a strain that I might get over in a day or two but might do her in. My Mom passed early last year, but I got one again last fall because of my father in law, but then he passed. I will have to decide in a few weeks, i guess, whether I get one this year. I’m not as anti-vaccine as you are, but I’m not as convinced of the need of a vaccine for a younger healthy person as myself. But here again, we each need to weigh our own circumstances.
YFC, Zicam and zinc work for me to keep colds and the flu away if I take it right away when I feel a cold coming on or am closely exposed to cold or the flu.. Even if I have not taken it right away it helps. I rarely get a cold even when closely exposed to one. I avoid using the spray more than needed since it can mess up ones sense of smell; I use the Zicam tablets mostly now. Most of the people I know who take the flu shot usually come down with a mild case of the flu, and I rarely get it without it. I do not drink out of other people”s cups, either, including the Communion cup. I do keep up with the shots for lock jaw (forgot how to spell it), but avoid getting those I feel are unnecessary for me. People usually know what their own bodies need and should act accordingly.
Also, people need to avoid using those shots that contain aborted fetal material as it is not only unethincal but can be dangerous. There are Catholic websites that report which one do use fetal material from aborted children. There are alternate companies and shots that can be used most times.
YFC, I am sorry to hear about your mother passing away. May she, through the mercy of God, rest in peace.
We agree Anne!
Another thing I do not do is to kiss anyone on the mouth other than my husband. Relatives can get a hug or a peck on the cheek. Kissing people on the mouth is a good way to get any mouth disease they have or to give them one, especially children.
This shot protects against a few starins of HPV. It does not protect against AIDS, and all the other std’s. Seriously it seems people want people who makes sinful choices to be punished.
Annie, I have no problem with finding cures for these diseases, but all medicines have side effects and newer or older strains come up (whatever) or return. We are never going to get rid of all the bad results of promiscuity, so chastity IS the best answer for all of us. I feel this vaccine is too experimental for young people. You don’t. There is the difference.
Vaccines can not overload the immune system. That is just not medical science. That theory has been tested and tested and tested some more.
Annie you are most in error but I wonder why you feel the need to promote this vaccine……I think their propaganda has bought you and since I am one who does my research before I believe what is being said…I only go by facts and this vaccine is something to be concerned about…..
Can’t believe my eyes. . .”Jesus, would approve of this vaccine” “anti-medicine is making our side look foolish”??? Since when would Jesus care about how he ‘looked’ to society at large? That’s part of the reason that HE went to the cross. Jesus would approve of aborted fetal cells, trans species DNA & a myriad of toxins to be injected into our bodies? Jesus would give HIS affirmation because a human being with a PHD said it was OK? Are the purveyors of this nonsense Catholic? There are surely some Catechists out there that need to be horsewhipped! What is wrong with some of you?